|
|
GEORGIA TECH CLEMSON |
|
| 114.5 | 63 Final 70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
519 | GEORGIA TECH | 114.5 | 114.5 | 520 | CLEMSON | -4 | -5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-16 | -3.4 | 13-12 | 11-10 | 63.7 | 29.9 | 41.3% | 38.1 | 63.7 | 28.1 | 43.4% | 30.9 | Road Games | 4-9 | -1.3 | 6-7 | 9-4 | 63.0 | 29.9 | 41.6% | 36.5 | 67.8 | 29.8 | 46.4% | 32.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -4.6 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 58.0 | 26.0 | 39.7% | 36.0 | 63.0 | 27.8 | 47.0% | 32.4 | Conference Games | 3-13 | -8.1 | 9-6 | 7-9 | 61.4 | 28.7 | 40.2% | 37.1 | 64.7 | 29.3 | 44.2% | 32.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 63.7 | 29.9 | 24-58 | 41.3% | 4-16 | 27.6% | 12-18 | 65.5% | 38 | 12 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.9 | 29.8 | 23-55 | 41.9% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 12-18 | 68.3% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.0 | 29.9 | 24-57 | 41.6% | 4-15 | 29.6% | 11-17 | 68.3% | 36 | 11 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.7 | 28.1 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 5-17 | 31.4% | 12-18 | 68.3% | 31 | 7 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.3 | 32.3 | 24-55 | 44.8% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 14-21 | 67.5% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.8 | 29.8 | 25-53 | 46.4% | 5-17 | 30.8% | 13-20 | 68.5% | 32 | 6 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 15-12 | +0.8 | 12-11 | 4-14 | 62.0 | 30.1 | 41.1% | 36.3 | 60.8 | 26.0 | 39.6% | 34.0 | Home Games | 10-5 | -0.6 | 6-5 | 2-7 | 65.8 | 30.9 | 42.1% | 38.6 | 59.7 | 25.7 | 39.2% | 33.1 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 57.2 | 29.0 | 40.1% | 34.0 | 62.2 | 28.0 | 43.8% | 32.2 | Conference Games | 7-8 | +3 | 8-7 | 3-12 | 58.3 | 27.8 | 38.9% | 35.3 | 60.1 | 25.7 | 40.0% | 34.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 62.0 | 30.1 | 22-54 | 41.1% | 6-19 | 30.0% | 12-19 | 66.1% | 36 | 10 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.6 | 30.7 | 24-56 | 42.4% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 13-19 | 68.5% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 65.8 | 30.9 | 23-55 | 42.1% | 6-21 | 29.1% | 14-21 | 65.9% | 39 | 11 | 12 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.8 | 26.0 | 22-56 | 39.6% | 6-18 | 32.2% | 11-16 | 68.5% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.5 | 32.3 | 25-56 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 14-21 | 68.6% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.7 | 25.7 | 22-56 | 39.2% | 6-18 | 30.9% | 11-16 | 67.8% | 33 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: GEORGIA TECH 77.4, CLEMSON 76.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
1/10/2015 | @ WAKE FOREST | 69-76 | L | 3 | L | 132.5 | O | 28-61 | 45.9% | 29 | 12 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 41 | 17 | 1/14/2015 | NOTRE DAME | 59-62 | L | 4 | W | 135 | U | 21-51 | 41.2% | 33 | 9 | 20-46 | 43.5% | 26 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | @ PITTSBURGH | 65-70 | L | 6 | W | 121 | O | 21-53 | 39.6% | 39 | 15 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 29 | 6 | 1/22/2015 | @ VIRGINIA | 28-57 | L | 17 | L | 116.5 | U | 12-49 | 24.5% | 33 | 10 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 36 | 4 | 1/25/2015 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 62-64 | L | -4.5 | L | 121.5 | O | 21-55 | 38.2% | 35 | 13 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 27 | 12 | 1/28/2015 | @ MIAMI | 70-50 | W | 9.5 | W | 127 | U | 25-44 | 56.8% | 32 | 10 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 29 | 12 | 1/31/2015 | NC STATE | 80-81 | L | 1 | T | 129 | O | 29-73 | 39.7% | 49 | 11 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 31 | 8 | 2/4/2015 | @ DUKE | 66-72 | L | 16.5 | W | 135.5 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 33 | 14 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 40 | 10 | 2/7/2015 | WAKE FOREST | 73-59 | W | -5.5 | W | 133.5 | U | 27-59 | 45.8% | 41 | 10 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 33 | 9 | 2/9/2015 