|
|
VANDERBILT GEORGIA |
|
| 133 | 62 Final 70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
537 | VANDERBILT | +180 | 538 | GEORGIA | -220 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-8 | -3.2 | 8-8 | 8-4 | 70.9 | 32.6 | 48.0% | 35.4 | 63.4 | 28.2 | 39.9% | 31.9 | Road Games | 2-5 | -3.9 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 63.4 | 29.6 | 47.7% | 31.0 | 63.9 | 27.0 | 41.0% | 33.7 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5.6 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 64.6 | 27.4 | 43.1% | 31.4 | 70.6 | 29.6 | 45.3% | 35.2 | Conference Games | 1-5 | -4.6 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 64.5 | 28.3 | 43.1% | 34.0 | 67.5 | 27.8 | 42.6% | 33.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.9 | 32.6 | 24-51 | 48.0% | 6-17 | 37.2% | 15-22 | 71.5% | 35 | 9 | 15 | 18 | 5 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.2 | 30.7 | 23-55 | 41.9% | 6-19 | 33.4% | 14-21 | 67.4% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.4 | 29.6 | 23-49 | 47.7% | 6-15 | 36.8% | 11-16 | 67.5% | 31 | 8 | 14 | 18 | 4 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.4 | 28.2 | 22-56 | 39.9% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 13-20 | 64.4% | 32 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.9 | 31.9 | 24-55 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 14-21 | 67.7% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 63.9 | 27.0 | 22-55 | 41.0% | 5-16 | 29.6% | 14-21 | 67.8% | 34 | 13 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-5 | +4.1 | 10-5 | 8-6 | 72.4 | 34.5 | 46.0% | 37.9 | 65.6 | 30.2 | 39.0% | 34.9 | Home Games | 9-1 | +3.5 | 5-4 | 4-4 | 73.1 | 36.9 | 45.5% | 40.6 | 62.6 | 28.0 | 38.2% | 34.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.2 | 4-0 | 4-1 | 73.6 | 32.8 | 46.5% | 34.0 | 69.0 | 31.4 | 41.7% | 35.2 | Conference Games | 4-2 | +1.7 | 4-1 | 5-1 | 73.8 | 34.7 | 46.3% | 35.0 | 70.7 | 32.3 | 43.4% | 33.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.4 | 34.5 | 24-53 | 46.0% | 6-16 | 35.6% | 18-27 | 66.5% | 38 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.2 | 29.7 | 23-55 | 41.4% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 13-20 | 67.5% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.1 | 36.9 | 24-54 | 45.5% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 18-28 | 64.7% | 41 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.6 | 30.2 | 23-58 | 39.0% | 6-21 | 30.5% | 14-19 | 70.7% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 22 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 70.2 | 33.2 | 25-55 | 45.0% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 14-21 | 69.2% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 62.6 | 28.0 | 23-59 | 38.2% | 6-20 | 27.3% | 12-17 | 69.9% | 35 | 9 | 9 | 23 | 6 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VANDERBILT 73.2, GEORGIA 76.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/13/2014 | PURDUE | 81-71 | W | 4 | W | 129 | O | 28-48 | 58.3% | 25 | 14 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 29 | 12 | 12/16/2014 | W CAROLINA | 99-79 | W | -10.5 | W | 135.5 | O | 26-47 | 55.3% | 34 | 18 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 18 | 14 | 12/20/2014 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 60-65 | L | 2.5 | L | | - | 21-45 | 46.7% | 30 | 13 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 39 | 7 | 12/22/2014 | PENNSYLVANIA | 79-50 | W | -13.5 | W | | - | 28-49 | 57.1% | 39 | 16 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 24 | 17 | 12/31/2014 | @ SAINT LOUIS | 70-55 | W | -4 | W | | - | 25-46 | 54.3% | 39 | 14 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 26 | 8 | 1/3/2015 | YALE | 79-74 | W | -5.5 | L | 123 | O | 23-56 | 41.1% | 39 | 12 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 39 | 17 | 1/6/2015 | AUBURN | 64-52 | W | -7.5 | W | 136 | U | 20-46 | 43.5% | 47 | 19 | 18-59 | 30.5% | 27 | 9 | 1/10/2015 | @ ARKANSAS | 70-82 | L | 10 | L | 144 | O | 26-50 | 52.0% | 27 | 22 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 33 | 11 | 1/14/2015 | GEORGIA | 67-70 | L | -2.5 | L | 128 | O | 23-56 | 41.1% | 36 | 11 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 27 | 11 | 1/17/2015 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | 54-57 | L | -4 | L | 123.5 | U | 20-52 | 38.5% | 28 | 7 | 17-44 | 38.6% | 41 | 17 | 1/20/2015 | @ KENTUCKY | 57-65 | L | 21.5 | W | 127 | U | 22-53 | 41.5% | 30 | 16 | 20-46 | 43.5% | 33 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | LSU | 75-79 | L | -2.5 | L | 140 | O | 27-63 | 42.9% | 36 | 16 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 42 | 19 | 1/27/2015 | @ GEORGIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ TEXAS A&M | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | S CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2015 | @ FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/2014 | SETON HALL | 65-47 | W | -5 | W | 139 | U | 22-53 | 41.5% | 50 | 17 | 16-54 | 29.6% | 31 | 14 | 12/27/2014 | MERCER | 86-77 | W | -15 | L | 123.5 | O | 29-71 | 40.8% | 57 | 16 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 40 | 13 | 12/31/2014 | @ KANSAS ST | 50-46 | W | 3.5 | W | 135 | U | 15-39 | 38.5% | 26 | 17 | 15-47 | 31.9% | 39 | 19 | 1/3/2015 | NORFOLK ST | 63-50 | W | | - | | - | 21-49 | 42.9% | 37 | 8 | 19-65 | 29.2% | 43 | 8 | 1/6/2015 | ARKANSAS | 75-79 | L | -3 | L | 137.5 | O | 25-55 | 45.5% | 40 | 17 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 25 | 9 | 1/10/2015 | @ LSU | 84-87 | L | 3 | T | 138 | O | 28-68 | 41.2% | 50 | 20 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 34 | 14 | 1/14/2015 | @ VANDERBILT | 70-67 | W | 2.5 | W | 128 | O | 22-45 | 48.9% | 27 | 11 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 36 | 11 | 1/17/2015 | FLORIDA | 73-61 | W | 2 | W | 125 | O | 23-41 | 56.1% | 26 | 16 | 24-48 | 50.0% | 26 | 19 | 1/20/2015 | OLE MISS | 69-64 | W | -4 | W | 141.5 | U | 22-53 | 41.5% | 35 | 10 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 38 | 14 | 1/24/2015 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | 72-66 | W | -5 | W | 125.5 | O | 23-47 | 48.9% | 32 | 11 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 42 | 9 | 1/27/2015 | VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ S CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | @ KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | @ TEXAS A&M | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | AUBURN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2015 | S CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VANDERBILT: The Commodores had a great recruiting class, showing their program is taking the right steps to move up the standings in the conference. Everything for the team will start with sophomore C Damian Jones (11.3 PPG, 5.7 RPG, 1.4 BPG), who showed last season that he is ready to be the leader on the team. While it may still take a little while for this team to start producing a lot of wins, PG Shelton Mitchell, SG Riley LaChance and SF Matthew Fisher-Davis are among the projected freshmen starters who could be the cornerstone of this program in the next few seasons. | | GEORGIA: Georgia had a solid 2013-14 campaign with 20 wins, and expects even more this season with its top five scorers all coming back. Unlike the schools ahead of the Bulldogs in the projected SEC standings, they are going to rely heavily on the play of the backcourt. PG Charles Mann (13.9 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 2.9 APG) and SG Kenny Gaines (13.0 PPG, 2.5 RPG, 38% threes) are two guards that are effective in different ways. Mann is at his best slashing to the rim, but he must limit the turnovers (3.4 TOPG). PF Marcus Thornton (8.3 PPG, 6.1 RPG) is heading into his senior year, and he took a giant step as a junior with a team-high 45 blocks (1.3 BPG). The Bulldogs didn't make the NCAA Tournament because of a slow start, but they finished second in the SEC with a 12-6 record. They will have to have a stronger non-conference performance, but the Bulldogs should contend for a tournament berth. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/21/2024 11:44:26 AM EST. |
|
|