|
|
AUBURN ALABAMA |
|
| 132 | 55 Final 57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
643 | AUBURN | 134 | 132 | 644 | ALABAMA | -11 | -10.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-8 | +1.3 | 6-7 | 9-4 | 67.9 | 30.0 | 41.0% | 33.3 | 68.0 | 31.3 | 44.9% | 36.9 | Road Games | 1-6 | -4 | 1-5 | 2-3 | 53.9 | 26.0 | 35.0% | 29.4 | 67.0 | 31.9 | 48.2% | 37.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.8 | 1-3 | 4-1 | 66.8 | 28.2 | 37.6% | 32.4 | 72.8 | 34.0 | 46.4% | 40.8 | Conference Games | 2-3 | -1.8 | 1-3 | 4-1 | 66.8 | 28.2 | 37.6% | 32.4 | 72.8 | 34.0 | 46.4% | 40.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.9 | 30.0 | 23-55 | 41.0% | 7-21 | 32.7% | 16-25 | 63.9% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.6 | 29.3 | 23-55 | 41.4% | 6-19 | 32.3% | 13-20 | 67.6% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 53.9 | 26.0 | 18-52 | 35.0% | 6-21 | 27.0% | 12-19 | 61.4% | 29 | 8 | 8 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.0 | 31.3 | 24-54 | 44.9% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 14-21 | 66.8% | 37 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 7 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.2 | 31.6 | 24-54 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-21 | 68.3% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.0 | 31.9 | 23-47 | 48.2% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 16-24 | 69.3% | 37 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-6 | +0.4 | 9-6 | 8-6 | 70.2 | 32.2 | 45.1% | 32.9 | 64.2 | 30.6 | 41.2% | 33.7 | Home Games | 10-1 | +2 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 69.5 | 34.3 | 45.0% | 35.4 | 59.3 | 29.5 | 38.9% | 33.2 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.6 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 65.2 | 25.6 | 45.8% | 29.6 | 62.6 | 29.4 | 39.0% | 34.4 | Conference Games | 2-3 | -0.6 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 65.2 | 25.6 | 45.8% | 29.6 | 62.6 | 29.4 | 39.0% | 34.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.2 | 32.2 | 23-52 | 45.1% | 6-21 | 31.2% | 17-23 | 73.7% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.7 | 31.1 | 23-55 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 32.9% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.5 | 34.3 | 23-52 | 45.0% | 5-20 | 27.1% | 17-24 | 71.8% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.2 | 30.6 | 22-54 | 41.2% | 6-20 | 32.0% | 14-20 | 67.9% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 14 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 69.3 | 32.1 | 24-56 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 14-21 | 67.0% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.3 | 29.5 | 21-53 | 38.9% | 7-20 | 32.4% | 11-17 | 66.3% | 33 | 10 | 11 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: AUBURN 74.4, ALABAMA 76 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/2014 | COASTAL CAROLINA | 54-58 | L | | - | | - | 17-50 | 34.0% | 32 | 15 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 41 | 13 | 12/14/2014 | @ CLEMSON | 61-72 | L | 7 | L | | - | 21-54 | 38.9% | 30 | 18 | 22-49 | 44.9% | 38 | 17 | 12/17/2014 | WINTHROP | 80-62 | W | -10 | W | 139 | O | 27-61 | 44.3% | 49 | 11 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 47 | 11 | 12/20/2014 | XAVIER | 89-88 | W | 6.5 | W | 147 | O | 33-67 | 49.3% | 37 | 16 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 41 | 16 | 12/23/2014 | TEXAS SOUTHERN | 61-60 | W | | - | | - | 20-56 | 35.7% | 34 | 15 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 37 | 18 | 12/29/2014 | MIDDLE TENN ST | 64-48 | W | -6 | W | 122.5 | U | 22-43 | 51.2% | 28 | 17 | 17-42 | 40.5% | 24 | 24 | 1/3/2015 | N ALABAMA | 82-61 | W | | - | | - | 31-65 | 47.7% | 43 | 13 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 32 | 18 | 1/6/2015 | @ VANDERBILT | 52-64 | L | 7.5 | L | 136 | U | 18-59 | 30.5% | 27 | 9 | 20-46 | 43.5% | 47 | 19 | 1/10/2015 | MISSOURI | 85-79 | W | -6 | T | 129 | O | 25-52 | 48.1% | 31 | 9 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 40 | 14 | 1/15/2015 | @ FLORIDA | 55-75 | L | 15.5 | L | 127.5 | O | 16-49 | 32.7% | 35 | 13 