| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
OKLAHOMA ST GONZAGA |
|
| 138.5 | 77 Final 85 |
|
|
| | |
|
NCAA Tournament - Second Round - Viejas Arena - San Diego, CA | | | | |
851 | OKLAHOMA ST | +0.5 | Over 135 | 852 | GONZAGA | +7.5 | Under 143 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 21-12 | -14.4 | 13-16 | 16-13 | 80.3 | 38.3 | 46.5% | 35.2 | 69.1 | 30.7 | 40.7% | 37.1 | Road Games | 8-9 | -8.4 | 5-12 | 9-8 | 74.9 | 36.9 | 44.1% | 33.8 | 72.7 | 32.6 | 43.0% | 37.9 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 76.0 | 32.2 | 43.1% | 29.2 | 70.0 | 26.6 | 42.5% | 40.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.3 | 38.3 | 26-57 | 46.5% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 20-28 | 72.4% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 20 | 8 | 10 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 70.4 | 32.9 | 24-56 | 43.2% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 15-22 | 69.3% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.9 | 36.9 | 25-57 | 44.1% | 7-19 | 36.7% | 18-24 | 72.3% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.1 | 30.7 | 24-58 | 40.7% | 6-19 | 32.2% | 16-23 | 69.0% | 37 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 73.1 | 34.3 | 25-57 | 44.6% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.7 | 32.6 | 25-57 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 17-25 | 69.5% | 38 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 28-6 | -4.6 | 17-15 | 12-16 | 76.9 | 37.8 | 49.8% | 35.7 | 65.0 | 28.6 | 39.4% | 32.6 | Road Games | 13-6 | -6.6 | 10-9 | 8-10 | 73.6 | 35.9 | 48.1% | 35.1 | 66.9 | 29.8 | 39.0% | 35.1 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 73.4 | 37.6 | 50.0% | 35.4 | 58.6 | 26.8 | 35.5% | 34.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.9 | 37.8 | 27-55 | 49.8% | 7-18 | 39.4% | 15-22 | 71.0% | 36 | 8 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 72 | 33.7 | 25-56 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 35.5% | 16-23 | 70.4% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.6 | 35.9 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 5-16 | 33.9% | 16-22 | 72.0% | 35 | 8 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.0 | 28.6 | 22-56 | 39.4% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 15-21 | 71.6% | 33 | 9 | 10 | 20 | 5 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 73.6 | 34.6 | 25-57 | 44.5% | 7-18 | 35.6% | 17-23 | 71.1% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 66.9 | 29.8 | 22-57 | 39.0% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 17-23 | 71.0% | 35 | 11 | 11 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: OKLAHOMA ST 76.2, GONZAGA 73.1 |
| | |
|
|
2/1/2014 | BAYLOR | 70-76 | L | -11 | L | 145.5 | O | 23-50 | 46.0% | 26 | 14 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 32 | 16 | 2/3/2014 | IOWA ST | 97-98 | L | -6.5 | L | 159.5 | O | 34-70 | 48.6% | 42 | 12 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 47 | 12 | 2/8/2014 | @ TEXAS TECH | 61-65 | L | -7 | L | 146 | U | 18-37 | 48.6% | 24 | 15 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 24 | 7 | 2/11/2014 | @ TEXAS | 68-87 | L | 3.5 | L | 145 | O | 21-59 | 35.6% | 34 | 10 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 40 | 12 | 2/15/2014 | OKLAHOMA | 74-77 | L | -4 | L | 156 | U | 28-60 | 46.7% | 41 | 8 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 39 | 8 | 2/17/2014 | @ BAYLOR | 64-70 | L | 5.5 | L | 143 | U | 22-59 | 37.3% | 36 | 12 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 51 | 14 | 2/22/2014 | TEXAS TECH | 84-62 | W | -10.5 | W | 138.5 | O | 29-51 | 56.9% | 26 | 9 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 26 | 15 | 2/24/2014 | @ TCU | 76-54 | W | -14 | W | 139 | U | 28-62 | 45.2% | 35 | 12 | 17-41 | 41.5% | 26 | 15 | 3/1/2014 | KANSAS | 72-65 | W | -1.5 | W | 149 | U | 20-47 | 42.6% | 24 | 10 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 42 | 22 | 3/3/2014 | KANSAS ST | 77-61 | W | -8.5 | W | 140 | U | 21-44 | 47.7% | 31 | 9 | 20-58 | 34.5% | 41 | 14 | 3/8/2014 | @ IOWA ST | 81-85 | L | 3.5 | L | 155.5 | O | 25-60 | 41.7% | 36 | 12 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 41 | 11 | 3/12/2014 | *TEXAS TECH | 80-62 | W | -9 | W | 135 | O | 22-45 | 48.9% | 25 | 8 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 34 | 17 | 3/13/2014 | *KANSAS | 70-77 | L | 3 | L | 