| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS WASHINGTON |
|
| 173.5 | 83 Final 78 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
621 | DALLAS | +175 | 622 | WASHINGTON | -210 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (97-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +52 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (28-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (104-64 since 1997.) (61.9%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season. (50-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (34-8 since 1997.) (81%, +34.8 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (34-8 since 1997.) (81%, +34.8 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an terrible defensive team (>=46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (34-8 since 1997.) (81%, +34.8 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (95-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +47.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, terrible defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=46% on the season. (110-60 since 1997.) (64.7%, +31.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent as a home favorite of 7 or more, off a loss against a division rival. (41-17 since 1997.) (70.7%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a straight up loss vs opponent as a favorite of 7 or more, off a loss against a division rival. (44-19 since 1997.) (69.8%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (47-26 since 1997.) (64.4%, +19.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor shooting team (38-40.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (29-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +24.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (40-18 since 1997.) (69%, +17.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (33-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season, on Saturday games. (38-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +30.1 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - off a road loss, playing with 2 days rest. (129-154 since 1997.) (45.6%, +53.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after playing a road game, playing with 2 days rest. (60-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.7%, +23.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, playing with 2 days rest. (28-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.9%, +13.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (123-89 over the last 5 seasons.) (58%, +32.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road loss, playing on back-to-back days. (29-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +27.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after playing a road game, playing on back-to-back days. (50-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +31.7 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS | 80 | | 28-71 | 38.9% | 7-22 | 33.6% | 18-21 | 83.1% | 43 | 14 | 12 | WASHINGTON | 91 | | 31-70 | 44.4% | 7-22 | 32.8% | 21-25 | 83.3% | 49 | 15 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 762 times, while DALLAS won 216 times. Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 114-177 against the money line (-56.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.1, OPPONENT 78.3 | WASHINGTON is 32-42 against the money line (-24.7 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 76.8 | WASHINGTON is 29-88 against the money line (-56.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 79.8 | WASHINGTON is 12-29 against the money line (-21.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.3, OPPONENT 87.7 | WASHINGTON is 16-28 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 83.4 | WASHINGTON is 16-26 against the money line (-14.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 83.4, OPPONENT 85.8 |
|
DALLAS is 20-35 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.0, OPPONENT 89.8 | DALLAS is 6-13 against the money line (-10.1 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 86.5, OPPONENT 92.1 | DALLAS is 19-39 against the money line (-23.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 90.6 | DALLAS is 9-36 against the money line (-33.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 93.7 | DALLAS is 6-19 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 90.5 | DALLAS is 1-10 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 78.4, OPPONENT 90.4 | DALLAS is 10-24 against the money line (-20.3 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 88.6 | WASHINGTON is 10-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 39% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.3, OPPONENT 73.1 | WASHINGTON is 14-6 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when they attempt 23 to 27 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.8, OPPONENT 78.8 | WASHINGTON is 9-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.8, OPPONENT 78.5 | WASHINGTON is 13-2 against the money line (+15.7 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 85.9, OPPONENT 78.7 | WASHINGTON is 8-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 84.8, OPPONENT 77.9 | WASHINGTON is 24-12 against the money line (+17.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 88.3, OPPONENT 81.3 | WASHINGTON is 21-5 against the money line (+22.2 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 91.6, OPPONENT 80.4 |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 138-160 against the money line (-65.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 71-94 against the money line (-54.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 43-71 against the money line (-33.9 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 27-54 against the money line (-35.6 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 25-34 against the money line (-21.1 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 44-55 against the money line (-26.8 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-10 against the money line (-7.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-18 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 70-112 against the money line (-43.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 63-73 against the money line (-32.2 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 3-6 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-19 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-21 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 39-42 against the money line (-29.5 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 78-133 against the money line (-51.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 55-97 against the money line (-41.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 4-11 against the money line (-12.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 11-20 against the money line (-13.