| | | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
VIRGINIA TECH
GEORGIA TECH |
|
|
139.5
| 76
Final
56 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 507 | VIRGINIA TECH | +0.5 | Over 135.5 | | 508 | GEORGIA TECH | +7.5 | Under 143.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
|
| All Games | 18-8 | -4.9 | 13-9 | 13-8 | 82.5 | 39.8 | 51.1% | 33.4 | 73.2 | 33.8 | 42.9% | 34.3 | | Road Games | 6-5 | -3.8 | 6-5 | 7-4 | 76.9 | 36.1 | 47.0% | 31.3 | 77.7 | 33.5 | 44.2% | 37.9 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +4.3 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 71.6 | 34.8 | 48.0% | 29.4 | 74.6 | 33.8 | 43.8% | 37.8 | | Conference Games | 7-6 | +3.8 | 6-7 | 7-6 | 73.7 | 34.8 | 47.6% | 29.3 | 76.2 | 34.3 | 45.7% | 36.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.5 | 39.8 | 29-57 | 51.1% | 9-23 | 39.6% | 15-21 | 71.7% | 33 | 6 | 17 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 2 | | vs opponents surrendering | 72.1 | 34.1 | 26-59 | 43.6% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 13-18 | 71.5% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 76.9 | 36.1 | 26-55 | 47.0% | 10-25 | 40.9% | 15-20 | 72.1% | 31 | 5 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 1 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.2 | 33.8 | 26-61 | 42.9% | 9-25 | 34.9% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.5 | 34.8 | 26-59 | 44.7% | 8-22 | 34.9% | 14-20 | 70.8% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.7 | 33.5 | 27-61 | 44.2% | 9-26 | 36.9% | 14-20 | 70.1% | 38 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 11-15 | -8.2 | 10-11 | 10-12 | 65.6 | 30.6 | 42.9% | 34.1 | 66.8 | 30.6 | 42.3% | 33.2 | | Home Games | 10-6 | -1.7 | 7-5 | 5-7 | 66.7 | 29.7 | 42.4% | 35.1 | 62.9 | 28.2 | 40.2% | 33.1 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 62.4 | 27.6 | 40.1% | 34.4 | 73.4 | 34.0 | 43.8% | 36.8 | | Conference Games | 4-9 | -2.2 | 6-6 | 6-7 | 63.5 | 29.6 | 42.0% | 33.6 | 69.2 | 32.2 | 43.4% | 35.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 65.6 | 30.6 | 23-54 | 42.9% | 5-15 | 32.2% | 14-20 | 71.8% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 70.6 | 32.9 | 25-59 | 42.5% | 8-22 | 34.3% | 13-19 | 71.0% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 66.7 | 29.7 | 23-54 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 34.3% | 16-22 | 72.2% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.8 | 30.6 | 24-56 | 42.3% | 7-19 | 37.8% | 12-17 | 71.1% | 33 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 74.4 | 34.7 | 26-59 | 44.6% | 8-22 | 35.6% | 14-20 | 72.0% | 37 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 62.9 | 28.2 | 23-56 | 40.2% | 7-19 | 35.0% | 11-15 | 70.4% | 33 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: VIRGINIA TECH 77.1, GEORGIA TECH 78.2 |
| | |
|
|
| 12/31/2017 | @ SYRACUSE | 56-68 | L | 3 | L | 144.5 | U | 18-52 | 34.6% | 26 | 12 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 39 | 15 | | 1/3/2018 | VIRGINIA | 52-78 | L | 3.5 | L | 134.5 | U | 17-47 | 36.2% | 33 | 16 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 31 | 6 | | 1/6/2018 | PITTSBURGH | 81-67 | W | -16.5 | L | 144.5 | O | 30-57 | 52.6% | 26 | 6 | 22-48 | 45.8% | 31 | 17 | | 1/10/2018 | @ WAKE FOREST | 83-75 | W | 2 | W | 156 | O | 29-57 | 50.9% | 30 | 11 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 40 | 13 | | 1/13/2018 | @ LOUISVILLE | 86-94 | L | 5 | L | 148.5 | O | 30-61 | 49.2% | 30 | 19 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 34 | 16 | | 1/20/2018 | FLORIDA ST | 82-91 | L | -2 | L | 161 | O | 32-60 | 53.3% | 25 | 13 | 31-58 | 53.4% | 37 | 10 | | 1/22/2018 | N CAROLINA | 80-69 | W | 3.5 | W | 164.5 | U | 30-63 | 47.6% | 36 | 9 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 35 | 13 | | 1/27/2018 | @ NOTRE DAME | 80-75 | W | 2.5 | W | 143 | O | 29-57 | 50.9% | 28 | 10 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 39 | 13 | | 1/31/2018 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 85-80 | W | -1 | W | 154 | O | 30-69 | 43.5% | 36 | 10 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 42 | 16 | | 2/3/2018 | MIAMI | 75-84 | L | -5.5 | L | 149 | O | 29-60 | 48.3% | 28 | 9 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 41 | 13 | | 2/7/2018 | NC STATE | 85-75 | W | -6 | W | 162 | U | 33-52 | 63.5% | 27 | 11 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 34 | 15 | | 2/10/2018 | @ VIRGINIA | 61-60 | W | 12 | W | 127.5 | U | 22-51 | 43.1% | 37 | 10 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 36 | 4 | | 2/14/2018 | @ DUKE | 52-74 | L | 10.5 | L | 163.5 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 19 | 10 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 36 | 13 | | 2/17/2018 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2018 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2018 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/26/2018 