| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
WASHINGTON |
|
|
162
| 81
Final
64 |
|
|
| | |
|
| IMG Academy - Bradenton, FL | | |  | |
| 669 | LOS ANGELES | -300 | | 670 | WASHINGTON | +220 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 55 points or less.
(90-33 since 1997.) (73.2%, +49.4 units. Rating = 4*) |  - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half.
(104-44 since 1997.) (70.3%, +46.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(28-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +31.5 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 55 points or less.
(85-53 since 1997.) (61.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 55 points or less.
(37-5 since 1997.) (88.1%, +29.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 55 points or less.
(49-22 since 1997.) (69%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 50 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(43-16 since 1997.) (72.9%, +27.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 30% of their shots or worse.
(32-3 since 1997.) (91.4%, +27.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game where a team made 30% of their shots or worse.
(32-4 since 1997.) (88.9%, +26.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 50 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(33-4 since 1997.) (89.2%, +26.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game where a team made 30% of their shots or worse.
(36-12 since 1997.) (75%, +25.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights.
(37-15 since 1997.) (71.2%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 55 points or less against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(42-18 since 1997.) (70%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 50 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more.
(28-6 since 1997.) (82.4%, +23.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 50 points or less.
(29-6 since 1997.) (82.9%, +23.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 30% of their shots or worse.
(39-16 since 1997.) (70.9%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 50 points or less against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(27-7 since 1997.) (79.4%, +21.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games against opponent after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games.
(22-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +27.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games against opponent after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(33-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 90 points or more.
(31-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.5%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 81 | | 32-67 | 47.1% | 8-20 | 37.9% | 11-15 | 72.4% | 42 | 8 | 15 | | WASHINGTON | 86 | | 32-71 | 45.2% | 9-23 | 40.0% | 12-15 | 82.4% | 41 | 9 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 604 times, while LOS ANGELES won 366 times.
Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 11-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 74.4 | LOS ANGELES is 291-78 against the money line (+162.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.4, OPPONENT 77.8 | WASHINGTON is 47-108 against the money line (-74.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 78.6 | WASHINGTON is 47-98 against the money line (-56.9 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 75.9 | WASHINGTON is 69-134 against the money line (-87.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 158-240 against the money line (-100.6 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 75.7 | WASHINGTON is 39-93 against the money line (-51.1 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 79.7 | WASHINGTON is 26-29 against the money line (-18.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.5, OPPONENT 87.3 | WASHINGTON is 89-131 against the money line (-59.2 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 75.4 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 34-30 against the money line (-25.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 78.6 | LOS ANGELES is 1-10 against the money line (-18.3 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 87.8 | LOS ANGELES is 72-63 against the money line (-42.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 76.4 | LOS ANGELES is 20-21 against the money line (-17.8 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 79.4 | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-14.4 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 81.7 | LOS ANGELES is 7-17 against the money line (-20.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 85.6 | LOS ANGELES is 3-13 against the money line (-18.6 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 88.2 | LOS ANGELES is 28-24 against the money line (-23.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 81.6 | WASHINGTON is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in road games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 88.0, OPPONENT 81.3 | WASHINGTON is 17-2 against the money line (+13.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 94.0, OPPONENT 80.9 | WASHINGTON is 49-15 against the money line (+29.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 90.9, OPPONENT 80.8 | WASHINGTON is 25-4 against the money line (+18.3 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 94.0, OPPONENT 79.5 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 18-8 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 157-232 against the money line (-68.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-36 against the money line (-22.0 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 185-252 against the money line (-85.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 253-344 against the money line (-109.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-56 against the money line (-37.4 Units) versus good pressure defensive teams - forcing >=17 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 58-135 against the money line (-58.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 45-89 against the money line (-40.2 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 32-25 against the money line (-23.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 205-169 against the money line (-78.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-16 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 250-208 against the money line (-78.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-16 against the money line (-22.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-18.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 38-29 against the money line (-24.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-26 against the money line (-32.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 230-211 against the money line (-81.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-24 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-20 against the money line (-23.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) on Thursday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 331-443 against the money line (-120.9 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 0-4 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in August or September games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 192-264 against the money line (-104.2 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 117-173 against the money line (-65.3 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 0-4 against the money line (-6.8 Units) after 3 consecutive division games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-11 against the money line (-12.4 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.9, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 0-4 against the money line (-8.4 Units) when playing their 3rd road game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 149-218 against the money line (-86.