|
|
OHIO ST ILLINOIS |
|
| 143 | 55 Final 74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
553 | OHIO ST | -175 | 554 | ILLINOIS | +155 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-2 | -2.2 | 7-4 | 5-5 | 77.6 | 38.5 | 46.4% | 39.7 | 56.5 | 25.5 | 36.8% | 31.6 | Road Games | 2-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 71.3 | 34.0 | 41.1% | 36.0 | 65.7 | 26.7 | 46.3% | 29.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -2.2 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 75.6 | 37.8 | 46.7% | 39.2 | 57.8 | 28.6 | 37.6% | 33.0 | Conference Games | 1-0 | 0 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 70.0 | 36.0 | 49.2% | 43.0 | 44.0 | 17.0 | 30.4% | 32.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.6 | 38.5 | 28-59 | 46.4% | 8-20 | 37.9% | 15-22 | 67.5% | 40 | 12 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.9 | 30.3 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 67.6% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.3 | 34.0 | 25-60 | 41.1% | 6-17 | 32.7% | 16-22 | 74.2% | 36 | 13 | 10 | 18 | 6 | 7 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 56.5 | 25.5 | 19-53 | 36.8% | 6-18 | 31.4% | 12-17 | 68.9% | 32 | 7 | 9 | 18 | 4 | 15 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 65.3 | 30.7 | 23-54 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 13-19 | 69.3% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.7 | 26.7 | 23-49 | 46.3% | 7-16 | 46.8% | 13-17 | 75.0% | 30 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 3 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-2 | +6.6 | 5-7 | 6-4 | 75.9 | 36.9 | 43.9% | 36.0 | 65.3 | 30.0 | 41.1% | 35.7 | Home Games | 7-0 | +1 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 72.0 | 33.9 | 43.2% | 38.0 | 59.1 | 25.6 | 40.4% | 31.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -2.6 | 0-4 | 2-2 | 69.0 | 34.4 | 39.7% | 37.2 | 67.2 | 32.6 | 40.7% | 40.2 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1.6 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 61.0 | 33.0 | 35.6% | 35.0 | 68.0 | 31.0 | 41.0% | 45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.9 | 36.9 | 26-60 | 43.9% | 9-26 | 37.0% | 14-20 | 70.3% | 36 | 11 | 12 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.2 | 31.3 | 24-56 | 41.9% | 6-19 | 33.2% | 14-20 | 68.1% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.0 | 33.9 | 26-60 | 43.2% | 9-25 | 37.2% | 11-18 | 61.4% | 38 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.3 | 30.0 | 24-57 | 41.1% | 7-20 | 33.2% | 11-18 | 65.4% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 70.5 | 32.8 | 25-58 | 43.8% | 7-20 | 33.9% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 37 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.1 | 25.6 | 22-53 | 40.4% | 7-21 | 33.6% | 9-14 | 63.9% | 32 | 8 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: OHIO ST 72.2, ILLINOIS 71.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/17/2012 | *RHODE ISLAND | 69-58 | W | -22 | L | | - | 24-55 | 43.6% | 34 | 7 | 21-48 | 43.7% | 24 | 11 | 11/18/2012 | *WASHINGTON | 77-66 | W | -8.5 | W | 141 | O | 27-57 | 47.4% | 34 | 7 | 23-48 | 47.9% | 28 | 13 | 11/23/2012 | MISSOURI-KC | 91-45 | W | -28 | W | 130 | O | 31-51 | 60.8% | 40 | 13 | 14-55 | 25.5% | 30 | 18 | 11/28/2012 | @ DUKE | 68-73 | L | 6 | W | 143 | U | 23-68 | 33.8% | 40 | 7 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 37 | 8 | 12/1/2012 | N KENTUCKY | 70-43 | W | | - | | - | 23-61 | 37.7% | 43 | 11 | 16-59 | 27.1% | 41 | 20 | 12/8/2012 | LONG BEACH ST | 89-55 | W | -21 | W | 138.5 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 49 | 9 | 19-61 | 31.1% | 33 | 13 | 12/12/2012 | SAVANNAH ST | 85-45 | W | -22 | W | 116.5 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 48 | 20 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 21 | 20 | 12/15/2012 | UNC-ASHEVILLE | 90-72 | W | -25.5 | L | 145 | O | 36-61 | 59.0% | 32 | 12 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 32 | 17 | 12/18/2012 | WINTHROP | 65-55 | W | -27.