| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
WASHINGTON |
|
|
174
| 78
Final
89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Finals - Best of 5 - Game 5 - Tied 2-2 | | |  | |
| 609 | CONNECTICUT | +210 | | 610 | WASHINGTON | -270 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(65-42 since 1997.) (60.7%, +28.1 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(34-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (94.4%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(34-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (94.4%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(34-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (94.4%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(34-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (94.4%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(34-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (94.4%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(34-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (94.4%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(32-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.9%, +23.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(32-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.9%, +23.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(32-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (88.9%, +23.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games.
(36-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.7%, +24.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games.
(37-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.1%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(79-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.7%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(133-109 over the last 5 seasons.) (55%, +29.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(50-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(87-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(35-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +24.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(74-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(78-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +25 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(98-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(163-121 since 1997.) (57.4%, +54.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(108-79 since 1997.) (57.8%, +51.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(86-55 since 1997.) (61%, +50 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(131-92 since 1997.) (58.7%, +47.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(51-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +41.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(90-84 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.7%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(138-97 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.7%, +29.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(60-40 since 1997.) (60%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(24-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.1%, +36.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(26-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +38.2 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(46-25 since 1997.) (64.8%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(67-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +47.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(105-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (58%, +21.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off an home win scoring 85 or more points.
(64-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(93-68 since 1997.) (57.8%, +23.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(52-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(25-12 since 1997.) (67.6%, +22.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(29-17 since 1997.) (63%, +22.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games.
(32-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(44-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (45.8%, +34.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(58-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +24.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(133-109 over the last 5 seasons.) (55%, +29.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(41-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(56-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +18.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(43-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +19.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(66-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +24.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(64-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +25.7 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 85 | | 33-73 | 45.4% | 8-22 | 36.9% | 11-15 | 71.7% | 43 | 12 | 13 | | WASHINGTON | 95 | | 35-70 | 50.1% | 10-25 | 40.0% | 15-17 | 89.7% | 41 | 8 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 736 times, while CONNECTICUT won 243 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 27-12 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 78.6 | CONNECTICUT is 89-37 against the money line (+48.1 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 75.3 | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 81.4 | CONNECTICUT is 23-6 against the money line (+16.0 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 77.4 | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 78.9 | CONNECTICUT is 24-4 against the money line (+21.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 78.2 | CONNECTICUT is 17-2 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.5, OPPONENT 80.4 | WASHINGTON is 45-108 against the money line (-76.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 78.5 | WASHINGTON is 46-97 against the money line (-56.5 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 75.8 | WASHINGTON is 56-68 against the money line (-38.7 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.4, OPPONENT 82.0 | WASHINGTON is 157-237 against the money line (-98.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 75.6 | WASHINGTON is 24-26 against the money line (-14.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.5, OPPONENT 87.5 | WASHINGTON is 15-22 against the money line (-19.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.0, OPPONENT 90.5 | WASHINGTON is 87-131 against the money line (-61.2 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 75.4 | WASHINGTON is 73-81 against the money line (-44.5 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.8, OPPONENT 84.3 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 2-7 against the money line (-9.2 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 93.4 | CONNECTICUT is 5-10 against the money line (-20.0 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.8, OPPONENT 85.9 | CONNECTICUT is 69-88 against the money line (-37.4 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.1, OPPONENT 74.6 | CONNECTICUT is 17-23 against the money line (-28.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 88.7 | CONNECTICUT is 12-19 against the money line (-21.8 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 91.5 | CONNECTICUT is 2-7 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.8, OPPONENT 87.9 | CONNECTICUT is 4-9 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 86.6 | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 88.1 | WASHINGTON is 21-2 against the money line (+22.0 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 96.0, OPPONENT 79.3 | WASHINGTON is 15-1 against the money line (+14.0 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 94.1, OPPONENT 80.3 | WASHINGTON is 24-6 against the money line (+11.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 91.9, OPPONENT 79.4 | WASHINGTON is 21-2 against the money line (+17.4 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 94.7, OPPONENT 78.9 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-6 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-6 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-7 against the money line (+6.