|
|
CINCINNATI CREIGHTON |
|
| 128 | 63 Final 67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament - Second Round - Wells Fargo Center - Philadephia, PA |
|
| | |
825 | CINCINNATI | 126 | 129 | 826 | CREIGHTON | -3 | -2.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 22-11 | +1.7 | 11-18 | 4-15 | 66.6 | 30.9 | 40.2% | 40.0 | 58.8 | 26.5 | 38.5% | 33.5 | Road Games | 9-6 | +3.2 | 9-6 | 3-9 | 62.1 | 28.6 | 39.0% | 38.4 | 60.3 | 28.9 | 40.7% | 34.1 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 1-4 | 0-3 | 55.4 | 26.6 | 36.4% | 37.0 | 56.4 | 28.8 | 38.7% | 33.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.6 | 30.9 | 23-58 | 40.2% | 7-21 | 31.7% | 14-21 | 64.9% | 40 | 12 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.3 | 29.6 | 23-55 | 41.5% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 62.1 | 28.6 | 21-54 | 39.0% | 6-20 | 29.6% | 14-20 | 70.1% | 38 | 12 | 10 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.8 | 26.5 | 21-55 | 38.5% | 5-17 | 30.0% | 12-18 | 65.6% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.1 | 31 | 24-55 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 69.1% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 60.3 | 28.9 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 5-16 | 28.5% | 12-18 | 65.4% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 27-7 | -8.5 | 17-13 | 4-5 | 75.4 | 36.0 | 50.8% | 35.2 | 63.1 | 29.9 | 40.7% | 30.3 | Road Games | 12-5 | +0.6 | 10-6 | 2-4 | 70.6 | 33.1 | 47.6% | 36.1 | 63.0 | 31.4 | 38.6% | 33.2 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 4-0 | 2-0 | 73.6 | 34.4 | 52.5% | 35.8 | 60.4 | 26.2 | 38.3% | 27.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.4 | 36.0 | 27-53 | 50.8% | 9-21 | 42.1% | 13-18 | 75.0% | 35 | 7 | 17 | 16 | 5 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.1 | 30.5 | 23-54 | 42.8% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 14-19 | 71.1% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 70.6 | 33.1 | 25-52 | 47.6% | 8-20 | 39.8% | 13-18 | 73.6% | 36 | 7 | 15 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.1 | 29.9 | 23-58 | 40.7% | 6-19 | 31.3% | 10-15 | 68.1% | 30 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 67.8 | 31.3 | 24-55 | 43.9% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 13-19 | 70.3% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 63.0 | 31.4 | 23-59 | 38.6% | 6-20 | 30.1% | 11-17 | 67.2% | 33 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 9 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CINCINNATI 76.3, CREIGHTON 73.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2/2/2013 | @ SETON HALL | 65-59 | W | -5.5 | W | 127.5 | U | 18-49 | 36.7% | 39 | 13 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 34 | 14 | 2/6/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | 50-54 | L | -4 | L | | - | 18-48 | 37.5% | 38 | 15 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 31 | 10 | 2/9/2013 | PITTSBURGH | 52-62 | L | -1.5 | L | 122 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 33 | 12 | 20-44 | 45.5% | 30 | 7 | 2/12/2013 | VILLANOVA | 68-50 | W | -7.5 | W | | - | 21-53 | 39.6% | 31 | 11 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 36 | 19 | 2/15/2013 | GEORGETOWN | 55-62 | L | -4 | L | 117.5 | U | 17-54 | 31.5% | 37 | 11 | 20-48 | 41.7% | 32 | 10 | 2/21/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 66-73 | L | 0 | L | 128 | O | 26-63 | 41.3% | 44 | 12 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 28 | 6 | 