150 | U | 25-66 | 37.9% | 30 | 5 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 46 | 14 | 3/21/2014 | *GONZAGA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2/1/2014 | @ SAN FRANCISCO | 75-65 | W | -6 | W | 137 | O | 19-49 | 38.8% | 40 | 14 | 20-58 | 34.5% | 35 | 14 | 2/5/2014 | PORTLAND | 71-66 | W | -15 | L | 140.5 | U | 20-43 | 46.5% | 29 | 10 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 33 | 13 | 2/8/2014 | @ MEMPHIS | 54-60 | L | 4.5 | L | 145.5 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 28 | 11 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 44 | 9 | 2/13/2014 | PEPPERDINE | 83-68 | W | -14 | W | 135 | O | 31-59 | 52.5% | 35 | 9 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 29 | 13 | 2/15/2014 | LOYOLA-MARYMOUNT | 86-67 | W | -16.5 | W | 142.5 | O | 29-62 | 46.8% | 40 | 10 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 25 | 11 | 2/20/2014 | @ BYU | 65-73 | L | 3 | L | 152 | U | 22-54 | 40.7% | 32 | 16 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 41 | 14 | 2/22/2014 | @ SAN DIEGO | 66-69 | L | -7.5 | L | 131 | O | 27-54 | 50.0% | 34 | 13 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 29 | 8 | 2/27/2014 | @ PACIFIC | 70-53 | W | -5.5 | W | 141.5 | U | 21-50 | 42.0% | 39 | 13 | 17-55 | 30.9% | 43 | 16 | 3/1/2014 | @ ST MARYS-CA | 75-47 | W | -1 | W | 133.5 | U | 32-57 | 56.1% | 42 | 10 | 12-52 | 23.1% | 30 | 11 | 3/8/2014 | *SANTA CLARA | 77-75 | W | -13 | L | 136 | O | 24-45 | 53.3% | 32 | 16 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 23 | 9 | 3/10/2014 | *ST MARYS-CA | 70-54 | W | -7 | W | 133 | U | 23-50 | 46.0% | 33 | 12 | 19-51 | 37.3% | 35 | 17 | 3/11/2014 | *BYU | 75-64 | W | -4 | W | 145.5 | U | 25-48 | 52.1% | 31 | 10 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 42 | 14 | 3/21/2014 | *OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | OKLAHOMA ST: The Cowboys will be relevant once again this season and that was set in stone when PG Marcus Smart (15.4 PPG, 5.8 RPG, 4.2 APG) decided to return for his sophomore season. He could have been a top pick in the last draft but chose to return after his team was bounced from the NCAA Tournament Round of 64 as a No. 5 seed. But just as important as the growth of Smart will be how his supporting cast develops, with key cogs such as swingmen Markel Brown (15.3 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 36% 3-pt FG) and Le'Bryan Nash (14.0 PPG, 4.1 RPG), the other two guys on this team to average more than 30 MPG. And don't forget about Phil Forte (10.2 PPG, 37% FG) who hit 2.1 threes per game and made 91.3% of his free throws while playing only 25.3 MPG. He and Smart will also get a backcourt reinforcement in 5-foot-11 recruit Stevie Clark, who may be the point guard of the future once Smart presumably leaves after this season. | | GONZAGA: Gonzaga was extremely successful during the last regular season but ultimately fell in the NCAA Tournament Round of 32 to super sleeper Wichita State. Gone is the dominant inside duo of Kelly Olynyk and Elias Harris to the NBA who combined for 32.4 PPG and 14.7 RPG last season, but head coach Mark Few still should have no problem winning the WCC again. The first player to watch out for this season will be the 7-foot-1 C Przemek Karnowski (5.4 PPG, 2.6 RPG, 57% FG), who played inconsistent minutes last year as a freshman, but was a highly regarded recruit. The Poland-born center will be tasked with a lot more playing time on the block than his meager 10.7 MPG last season. Joining him down low will be PF Sam Dower (6.9 PPG, 2.7 RPG, 56% FG), who is more experienced as a senior, but lacks the same upside as Karnowski. The backcourt will be filled with more familiar faces in PG Kevin Pangos (11.9 PPG, 3.3 APG) and SG Gary Bell Jr. (9.0 PPG, 39% 3-pt FG), who should both see increases in their production this season. Spelling Pangos will be savvy backup PG David Stockton (3.7 PPG, 3.4 APG, 1.5 SPG), who isn't much of a scorer but can pass and defend quite well, kind of like his Hall of Fame father John Stockton. Also key to this year's perimeter play will be SG Gerard Coleman, who sat out last season after transferring from Providence, where he averaged 13.2 PPG in the 2011-12 season. |
| | Follow Bernie Wilson on Twitter at http://twitter.com/berniewilson
|
| Last Updated: 5/8/2024 2:30:34 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|