| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA
WASHINGTON |
|
|
153.5
| 74
Final
92 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 607 | ATLANTA | +250 | | 608 | WASHINGTON | -330 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(265-91 since 1997.) (74.4%, +73.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(265-91 since 1997.) (74.4%, +73.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(265-91 since 1997.) (74.4%, +73.9 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(260-87 since 1997.) (74.9%, +73.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(260-87 since 1997.) (74.9%, +73.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(260-87 since 1997.) (74.9%, +73.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(298-136 since 1997.) (68.7%, +73.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(298-136 since 1997.) (68.7%, +73.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(298-136 since 1997.) (68.7%, +73.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(298-136 since 1997.) (68.7%, +73.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(298-136 since 1997.) (68.7%, +73.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(298-136 since 1997.) (68.7%, +73.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(119-55 since 1997.) (68.4%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(119-55 since 1997.) (68.4%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(119-55 since 1997.) (68.4%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road underdogs vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(78-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (44.3%, +56.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(62-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.4%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a road win by 3 points or less.
(38-20 since 1997.) (65.5%, +29.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win by 3 points or less.
(60-39 since 1997.) (60.6%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(49-32 since 1997.) (60.5%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots.
(26-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(33-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (ATLANTA) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(27-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (50%, +23.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(35-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | 71 | | 28-68 | 40.9% | 7-20 | 32.7% | 9-12 | 76.1% | 43 | 8 | 15 | | WASHINGTON | 79 | | 29-68 | 42.0% | 8-24 | 33.2% | 13-17 | 77.6% | 46 | 9 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 718 times, while ATLANTA won 254 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 86-67 against the money line (+25.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 79.8 | WASHINGTON is 184-241 against the money line (-69.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 79.3 | WASHINGTON is 11-17 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 79.9 | WASHINGTON is 39-49 against the money line (-30.7 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 80.3 | WASHINGTON is 107-141 against the money line (-50.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 76.6 | WASHINGTON is 11-17 against the money line (-12.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 80.1 | WASHINGTON is 83-90 against the money line (-47.6 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.0, OPPONENT 85.3 | WASHINGTON is 5-8 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 80.0 |
|
ATLANTA is 185-237 against the money line (-91.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.6 | ATLANTA is 60-97 against the money line (-56.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 82.8 | ATLANTA is 39-68 against the money line (-42.4 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 82.5 | ATLANTA is 36-54 against the money line (-32.9 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 80.0 | ATLANTA is 8-23 against the money line (-15.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.1, OPPONENT 88.2 | ATLANTA is 16-61 against the money line (-68.2 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 68.7, OPPONENT 77.4 | WASHINGTON is 11-3 against the money line (+13.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.8, OPPONENT 77.0 | WASHINGTON is 80-71 against the money line (+19.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 75.1 | WASHINGTON is 7-1 against the money line (+8.2 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 69.1 | WASHINGTON is 11-5 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 76.1 | WASHINGTON is 19-13 against the money line (+8.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.4, OPPONENT 81.2 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 4-5 against the money line (-13.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 86-99 against the money line (-47.3 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 50-79 against the money line (-38.1 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-57 against the money line (-35.6 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 110-183 against the money line (-66.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 76-72 against the money line (-35.5 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 50-60 against the money line (-34.0 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 88-89 against the money line (-42.1 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 135-198 against the money line (-73.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 205-274 against the money line (-90.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 179-260 against the money line (-90.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 277-375 against the money line (-116.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 129-170 against the money line (-58.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 4-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-27 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-26 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-24 against the money line (-14.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-15 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-28 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.2, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 9-27 against the money line (-18.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 73.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-25 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-15 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-28 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 1-19 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 55-92 against the money line (-44.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 84-134 against the money line (-62.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-27 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-27 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-21 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 1-6 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 5*) | WASHINGTON is 360-480 against the money line (-131.0 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-17 against the money line (-17.9 Units) as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 203-203 against the money line (-82.5 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 152-148 against the money line (-54.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 131-135 against the money line (-66.6 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-9 against the money line (-11.9 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 14-18 against the money line (-13.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 58-90 against the money line (-44.5 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-10 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 7-15 against the money line (-12.2 Units) off a road win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 21-30 against the money line (-27.1 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 2-7 against the money line (-14.3 Units) off a road win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 5*) | WASHINGTON is 168-231 against the money line (-65.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 118-166 against the money line (-52.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 179-253 against the money line (-77.