|
|
VILLANOVA CINCINNATI |
|
|
| 50 Final 68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
529 | VILLANOVA | +12 | | 530 | CINCINNATI | -4 | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 15-9 | +4 | 15-6 | 7-8 | 69.5 | 33.0 | 41.7% | 37.7 | 65.1 | 28.2 | 39.2% | 33.6 | Road Games | 6-5 | +1.2 | 8-2 | 3-4 | 70.3 | 33.6 | 42.8% | 36.1 | 66.0 | 28.2 | 39.7% | 33.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.7 | 4-1 | 2-2 | 69.8 | 33.0 | 44.7% | 38.8 | 60.4 | 28.0 | 36.9% | 32.2 | Conference Games | 6-5 | +5.9 | 8-3 | 3-3 | 68.3 | 32.3 | 42.2% | 38.1 | 64.0 | 27.4 | 38.2% | 34.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.5 | 33.0 | 22-52 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 34.5% | 19-27 | 71.9% | 38 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.8 | 30.2 | 23-56 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 31.9% | 13-18 | 69.6% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 70.3 | 33.6 | 22-51 | 42.8% | 6-17 | 37.0% | 20-27 | 73.9% | 36 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.1 | 28.2 | 21-54 | 39.2% | 7-20 | 35.2% | 16-23 | 67.2% | 34 | 8 | 13 | 22 | 8 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.5 | 31.4 | 24-56 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 14-20 | 68.4% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 66.0 | 28.2 | 22-54 | 39.7% | 7-20 | 33.8% | 16-24 | 67.6% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 18-6 | +3.6 | 9-11 | 3-10 | 70.5 | 32.5 | 41.6% | 41.5 | 58.7 | 25.2 | 37.8% | 33.5 | Home Games | 10-4 | -2.7 | 1-9 | 1-5 | 73.0 | 34.8 | 42.7% | 42.9 | 58.1 | 23.3 | 36.0% | 33.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2 | 2-3 | 0-3 | 56.8 | 25.0 | 34.9% | 36.6 | 57.2 | 26.4 | 41.9% | 30.0 | Conference Games | 6-5 | +1 | 4-7 | 2-5 | 61.8 | 27.0 | 38.2% | 36.3 | 60.3 | 26.2 | 41.8% | 31.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.5 | 32.5 | 25-59 | 41.6% | 7-22 | 32.3% | 14-22 | 65.5% | 41 | 13 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 65 | 30.3 | 23-55 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.0 | 34.8 | 26-62 | 42.7% | 8-22 | 33.9% | 13-21 | 60.9% | 43 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.7 | 25.2 | 21-56 | 37.8% | 5-17 | 30.3% | 11-18 | 63.1% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.9 | 31.6 | 24-56 | 43.5% | 6-17 | 33.0% | 14-21 | 68.2% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 58.1 | 23.3 | 21-57 | 36.0% | 6-17 | 33.1% | 11-17 | 64.6% | 33 | 8 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VILLANOVA 75.8, CINCINNATI 74 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/28/2012 | NEW JERSEY TECH | 70-60 | W | | - | | - | 20-65 | 30.8% | 41 | 8 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 46 | 19 | 1/2/2013 | ST JOHNS | 98-86 | W | -7.5 | W | 136.5 | O | 27-63 | 42.9% | 47 | 18 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 34 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | 61-53 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 23-55 | 41.8% | 42 | 12 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 32 | 11 | 1/12/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | 61-72 | L | 14 | W | | - | 17-54 | 31.5% | 40 | 16 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 34 | 10 | 1/16/2013 | PITTSBURGH | 43-58 | L | 4.5 | L | 129 | U | 14-44 | 31.8% | 27 | 18 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 39 | 15 | 1/19/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | 66-69 | L | 2.5 | L | | - | 22-49 | 44.9% | 35 | 25 | 19-56 | 33.9% | 41 | 13 | 1/22/2013 | LOUISVILLE | 73-64 | W | 11.5 | W | | - | 22-47 | 46.8% | 34 | 19 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 34 | 17 | 1/26/2013 | SYRACUSE | 75-71 | W | 7 | W | 136.5 | O | 24-57 | 42.1% | 50 | 14 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 41 | 7 | 1/30/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 60-65 | L | 8 | W | 133.5 | U | 21-50 | 42.0% | 34 | 9 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 32 | 6 | 2/3/2013 | PROVIDENCE | 52-55 | L | -6 | L | | - | 14-51 | 