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-14 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 12-23 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 7-20 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 18-33 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-18 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 17-31 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 3-13 against the money line (-16.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.8, OPPONENT 93.4 - (Rating = 5*) | DALLAS is 8-20 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.9, OPPONENT 91.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 9-21 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 20-32 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-19 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 19-29 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-21 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.5, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 17-35 against the money line (-21.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 7-21 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 14-33 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 6-18 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.7, OPPONENT 90.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 276-405 against the money line (-121.3 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 78-81 against the money line (-48.1 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 162-177 against the money line (-72.5 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 111-122 against the money line (-44.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 85-141 against the money line (-53.1 Units) in August or September games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 39-73 against the money line (-33.4 Units) on Saturday games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) against Western conference opponents this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 166-244 against the money line (-100.1 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 103-161 against the money line (-63.5 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 133-195 against the money line (-63.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 130-211 against the money line (-85.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-10 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in non-conference games this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 42-65 against the money line (-30.4 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 125-199 against the money line (-84.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 104-146 against the money line (-47.8 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 61-116 against the money line (-59.5 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 66-120 against the money line (-43.5 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 28-73 against the money line (-41.1 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 9-19 against the money line (-11.3 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 86-148 against the money line (-58.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 50-80 against the money line (-32.6 Units) off a road loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 81-135 against the money line (-47.9 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 110-183 against the money line (-68.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 75-124 against the money line (-50.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-10 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 22-36 against the money line (-20.1 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 149-256 against the money line (-93.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 111-171 against the money line (-54.4 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 129-200 against the money line (-79.1 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 133-219 against the money line (-73.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 67-115 against the money line (-51.3 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-30 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 4 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 65.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 146-241 against the money line (-69.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 25-39 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 4-10 against the money line (-9.4 Units) on Saturday games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-23 against the money line (-19.7 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 7-20 against the money line (-18.9 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 91.5 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 11-26 against the money line (-17.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-14 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 91.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 13-23 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-23 against the money line (-19.7 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 2-6 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 89.1 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-34 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 19-32 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.5, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 16-31 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 90.1 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 16-28 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 89.8 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 22-36 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 89.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-32 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 19-29 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.1, OPPONENT 89.4 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 16-27 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.7, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 18-31 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 11-22 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 82.7, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 17-29 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.1, OPPONENT 90.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 18-31 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.6, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 14-22 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.8, OPPONENT 91.