|
|
MARYLAND ALABAMA |
|
| 128.5 | 58 Final 57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NIT - Quarterfinals |
|
| | |
657 | MARYLAND | 126 | 127 | 658 | ALABAMA | -3.5 | -4 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 24-12 | +3.8 | 16-11 | 9-8 | 71.4 | 33.3 | 46.5% | 40.6 | 64.0 | 29.7 | 38.3% | 31.8 | Road Games | 6-9 | +0.5 | 9-5 | 6-4 | 66.3 | 29.9 | 41.7% | 41.7 | 66.6 | 31.7 | 39.7% | 33.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +6 | 5-0 | 4-1 | 76.4 | 31.6 | 47.6% | 37.4 | 67.4 | 32.6 | 40.7% | 31.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.4 | 33.3 | 26-56 | 46.5% | 6-17 | 33.6% | 13-20 | 68.4% | 41 | 11 | 15 | 17 | 5 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.1 | 31.1 | 24-55 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 13-19 | 69.2% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 66.3 | 29.9 | 24-57 | 41.7% | 5-17 | 30.4% | 14-20 | 67.4% | 42 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 5 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.0 | 29.7 | 23-59 | 38.3% | 6-20 | 30.3% | 12-18 | 70.3% | 32 | 9 | 11 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.7 | 31.8 | 24-55 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 35.1% | 14-20 | 69.4% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 66.6 | 31.7 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 5-20 | 27.5% | 15-22 | 68.9% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 9 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 23-12 | +2.9 | 16-15 | 4-17 | 63.1 | 28.9 | 42.9% | 32.9 | 58.4 | 26.1 | 40.2% | 33.4 | Home Games | 16-3 | +4.6 | 5-10 | 2-8 | 63.8 | 28.9 | 42.1% | 33.7 | 55.2 | 24.6 | 38.7% | 34.1 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 4-1 | 0-4 | 59.6 | 30.2 | 42.4% | 33.4 | 52.8 | 23.4 | 36.4% | 32.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 63.1 | 28.9 | 22-52 | 42.9% | 6-16 | 33.7% | 13-18 | 70.1% | 33 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66 | 30.3 | 23-55 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 63.8 | 28.9 | 22-52 | 42.1% | 5-17 | 29.5% | 15-21 | 70.9% | 34 | 10 | 11 | 15 | 9 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.4 | 26.1 | 21-52 | 40.2% | 5-17 | 30.4% | 12-17 | 69.8% | 33 | 9 | 10 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.8 | 31.4 | 24-55 | 42.9% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 14-20 | 69.0% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 55.2 | 24.6 | 20-52 | 38.7% | 5-17 | 30.5% | 10-14 | 68.8% | 34 | 10 | 9 | 17 | 5 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MARYLAND 74.3, ALABAMA 76.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
2/7/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 60-55 | W | -5 | T | | - | 21-52 | 40.4% | 46 | 15 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 38 | 7 | 2/10/2013 | VIRGINIA | 69-80 | L | -2.5 | L | | - | 27-58 | 46.6% | 29 | 13 | 26-48 | 54.2% | 34 | 16 | 2/16/2013 | DUKE | 83-81 | W | 4 | W | 141.5 | O | 27-45 | 60.0% | 40 | 26 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 20 | 12 | 2/19/2013 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 58-69 | L | -1 | L | | - | 20-56 | 35.7% | 32 | 12 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 37 | 8 | 2/23/2013 | CLEMSON | 72-59 | W | -6 | W | 126 | O | 30-63 | 47.6% | 39 | 8 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 29 | 11 | 2/27/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 68-78 | L | 0 | L | | - | 27-63 | 42.9% | 32 | 14 | 26-51 | 51.0% | 34 | 13 | 3/2/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | 67-57 | W | -2.5 | W | | - | 28-59 | 47.5% | 41 | 19 | 16-49 | 32.7% | 30 | 18 | 3/6/2013 | N CAROLINA | 68-79 | L | 0 | L | 148 | U | 27-63 | 42.9% | 34 | 14 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 12 | 3/10/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | 58-61 | L | 8.5 | W | 122.5 | U | 20-61 | 32.8% | 44 | 12 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 40 | 8 | 3/14/2013 | *WAKE FOREST | 75-62 | W | -6 | W | 134.5 | O | 23-48 | 47.9% | 35 | 13 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 31 | 14 | 3/15/2013 | *DUKE | 83-74 | W | 10.5 | W | 140 | O | 26-51 | 51.0% | 38 | 14 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 28 | 6 | 3/16/2013 | *N CAROLINA | 76-79 | L | 4.5 | W | 142 | O | 25-61 | 41.0% | 40 | 10 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 36 | 7 | 3/19/2013 | NIAGARA | 86-70 | W | -10 | W | 149.5 | O | 31-59 | 52.5% | 42 | 17 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 32 | 11 | 3/21/2013 | DENVER | 62-52 | W | -4.5 | W | 130 | U | 22-48 | 45.8% | 32 | 13 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 30 | 14 | 3/26/2013 | @ ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/6/2013 | @ AUBURN | 37-49 | L | -3.5 | L | | - | 14-49 | 28.6% | 30 | 16 | 15-44 | 34.1% | 35 | 14 | 2/9/2013 | LSU | 60-57 | W | -8.5 | L | 122.5 | U | 19-54 | 35.2% | 43 | 10 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 36 | 12 | 2/12/2013 | @ GEORGIA | 52-45 | W | -1.5 | W | 111 | U | 19-49 | 38.8% | 33 | 9 | 16-52 | 30.8% | 41 | 11 | 2/16/2013 | S CAROLINA | 68-58 | W | -12 | L | | - | 22-47 | 46.8% | 31 | 12 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 34 | 20 | 2/20/2013 | MISSISSIPPI ST | 64-56 | W | -15 | L | | - | 20-51 | 39.2% | 31 | 14 | 20-48 | 41.7% | 33 | 23 | 2/23/2013 | @ LSU | 94-97 | L | 1.5 | L | | - | 35-76 | 46.1% | 38 | 13 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 47 | 16 | 2/26/2013 | AUBURN | 61-43 | W | -11.5 | W | 120.5 | U | 22-56 | 39.3% | 41 | 11 | 15-50 | 30.0% | 31 | 15 | 3/2/2013 | @ FLORIDA | 52-64 | L | 15.5 | W | 119.5 | U | 22-55 | 40.0% | 31 | 11 | 20-45 | 44.4% | 33 | 10 | 3/5/2013 | @ OLE MISS | 83-87 | L | 5.5 | W | 134 | O | 29-66 | 43.9% | 41 | 17 | 27-49 | 55.1% | 25 | 9 | 3/9/2013 | GEORGIA | 61-58 | W | -7.5 | L | | - | 20-48 | 41.7% | 28 | 12 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 34 | 16 | 3/15/2013 | *TENNESSEE | 58-48 | W | 1.5 | W | 118 | U | 19-46 | 41.3% | 35 | 10 | 18-56 | 32.1% | 37 | 10 | 3/16/2013 | *FLORIDA | 51-61 | L | 11.5 | W | 117 | U | 19-42 | 45.2% | 28 | 12 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 29 | 4 | 3/19/2013 | NORTHEASTERN | 62-43 | W | -11 | W | 129 | U | 25-55 | 45.5% | 37 | 12 | 15-45 | 33.3% | 27 | 15 | 3/23/2013 | STANFORD | 66-54 | W | -4.5 | W | 128.5 | U | 20-52 | 38.5% | 39 | 12 | 18-58 | 31.0% | 36 | 14 | 3/26/2013 | MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MARYLAND: In Mark Turgeon's first season with the Terrapins, he guided the team to a 6-10 ACC record. Now he will need to find a way to compete without the only dangerous player from last year's squad Terrell Stoglin, who scored 21.6 PPG. Sophomore guard Nick Faust (8.9 PPG) will need to take over the scoring onus, while Pe'Shon Howard (3.7 APG) resumes his role as starting point guard after missing half of 2011-12 with a knee injury. Highly-rated freshman Shaquille Cleare should give the team a much-needed post presence along with 7-foot-1 Alex Len (5.4 RPG) and 6-foot-8 James Padgett (8.8 PPG, 5.6 RPG). | | ALABAMA: The Crimson Tide made waves when they secured one of the nation's top recruits in 6-foot-7 Devonta Pollard who from the season's first game will be a threat on the open floor. Minutes won't be easy to come by on this team, however, with four starters returning. But Pollard's scoring presence will be critical on a team that will sorely miss JaMychal Green and Tony Mitchell's combined 27.1 PPG,14.4 RPG and 2.9 BPG from last season. The team still features Trevor Releford (12.0 PPG), however, who is not the best shooter (27% 3-pt FG). He is, however, a menace defensively with 2.0 SPG last year. He and senior Andrew Steele (6.6 PPG, 3.9 RPG, 2.7 APG) will form a solid backcourt, but the question is who will step up on the block. They possess two 7-footers in Carl Engstrom and Moussa Gueye, but neither has proven to be a force on the college level. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 9/28/2024 6:58:43 PM EST. |
|
|