| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA GEORGIA |
|
| 147.5 | 66 Final 62 |
|
|
| | |
|
NIT TOURNAMENT - Final Rnd - Madison Square Garden - New York, NY | | | | |
789 | MINNESOTA | -0.5 | Over 142.5 | 790 | GEORGIA | +8.5 | Under 150.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 3-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 76.6 | 40.6 | 43.9% | 40.8 | 62.6 | 31.8 | 37.1% | 41.4 | Road Games | 0-2 | -2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 64.5 | 35.0 | 37.8% | 37.0 | 75.5 | 37.0 | 42.6% | 44.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 76.6 | 40.6 | 43.9% | 40.8 | 62.6 | 31.8 | 37.1% | 41.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.6 | 40.6 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 7-19 | 36.1% | 12-21 | 56.6% | 41 | 12 | 19 | 22 | 12 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.7 | 33.6 | 24-60 | 40.7% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 14-22 | 61.8% | 39 | 11 | 14 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.5 | 35.0 | 22-59 | 37.8% | 5-18 | 27.0% | 14-24 | 59.2% | 37 | 9 | 12 | 28 | 6 | 19 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.6 | 31.8 | 20-55 | 37.1% | 6-20 | 29.3% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 41 | 10 | 12 | 21 | 8 | 21 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.3 | 34.9 | 23-58 | 40.6% | 5-20 | 27.7% | 15-24 | 63.9% | 40 | 12 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.5 | 37.0 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 4-14 | 27.6% | 25-39 | 64.6% | 44 | 11 | 10 | 22 | 13 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 3-2 | -1 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 77.0 | 37.2 | 46.2% | 38.8 | 71.8 | 35.8 | 40.5% | 36.6 | Road Games | 0-2 | -2 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 74.5 | 32.5 | 44.0% | 32.5 | 84.0 | 44.0 | 47.0% | 38.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 77.0 | 37.2 | 46.2% | 38.8 | 71.8 | 35.8 | 40.5% | 36.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.0 | 37.2 | 27-58 | 46.2% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 20-30 | 66.9% | 39 | 10 | 15 | 22 | 8 | 11 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.7 | 30.4 | 23-56 | 41.4% | 5-18 | 28.3% | 14-20 | 66.3% | 32 | 8 | 11 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.5 | 32.5 | 25-58 | 44.0% | 4-18 | 25.0% | 19-28 | 67.9% | 32 | 9 | 13 | 24 | 7 | 10 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.8 | 35.8 | 24-59 | 40.5% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 18-24 | 75.2% | 37 | 9 | 11 | 23 | 5 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 73.6 | 36.1 | 26-57 | 45.8% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 15-23 | 66.2% | 39 | 12 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.0 | 44.0 | 27-57 | 47.0% | 5-16 | 34.4% | 24-31 | 79.0% | 38 | 9 | 14 | 22 | 6 | 10 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 70, GEORGIA 72.8 |
| | |
|
|
11/14/2014 | *LOUISVILLE | 68-81 | L | 9.5 | L | 139.5 | O | 22-55 | 40.0% | 35 | 18 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 37 | 15 | 11/18/2014 | W KENTUCKY | 76-54 | W | -10 | W | | - | 29-67 | 43.3% | 41 | 11 | 18-57 | 31.6% | 42 | 25 | 11/20/2014 | FRANKLIN PIERCE | 109-57 | W | | - | | - | 42-72 | 58.3% | 46 | 11 | 21-65 | 32.3% | 37 | 24 | 11/22/2014 | MD-BALT COUNTY | 69-51 | W | | - | | - | 28-70 | 40.0% | 43 | 8 | 17-45 | 37.8% | 40 | 23 | 11/26/2014 | @ ST JOHNS | 61-70 | L | 1 | L | 137.5 | U | 23-64 | 35.9% | 39 | 20 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 51 | 18 | 11/28/2014 | *GEORGIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/2/2014 | @ WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/5/2014 | W CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/8/2014 | N DAKOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/10/2014 | SOUTHERN U | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/19/2014 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/14/2014 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 73-80 | L | 1 | L | | - | 26-62 | 41.9% | 36 | 12 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 12 | 11/18/2014 | STONY BROOK | 80-70 | W | -13 | L | 137 | O | 21-47 | 44.7% | 41 | 12 | 21-66 | 31.8% | 42 | 10 | 11/21/2014 | TROY | 82-60 | W | -18 | W | | - | 33-64 | 51.6% | 43 | 9 | 19-52 | 36.5% | 33 | 16 | 11/23/2014 | FLA ATLANTIC | 74-61 | W | -15 | L | 137.5 | U | 28-61 | 45.9% | 45 | 15 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 32 | 15 | 11/26/2014 | *GONZAGA | 76-88 | L | 12.5 | W | 146.5 | O | 25-54 | 46.3% | 29 | 9 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 35 | 9 | 11/28/2014 | *MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/2/2014 | @ UT-CHATTANOOGA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/7/2014 | COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/21/2014 | SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | MINNESOTA: If you're looking for a sleeper team in the Big Ten, it is the Golden Gophers. Minnesota is coming off an NIT championship win against SMU, and brings back all but one starter. SG Andre Hollins (13.6 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 2.4 APG) had a solid junior campaign, but saw his numbers drop in every statistic. Especially worrisome was his shooting percentages, as he shot only 38% FG and 34% from threes, falling considerably from 42% in both areas as a sophomore. He is relentless when attacking, but he can get out of control, and try to shoot himself out of a slump. PG Deandre Mathieu (12 PPG, 4.2 APG and 2.7 RPG) is a cool customer at the point guard running the offense, as he doesn't get too high or low on the court. He has the speed to get by the defender, but the IQ to know whether to dish it off or attack the rim. Veteran PFs Maurice Walker (7.8 PPG, 4.5 RPG, 56% FG) and Joey King (7.1 PPG, 2.7 RPG, 48% FG) and 6-foot-11 C Elliott Eliason (5.0 PPG, 6.6 RPG) give the Golden Gophers size, experience and toughness in the post. | | GEORGIA: Georgia had a solid 2013-14 campaign with 20 wins, and expects even more this season with its top five scorers all coming back. Unlike the schools ahead of the Bulldogs in the projected SEC standings, they are going to rely heavily on the play of the backcourt. PG Charles Mann (13.9 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 2.9 APG) and SG Kenny Gaines (13.0 PPG, 2.5 RPG, 38% threes) are two guards that are effective in different ways. Mann is at his best slashing to the rim, but he must limit the turnovers (3.4 TOPG). PF Marcus Thornton (8.3 PPG, 6.1 RPG) is heading into his senior year, and he took a giant step as a junior with a team-high 45 blocks (1.3 BPG). The Bulldogs didn't make the NCAA Tournament because of a slow start, but they finished second in the SEC with a 12-6 record. They will have to have a stronger non-conference performance, but the Bulldogs should contend for a tournament berth. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/19/2024 11:41:19 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|