| | | |
WASHINGTON ST First Half Results COLORADO |
|
| 63 | 31 Final 47 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
639 | WASHINGTON ST | 64 | 640 | COLORADO | -5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 9-9 | +6.5 | 8-9 | 9-3 | 71.4 | 32.7 | 43.3% | 34.3 | 74.7 | 34.7 | 45.8% | 34.8 | Road Games | 4-7 | +6.8 | 4-6 | 4-2 | 65.1 | 27.9 | 41.3% | 33.5 | 75.6 | 36.0 | 45.5% | 36.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +8.4 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 73.6 | 32.2 | 44.7% | 32.8 | 78.0 | 36.0 | 46.9% | 33.6 | Conference Games | 3-3 | +8.4 | 3-2 | 4-2 | 70.7 | 30.8 | 43.2% | 32.8 | 76.8 | 34.5 | 46.8% | 34.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.4 | 32.7 | 24-55 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 35.0% | 16-22 | 72.3% | 34 | 8 | 15 | 18 | 4 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.2 | 29.5 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 14-20 | 68.7% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 65.1 | 27.9 | 22-53 | 41.3% | 6-17 | 33.3% | 16-23 | 68.2% | 33 | 7 | 13 | 18 | 3 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.7 | 34.7 | 28-60 | 45.8% | 7-18 | 37.7% | 13-19 | 69.4% | 35 | 8 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.9 | 32.3 | 24-55 | 44.6% | 7-18 | 36.1% | 14-20 | 69.0% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.6 | 36.0 | 28-61 | 45.5% | 7-18 | 36.6% | 13-18 | 72.4% | 36 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 6 | 9 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 9-9 | -4.6 | 8-8 | 5-10 | 66.3 | 31.9 | 44.2% | 36.0 | 62.4 | 30.1 | 39.9% | 32.2 | Home Games | 8-2 | +1.6 | 6-3 | 3-6 | 73.0 | 36.0 | 47.7% | 38.4 | 59.3 | 29.2 | 37.0% | 31.3 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.2 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 62.2 | 28.2 | 43.2% | 32.4 | 67.4 | 28.2 | 43.7% | 35.2 | Conference Games | 2-4 | -1.2 | 3-2 | 2-4 | 62.2 | 28.2 | 42.4% | 33.8 | 65.5 | 28.0 | 41.2% | 36.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.3 | 31.9 | 23-51 | 44.2% | 6-15 | 37.3% | 15-21 | 72.6% | 36 | 8 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.1 | 30.2 | 23-55 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 13-19 | 68.5% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.0 | 36.0 | 25-52 | 47.7% | 6-15 | 43.9% | 17-22 | 75.9% | 38 | 9 | 14 | 16 | 6 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.4 | 30.1 | 22-56 | 39.9% | 7-21 | 32.6% | 11-16 | 67.7% | 32 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 70.3 | 32.6 | 24-54 | 45.0% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 15-22 | 67.5% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.3 | 29.2 | 22-59 | 37.0% | 7-23 | 28.8% | 9-14 | 65.0% | 31 | 9 | 10 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON ST 72.5, COLORADO 75.7 |
| | |
|
|
12/6/2014 | TX-SAN ANTONIO | 91-71 | W | -8.5 | W | 146 | O | 31-51 | 60.8% | 31 | 20 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 29 | 17 | 12/10/2014 | @ GONZAGA | 66-81 | L | 22.5 | W | 143 | O | 25-48 | 52.1% | 23 | 15 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 36 | 12 | 12/13/2014 | @ SANTA CLARA | 67-76 | L | 4.5 | L | | - | 25-55 | 45.5% | 39 | 13 | 26-51 | 51.0% | 22 | 6 | 12/21/2014 | SAN JOSE ST | 82-53 | W | -22 | W | 124 | O | 31-67 | 46.3% | 45 | 10 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 33 | 14 | 12/28/2014 | CAL DAVIS | 90-83 | W | -4.5 | W | 143 | O | 31-57 | 54.4% | 34 | 19 | 33-59 | 55.9% | 23 | 13 | 1/2/2015 | @ STANFORD | 56-71 | L | 15 | T | 139.5 | U | 14-42 | 33.3% | 33 | 9 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 37 | 6 | 1/4/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 69-66 | W | 9.5 | W | 134.5 | O | 23-55 | 41.8% | 38 | 10 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 34 | 9 | 1/10/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-77 | W | 11.5 | W | 137 | O | 28-61 | 45.9% | 34 | 10 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 31 | 9 | 1/15/2015 | OREGON | 108-99 | W | 3 | W | 147 | O | 33-56 | 58.9% | 35 | 12 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 36 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | OREGON ST | 47-62 | L | -2.5 | L | 132.5 | U | 14-48 | 29.2% | 22 | 10 | 21-43 | 48.8% | 37 | 10 | 1/21/2015 | @ UTAH | 64-86 | L | 18.5 | L | 136 | O | 21-46 | 45.7% | 35 | 17 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 30 | 4 | 1/24/2015 | @ COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2015 | CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | @ OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2015 | @ OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2015 | ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/7/2014 | @ GEORGIA | 57-64 | L | 4.