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-23 against the money line (+18.8 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the money line (+9.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+8.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-7 against the money line (+8.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-7 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-7 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 30-30 against the money line (+19.9 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-7 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-4 against the money line (+8.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 125-100 against the money line (+21.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 99-169 against the money line (-75.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 156-230 against the money line (-66.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 124-185 against the money line (-80.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 184-250 against the money line (-83.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 166-243 against the money line (-97.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 252-342 against the money line (-107.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 47-73 against the money line (-32.1 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 65-101 against the money line (-42.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 76-111 against the money line (-42.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 30-56 against the money line (-25.8 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 116-154 against the money line (-66.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-18 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.7, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 57-135 against the money line (-59.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 110-157 against the money line (-54.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 79-118 against the money line (-47.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 13-16 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-17 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-18 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 41-21 against the money line (+11.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 87.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-4 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+10.9 Units) off a home win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 31-9 against the money line (+14.2 Units) off a home win over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 22-9 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 38-14 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-7 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-7 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 327-439 against the money line (-119.2 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 188-191 against the money line (-74.4 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 189-260 against the money line (-101.5 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 115-169 against the money line (-61.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 73-114 against the money line (-48.6 Units) after 3 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 82-134 against the money line (-55.2 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 29-48 against the money line (-34.0 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 23-58 against the money line (-42.9 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 13-37 against the money line (-28.5 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 74-109 against the money line (-42.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 114-158 against the money line (-51.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 92-153 against the money line (-62.1 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 52-84 against the money line (-39.1 Units) off a road loss against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-6 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in home games off a road loss over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.4, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 9-13 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 147-206 against the money line (-61.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 60-71 against the money line (-33.5 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 31-43 against the money line (-22.7 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 155-229 against the money line (-76.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 53-63 against the money line (-32.1 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 26-45 against the money line (-30.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 14-30 against the money line (-21.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 8-24 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 99-152 against the money line (-51.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-29 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-13 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 21-30 against the money line (-18.3 Units) in home games after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 160-270 against the money line (-101.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 92-167 against the money line (-63.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 120-183 against the money line (-64.8 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 149-220 against the money line (-91.0 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 70-98 against the money line (-39.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 156-232 against the money line (-69.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-8 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 69-83 against the money line (-39.3 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after a game forcing opponent to commit 8 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 12-13 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-12 against the money line (-13.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-7 against the money line (-11.7 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-9 against the money line (-16.2 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-11 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-32 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-7 against the money line (-10.0 Units) when tied in a playoff series since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 68.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-43 against the money line (-22.5 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-15 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-9.6 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-15 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 23-21 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-12 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-14 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-8 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-18 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 5*) | WASHINGTON is 26-11 against the money line (+11.0 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 87.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 34-12 against the money line (+14.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 89.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-7 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 88.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-4 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 87.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 19-11 against the money line (+9.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 87.8, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-11 against the money line (+8.1 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 87.4, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 92.