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 59-67 against the money line (-37.4 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 30-47 against the money line (-28.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 22-36 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after a close win by 3 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-25 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-21 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 64-59 against the money line (-33.0 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-21 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-14 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 58-68 against the money line (-34.2 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 177-290 against the money line (-100.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 102-177 against the money line (-61.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 127-192 against the money line (-62.2 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 160-237 against the money line (-101.1 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-11 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 5*) | WASHINGTON is 4-7 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 4-7 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 4-12 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 229-279 against the money line (-81.5 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 53-80 against the money line (-51.0 Units) in June games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 142-166 against the money line (-64.3 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 49-71 against the money line (-29.5 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 104-135 against the money line (-50.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-12 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-11 against the money line (-11.3 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.7, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-8 against the money line (-11.0 Units) revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-19 against the money line (-13.7 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-21 against the money line (-17.0 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 23-37 against the money line (-19.7 Units) off a home loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 65-92 against the money line (-36.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 24-49 against the money line (-29.9 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-15 against the money line (-12.2 Units) off 2 consecutive losses by 10 points or more to division rivals since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.7, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 41-62 against the money line (-33.1 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-29 against the money line (-26.4 Units) off a home loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 42-82 against the money line (-51.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 99-138 against the money line (-61.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 106-159 against the money line (-71.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 55-96 against the money line (-36.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-1 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.3, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 8-10 | +1 | 10-8 | 8-10 | 77.1 | 38.2 | 41.5% | 44.8 | 78.6 | 39.7 | 40.5% | 43.8 | | Road Games | 3-5 | -0.2 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 80.2 | 37.7 | 42.9% | 46.0 | 82.5 | 40.7 | 41.0% | 43.0 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.6 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 82.0 | 39.8 | 41.6% | 42.8 | 89.4 | 49.2 | 45.3% | 46.8 | | Division Games | 3-7 | -4.1 | 4-6 | 5-5 | 77.9 | 36.3 | 41.9% | 42.5 | 81.7 | 42.0 | 43.3% | 44.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.1 | 38.2 | 28-69 | 41.5% | 8-22 | 35.2% | 12-16 | 77.3% | 45 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 9 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 8-22 | 34.7% | 14-18 | 78.7% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.2 | 37.7 | 29-69 | 42.9% | 7-23 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 76.6% | 46 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 9 | 16 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.6 | 39.7 | 27-67 | 40.5% | 8-24 | 33.0% | 16-21 | 76.8% | 44 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.8 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 8-22 | 34.4% | 14-18 | 78.8% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.5 | 40.7 | 29-70 | 41.0% | 9-25 | 36.5% | 16-20 | 78.5% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 12-9 | -5.8 | 12-9 | 7-14 | 79.1 | 39.5 | 43.2% | 42.4 | 76.1 | 36.5 | 43.0% | 41.1 | | Home Games | 6-4 | -8.3 | 5-5 | 3-7 | 80.0 | 40.5 | 43.2% | 42.5 | 75.5 | 35.3 | 43.2% | 40.8 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.8 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 75.2 | 38.4 | 40.8% | 43.0 | 79.0 | 37.6 | 42.9% | 44.2 | | Division Games | 6-5 | -7 | 6-5 | 2-9 | 75.9 | 39.1 | 42.5% | 40.0 | 74.2 | 36.2 | 43.8% | 41.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.1 | 39.5 | 29-68 | 43.2% | 8-24 | 33.5% | 12-16 | 76.7% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 41.1 | 30-69 | 43.6% | 8-22 | 34.3% | 14-18 | 78.7% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.0 | 40.5 | 29-68 | 43.2% | 7-23 | 33.2% | 13-18 | 75.8% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 36.5 | 28-66 | 43.0% | 8-23 | 34.0% | 12-16 | 76.1% | 41 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 8-23 | 34.6% | 14-18 | 79.2% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.5 | 35.3 | 28-65 | 43.2% | 8-24 | 31.5% | 12-15 | 77.8% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70.1, WASHINGTON 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/20/2022 | WASHINGTON | 73-78 | L | +100 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 35 | 14 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 43 | 17 | | 5/24/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 50-70 | L | +300 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 40 | 23 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 36 | 13 | | 5/29/2022 | PHOENIX | 81-54 | W | +100 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 56 | 23 | 18-68 | 26.5% | 38 | 14 | | 6/1/2022 | MINNESOTA | 84-76 | W | -200 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 43 | 13 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 45 | 24 | | 6/3/2022 | CHICAGO | 65-73 | L | +170 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 42 | 12 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 47 | 16 | | 6/5/2022 | INDIANA | 75-66 | W | -300 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 49 | 22 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 43 | 21 | | 6/7/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 60-72 | L | +280 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 47 | 15 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 39 | 19 | | 6/10/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 88-90 | L | +170 | 35-79 | 44.3% | 41 | 4 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 47 | 9 | | 6/15/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 92-105 | L | +375 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 44 | 16 | 40-77 | 51.9% | 44 | 11 | | 6/17/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 100-106 | L | +250 | 39-87 | 44.8% | 47 | 15 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 51 | 15 | | 6/21/2022 | DALLAS | 80-75 | W | +155 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 47 | 22 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 39 | 13 | | 6/24/2022 | NEW YORK | 77-89 | L | -115 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 37 | 10 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 52 | 16 | | 6/26/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 61-72 | L | +280 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 39 | 17 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 48 | 20 | | 6/28/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2022 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2022 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2022 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2022 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/20/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 