|
|
NOTRE DAME DEPAUL |
|
| 145.5 | 79 Final 71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
539 | NOTRE DAME | -270 | 540 | DEPAUL | +210 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 17-4 | -1.2 | 8-9 | 5-5 | 72.7 | 35.0 | 49.6% | 35.2 | 61.9 | 29.4 | 41.0% | 30.7 | Road Games | 4-2 | -0.1 | 4-2 | 2-2 | 71.8 | 32.8 | 48.0% | 33.2 | 67.8 | 32.5 | 43.6% | 31.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -2.2 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 63.4 | 29.4 | 45.3% | 29.6 | 64.2 | 32.6 | 46.1% | 30.6 | Conference Games | 5-3 | -3.5 | 3-5 | 0-4 | 66.7 | 31.7 | 47.2% | 29.5 | 65.0 | 32.0 | 46.7% | 30.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.7 | 35.0 | 27-55 | 49.6% | 7-17 | 39.9% | 12-16 | 70.8% | 35 | 9 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 30.2 | 23-55 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 68.6% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.8 | 32.8 | 25-53 | 48.0% | 7-17 | 40.0% | 14-18 | 76.6% | 33 | 8 | 15 | 15 | 4 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.9 | 29.4 | 23-57 | 41.0% | 6-18 | 32.9% | 9-13 | 72.0% | 31 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.6 | 31.6 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 13-20 | 68.2% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.8 | 32.5 | 25-57 | 43.6% | 5-17 | 30.4% | 13-17 | 74.3% | 32 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 5 | 10 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-10 | -3.5 | 8-8 | 2-2 | 73.2 | 35.6 | 43.2% | 37.5 | 71.4 | 36.6 | 43.2% | 39.6 | Home Games | 6-5 | -4.4 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 74.5 | 38.0 | 45.9% | 36.1 | 67.1 | 33.3 | 43.3% | 37.1 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4.6 | 2-3 | 1-0 | 67.8 | 33.2 | 37.9% | 37.0 | 83.4 | 44.2 | 48.4% | 44.4 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -3.4 | 3-4 | 1-0 | 70.6 | 33.6 | 39.7% | 36.0 | 80.4 | 41.6 | 46.7% | 43.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.2 | 35.6 | 27-63 | 43.2% | 5-16 | 28.3% | 15-21 | 70.1% | 37 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 9 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.9 | 30.1 | 23-55 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 13-19 | 69.0% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.5 | 38.0 | 29-63 | 45.9% | 4-15 | 27.8% | 13-18 | 68.8% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 11 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.4 | 36.6 | 26-61 | 43.2% | 5-15 | 32.4% | 14-21 | 65.4% | 40 | 12 | 14 | 18 | 9 | 17 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 66.9 | 30.9 | 24-56 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 32.8% | 13-19 | 66.8% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 67.1 | 33.3 | 24-56 | 43.3% | 5-16 | 32.8% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 37 | 11 | 13 | 16 | 8 | 20 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: NOTRE DAME 72.6, DEPAUL 70.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/15/2012 | *PURDUE | 81-68 | W | -7.5 | W | 124.5 | O | 26-53 | 49.1% | 38 | 12 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 33 | 15 | 12/17/2012 | IUPU-FT WAYNE | 74-62 | W | -21.5 | L | 132 | O | 29-56 | 51.8% | 37 | 13 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 34 | 11 | 12/19/2012 | KENNESAW ST | 85-57 | W | | - | | - | 32-52 | 61.5% | 36 | 11 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 17 | 10 | 12/21/2012 | NIAGARA | 89-67 | W | -15.5 | W | 141.5 | O | 31-50 | 62.0% | 41 | 11 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 29 | 5 | 1/5/2013 | SETON HALL | 93-74 | W | -9.5 | W | | - | 35-62 | 56.5% | 37 | 8 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 30 | 11 | 1/7/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | 66-60 | W | 4.5 | W | 132.5 | U | 24-48 | 50.0% | 23 | 7 | 23-49 | 46.9% | 28 | 9 | 1/12/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 