| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
DALLAS |
|
|
156
| 85
Final
67 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 619 | CONNECTICUT | -270 | | 620 | DALLAS | +210 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off 3 consecutive losses against division rivals, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(59-38 since 1997.) (60.8%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival.
(23-10 since 1997.) (69.7%, +21 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(55-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest.
(55-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +22 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(61-81 over the last 5 seasons.) (43%, +45.6 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(45-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.2%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(46-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival.
(259-175 since 1997.) (59.7%, +76.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(47-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +34.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(159-133 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +62.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(296-231 since 1997.) (56.2%, +67.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(228-179 since 1997.) (56%, +66.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(126-85 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.7%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(127-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(149-54 since 1997.) (73.4%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a home loss against a division rival.
(106-26 since 1997.) (80.3%, +51.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(126-92 since 1997.) (57.8%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses.
(115-57 since 1997.) (66.9%, +48 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(80-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +41.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(21-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +16.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a win against a division rival, playing with 2 days rest.
(103-37 since 1997.) (73.6%, +45.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, on Saturday games.
(87-26 since 1997.) (77%, +38.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(52-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.5%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season, on Saturday games.
(49-8 since 1997.) (86%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(67-29 since 1997.) (69.8%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(61-40 since 1997.) (60.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(58-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(24-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +16.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(111-110 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.2%, +53.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(69-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.6%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(72-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (72%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(41-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.4%, +29.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(32-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(118-110 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.8%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(112-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.6%, +42.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after 4 straight games allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(41-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(141-136 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.9%, +57.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(100-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(63-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(77-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.7%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 84 | | 32-70 | 45.3% | 7-20 | 35.9% | 14-18 | 76.0% | 41 | 10 | 13 | | DALLAS | 83 | | 32-70 | 45.6% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 13-16 | 81.1% | 45 | 11 | 16 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CONNECTICUT won the game straight up 513 times, while DALLAS won 455 times.
Edge against the money line=DALLAS |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 70.6 | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 77.4 | CONNECTICUT is 100-59 against the money line (+46.3 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 75.4 | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 79.7 | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.3, OPPONENT 70.9 | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 76.1 | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.0, OPPONENT 76.9 | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 77.4 | CONNECTICUT is 17-3 against the money line (+15.3 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 78.6 | CONNECTICUT is 14-2 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 79.8 | CONNECTICUT is 18-5 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 74.7 | DALLAS is 24-28 against the money line (-20.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.8, OPPONENT 85.6 | DALLAS is 28-57 against the money line (-34.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 85.5 | DALLAS is 1-6 against the money line (-6.1 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was DALLAS 78.4, OPPONENT 86.3 | DALLAS is 10-16 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 85.3 | DALLAS is 14-25 against the money line (-27.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.6, OPPONENT 90.2 | DALLAS is 8-22 against the money line (-31.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 89.5, OPPONENT 93.2 | DALLAS is 7-10 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 87.3 | DALLAS is 22-27 against the money line (-20.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.4, OPPONENT 87.0 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 61-81 against the money line (-69.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 80.6 | CONNECTICUT is 10-17 against the money line (-28.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 86.9 | CONNECTICUT is 4-14 against the money line (-28.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 90.0 | DALLAS is 16-10 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.8, OPPONENT 84.4 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 110-64 against the money line (+34.7 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-14 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-14 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-14 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-14 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-13 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-14 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 69-40 against the money line (+26.6 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-4 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-14 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 28-13 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-14 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-5 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 9-13 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 20-25 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 20-25 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 20-24 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 19-25 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 20-24 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.8, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-18 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 6*) | DALLAS is 20-25 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 19-23 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-20 against the money line (-24.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 28-27 against the money line (-22.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-17 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in all games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in road games in June games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-1 against the money line (+17.6 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 7*) | CONNECTICUT is 189-118 against the money line (+38.0 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 189-118 against the money line (+38.0 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 40-18 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-2 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after 3 straight games where opponent grabbed 35 or less rebounds since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in road games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-3 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-2 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-12 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-10 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-10 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-9 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-8 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-7 against the money line (+16.1 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 26-29 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-14 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-14 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-14 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 4-12 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in June games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 12-16 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in home games on Saturday games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-12 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 16-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 24-31 against the money line (-19.5 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 2-6 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in home games after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 88.3, OPPONENT 91.