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 93-156 against the money line (-65.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-15 against the money line (-13.4 Units) off 2 or more consecutive upset losses as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-7 against the money line (-9.5 Units) off 3 or more consecutive upset losses as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 66.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 33-68 against the money line (-36.7 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-13 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after scoring 50 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 14-36 against the money line (-27.6 Units) after scoring 55 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 37-76 against the money line (-50.6 Units) after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.2, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 39-64 against the money line (-30.5 Units) after a combined score of 125 points or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 68.2, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 41-49 against the money line (-25.3 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 157-235 against the money line (-73.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 33-66 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-33 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 4 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 67.4, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 163-258 against the money line (-78.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 44-93 against the money line (-39.0 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 5-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-13 against the money line (-13.2 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-11.5 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 36-44 against the money line (-32.2 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-23 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 164-120 against the money line (-86.9 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 134-88 against the money line (-55.5 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-6 against the money line (-20.1 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-12 against the money line (-23.0 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-11 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-9 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 69-56 against the money line (-34.8 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-24 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-22 against the money line (-29.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-21 against the money line (-33.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-19 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-14 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-8 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-16 against the money line (-20.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-33 against the money line (-29.9 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 36-42 against the money line (-26.1 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 33-37 against the money line (-31.5 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 38-37 against the money line (-43.2 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-11 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-10 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-13 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) on Thursday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 90.3, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 87.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-4 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 5-3 | +1 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 86.4 | 42.4 | 47.8% | 38.1 | 81.1 | 39.1 | 44.5% | 41.5 | | Road Games | 5-3 | +1 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 86.4 | 42.4 | 47.8% | 38.1 | 81.1 | 39.1 | 44.5% | 41.5 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 86.6 | 42.4 | 47.9% | 38.2 | 80.2 | 38.2 | 44.5% | 38.8 | | Division Games | 5-3 | +1 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 86.4 | 42.4 | 47.8% | 38.1 | 81.1 | 39.1 | 44.5% | 41.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.4 | 42.4 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 8-19 | 41.0% | 13-16 | 79.5% | 38 | 6 | 20 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 7-21 | 33.9% | 14-18 | 79.0% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 86.4 | 42.4 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 8-19 | 41.0% | 13-16 | 79.5% | 38 | 6 | 20 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.1 | 39.1 | 29-65 | 44.5% | 7-21 | 35.5% | 16-20 | 77.9% | 41 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 18 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 83.1 | 41.7 | 30-67 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 34.6% | 16-20 | 79.0% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 81.1 | 39.1 | 29-65 | 44.5% | 7-21 | 35.5% | 16-20 | 77.9% | 41 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 18 | 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 3-5 | -2.7 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 80.6 | 41.4 | 42.3% | 40.2 | 80.0 | 41.1 | 44.0% | 43.6 | | Road Games | 3-5 | -2.7 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 80.6 | 41.4 | 42.3% | 40.2 | 80.0 | 41.1 | 44.0% | 43.6 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -6.8 | 0-5 | 1-4 | 72.2 | 34.2 | 38.1% | 39.4 | 80.8 | 42.0 | 45.8% | 45.4 | | Division Games | 3-5 | -2.7 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 80.6 | 41.4 | 42.3% | 40.2 | 80.0 | 41.1 | 44.0% | 43.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.6 | 41.4 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 8-22 | 34.8% | 14-18 | 81.0% | 40 | 7 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 12 | 1 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.4 | 41.5 | 31-68 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 34.0% | 14-19 | 78.1% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.6 | 41.4 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 8-22 | 34.8% | 14-18 | 81.0% | 40 | 7 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 12 | 1 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.0 | 41.1 | 28-64 | 44.0% | 8-22 | 35.8% | 16-21 | 76.6% | 44 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 6 | 16 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.8 | 42 | 30-67 | 44.9% | 7-20 | 34.6% | 16-20 | 79.6% | 42 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.0 | 41.1 | 28-64 | 44.0% | 8-22 | 35.8% | 16-21 | 76.6% | 44 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 6 | 16 | 2 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71, WASHINGTON 69.5 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/25/2020 | *PHOENIX | 99-76 | W | -200 | 38-68 | 55.9% | 35 | 15 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 