|
|
UNC-GREENSBORO First Half Results INDIANA |
|
|
| 34 Final 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
819 | UNC-GREENSBORO | | 820 | INDIANA | -12.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-4 | -7.2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 71.2 | 31.2 | 42.4% | 33.2 | 74.6 | 30.8 | 48.0% | 35.2 | Road Games | 0-3 | -6 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 69.3 | 27.0 | 42.1% | 34.7 | 75.7 | 30.0 | 43.9% | 37.7 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -7.2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 71.2 | 31.2 | 42.4% | 33.2 | 74.6 | 30.8 | 48.0% | 35.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.2 | 31.2 | 24-57 | 42.4% | 8-22 | 35.5% | 15-23 | 66.4% | 33 | 11 | 12 | 24 | 8 | 15 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 71.4 | 34.1 | 24-55 | 43.1% | 7-20 | 34.7% | 17-25 | 69.7% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.3 | 27.0 | 25-59 | 42.1% | 10-24 | 40.3% | 10-16 | 61.7% | 35 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 1 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.6 | 30.8 | 25-51 | 48.0% | 8-20 | 40.8% | 17-24 | 71.9% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 71 | 32.7 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 15-24 | 63.2% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.7 | 30.0 | 24-55 | 43.9% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 20-25 | 79.7% | 38 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-1 | -8.5 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 88.8 | 43.8 | 51.5% | 36.4 | 71.4 | 32.4 | 46.4% | 33.2 | Home Games | 4-1 | -8.5 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 88.8 | 43.8 | 51.5% | 36.4 | 71.4 | 32.4 | 46.4% | 33.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -8.5 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 88.8 | 43.8 | 51.5% | 36.4 | 71.4 | 32.4 | 46.4% | 33.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 88.8 | 43.8 | 30-58 | 51.5% | 10-22 | 45.0% | 19-26 | 72.5% | 36 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.4 | 36.5 | 27-56 | 47.5% | 8-20 | 37.9% | 15-22 | 67.1% | 37 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 88.8 | 43.8 | 30-58 | 51.5% | 10-22 | 45.0% | 19-26 | 72.5% | 36 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.4 | 32.4 | 28-61 | 46.4% | 5-18 | 29.5% | 9-16 | 57.3% | 33 | 10 | 11 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.2 | 31.6 | 24-57 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 33.5% | 13-21 | 64.8% | 33 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.4 | 32.4 | 28-61 | 46.4% | 5-18 | 29.5% | 9-16 | 57.3% | 33 | 10 | 11 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: UNC-GREENSBORO 62.2, INDIANA 65.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | CHOWAN | 76-62 | W | | - | | - | 21-50 | 42.0% | 30 | 9 | 19-43 | 44.2% | 37 | 19 | 11/18/2014 | UNC-WILMINGTON | 72-84 | L | -2 | L | | - | 24-55 | 43.6% | 32 | 15 | 32-49 | 65.3% | 26 | 19 | 11/21/2014 | *LONGWOOD | 79-81 | L | -8.5 | L | | - | 29-66 | 43.9% | 43 | 24 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 39 | 17 | 11/22/2014 | @ E MICHIGAN | 62-70 | L | 13 | W | | - | 21-53 | 39.6% | 31 | 13 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 37 | 12 | 11/23/2014 | *YOUNGSTOWN ST | 67-76 | L | 4.5 | L | | - | 25-59 | 42.4% | 30 | 13 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 37 | 13 | 11/28/2014 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/1/2014 | HIGH POINT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/6/2014 | @ PRESBYTERIAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/10/2014 | GREENSBORO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/13/2014 | @ E TENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/16/2014 | N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/20/2014 | ELON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | MISS VALLEY ST | 116-65 | W | -26.5 | W | 152.5 | O | 39-59 | 66.1% | 53 | 19 | 25-73 | 34.2% | 26 | 11 | 11/17/2014 | TEXAS SOUTHERN | 83-64 | W | -24 | L | 152 | U | 32-56 | 57.1% | 32 | 13 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 34 | 16 | 11/20/2014 | SMU | 74-68 | W | 1 | W | 133.5 | O | 21-58 | 36.2% | 27 | 7 | 29-51 | 56.9% | 40 | 19 | 11/22/2014 | LAMAR | 85-72 | W | -29.5 | L | 147.5 | O | 30-59 | 50.8% | 38 | 9 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 29 | 12 | 11/24/2014 | E WASHINGTON | 86-88 | L | -12.5 | L | 149 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 32 | 13 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | 11/28/2014 | UNC-GREENSBORO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/2/2014 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/6/2014 | SAVANNAH ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/9/2014 | *LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/13/2014 | GRAND CANYON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/20/2014 | *BUTLER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| INDIANA: Point guard Yogi Ferrell (19.3 PPG, 3.9 APG, 3.0 APG) took significant strides in his freshman campaign, improving in nearly every statistic. His ability to score is unmatched in the Big Ten, as The 6-foot-0 Ferrell is able to get points from all over the floor. He is known as a slasher, but he still drained 40% of his three-pointers. Many times last season Ferrell was the only guy scoring, as he reached double figures in all but two games. If the Hoosiers are going to be more competitive this season, they will need to get PF Troy Williams (7.3 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 51% FG) and SG Stanford Robinson (6.4 PPG, 2.5 RPG, 1.0 APG) to have the same improvement in their sophomore campaign that Ferrell did. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/13/2024 7:23:57 AM EST. |
|
|