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2018 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 12/30/2017 | @ NOTRE DAME | 59-68 | L | 14 | W | 139 | U | 23-60 | 38.3% | 34 | 7 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 45 | 11 | | 1/3/2018 | MIAMI | 64-54 | W | 5 | W | 126 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 38 | 11 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 39 | 18 | | 1/6/2018 | YALE | 74-60 | W | -9 | W | 139.5 | U | 23-47 | 48.9% | 34 | 10 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 23 | 12 | | 1/10/2018 | NOTRE DAME | 60-53 | W | -2 | W | 125.5 | U | 25-59 | 42.4% | 39 | 13 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 33 | 10 | | 1/13/2018 | @ PITTSBURGH | 69-54 | W | -6 | W | 125.5 | U | 26-55 | 47.3% | 39 | 12 | 17-42 | 40.5% | 20 | 14 | | 1/18/2018 | VIRGINIA | 48-64 | L | 7.5 | L | 116 | U | 17-42 | 40.5% | 28 | 18 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 29 | 9 | | 1/20/2018 | @ N CAROLINA | 66-80 | L | 14 | T | 140 | O | 29-60 | 48.3% | 25 | 15 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 46 | 14 | | 1/24/2018 | @ FLORIDA ST | 77-88 | L | 10 | L | 141.5 | O | 24-58 | 41.4% | 34 | 16 | 32-54 | 59.3% | 26 | 12 | | 1/28/2018 | CLEMSON | 70-72 | L | 2.5 | W | 127.5 | O | 25-52 | 48.1% | 28 | 9 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 33 | 7 | | 1/31/2018 | SYRACUSE | 55-51 | W | 0 | W | 121 | U | 21-63 | 33.3% | 38 | 9 | 15-50 | 30.0% | 40 | 15 | | 2/4/2018 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 72-80 | L | 1.5 | L | 138 | O | 29-57 | 50.9% | 31 | 13 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 38 | 13 | | 2/8/2018 | @ LOUISVILLE | 54-77 | L | 7 | L | 135.5 | U | 20-55 | 36.4% | 36 | 20 | 27-54 | 50.0% | 32 | 10 | | 2/11/2018 | DUKE | 69-80 | L | 9 | L | 144.5 | O | 22-66 | 33.3% | 39 | 10 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 44 | 11 | | 2/14/2018 | @ WAKE FOREST | 62-79 | L | 5.5 | L | 138 | O | 22-43 | 51.2% | 28 | 14 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 30 | 5 | | 2/17/2018 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2018 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2018 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/1/2018 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2018 | WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |  | VIRGINIA TECH: Last season: 22-11, lost to Wisconsin in first round of NCAA Tournament.
Who's gone: F Zach LeDay, G Seth Allen, G Ty Outlaw, Khadim Sy
Who's back: G/F Chris Clarke, eventually. The Hokies' most athletic player sustained a torn ACL last season and, depending on who you talk to, could be ready for the start of the season, or not at all. He averaged 11.4 points and 7.3 rebounds and provides boundless energy. G Ahmed Hill. He also averaged 11.4 points and was second on the team with 59 3-pointers, which have always been a big part of the offense for what always seems to be a undersized team, and is again.
Who's new: True freshmen Wabissa Bede, Nickeil Alexander-Walker and P.J. Horne and redshirt freshman Tyrie Jackson are all being counted on to boost the Hokies' outside shooting and provide depth to a team that has only six returnees with experience in the rigors of ACC play.
The Skinny: Virginia Tech basically outscored people last season, but is less likely to be able to do that this year. Williams has pledged an increased emphasis on defense, and while his players seem on board, the absence of experienced depth or proven defensive stoppers will make last year's success hard to replicate. | | GEORGIA TECH: Last season: 21-16, lost in final of NIT.
Who's gone: G Josh Heath, F Quinton Stephens, G Corey Heyward, F Christian Matthews, F Kellen McCormick, G/F Jodan Price, F Rand Rowland.
Who's back: G Josh Okogie is coming off a brilliant freshman season in which he averaged 16.1 points and 5.4 rebounds per game. C Ben Lammers (14.2 ppg, 9.2 rpg) and guard Tadric Jackson (12.1 ppg) provide senior leadership. G Justin Moore, who started 18 games, figures to play a much bigger role in his sophomore year.
Who's new: Pastner whiffed on several high-profile prospects but landed four recruits. F Curtis Haywood II, G Jose Alvarado, F Moses Wright and F Evan Cole will all get a shot at significant playing time. Ditto for G Brandon Alston, who came aboard as a graduate transfer after playing two seasons at Lehigh.
The Skinny: After a much-better-than-expected showing in Pastner's first season, the Yellow Jackets return their top three scorers and facing greater expectations. But it may be a little soon to expect a run at the NCAA Tournament. Pastner has yet to land a top-notch recruiting class and said all along that turning Georgia Tech around would be a multi-year process. But at least the Jackets are generating some excitement on campus after a long dry spell. |
| | |
| | Last Updated: 10/8/2024 11:14:43 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|