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 3-7 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in home games after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-10 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 3-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in home games after 4 straight games allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 2-5 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in home games after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-17 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-9 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 88.4, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-12 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in home games in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 15-17 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 9-15 against the money line (-13.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 23-33 against the money line (-26.2 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 34-50 against the money line (-32.5 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 88-129 against the money line (-52.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 78-112 against the money line (-47.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 14-20 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 11-19 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 10-13 against the money line (-13.6 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.0, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 79-108 against the money line (-43.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 49-75 against the money line (-42.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 40-61 against the money line (-32.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 48-70 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-11 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 73-105 against the money line (-46.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 58-87 against the money line (-49.5 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 46-72 against the money line (-47.1 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 22-27 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 22-24 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 21-23 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 19-22 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 77-103 against the money line (-45.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-12 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 18-20 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.9, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 58-83 against the money line (-39.6 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 86-120 against the money line (-52.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 64-95 against the money line (-43.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 63-91 against the money line (-42.9 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-15 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 11-15 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 17-36 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-13 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 23-38 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-16 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 18-28 against the money line (-23.1 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-18 against the money line (-24.1 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 7-8 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-8 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-6 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-11 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-17 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-8 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-26 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in road games off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 27-18 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-23 against the money line (-24.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-10 against the money line (-26.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 11*) | DALLAS is 14-9 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 11-1 | +10 | 6-6 | 7-5 | 80.7 | 40.7 | 44.0% | 43.6 | 71.1 | 36.2 | 42.4% | 38.2 | | Road Games | 4-0 | +4 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 81.5 | 40.5 | 44.2% | 45.5 | 72.7 | 39.7 | 41.9% | 36.2 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 78.4 | 41.0 | 44.2% | 45.8 | 67.6 | 34.4 | 39.5% | 36.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.7 | 40.7 | 29-66 | 44.0% | 5-17 | 29.7% | 17-23 | 76.3% | 44 | 9 | 19 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.1 | 41.8 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 8-23 | 33.5% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.5 | 40.5 | 29-66 | 44.2% | 5-17 | 27.9% | 18-23 | 79.3% | 45 | 11 | 19 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.1 | 36.2 | 26-62 | 42.4% | 6-21 | 30.0% | 12-16 | 77.7% | 38 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 79.8 | 40.2 | 29-68 | 42.5% | 8-23 | 33.6% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.7 | 39.7 | 27-64 | 41.9% | 6-16 | 34.8% | 13-15 | 83.9% | 36 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 3-8 | -5.6 | 5-6 | 7-4 | 82.3 | 41.9 | 44.3% | 45.3 | 86.0 | 39.7 | 44.3% | 42.2 | | Home Games | 1-4 | -3.8 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 83.2 | 39.2 | 42.7% | 45.2 | 89.2 | 40.6 | 45.0% | 44.6 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5.8 | 0-5 | 4-1 | 80.6 | 39.2 | 43.7% | 43.6 | 90.4 | 41.4 | 47.8% | 39.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.3 | 41.9 | 32-71 | 44.3% | 5-17 | 29.6% | 14-17 | 84.6% | 45 | 11 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 17 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81 | 40.8 | 29-69 | 42.6% | 8-23 | 33.4% | 15-18 | 80.5% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.2 | 39.2 | 31-73 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 30.9% | 15-17 | 87.2% | 45 | 12 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 19 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 86.0 | 39.7 | 32-72 | 44.3% | 7-22 | 30.9% | 15-20 | 75.9% | 42 | 11 | 22 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 81 | 39.9 | 29-68 | 42.5% | 7-22 | 33.2% | 16-20 | 78.6% | 44 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 89.2 | 40.6 | 34-75 | 45.0% | 7-24 | 28.6% | 15-20 | 76.0% | 45 | 12 | 22 | 19 | 11 | 14 | 6 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 69, DALLAS 70.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/14/2024 | INDIANA | 92-71 | W | -270 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 39 | 15 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 25 | | 5/17/2024 | WASHINGTON | 84-77 | W | -360 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 37 | 10 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 36 | 20 | | 5/20/2024 | @ INDIANA | 88-84 | W | -200 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 8 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 44 | 17 | | 5/23/2024 | MINNESOTA | 83-82 | W | -250 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 40 | 16 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 17 | | 5/25/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 86-82 | W | -200 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 47 | 17 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 28 | 11 | | 5/28/2024 | PHOENIX | 70-47 | W | -360 | 27-77 | 35.1% | 52 | 9 | 15-63 | 23.8% | 59 | 20 | | 5/31/2024 | DALLAS | 74-72 | W | -400 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | | 6/2/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 69-50 | W | -140 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 54 | 15 | 19-67 | 28.4% | 41 | 12 | | 6/4/2024 | WASHINGTON | 76-59 | W | -1050 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 45 | 12 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 42 | 16 | | 6/8/2024 | NEW YORK | 75-82 | L | +120 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 44 | 13 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 33 | 11 | | 6/10/2024 | INDIANA | 89-72 | W | -550 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 48 | 10 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 33 | 11 | | 6/12/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 83-75 | W | -330 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 38 | 14 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 32 | 17 | | 6/15/2024 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/18/2024 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/21/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2024 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/15/2024 | CHICAGO | 87-79 | W | -330 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 49 | 15 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 54 | 12 | | 5/18/2024 | CHICAGO | 74-83 | L | -175 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 48 | 25 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 50 | 17 | | 5/21/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 78-83 | L | +210 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 14 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 47 | 12 | | 5/25/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 107-92 | W | +155 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 47 | 18 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 36 | 19 | | 5/26/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 84-83 | W | +145 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 54 | 6 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 46 | 8 | | 5/31/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 72-74 | L | +300 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 10 | | 6/2/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-87 | L | +210 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 47 | 25 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 31 | 15 | | 6/5/2024 | LAS VEGAS | 81-95 | L | +325 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 46 | 13 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 40 | 12 | | 6/7/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-81 | L | -175 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 42 | 14 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 45 | 14 | | 6/9/2024 | PHOENIX | 90-97 | L | -105 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 47 | 21 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 46 | 20 | | 6/13/2024 | SEATTLE | 84-92 | L | +200 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 36 | 19 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 33 | 11 | | 6/15/2024 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/17/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/20/2024 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| DALLAS is 38-46 (-1.9 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 5-6 (+5.5 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| DALLAS is 21-19 (-4.9 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 2-2 (+0.0 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