27.5% | 38 | 18 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 33 | 21 | 2/5/2013 | @ DEPAUL | 94-71 | W | -3 | W | 145.5 | O | 34-57 | 59.6% | 33 | 13 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 27 | 16 | 2/9/2013 | S FLORIDA | 68-40 | W | -8.5 | W | 123 | U | 22-42 | 52.4% | 39 | 13 | 11-47 | 23.4% | 28 | 10 | 2/12/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2013 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/25/2013 | @ SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2013 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/6/2013 | GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/27/2012 | NEW MEXICO | 54-55 | L | -6 | L | 136.5 | U | 20-64 | 31.2% | 40 | 11 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 35 | 14 | 12/31/2012 | @ PITTSBURGH | 70-61 | W | 6 | W | 125 | O | 21-51 | 41.2% | 37 | 9 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 32 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | ST JOHNS | 52-53 | L | -13.5 | L | 138 | U | 19-60 | 31.7% | 34 | 16 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 40 | 17 | 1/7/2013 | NOTRE DAME | 60-66 | L | -4.5 | L | 132.5 | U | 23-49 | 46.9% | 28 | 9 | 24-48 | 50.0% | 23 | 7 | 1/12/2013 | @ RUTGERS | 68-58 | W | -5 | W | | - | 20-53 | 37.7% | 41 | 6 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 34 | 9 | 1/15/2013 | @ DEPAUL | 75-70 | W | -7 | L | | - | 25-42 | 59.5% | 35 | 19 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 27 | 10 | 1/19/2013 | MARQUETTE | 71-69 | W | -7.5 | L | 128.5 | O | 20-58 | 34.5% | 41 | 12 | 20-62 | 32.3% | 41 | 11 | 1/21/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | 55-57 | L | 8.5 | W | 131.5 | U | 18-55 | 32.7% | 38 | 10 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 28 | 6 | 1/30/2013 | RUTGERS | 62-54 | W | -12 | L | | - | 18-48 | 37.5% | 35 | 17 | 18-48 | 37.5% | 27 | 21 | 2/2/2013 | @ SETON HALL | 65-59 | W | -5.5 | W | 127.5 | U | 18-49 | 36.7% | 39 | 13 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 34 | 14 | 2/6/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | 50-54 | L | -4 | L | | - | 18-48 | 37.5% | 38 | 15 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 31 | 10 | 2/9/2013 | PITTSBURGH | 52-62 | L | -1.5 | L | 122 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 33 | 12 | 20-44 | 45.5% | 30 | 7 | 2/12/2013 | VILLANOVA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2013 | GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/4/2013 | @ LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VILLANOVA: With three returning starters, Jay Wright has veteran talent to mold, but it remains to be seen if that talent is enough to compete in this deep conference. Last year's leading scorers, Maalik Wayns and Dominic Cheek and their combined 30.1 PPG are gone, leaving a huge scoring void in the Wildcats backcourt. C Mouphtaou Yarou (11.3 PPG, 8.2 RPG) is also back, and the pressure will be on that pair to give this team a chance this year. Wright has also done a solid job recruiting with point guard Ryan Arcidiacono and 6-foot-10 PF Daniel Ochefu both talented enough to play meaningful minutes. | | CINCINNATI: The Bearcats hung around amongst the Big East elite last year, tying for fourth with a 12-6 conference record and reaching the Sweet 16. They bring back their leading scorer Sean Kilpatrick (14.3 PPG, 4.6 RPG), who averaged 2.5 three-pointers per game last year and isn't afraid to shoot the ball. Although the next two leading scorers'Dion Dixon and Yancy Gates'are gone, Cashmere Wright (10.9 PPG, 4.6 APG) is back to give this team a senior presence running the point. If fellow senior JaQuon Parker (9.4 PPG, 5.6 RPG) improves on his play from last season with increased minutes, this will be a nasty backcourt. It remains to be seen, though, if guys like Justin Jackson (5.1 PPG, 4.2 RPG), 6-foot-10 sophomore Kelvin Gaines and freshman Shaquille Thomas can step up in the post for Mick Cronin to make this team compete with the conference's best. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 12:15:45 PM EST. |
|
|