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 20-12 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in home games after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 28-13 | +6.3 | 19-21 | 20-20 | 82.0 | 41.5 | 43.0% | 45.7 | 78.3 | 40.7 | 44.1% | 40.3 | | Road Games | 10-10 | -4.2 | 6-13 | 10-10 | 78.1 | 41.0 | 41.1% | 45.3 | 80.4 | 42.3 | 44.5% | 42.9 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +3.1 | 3-2 | 3-1 | 86.8 | 47.4 | 46.7% | 42.6 | 83.6 | 43.2 | 45.5% | 38.6 | | Division Games | 13-7 | +2.4 | 8-12 | 13-6 | 84.1 | 43.9 | 43.0% | 44.6 | 82.8 | 42.1 | 45.1% | 42.1 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.0 | 41.5 | 31-72 | 43.0% | 8-21 | 35.6% | 13-18 | 71.4% | 46 | 11 | 20 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 79.2 | 40.2 | 29-69 | 42.5% | 7-20 | 34.3% | 14-17 | 79.8% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.1 | 41.0 | 29-71 | 41.1% | 7-21 | 33.7% | 13-18 | 68.4% | 45 | 11 | 18 | 18 | 9 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.3 | 40.7 | 29-66 | 44.1% | 7-21 | 31.8% | 13-16 | 80.0% | 40 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 79.6 | 40.5 | 29-69 | 42.9% | 7-21 | 34.0% | 14-17 | 81.3% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.4 | 42.3 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 7-21 | 34.0% | 14-17 | 80.5% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 30-11 | -0.8 | 22-19 | 25-14 | 89.4 | 47.0 | 46.9% | 40.0 | 80.0 | 41.1 | 44.2% | 40.3 | | Home Games | 17-4 | -1.1 | 13-8 | 14-6 | 92.9 | 48.4 | 48.4% | 40.4 | 78.1 | 40.0 | 44.4% | 38.2 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.1 | 2-3 | 4-0 | 91.2 | 45.8 | 49.1% | 36.2 | 89.2 | 48.0 | 47.3% | 41.6 | | Division Games | 15-5 | +2.2 | 12-8 | 12-6 | 91.4 | 47.6 | 47.5% | 42.1 | 79.6 | 40.8 | 43.6% | 39.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 89.4 | 47.0 | 33-70 | 46.9% | 10-25 | 37.8% | 14-16 | 88.1% | 40 | 8 | 22 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 79.2 | 40.4 | 29-69 | 42.5% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 14-17 | 79.9% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 92.9 | 48.4 | 34-71 | 48.4% | 10-26 | 37.5% | 15-16 | 89.5% | 40 | 9 | 23 | 15 | 8 | 10 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.0 | 41.1 | 30-69 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 34.8% | 13-15 | 82.3% | 40 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 79 | 40.1 | 29-69 | 42.4% | 7-19 | 33.9% | 14-18 | 78.4% | 44 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 78.1 | 40.0 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 12-15 | 80.4% | 38 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 2 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71.6, WASHINGTON 71.6 |
| | |
|
|
| 9/4/2019 | DALLAS | 102-72 | W | -600 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 48 | 16 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 23 | 9 | | 9/6/2019 | CHICAGO | 104-109 | L | -250 | 38-89 | 42.7% | 49 | 17 | 41-77 | 53.2% | 47 | 20 | | 9/8/2019 | @ INDIANA | 76-104 | L | -165 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 42 | 14 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 47 | 15 | | 9/17/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 84-75 | W | -115 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 49 | 9 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 42 | 17 | | 9/19/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 94-68 | W | -115 | 36-79 | 45.6% | 57 | 12 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 31 | 13 | | 9/22/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | 78-56 | W | +200 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 54 | 13 | 23-75 | 30.7% | 45 | 10 | | 9/29/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | 86-95 | L | +300 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 33 | 13 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 38 | 14 | | 10/1/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | 99-87 | W | +250 | 42-84 | 50.0% | 49 | 9 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 34 | 7 | | 10/6/2019 | WASHINGTON | 81-94 | L | -140 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 31 | 12 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 39 | 12 | | 10/8/2019 | WASHINGTON | 90-86 | W | -120 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 46 | 7 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 37 | 9 | | 10/10/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/31/2019 | @ DALLAS | 91-85 | W | -750 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 41 | 9 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 38 | 4 | | 9/3/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 93-77 | W | | 33-67 | 49.3% | 50 | 18 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 26 | 14 | | 9/6/2019 | DALLAS | 86-73 | W | | 33-69 | 47.8% | 42 | 11 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 37 | 9 | | 9/8/2019 | CHICAGO | 100-86 | W | -270 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 46 | 11 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 36 | 14 | | 9/17/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 97-95 | W | -600 | 38-85 | 44.7% | 38 | 4 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 48 | 13 | | 9/19/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 103-91 | W | -500 | 38-73 | 52.1% | 34 | 6 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 40 | 12 | | 9/22/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 75-92 | L | -175 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 33 | 13 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 51 | 16 | | 9/24/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 94-90 | W | -200 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 33 | 6 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 49 | 11 | | 9/29/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 95-86 | W | -400 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 38 | 14 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 33 | 13 | | 10/1/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 87-99 | L | -330 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 34 | 7 | 42-84 | 50.0% | 49 | 9 | | 10/6/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 94-81 | W | +120 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 39 | 12 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 31 | 12 | | 10/8/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 86-90 | L | +100 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 37 | 9 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 46 | 7 | | 10/10/2019 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 51-36 (+7.1 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 6-8 (-2.1 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 23-19 (-2.1 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 3-4 (+0.6 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