08/18/2023 | DALLAS | 95 | 169 | SU ATS | 46 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 49 | 16 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 75 | -4.5 | Over | 40 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 46 | 16 | 12 | 08/12/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 81 | 168.5 | Over | 43 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 41 | 9 | 12 | | | DALLAS | 91 | -3 | SU ATS | 52 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 25-27 | 92.6% | 42 | 7 | 12 | 07/25/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 88 | 168 | SU ATS | 40 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 7-24 | 29.2% | 23-26 | 88.5% | 39 | 8 | 7 | | | DALLAS | 83 | -4 | Over | 42 | 31-76 | 40.8% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 52 | 18 | 9 | 06/04/2023 | DALLAS | 74 | 165.5 | ATS | 30 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 36 | 11 | 17 | | | CONNECTICUT | 80 | -6.5 | SU Under | 44 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 19-23 | 82.6% | 45 | 6 | 17 | 05/31/2024 | DALLAS | 72 | 161.5 | ATS | 34 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 2-4 | 50.0% | 37 | 7 | 14 | | | CONNECTICUT | 74 | -8.5 | SU Under | 40 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 14-24 | 58.3% | 36 | 9 | 10 |
|
| | |
|
White is 11-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 20-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 20-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 20-7 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 14-4 against the money line (+13.9 Units) in road games in June games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 81.2, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 14-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 18-1 against the money line (+17.6 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 7*) | White is 22-14 against the money line (+13.9 Units) in road games after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 27-17 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 81.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 17-9 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 14-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 11-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 12-4 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 9-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 75.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 14-3 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 22-10 against the money line (+16.0 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 11-3 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 12-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 17-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 23-13 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 11-3 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 18-7 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 16-6 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 81.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 14-5 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 10-2 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 16-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 20-11 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in road games after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 22-15 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 16-5 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 15-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 10-5 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in road games after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 74.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 23-6 against the money line (+16.5 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 3*) | White is 25-11 against the money line (+16.1 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 25-13 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 24-14 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 35-22 against the money line (+21.1 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 31-19 against the money line (+19.4 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 17-9 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 29-18 against the money line (+15.9 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 35-20 against the money line (+21.1 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 8-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 32-15 against the money line (+21.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 28-13 against the money line (+17.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 31-20 against the money line (+17.6 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 15-5 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 26-29 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in all games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 13-14 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in home games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 13-14 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 13-14 against the money line (-16.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 4-12 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in June games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 16-19 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 2-6 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in home games after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 88.3, OPPONENT 91.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 6-10 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 13-17 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 5-9 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 88.4, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 15-17 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 9-15 against the money line (-13.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 14-20 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 11-19 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 10-13 against the money line (-13.6 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.0, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 8-11 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 22-27 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.3, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 22-24 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 21-23 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 19-22 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 10-12 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 18-20 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.9, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 9-15 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 11-15 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 8-13 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 10-16 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 20-25 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 20-25 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 20-24 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 19-25 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 20-24 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.8, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 5-18 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 6*) | Trammell is 20-25 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 19-23 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 12-20 against the money line (-24.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
White is 15-17 against the money line (-18.4 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 7-8 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-8 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 2-6 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.9, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 6*) | White is 15-11 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 1-5 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 4*) | White is 39-37 against the money line (-27.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 21-22 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 8-10 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 4*) | White is 3-10 against the money line (-26.0 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 11*) | White is 14-12 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 22-17 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 65 times, while the home underdog won straight up 25 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 11 times, while the home underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 9/8/2024 1:28:39 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|