2/24/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 41-62 | L | 2.5 | L | 123.5 | U | 17-54 | 31.5% | 27 | 5 | 22-47 | 46.8% | 43 | 11 | 3/2/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 61-56 | W | -7.5 | L | | - | 20-65 | 30.8% | 41 | 8 | 18-52 | 34.6% | 41 | 15 | 3/4/2013 | @ LOUISVILLE | 51-67 | L | 10.5 | L | 122 | U | 18-51 | 35.3% | 37 | 21 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 31 | 9 | 3/9/2013 | S FLORIDA | 61-53 | W | -12.5 | L | | - | 20-49 | 40.8% | 35 | 15 | 20-49 | 40.8% | 24 | 13 | 3/13/2013 | *PROVIDENCE | 61-44 | W | -3 | W | 123.5 | U | 22-55 | 40.0% | 46 | 10 | 18-64 | 28.1% | 40 | 7 | 3/14/2013 | *GEORGETOWN | 43-62 | L | 3.5 | L | 113 | U | 14-38 | 36.8% | 26 | 15 | 21-48 | 43.7% | 29 | 9 | 3/22/2013 | *CREIGHTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/2/2013 | BRADLEY | 75-58 | W | -17.5 | L | | - | 28-55 | 50.9% | 33 | 10 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 24 | 9 | 2/6/2013 | @ INDIANA ST | 57-76 | L | -5 | L | | - | 20-48 | 41.7% | 30 | 13 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 32 | 5 | 2/9/2013 | ILLINOIS ST | 72-75 | L | -8 | L | 152.5 | U | 25-66 | 37.9% | 48 | 11 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 29 | 6 | 2/13/2013 | @ N IOWA | 54-61 | L | -2 | L | | - | 21-48 | 43.7% | 37 | 18 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 33 | 8 | 2/16/2013 | @ EVANSVILLE | 71-68 | W | -5 | L | 140 | U | 24-46 | 52.2% | 25 | 11 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 37 | 11 | 2/19/2013 | S ILLINOIS | 59-45 | W | -14.5 | L | | - | 20-39 | 51.3% | 31 | 15 | 18-51 | 35.3% | 27 | 12 | 2/23/2013 | @ ST MARYS-CA | 66-74 | L | 5.5 | L | 141.5 | U | 21-51 | 41.2% | 27 | 6 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 39 | 9 | 2/27/2013 | @ BRADLEY | 80-62 | W | -6.5 | W | | - | 27-52 | 51.9% | 41 | 15 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 20 | 12 | 3/2/2013 | WICHITA ST | 91-79 | W | -5 | W | 136.5 | O | 33-47 | 70.2% | 24 | 13 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 21 | 10 | 3/8/2013 | *DRAKE | 65-53 | W | -12 | T | | - | 22-47 | 46.8% | 44 | 17 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 26 | 8 | 3/9/2013 | *INDIANA ST | 64-43 | W | -8.5 | W | | - | 23-43 | 53.5% | 29 | 14 | 13-49 | 26.5% | 28 | 11 | 3/10/2013 | *WICHITA ST | 68-65 | W | -1.5 | W | 132.5 | O | 22-53 | 41.5% | 41 | 9 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 42 | 5 | 3/22/2013 | *CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CINCINNATI: The Bearcats hung around amongst the Big East elite last year, tying for fourth with a 12-6 conference record and reaching the Sweet 16. They bring back their leading scorer Sean Kilpatrick (14.3 PPG, 4.6 RPG), who averaged 2.5 three-pointers per game last year and isn't afraid to shoot the ball. Although the next two leading scorers'Dion Dixon and Yancy Gates'are gone, Cashmere Wright (10.9 PPG, 4.6 APG) is back to give this team a senior presence running the point. If fellow senior JaQuon Parker (9.4 PPG, 5.6 RPG) improves on his play from last season with increased minutes, this will be a nasty backcourt. It remains to be seen, though, if guys like Justin Jackson (5.1 PPG, 4.2 RPG), 6-foot-10 sophomore Kelvin Gaines and freshman Shaquille Thomas can step up in the post for Mick Cronin to make this team compete with the conference's best. |
|
|
Follow Dan Gelston at www.Twitter.com/APGelston
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 9:20:03 AM EST. |
|
|