78-73 | W | -120 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 43 | 17 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 35 | 14 | | 5/22/2022 | CHICAGO | 73-82 | L | -120 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 37 | 12 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 41 | 15 | | 5/24/2022 | ATLANTA | 70-50 | W | -400 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 36 | 13 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 40 | 23 | | 5/28/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 71-79 | L | +375 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 28 | 8 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 50 | 18 | | 5/31/2022 | @ INDIANA | 87-75 | W | -300 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 50 | 15 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 39 | 13 | | 6/3/2022 | NEW YORK | 70-74 | L | -850 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 50 | 14 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 38 | 12 | | 6/5/2022 | @ CHICAGO | 82-91 | L | +180 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 38 | 15 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 36 | 16 | | 6/8/2022 | CHICAGO | 84-82 | W | -165 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 41 | 13 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 38 | 13 | | 6/10/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-59 | W | -360 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 43 | 9 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 45 | 17 | | 6/12/2022 | PHOENIX | 90-99 | L | -250 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 59 | 18 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 36 | 15 | | 6/14/2022 | PHOENIX | 83-65 | W | -400 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 45 | 9 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 44 | 16 | | 6/16/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 65-77 | L | -175 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 43 | 13 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 45 | 10 | | 6/19/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 71-63 | W | +145 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 10 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 48 | 16 | | 6/21/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | 82-84 | L | -140 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 41 | 17 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 44 | 16 | | 6/23/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 71-85 | L | +170 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 45 | 12 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 39 | 7 | | 6/25/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 87-86 | W | +350 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 47 | 18 | 31-81 | 38.3% | 45 | 15 | | 6/28/2022 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2022 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2022 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 32-30 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 6-1 (+4.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 17-13 (-1.9 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 3-0 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/24/2022 | ATLANTA | 50 | 157.5 | Under | 25 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 4-21 | 19.0% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 40 | 9 | 23 | | | WASHINGTON | 70 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 34 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 36 | 6 | 13 | 5/20/2022 | WASHINGTON | 78 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 25-31 | 80.6% | 43 | 6 | 17 | | | ATLANTA | 73 | 158 | Under | 44 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 35 | 8 | 14 | 9/10/2021 | ATLANTA | 74 | 156.5 | Under | 34 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 4-8 | 50.0% | 45 | 11 | 7 | | | WASHINGTON | 82 | -5 | SU ATS | 40 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 50 | 11 | 10 | 6/17/2021 | ATLANTA | 93 | -1 | Over | 46 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 39 | 8 | 13 | | | WASHINGTON | 96 | 164.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 13-31 | 41.9% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 38 | 5 | 15 | 6/13/2021 | WASHINGTON | 78 | -4 | Over | 49 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 11-27 | 40.7% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 41 | 12 | 17 | | | ATLANTA | 101 | 167 | SU ATS | 51 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 13-29 | 44.8% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 42 | 10 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Thibault is 14-21 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 108-66 against the money line (-29.1 Units) as a favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 23-20 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in home games when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 28-46 against the money line (-34.3 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 14-21 against the money line (-23.1 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 32-39 against the money line (-25.4 Units) off a road win as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 109-107 against the money line (-24.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 88-89 against the money line (-28.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 73-73 against the money line (-22.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 81-77 against the money line (-25.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 32-35 against the money line (-19.9 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 42-58 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 66-87 against the money line (-41.8 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 30-42 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 85-84 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 24-28 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.7, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 75-61 against the money line (-22.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 134-141 against the money line (-27.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 94-108 against the money line (-28.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 95-100 against the money line (-23.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 128-135 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 131-132 against the money line (-25.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Thibault is 103-90 against the money line (+4.7 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 32-24 against the money line (+10.7 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 103-89 against the money line (+9.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 80-55 against the money line (+26.8 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 80.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 22-9 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in home games after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 81.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 59-50 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 101-88 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 75-69 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 70-61 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 76-75 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 36-34 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 45-29 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 41-40 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 161 times, while the road underdog won straight up 79 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 8 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 7 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 06/28/2022 - Nia Coffey is downgraded to OUT Tuesday vs Wash Mystics ( Knee ) | | [C] 06/28/2022 - Kia Vaughn is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs Wash Mystics ( Quarantine ) | | [G] 06/28/2022 - Erica Wheeler is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs Wash Mystics ( Foot ) | | [G] 06/28/2022 - Kristy Wallace is upgraded to probable Tuesday vs Wash Mystics ( Concussion ) | | [G] 06/15/2022 - Tiffany Hayes is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/19/2024 11:22:32 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|