58-65 | L | -8.5 | L | | - | 24-56 | 42.9% | 28 | 9 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 34 | 7 | 1/15/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | 63-67 | L | -7 | L | 132.5 | U | 24-51 | 47.1% | 32 | 12 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 36 | 10 | 1/19/2013 | RUTGERS | 69-66 | W | -12 | L | | - | 24-49 | 49.0% | 26 | 16 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 31 | 15 | 1/21/2013 | GEORGETOWN | 47-63 | L | -5.5 | L | 122 | U | 17-49 | 34.7% | 24 | 5 | 24-45 | 53.3% | 35 | 9 | 1/26/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | 73-65 | W | -3.5 | W | | - | 27-50 | 54.0% | 34 | 13 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 17 | 7 | 1/30/2013 | VILLANOVA | 65-60 | W | -8 | L | 133.5 | U | 24-57 | 42.1% | 32 | 6 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 34 | 9 | 2/2/2013 | @ DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2013 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/16/2012 | N ILLINOIS | 69-64 | W | -17 | L | | - | 22-47 | 46.8% | 29 | 20 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 39 | 22 | 12/22/2012 | MD-BALT COUNTY | 69-61 | W | | - | | - | 20-49 | 40.8% | 39 | 18 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 38 | 20 | 12/29/2012 | LOYOLA-IL | 61-69 | L | -6 | L | | - | 24-55 | 43.6% | 34 | 15 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 30 | 15 | 1/2/2013 | SETON HALL | 72-73 | L | -2.5 | L | | - | 27-59 | 45.8% | 32 | 12 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 40 | 21 | 1/5/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | 83-73 | W | 7.5 | W | | - | 27-62 | 43.5% | 35 | 15 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 44 | 23 | 1/8/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 78-99 | L | 9 | L | | - | 31-70 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 49 | 13 | 1/15/2013 | CINCINNATI | 70-75 | L | 7 | W | | - | 31-66 | 47.0% | 27 | 10 | 25-42 | 59.5% | 35 | 19 | 1/19/2013 | ST JOHNS | 62-71 | L | -3 | L | | - | 25-72 | 34.7% | 43 | 18 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 41 | 18 | 1/26/2013 | @ PITTSBURGH | 55-93 | L | 15.5 | L | | - | 18-65 | 27.7% | 34 | 18 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 58 | 18 | 1/30/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | 74-79 | L | 7 | W | 146 | O | 25-70 | 35.7% | 52 | 18 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 39 | 5 | 2/2/2013 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | VILLANOVA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | @ GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| NOTRE DAME: Any Mike Brey squad can compete, and this year's team has the potential to do way more than that with all five starters returning from a squad that finished third in the conference with a 13-5 record. Jack Cooley (12.5 PPG, 8.9 RPG) is one of the Big East's premier bigs, coming off an uber-efficient campaign in which he made 62.5% of his field goals and swatted 1.6 shots per game. But the backcourt figures to be just as dangerous led by Jerian Grant (12.3 PPG, 5.0 APG) and Eric Atkins (12.1 PPG, 4.1 APG). Both are strong passers and shooters, who should have no problem making this offense flow alongside 6-foot-8 swingman Scott Martin (9.5 PPG, 5.7 RPG). He is a matchup nightmare with a guard's skillset and a forward's body. Throw in some fresh blood with small forward Cameron Biedscheid and power forwards Austin Burgett and Eric Katenda, and this team has no shortage of talent in the frontcourt. | | DEPAUL: The Blue Demons might be able to improve on last year's putrid three conference wins with the return of Cleveland Melvin (17.5 PPG, 7.4 RPG) and Brandon Young (14.5 PPG, 4.7 APG). But this is largely the same nucleus that struggled to compete last year, allowing the most points among Big East teams (76.7 PPG). |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 7:05:34 PM EST. |
|
|