| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS
WASHINGTON |
|
|
160
| 69
Final
97 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 621 | DALLAS | -115 | | 622 | WASHINGTON | -105 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(43-21 since 1997.) (67.2%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(80-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.7%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(230-180 since 1997.) (56.1%, +67.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(150-54 since 1997.) (73.5%, +54.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(53-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.1%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(58-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.7%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(51-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.7%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(51-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.3%, +36.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(138-92 since 1997.) (60%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(169-124 since 1997.) (57.7%, +44 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - playing with 2 days rest, with a losing record.
(59-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(120-86 since 1997.) (58.3%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(64-40 since 1997.) (61.5%, +23.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(94-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (74%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(89-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.9%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(37-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor pressure defensive team - forcing <=14 turnovers/game, in June games.
(64-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.2%, +26.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(53-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(68-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +41 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
| DALLAS | 80 | | 31-69 | 44.6% | 5-18 | 29.9% | 14-17 | 80.4% | 45 | 11 | 16 | | WASHINGTON | 83 | | 30-70 | 43.6% | 9-27 | 34.8% | 13-16 | 79.5% | 41 | 10 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 545 times, while DALLAS won 426 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 16-10 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 84.6 | DALLAS is 19-7 against the money line (+12.7 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.5, OPPONENT 79.7 | DALLAS is 11-6 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 80.8 | DALLAS is 19-12 against the money line (+17.7 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 90.5, OPPONENT 86.3 | WASHINGTON is 31-43 against the money line (-24.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 80.0 | WASHINGTON is 10-16 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 78.9 | WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 84.8 | WASHINGTON is 5-13 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 80.6 | WASHINGTON is 4-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 83.9 | WASHINGTON is 70-77 against the money line (-37.5 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 80.8 | WASHINGTON is 4-15 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 83.5 | WASHINGTON is 4-11 against the money line (-17.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 80.4 | WASHINGTON is 6-29 against the money line (-27.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 88.1 | WASHINGTON is 4-13 against the money line (-9.9 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 84.7 | WASHINGTON is 11-26 against the money line (-18.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.6, OPPONENT 86.1 | WASHINGTON is 20-26 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 79.6 |
|
DALLAS is 24-29 against the money line (-21.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 85.7 | DALLAS is 28-58 against the money line (-35.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 85.5 | DALLAS is 1-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was DALLAS 76.4, OPPONENT 85.8 | DALLAS is 10-17 against the money line (-13.2 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 85.4 | DALLAS is 14-27 against the money line (-29.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 89.9 | DALLAS is 8-24 against the money line (-33.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 88.0, OPPONENT 92.6 | DALLAS is 7-10 against the money line (-11.7 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 87.4 | DALLAS is 22-28 against the money line (-21.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.9, OPPONENT 87.0 | WASHINGTON is 33-22 against the money line (+13.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.3, OPPONENT 81.5 | WASHINGTON is 25-14 against the money line (+14.3 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 87.6, OPPONENT 83.4 |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 15-10 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-10 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 26-23 against the money line (-21.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 30-39 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 103-99 against the money line (-43.7 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 76-120 against the money line (-47.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 230-302 against the money line (-97.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 304-408 against the money line (-128.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-26 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 40-65 against the money line (-28.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 13-16 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 55-75 against the money line (-40.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-26 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 56-81 against the money line (-43.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-26 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 20-26 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 61-89 against the money line (-48.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 19-27 against the money line (-24.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 53-79 against the money line (-45.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 16-23 against the money line (-22.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 61-87 against the money line (-46.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-26 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 29-33 against the money line (-42.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 9-8 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 88.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 63-88 against the money line (-45.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-26 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 19-24 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 31-20 against the money line (-27.7 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 88.3, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 60-89 against the money line (-48.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 20-27 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 13-11 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in road games against Eastern conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 13-11 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in road games in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-16 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 24-36 against the money line (-27.8 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 42-50 against the money line (-23.3 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 222-218 against the money line (-86.0 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 171-163 against the money line (-57.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 14-25 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 85-118 against the money line (-54.5 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 147-209 against the money line (-70.8 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 226-306 against the money line (-110.3 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 139-203 against the money line (-73.8 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 89-139 against the money line (-61.4 Units) after 3 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-13 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-30 against the money line (-22.