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 22-57 | 38.6% | 36 | 5 | 19-50 | 38.0% | 38 | 14 | 12/22/2012 | KANSAS | 66-74 | L | -5.5 | L | 140.5 | U | 20-65 | 30.8% | 37 | 13 | 25-49 | 51.0% | 41 | 19 | 12/29/2012 | CHICAGO ST | 87-44 | W | -36.5 | W | 144 | U | 33-58 | 56.9% | 48 | 10 | 13-49 | 26.5% | 22 | 14 | 1/2/2013 | NEBRASKA | 70-44 | W | -21 | W | 129.5 | U | 29-59 | 49.2% | 43 | 9 | 17-56 | 30.4% | 32 | 14 | 1/5/2013 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/8/2013 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/16/2012 | @ HAWAII | 78-77 | W | -8.5 | L | | - | 27-64 | 42.2% | 31 | 9 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 51 | 16 | 11/19/2012 | *USC | 94-64 | W | 2.5 | W | 126.5 | O | 33-62 | 53.2% | 42 | 20 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 20 | 17 | 11/20/2012 | @ CHAMINADE | 84-61 | W | -14.5 | W | 154 | U | 29-59 | 49.2% | 41 | 12 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 32 | 14 | 11/21/2012 | *BUTLER | 78-61 | W | -2.5 | W | 134 | O | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 8 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 37 | 10 | 11/25/2012 | GARDNER WEBB | 63-62 | W | -17 | L | 131.5 | U | 21-48 | 43.7% | 29 | 18 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 29 | 14 | 11/28/2012 | GEORGIA TECH | 75-62 | W | -10 | W | 126.5 | O | 27-57 | 47.4% | 36 | 14 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 30 | 17 | 12/4/2012 | W CAROLINA | 72-64 | W | -18 | L | | - | 26-65 | 40.0% | 34 | 11 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 41 | 22 | 12/8/2012 | @ GONZAGA | 85-74 | W | 11.5 | W | 143.5 | O | 30-60 | 50.0% | 28 | 11 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 32 | 16 | 12/11/2012 | NORFOLK ST | 64-54 | W | | - | | - | 21-60 | 35.0% | 43 | 9 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 36 | 14 | 12/16/2012 | E KENTUCKY | 66-53 | W | -14 | L | 133.5 | U | 25-50 | 50.0% | 42 | 20 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 23 | 10 | 12/22/2012 | *MISSOURI | 73-82 | L | 2 | L | 145.5 | O | 25-74 | 33.8% | 35 | 7 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 58 | 12 | 12/29/2012 | *AUBURN | 81-79 | W | -13.5 | L | 133.5 | O | 25-52 | 48.1% | 31 | 11 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 20 | 1/2/2013 | @ PURDUE | 61-68 | L | -3 | L | 138.5 | U | 21-59 | 35.6% | 35 | 10 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 45 | 11 | 1/5/2013 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| OHIO ST: Ohio State will be very different looking this year, without Jared Sullinger and William Buford, but Thad Matta's Buckeyes should still be able to hang with the best of the best in the nation. Deshaun Thomas (15.9 PPG, 5.4 RPG) is a threat both on the perimeter and in the post from the forward position and he should benefit from more opportunities. Point guard Aaron Craft (8.8 PPG, 4.6 APG, 2.5 SPG) may be the best pure point guard in the Big Ten, and there's no doubt he should be able to improve now as an upperclassman. The Buckeyes missed out on a number of top recruits, but this veteran-led squad should still be dangerous, especially if Lenzelle Smith Jr. (6.8 PPG, 4.6 RPG) takes the necessary steps forward in his junior campaign. | | ILLINOIS: Replacing Bruce Weber, John Groce gets a chance to take over a major conference squad that returns four starters from a disappointing team that posted a dismal 6-12 conference record. It will take him time to bring in top talent that will let this program compete again, but with three of their top four scorers coming back in Brandon Paul (14.7 PPG, 4.7 RPG), D.J. Richardson (11.6 PPG) and Joseph Bertrand (6.5 PPG, 54% FG), this team has a respectable core. Look for Bertrand and Coastal Carolina transfer Sam McLaurin to assume big roles on this team as the Fighting Illini attempt to compete during this transition period. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 7:57:15 AM EST. |
|
|