|
|
MARYLAND FLORIDA ST |
|
|
| 71 Final 73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
783 | MARYLAND | +135 | 784 | FLORIDA ST | -155 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 15-5 | -1 | 5-7 | 3-5 | 71.4 | 34.3 | 46.5% | 43.0 | 60.8 | 28.9 | 36.0% | 32.6 | Road Games | 2-4 | -1.3 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 63.0 | 27.8 | 40.1% | 47.0 | 65.2 | 34.8 | 38.3% | 34.7 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 0-5 | 1-4 | 55.6 | 24.0 | 37.9% | 43.6 | 61.8 | 29.8 | 38.0% | 38.4 | Conference Games | 3-4 | -2.7 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 62.0 | 29.9 | 39.8% | 43.0 | 63.6 | 30.4 | 37.7% | 38.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.4 | 34.3 | 26-56 | 46.5% | 5-16 | 32.6% | 14-20 | 67.7% | 43 | 12 | 16 | 15 | 4 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.8 | 31.4 | 24-57 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 13-19 | 68.1% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.0 | 27.8 | 23-58 | 40.1% | 3-15 | 21.6% | 13-21 | 63.2% | 47 | 13 | 11 | 18 | 5 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.8 | 28.9 | 22-62 | 36.0% | 6-21 | 30.7% | 10-15 | 67.6% | 33 | 10 | 11 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.9 | 31.6 | 25-56 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 14-20 | 68.5% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.2 | 34.8 | 24-62 | 38.3% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 12-19 | 60.3% | 35 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-8 | -7.8 | 8-9 | 6-3 | 68.9 | 31.6 | 44.0% | 33.0 | 66.8 | 32.4 | 41.3% | 35.3 | Home Games | 5-5 | -11.6 | 2-6 | 2-2 | 69.8 | 30.5 | 43.2% | 31.9 | 66.2 | 30.9 | 42.4% | 33.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.4 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 56.0 | 24.4 | 38.6% | 27.0 | 64.6 | 33.6 | 43.3% | 38.2 | Conference Games | 3-3 | +0.9 | 2-4 | 0-2 | 58.5 | 26.7 | 40.1% | 28.0 | 64.8 | 32.2 | 42.6% | 38.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.9 | 31.6 | 24-53 | 44.0% | 7-18 | 36.5% | 15-21 | 71.6% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 63 | 29.3 | 22-55 | 40.2% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 12-18 | 67.7% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.8 | 30.5 | 23-53 | 43.2% | 6-17 | 37.6% | 17-23 | 75.2% | 32 | 9 | 11 | 17 | 7 | 16 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.8 | 32.4 | 23-57 | 41.3% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 13-19 | 68.1% | 35 | 11 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.2 | 31.8 | 24-55 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 13-19 | 67.8% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 66.2 | 30.9 | 23-55 | 42.4% | 6-20 | 33.2% | 13-18 | 72.0% | 33 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 17 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MARYLAND 72.6, FLORIDA ST 75.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/12/2012 | MONMOUTH | 71-38 | W | | - | | - | 25-43 | 58.1% | 44 | 23 | 14-68 | 20.6% | 29 | 13 | 12/21/2012 | STONY BROOK | 76-69 | W | | - | | - | 28-53 | 52.8% | 34 | 11 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 31 | 4 | 12/29/2012 | DELAWARE ST | 79-50 | W | | - | | - | 33-58 | 56.9% | 36 | 10 | 18-56 | 32.1% | 30 | 19 | 1/1/2013 | IUPUI | 81-63 | W | -22.5 | L | | - | 29-53 | 54.7% | 35 | 14 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 21 | 12 | 1/5/2013 | VIRGINIA TECH | 94-71 | W | -11.5 | W | | - | 31-60 | 51.7% | 41 | 11 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 38 | 11 | 1/9/2013 | FLORIDA ST | 62-65 | L | -6.5 | L | | - | 22-60 | 36.7% | 42 | 18 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 13 | 1/13/2013 | @ MIAMI | 47-54 | L | 6 | L | 130.5 | U | 18-57 | 31.6% | 48 | 15 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 44 | 8 | 1/16/2013 | NC STATE | 51-50 | W | -2.5 | L | 149 | U | 21-61 | 34.4% | 45 | 13 | 19-61 | 31.1% | 41 | 11 | 1/19/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | 52-62 | L | 6 | L | 146 | U | 21-53 | 39.6% | 41 | 21 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 39 | 12 | 1/22/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 64-59 | W | -8.5 | L | 133.5 | U | 25-59 | 42.4% | 41 | 14 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 34 | 10 | 1/26/2013 | @ DUKE | 64-84 | L | 13 | L | 139.5 | O | 25-60 | 41.7% | 43 | 14 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 34 | 4 | 1/30/2013 | @ FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2013 | VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2012 | LA-MONROE | 63-48 | W | -25 | L | | - | 19-47 | 40.4% | 37 | 19 | 19-50 | 38.0% | 25 | 23 | 12/22/2012 | *CHARLOTTE | 79-76 | W | 1 | W | 134 | O | 22-49 | 44.9% | 29 | 14 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 34 | 17 | 12/29/2012 | *TULSA | 81-63 | W | -11 | W | 135.5 | O | 29-63 | 46.0% | 43 | 13 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 32 | 17 | 1/2/2013 | @ AUBURN | 72-78 | L | -4 | L | 136 | O | 28-58 | 48.3% | 40 | 20 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 42 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | @ CLEMSON | 71-66 | W | 3 | W | | - | 25-53 | 47.2% | 33 | 14 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 37 | 13 | 1/9/2013 | @ MARYLAND | 65-62 | W | 6.5 | W | | - | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 13 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 42 | 18 | 1/12/2013 | N CAROLINA | 72-77 | L | -3 | L | 152.5 | U | 24-50 | 48.0% | 19 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 41 | 14 | 1/19/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | 36-56 | L | 6 | L | | - | 16-43 | 37.2% | 22 | 18 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 30 | 16 | 1/24/2013 | CLEMSON | 60-57 | W | -4.5 | L | | - | 19-46 | 41.3% | 23 | 15 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 34 | 13 | 1/27/2013 | @ MIAMI | 47-71 | L | 9.5 | L | 129 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 32 | 12 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 44 | 8 | 1/30/2013 | MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MARYLAND: In Mark Turgeon's first season with the Terrapins, he guided the team to a 6-10 ACC record. Now he will need to find a way to compete without the only dangerous player from last year's squad Terrell Stoglin, who scored 21.6 PPG. Sophomore guard Nick Faust (8.9 PPG) will need to take over the scoring onus, while Pe'Shon Howard (3.7 APG) resumes his role as starting point guard after missing half of 2011-12 with a knee injury. Highly-rated freshman Shaquille Cleare should give the team a much-needed post presence along with 7-foot-1 Alex Len (5.4 RPG) and 6-foot-8 James Padgett (8.8 PPG, 5.6 RPG). | | FLORIDA ST: After a strong ACC showing last year (12-4 record), the Seminoles were bounced in the Round of 32 in the Big Dance. Although Leonard Hamilton's squad returns just one starter, it is the most important one'senior guard Michael Snaer (14.0 PPG, 3.8 RPG), who made 40% of his shots from deep. Ian Miller (10.3 PPG) joins him in the backcourt, where they will also receive help from freshman Montay Brandon, who at 6-foot-7 should be ready to contribute from day one. The question is if the return of Terrance Shannon, who played just seven games last season due to a shoulder injury, to the frontcourt can make up for the loss of bigs Bernard James and Xavier Gibson, who did all the dirty work for Hamilton last year. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 4:23:22 AM EST. |
|
|