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 21-59 | 35.6% | 37 | 13 | 21-44 | 47.7% | 32 | 14 | 12/10/2014 | COLORADO ST | 60-62 | L | -5.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 21-52 | 40.4% | 40 | 14 | 21-46 | 45.7% | 26 | 9 | 12/13/2014 | N COLORADO | 93-68 | W | -12 | W | 134 | O | 31-49 | 63.3% | 35 | 11 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 24 | 8 | 12/22/2014 | *DEPAUL | 82-68 | W | -9 | W | 143.5 | O | 24-53 | 45.3% | 36 | 12 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 40 | 18 | 12/23/2014 | *GEORGE WASHINGTON | 50-53 | L | 1 | L | 126 | U | 19-52 | 36.5% | 33 | 14 | 17-44 | 38.6% | 32 | 12 | 12/25/2014 | @ HAWAII | 66-69 | L | -4.5 | L | 135 | P | 20-48 | 41.7% | 41 | 16 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 29 | 9 | 1/2/2015 | UCLA | 62-56 | W | -4 | W | 133.5 | U | 18-48 | 37.5% | 41 | 18 | 22-70 | 31.4% | 41 | 13 | 1/4/2015 | USC | 86-65 | W | -11 | W | 128.5 | O | 32-58 | 55.2% | 33 | 10 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 35 | 13 | 1/7/2015 | @ UTAH | 49-74 | L | 10.5 | L | 123.5 | U | 17-43 | 39.5% | 30 | 18 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 8 | 1/15/2015 | @ ARIZONA | 54-68 | L | 16.5 | W | 125 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 26 | 10 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 41 | 8 | 1/17/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | 72-78 | L | 6 | T | 124.5 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 33 | 13 | 26-47 | 55.3% | 28 | 14 | 1/22/2015 | WASHINGTON | 50-52 | L | -1 | L | 129 | U | 19-60 | 31.7% | 40 | 12 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 35 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2015 | @ USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | WASHINGTON ST: The Cougars have a new coach in Ernie Kent, as the program is looking for anything to get things going back on the right track. If there is one positive, Washington State has one of the best players in the conference in SG DaVonte Lacy (19.4 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 39% threes). He is a complete scorer who can get to the rim, but can also catch fire from the outside as well. He was really the only scoring threat last season, and was able to put up those big numbers with defenses focusing on him. The other key WSU player is swingman Que Johnson (9.5 PPG, 2.4 RPG, 35% threes) who quietly had a solid season in the Pac-12 as a freshman. The weak spot on the team will be at the point, where Kent brought in three freshmen (Jackie Davis, Trevor Dunbar and Ny Redding) to compete with sophomore PG Ike Iroegbu (5.5 PPG, 1.5 APG in 18.1 MPG). Washington State also has to find some scoring from the frontcourt if it is going to be able to compete with the top teams in the conference. Forwards Dexter Kernich-Drew (6.3 PPG, 36% threes) and Junior Longrus (3.3 PPG, 3.5 RPG) need to make huge strides for the Cougars this season. | | COLORADO: Tad Boyle has done a terrific job of taking the Buffaloes' program to another level in the Pac-12. The team lost Spence Dinwiddie to the NBA, but still brings back a lot of talent from a team that made the NCAA Tournament. C Josh Scott (14.1 PPG, 8.4 RPG, 1.1 BPG) is a highly-skilled post player who can score over both shoulders. He is not an elite athlete, but he knows how to play the game of basketball. Scott is also a solid passer from the block, kicking it out to teammates like PG Askia Booker (13.3 PPG, 3.7 RPG, 3.3 APG) and SG Xavier Johnson (12.0 PPG, 5.9 RPG, 36% threes). Booker is at his best when scoring off the bounce, while Johnson is better at finding the open spot on the perimeter. The Buffaloes are a deep and experienced team, but they will have to shoot better from behind the three-point arc (32% threes). |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/19/2024 12:02:03 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|