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 63-65 | L | -3 | L | 130.5 | U | 23-61 | 37.7% | 39 | 13 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 27 | 13 | 2/14/2015 | FLORIDA ST | 53-57 | L | -4.5 | L | 127.5 | U | 21-59 | 35.6% | 34 | 11 | 22-48 | 45.8% | 35 | 18 | 2/16/2015 | CLEMSON | 63-52 | W | -2.5 | W | 117.5 | U | 25-54 | 46.3% | 38 | 15 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 29 | 14 | 2/21/2015 | @ N CAROLINA | 60-89 | L | 11 | L | 141.5 | O | 23-60 | 38.3% | 29 | 11 | 38-61 | 62.3% | 37 | 8 | 2/23/2015 | LOUISVILLE | 51-52 | L | 5.5 | W | 123.5 | U | 23-56 | 41.1% | 40 | 14 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 34 | 13 | 2/28/2015 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2015 | N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/10/2015 | @ PITTSBURGH | 71-62 | W | 7 | W | 113.5 | O | 24-51 | 47.1% | 39 | 9 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 22 | 3 | 1/13/2015 | @ VIRGINIA | 42-65 | L | 16.5 | L | 117 | U | 15-42 | 35.7% | 29 | 11 | 25-50 | 50.0% | 27 | 4 | 1/17/2015 | SYRACUSE | 66-53 | W | 1.5 | W | 120.5 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 30 | 9 | 1/19/2015 | FLORIDA ST | 55-59 | L | -4.5 | L | 124.5 | U | 17-50 | 34.0% | 31 | 10 | 22-46 | 47.8% | 32 | 16 | 1/24/2015 | WAKE FOREST | 59-57 | W | -5 | L | 127 | U | 20-57 | 35.1% | 43 | 7 | 19-61 | 31.1% | 45 | 10 | 1/28/2015 | @ NC STATE | 68-57 | W | 8 | W | 128 | U | 25-53 | 47.2% | 37 | 12 | 18-63 | 28.6% | 45 | 11 | 1/31/2015 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 64-49 | W | -5 | W | 118 | U | 22-56 | 39.3% | 37 | 8 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 27 | 13 | 2/4/2015 | @ FLORIDA ST | 62-56 | W | 2 | W | 124.5 | U | 19-47 | 40.4% | 34 | 14 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 37 | 17 | 2/8/2015 | @ MIAMI | 45-56 | L | 6.5 | L | 117 | U | 20-61 | 32.8% | 36 | 10 | 19-48 | 39.6% | 36 | 11 | 2/10/2015 | NOTRE DAME | 58-60 | L | 3.5 | W | 126 | U | 24-56 | 42.9% | 38 | 11 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 26 | 8 | 2/14/2015 | VIRGINIA TECH | 75-54 | W | -9.5 | W | 122 | O | 27-57 | 47.4% | 38 | 8 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 28 | 11 | 2/16/2015 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 52-63 | L | 2.5 | L | 117.5 | U | 20-55 | 36.4% | 29 | 14 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 38 | 15 | 2/21/2015 | @ DUKE | 56-78 | L | 13 | L | 129.5 | O | 22-53 | 41.5% | 29 | 14 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 33 | 11 | 2/28/2015 | GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2015 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| GEORGIA TECH: Junior SF Marcus Georges-Hunt (11.7 PPG, 4.3 RPG, 2.1 APG) is the only returning starter from a team that really struggled last season. Freshman PG Travis Jorgenson (4.3 PPG, 2.5 APG) tore his ACL in the fourth game of the 2013-14 campaign, but is fully healed and will share point guard duties with South Florida transfer Josh Heath. The Yellow Jackets are going to have to get out in transition and get easy baskets, because the team will struggle to score in the half-court. SG Chris Bolden (5.4 PPG) is the second highest-scoring returnee, but he made just 29.8% FG last season. | | CLEMSON: The Tigers return four starters, but the one they don't have, K.J. McDaniels, was the star of the team with more than 17 points and seven boards per game. SG Damarcus Harrison (7.8 PPG, 2.7 RPG) is the leading scorer on the team, and should once again prove to be a key player for this team that won 23 games last season and nearly made the NCAA Tournament. The guy with the most scoring potential on the team is SG Jordan Roper (7.4 PPG in 19.2 MPG). He was a reserve on last season's team, but the junior has the potential to double his scoring this season. The Tigers were a tremendous defensive squad (58.4 PPG allowed, 2nd in ACC), and that helped them make a deep run in the NIT where they lost in the semifinals. Scoring once again may be difficult for Clemson, so the school will have to bring that same type of defensive effort on a nightly basis. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/2/2024 10:40:25 PM EST. |
|
|