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 147-209 against the money line (-70.8 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 14-23 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-26 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in home games after having lost 12 or more of their last 15 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 17-22 against the money line (-25.8 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 70-111 against the money line (-64.7 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 91-133 against the money line (-72.4 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 35-62 against the money line (-57.8 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 113-178 against the money line (-60.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 65-93 against the money line (-37.4 Units) off a road loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 107-169 against the money line (-65.0 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-16 against the money line (-23.4 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 5*) | WASHINGTON is 22-30 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-25 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 68-76 against the money line (-38.0 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 69-76 against the money line (-40.4 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-10 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 32-37 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 29-32 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-26 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 21-25 against the money line (-24.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 17-28 against the money line (-25.8 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 13-25 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-28 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-14 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 7-14 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-10 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 18-28 against the money line (-27.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 8-14 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 26-35 against the money line (-24.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-18 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-32 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 11-20 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 189-312 against the money line (-111.9 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 109-190 against the money line (-68.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 25-69 against the money line (-34.6 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 136-206 against the money line (-71.5 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 22-25 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after playing a road game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 112-123 against the money line (-46.6 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 26-31 against the money line (-21.3 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 65-45 against the money line (-42.4 Units) as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 4-14 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in June games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 11-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 88.2, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 16-21 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 33-55 against the money line (-25.9 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 13-18 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.6, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 48-72 against the money line (-30.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 6-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 19-26 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 18-22 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 14-22 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 11-21 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 2-9 against the money line (-7.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 79-110 against the money line (-45.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 49-77 against the money line (-44.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 40-63 against the money line (-34.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-20 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 48-72 against the money line (-33.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 32-51 against the money line (-25.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 3-7 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-10 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 73-106 against the money line (-47.0 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 22-28 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 58-85 against the money line (-41.6 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 86.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 86-122 against the money line (-54.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 64-96 against the money line (-44.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 6-8 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 8-14 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 10-18 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-21 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after 4 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-38 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 3-11 | -7.6 | 6-8 | 8-6 | 80.1 | 39.9 | 43.6% | 44.1 | 86.0 | 40.4 | 44.5% | 42.1 | | Road Games | 2-6 | -2.8 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 79.9 | 41.1 | 44.7% | 44.5 | 84.1 | 39.9 | 44.1% | 40.1 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 78.2 | 33.8 | 43.6% | 40.6 | 89.4 | 42.2 | 46.9% | 41.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.1 | 39.9 | 31-70 | 43.6% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 14-16 | 83.8% | 44 | 11 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 79.7 | 39.9 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 7-23 | 32.7% | 14-18 | 80.0% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 5 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.9 | 41.1 | 31-70 | 44.7% | 5-17 | 31.1% | 12-15 | 81.5% | 44 | 11 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 86.0 | 40.4 | 32-71 | 44.5% | 7-21 | 31.2% | 16-20 | 78.7% | 42 | 10 | 22 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 40.2 | 29-68 | 43.1% | 7-21 | 33.7% | 15-19 | 78.7% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.1 | 39.9 | 31-70 | 44.1% | 6-20 | 32.9% | 16-20 | 79.4% | 40 | 10 | 22 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 2-13 | -8.6 | 9-6 | 8-7 | 76.5 | 39.9 | 41.5% | 39.3 | 82.7 | 39.7 | 45.1% | 43.4 | | Home Games | 1-5 | -3.6 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 76.5 | 40.3 | 40.8% | 42.7 | 81.2 | 38.3 | 43.0% | 46.0 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1.5 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 84.4 | 42.6 | 45.0% | 39.4 | 83.0 | 40.4 | 44.9% | 41.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 76.5 | 39.9 | 28-67 | 41.5% | 9-27 | 34.2% | 12-15 | 76.8% | 39 | 8 | 21 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80 | 40.6 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 8-23 | 33.6% | 14-18 | 79.8% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.5 | 40.3 | 28-69 | 40.8% | 8-28 | 30.1% | 12-16 | 73.2% | 43 | 8 | 21 | 21 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.7 | 39.7 | 29-64 | 45.1% | 8-23 | 33.7% | 17-22 | 77.6% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 20 | 9 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 40.6 | 29-68 | 43.1% | 7-22 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 81.2 | 38.3 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 7-22 | 30.5% | 16-21 | 76.7% | 46 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 10 | 16 | 2 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 71.6, WASHINGTON 71.