10/8/2019 | WASHINGTON | 86 | 176 | | 40 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 37 | 5 | 9 | | | CONNECTICUT | 90 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 56 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 23-26 | 88.5% | 46 | 8 | 7 | 10/6/2019 | WASHINGTON | 94 | 173 | SU ATS | 43 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 16-27 | 59.3% | 10-10 | 100.0% | 39 | 7 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 81 | -2.5 | Over | 39 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 31 | 7 | 12 | 10/1/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 99 | 174 | SU ATS | 56 | 42-84 | 50.0% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 49 | 17 | 9 | | | WASHINGTON | 87 | -7.5 | Over | 46 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 34 | 6 | 7 | 9/29/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 86 | 166.5 | Over | 46 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 33 | 9 | 13 | | | WASHINGTON | 95 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 55 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 38 | 6 | 14 | 6/29/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 59 | 161.5 | Under | 30 | 22-73 | 30.1% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 41 | 13 | 14 | | | WASHINGTON | 102 | -7 | SU ATS | 56 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 13-30 | 43.3% | 21-21 | 100.0% | 43 | 5 | 12 | 6/11/2019 | WASHINGTON | 75 | 166.5 | Under | 37 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 6-28 | 21.4% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 35 | 5 | 8 | | | CONNECTICUT | 83 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 44 | 6 | 15 | 5/25/2019 | WASHINGTON | 69 | 166.5 | Under | 41 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 45 | 11 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 84 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 48 | 11 | 9 | 7/24/2018 | WASHINGTON | 68 | 170.5 | Under | 35 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 4-26 | 15.4% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 35 | 7 | 9 | | | CONNECTICUT | 94 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 39-68 | 57.4% | 9-16 | 56.2% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 41 | 7 | 13 | 6/26/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 80 | 171.5 | Over | 46 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 46 | 15 | 17 | | | WASHINGTON | 92 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 21-28 | 75.0% | 37 | 8 | 7 | 6/13/2018 | WASHINGTON | 95 | 173 | SU ATS | 65 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 24-26 | 92.3% | 38 | 8 | 12 | | | CONNECTICUT | 91 | -9 | Over | 37 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 42 | 12 | 11 | 6/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 88 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 10-26 | 38.5% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 59 | 14 | 14 | | | WASHINGTON | 64 | 172 | Under | 35 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 35 | 9 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 41-24 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 22-15 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 8-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 31-21 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 26-17 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 20-10 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.0, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 14-3 against the money line (+11.9 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 34-14 against the money line (+13.1 Units) off a home win as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 40-29 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 22-20 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 14-7 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 8-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 34-24 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 40-16 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-7 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.3, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 45-24 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 25-11 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 26-13 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 19-8 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 11-4 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 23-15 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 51-31 against the money line (+14.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 51-28 against the money line (+19.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 68-43 against the money line (+14.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 32-15 against the money line (+24.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 39-26 against the money line (+16.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 35-20 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 20-8 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 52-31 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 48-31 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-8 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 40-25 against the money line (+19.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 52-40 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 40-36 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in home games after a division game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 3-10 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in the finals in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 72.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 3-9 against the money line (-9.6 Units) when tied in a playoff series in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 72.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 9-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in home games off a road loss against a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 25-39 against the money line (-21.6 Units) off a road loss as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 23-35 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 31-32 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 18-22 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.9, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 23-29 against the money line (-21.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 35-49 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 55-70 against the money line (-31.7 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 25-30 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 9-13 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in home games after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 20-28 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 40-50 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 69-74 against the money line (-24.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 44-45 against the money line (-18.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Miller is 34-32 against the money line (-23.9 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-13 against the money line (-16.1 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 3-9 against the money line (-16.2 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 7-13 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 6-12 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 7-12 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 8-13 against the money line (-11.6 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 80-64 against the money line (+12.8 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 92-73 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 29-17 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 151-126 against the money line (+23.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 63-52 against the money line (+18.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 80.4, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 80-63 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 62-46 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 57-45 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 36-32 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 10-5 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 58-43 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 42-10 against the money line (+23.5 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 85.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 24-5 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in home games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 86.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 59-48 against the money line (+22.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 78.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 205 times, while the road underdog won straight up 69 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 20 times, while the road underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 10/10/2019 - Layshia Clarendon is "?" Thursday vs Wash Mystics ( Ankle ) | |
| [G] 05/30/2019 - Kiara Leslie is out indefinitely ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/25/2024 7:20:10 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|