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 39 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | S CAROLINA | 71-68 | W | 2.5 | W | 134.5 | O | 19-52 | 36.5% | 36 | 13 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 34 | 17 | 1/21/2015 | MISSISSIPPI ST | 71-78 | L | -7 | L | 129 | O | 25-62 | 40.3% | 33 | 12 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 44 | 17 | 1/24/2015 | @ ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2015 | TEXAS A&M | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | @ LSU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | OLE MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2015 | ARKANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ GEORGIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/6/2014 | @ XAVIER | 84-97 | L | 7 | L | 150 | O | 28-53 | 52.8% | 22 | 17 | 30-53 | 56.6% | 32 | 13 | 12/13/2014 | TENNESSEE TECH | 65-53 | W | -15.5 | L | | - | 17-39 | 43.6% | 30 | 9 | 18-52 | 34.6% | 35 | 13 | 12/16/2014 | @ WICHITA ST | 52-53 | L | 13.5 | W | 141.5 | U | 20-43 | 46.5% | 28 | 11 | 20-49 | 40.8% | 32 | 10 | 12/19/2014 | STILLMAN | 69-49 | W | | - | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 45 | 16 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 40 | 20 | 12/21/2014 | APPALACHIAN ST | 60-59 | W | -18 | L | 137.5 | U | 23-56 | 41.1% | 38 | 11 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 38 | 13 | 12/28/2014 | UCLA | 56-50 | W | -4.5 | W | 144 | U | 17-51 | 33.3% | 39 | 12 | 16-52 | 30.8% | 40 | 18 | 1/2/2015 | N FLORIDA | 76-61 | W | | - | | - | 28-53 | 52.8% | 35 | 14 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 26 | 15 | 1/6/2015 | TEXAS A&M | 65-44 | W | -5.5 | W | 126 | U | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 8 | 16-52 | 30.8% | 33 | 14 | 1/10/2015 | @ TENNESSEE | 56-38 | W | 3 | W | 123 | U | 20-48 | 41.7% | 34 | 12 | 14-45 | 31.1% | 29 | 13 | 1/13/2015 | @ S CAROLINA | 66-68 | L | 4 | W | 125.5 | O | 20-41 | 48.8% | 23 | 14 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 33 | 13 | 1/17/2015 | KENTUCKY | 48-70 | L | 9.5 | L | 119.5 | U | 20-45 | 44.4% | 21 | 15 | 23-46 | 50.0% | 30 | 10 | 1/22/2015 | @ ARKANSAS | 91-93 | L | 7 | W | 143.5 | O | 28-57 | 49.1% | 34 | 17 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 47 | 10 | 1/24/2015 | AUBURN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2015 | FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ LSU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2015 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| AUBURN: Just having Bruce Pearl in as the new head coach is a big reason to have Auburn fans optimistic for the season. However, a combination of experienced players and transfers make the Tigers an intriguing team in the SEC. Senior SG KT Harrell (18.3 PPG, 4.0 RPG, 2.1 APG) and sophomore PG Tahj Shamsid-Deen (9.5 PPG, 2.9 APG and 1.5 RPG) played well together last season, and should improve with a full summer and offseason to work together. SG Antoine Mason (25.6 PPG last season at Niagara) should come in and give the Tigers a guy capable of taking a game over with his scoring. The frontcourt is very thin though, as sophomore C Matthew Atewe (1.5 PPG, 3.4 RPG in 14.4 MPG) needs to stay out of foul trouble to help this team compete every night. | | ALABAMA: The Crimson Tide have been on the NCAA Tournament bubble the past few seasons, missing out on the tourney each time. However, there is reason for optimism for the team this season, and SG Levi Randolph (9.6 PPG, 3.8 RPG, 35% threes) and SF Shannon Hale (8.8 PPG, 3.6 RPG, 35% threes) are a talented backcourt duo, as both guys are able to score in bunches. They do a great job of keeping pressure on the defense, as they are always looking to push the pace. The backcourt will be a strength of this team, as incoming freshmen like PG Justin Coleman and SG Devin Mitchell have the potential to contribute heavily this season. The Tide will have to figure out how to win outside of Tuscaloosa, as they did not win a road or neutral-site game last season, going 0-15 SU. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/5/2024 9:49:02 PM EST. |
|
|