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/15/2024 | CHICAGO | 87-79 | W | -330 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 49 | 15 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 54 | 12 | | 5/18/2024 | CHICAGO | 74-83 | L | -175 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 48 | 25 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 50 | 17 | | 5/21/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 78-83 | L | +210 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 14 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 47 | 12 | | 5/25/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 107-92 | W | +155 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 47 | 18 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 36 | 19 | | 5/26/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 84-83 | W | +145 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 54 | 6 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 46 | 8 | | 5/31/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 72-74 | L | +300 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 36 | 10 | | 6/2/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-87 | L | +210 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 47 | 25 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 31 | 15 | | 6/5/2024 | LAS VEGAS | 81-95 | L | +325 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 46 | 13 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 40 | 12 | | 6/7/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-81 | L | -175 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 42 | 14 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 45 | 14 | | 6/9/2024 | PHOENIX | 90-97 | L | -105 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 47 | 21 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 46 | 20 | | 6/13/2024 | SEATTLE | 84-92 | L | +200 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 36 | 19 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 33 | 11 | | 6/15/2024 | CONNECTICUT | 67-85 | L | +210 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 11 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 46 | 7 | | 6/17/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-90 | L | | 35-73 | 47.9% | 44 | 16 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 34 | 7 | | 6/20/2024 | @ CHICAGO | 72-83 | L | +200 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 40 | 15 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 46 | 13 | | 6/22/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2024 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2024 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2024 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2024 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2024 | NEW YORK | 80-85 | L | +450 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 43 | 12 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 45 | 18 | | 5/17/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-84 | L | +280 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 36 | 20 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 37 | 10 | | 5/19/2024 | SEATTLE | 75-84 | L | +170 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 16 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 52 | 20 | | 5/21/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | 68-70 | L | +120 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 32 | 18 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 44 | 24 | | 5/23/2024 | @ PHOENIX | 80-83 | L | +220 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 42 | 17 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 41 | 16 | | 5/25/2024 | @ SEATTLE | 69-101 | L | +300 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 33 | 14 | 37-60 | 61.7% | 40 | 16 | | 5/29/2024 | ATLANTA | 67-73 | L | +120 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 38 | 13 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 51 | 17 | | 5/31/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 79-90 | L | +650 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 41 | 14 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 40 | 14 | | 6/4/2024 | @ CONNECTICUT | 59-76 | L | +650 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 42 | 16 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 45 | 12 | | 6/6/2024 | CHICAGO | 71-79 | L | +135 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 48 | 24 | 30-79 | 38.0% | 49 | 13 | | 6/7/2024 | INDIANA | 83-85 | L | +155 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 47 | 15 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 37 | 15 | | 6/9/2024 | @ NEW YORK | 88-93 | L | | 33-67 | 49.3% | 26 | 12 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 45 | 21 | | 6/11/2024 | @ ATLANTA | 87-68 | W | +210 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 45 | 11 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 41 | 8 | | 6/14/2024 | CHICAGO | 83-81 | W | +135 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 42 | 18 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 42 | 14 | | 6/19/2024 | @ INDIANA | 81-88 | L | +175 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 37 | 11 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 42 | 10 | | 6/22/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2024 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2024 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2024 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2024 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/4/2024 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2024 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 38-39 (-1.1 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 4-3 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| DALLAS is 18-20 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| DALLAS is 2-1 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
08/20/2023 | DALLAS | 97 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 56 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 46 | 8 | 18 | | | WASHINGTON | 84 | 166.5 | Over | 46 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 12-29 | 41.4% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 38 | 7 | 15 | 07/28/2023 | WASHINGTON | 62 | 165.5 | Under | 29 | 25-73 | 34.2% | 5-26 | 19.2% | 7-12 | 58.3% | 24 | 7 | 8 | | | DALLAS | 90 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 37-63 | 58.7% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 56 | 6 | 20 | 07/02/2023 | WASHINGTON | 72 | 161.5 | Under | 33 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 4-25 | 16.0% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 33 | 5 | 9 | | | DALLAS | 89 | -6 | SU ATS | 37 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 17-23 | 73.9% | 65 | 15 | 18 | 06/02/2023 | DALLAS | 74 | 168 | ATS | 30 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 9-32 | 28.1% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 49 | 11 | 10 | | | WASHINGTON | 75 | -7.5 | SU Under | 36 | 19-59 | 32.2% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 29-31 | 93.5% | 46 | 4 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 14-25 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 12-25 against the money line (-13.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 13-25 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 3-14 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 13-26 against the money line (-13.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Trammell is 26-31 against the money line (-21.3 Units) in all games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 4-14 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in June games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Trammell is 11-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after a non-conference game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 88.2, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 16-21 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 13-18 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.6, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 6-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 19-26 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 18-22 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.4, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 14-22 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 11-21 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 21-25 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 15-20 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 3-7 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 22-28 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 6-8 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 8-14 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 10-18 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 13-16 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 87.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Trammell is 20-26 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 20-26 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 20-26 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 19-27 against the money line (-24.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 16-23 against the money line (-22.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Trammell is 20-26 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 9-8 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 88.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Trammell is 20-26 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.0, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 19-24 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 86.7, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Trammell is 20-27 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 26 times, while the home underdog won straight up 16 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog won the game straight up 3 times, while the road favorite won the game straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 7/6/2024 8:44:35 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|