40 | 27 | | 7/28/2020 | *CHICAGO | 78-96 | L | -200 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 36 | 16 | 37-68 | 54.4% | 42 | 15 | | 7/30/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 81-76 | W | -250 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 43 | 15 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 56 | 14 | | 8/1/2020 | *SEATTLE | 75-81 | L | +145 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 44 | 14 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 44 | 16 | | 8/5/2020 | *INDIANA | 86-75 | W | -360 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 38 | 12 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 39 | 15 | | 8/7/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 82-86 | L | +175 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 35 | 13 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 44 | 18 | | 8/9/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 97-81 | W | -300 | 38-58 | 65.5% | 39 | 20 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 26 | 12 | | 8/11/2020 | *NEW YORK | 93-78 | W | -1050 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 35 | 16 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 41 | 26 | | 8/13/2020 | *WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2020 | *INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2020 | *PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/21/2020 | *ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/23/2020 | *DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2020 | *MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/28/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/25/2020 | *INDIANA | 101-76 | W | +100 | 38-68 | 55.9% | 45 | 13 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 33 | 13 | | 7/28/2020 | *CONNECTICUT | 94-89 | W | -175 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 41 | 15 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 43 | 16 | | 7/30/2020 | *SEATTLE | 89-71 | W | +210 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 39 | 8 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 46 | 18 | | 8/1/2020 | *CHICAGO | 86-88 | L | -210 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 44 | 14 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 40 | 17 | | 8/5/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 77-83 | L | -140 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 39 | 11 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 44 | 15 | | 8/7/2020 | *NEW YORK | 66-74 | L | | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 14 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 46 | 18 | | 8/9/2020 | *INDIANA | 84-91 | L | -210 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 40 | 9 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 46 | 16 | | 8/11/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 48-68 | L | -120 | 18-61 | 29.5% | 38 | 16 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 51 | 14 | | 8/13/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2020 | *ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/21/2020 | *DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/23/2020 | *PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2020 | *ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/28/2020 | *PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 17-31 (-4.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 5-2 (+3.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
8/27/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 66 | 167 | Under | 37 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 44 | 12 | 15 | | | WASHINGTON | 95 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 54 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 11-35 | 31.4% | 22-24 | 91.7% | 41 | 6 | 9 | 7/7/2019 | WASHINGTON | 81 | -3 | Over | 46 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 38 | 4 | 10 | | | LOS ANGELES | 98 | 161.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 16-31 | 51.6% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 43 | 7 | 6 | 6/18/2019 | WASHINGTON | 81 | 166 | SU ATS | 48 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 13-28 | 46.4% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 41 | 8 | 17 | | | LOS ANGELES | 52 | -1.5 | Under | 27 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 3-19 | 15.8% | 11-18 | 61.1% | 53 | 10 | 26 |
|
| | |
|
Fisher is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) on Thursday as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 11-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 18-8 against the money line (+9.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 50-56 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in August or September games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 1-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) when playing their 3rd road game in 5 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Thibault is 1-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where opponent grabbed 45 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 75.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 19-26 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-19 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 15-24 against the money line (-12.8 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 73-80 against the money line (-23.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Fisher is 2-7 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 5-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 4-10 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 14-9 against the money line (+8.6 Units) on Thursday as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 84-68 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 30-18 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 31-27 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 26-15 against the money line (+13.8 Units) off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 73.9, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 16-10 against the money line (+11.8 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 37-22 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 15-13 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in road games after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 30-29 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 31-25 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 13-9 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 58-49 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 27-18 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 78.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | | Line Movement Analysis not posted for neutral court games. |
|
| | |
| [G] 08/13/2020 - Tierra Ruffin-Pratt is downgraded to doubtful Thursday vs Wash Mystics ( Ankle ) | | [C] 07/23/2020 - Maria Vadeeva is out for season ( Personal ) | | [G] 06/26/2020 - Kristi Toliver is out for season ( Personal ) | | [F] 06/26/2020 - Chiney Ogwumike is out for season ( Personal ) | |
| [F] 08/13/2020 - Aerial Powers is downgraded to OUT Thursday vs LA Sparks ( Hip ) | | [G] 07/18/2020 - Natasha Cloud is out for season ( Personal ) | | [F] 07/18/2020 - LaToya Sanders is out for season ( Undisclosed ) | | [C] 07/18/2020 - Tina Charles is out for season ( Medical ) | | [F] 07/17/2020 - Elena Delle Donne is out indefinitely ( Back ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/20/2024 11:18:02 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|