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 3-8 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-16 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 85.7, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 21-33 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 8-20 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 14-25 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-18 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-4 against the money line (+9.6 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 5-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 14-17 | +2.8 | 15-16 | 19-11 | 86.0 | 43.3 | 40.4% | 43.8 | 89.1 | 45.2 | 48.3% | 42.6 | Road Games | 4-11 | -3 | 7-8 | 10-4 | 82.3 | 41.8 | 39.2% | 42.1 | 90.7 | 46.9 | 49.8% | 43.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.4 | 3-2 | 3-1 | 90.0 | 47.4 | 39.6% | 49.0 | 91.0 | 46.8 | 46.1% | 45.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.0 | 43.3 | 29-71 | 40.4% | 7-21 | 32.1% | 22-26 | 83.0% | 44 | 11 | 15 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.7 | 40.6 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 82.3 | 41.8 | 28-70 | 39.2% | 7-23 | 31.2% | 20-24 | 82.9% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 89.1 | 45.2 | 33-68 | 48.3% | 6-16 | 34.6% | 18-22 | 80.1% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 81.3 | 41 | 30-67 | 44.7% | 6-17 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 90.7 | 46.9 | 34-68 | 49.8% | 6-16 | 35.2% | 18-22 | 78.3% | 44 | 9 | 21 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 17-13 | -0.7 | 13-16 | 15-15 | 81.4 | 43.5 | 41.5% | 43.2 | 79.8 | 39.8 | 43.1% | 42.8 | Home Games | 10-4 | +2.4 | 7-6 | 8-6 | 83.6 | 42.6 | 42.0% | 44.9 | 80.0 | 39.6 | 44.1% | 40.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 78.8 | 40.2 | 42.7% | 38.2 | 84.0 | 41.8 | 49.1% | 40.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.4 | 43.5 | 28-68 | 41.5% | 7-22 | 31.3% | 18-22 | 84.2% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.6 | 42.6 | 28-67 | 42.0% | 7-22 | 31.7% | 20-24 | 82.5% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.8 | 39.8 | 30-69 | 43.1% | 6-17 | 35.8% | 14-18 | 79.9% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 80.9 | 40.5 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.0 | 39.6 | 30-69 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 37.4% | 13-17 | 78.6% | 40 | 8 | 19 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 72.4, WASHINGTON 71 |
| | |
|
|
7/19/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 74-100 | L | | 26-75 | 34.7% | 36 | 13 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 52 | 17 | 7/25/2017 | INDIANA | 84-82 | W | -270 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 39 | 14 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 40 | 17 | 7/28/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 93-109 | L | +200 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 38 | 15 | 40-65 | 61.5% | 31 | 12 | 7/30/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 74-95 | L | +550 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 32 | 12 | 40-71 | 56.3% | 50 | 15 | 8/4/2017 | SEATTLE | 93-80 | W | -110 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 50 | 14 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 32 | 9 | 8/6/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 85-79 | W | +210 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 54 | 15 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 36 | 15 | 8/10/2017 | PHOENIX | 100-101 | L | -155 | 33-80 | 41.2% | 54 | 15 | 38-74 | 51.4% | 40 | 15 | 8/12/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 88-96 | L | +350 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 38 | 11 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 55 | 15 | 8/19/2017 | ATLANTA | 90-86 | W | -210 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 54 | 8 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 48 | 13 | 8/23/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 87-93 | L | +500 | 34-81 | 42.0% | 45 | 13 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 50 | 16 | 8/26/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2017 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/19/2017 | ATLANTA | 100-96 | W | -165 | 37-89 | 41.6% | 53 | 12 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 43 | 12 | 7/25/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-76 | W | -300 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 44 | 12 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 47 | 10 | 7/30/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 77-70 | W | -125 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 58 | 12 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 38 | 6 | 8/4/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-76 | L | -200 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 43 | 11 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 42 | 10 | 8/6/2017 | PHOENIX | 85-80 | W | -155 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 55 | 12 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 36 | 9 | 8/12/2017 | INDIANA | 100-80 | W | -400 | 34-59 | 57.6% | 39 | 11 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 33 | 10 | 8/16/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 62-95 | L | +200 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 30 | 20 | 40-65 | 61.5% | 38 | 13 | 8/18/2017 | PHOENIX | 79-89 | L | +155 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 43 | 12 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 40 | 12 | 8/20/2017 | @ INDIANA | 87-82 | W | -250 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 40 | 6 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 41 | 15 | 8/25/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 66-74 | L | +170 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 39 | 10 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 50 | 8 | 8/26/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
WASHINGTON is 30-29 (+5.7 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 4-3 (-1.3 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
WASHINGTON is 16-14 (-2.3 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
DALLAS is 3-0 (+5.6 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/18/2017 | DALLAS | 87 | 176 | SU ATS | 39 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 8-21 | 38.1% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 49 | 11 | 11 | | WASHINGTON | 83 | -8 | Under | 49 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 38 | 10 | 7 | 6/6/2017 | WASHINGTON | 101 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 21-22 | 95.5% | 44 | 11 | 7 | | DALLAS | 89 | 167 | Over | 42 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 25-28 | 89.3% | 47 | 14 | 12 | 9/4/2016 | WASHINGTON | 88 | 163.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 24-26 | 92.3% | 39 | 13 | 11 | | DALLAS | 83 | -4 | Over | 42 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 47 | 7 | 17 | 6/8/2016 | WASHINGTON | 87 | 162 | SU ATS | 40 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 28-37 | 75.7% | 52 | 9 | 15 | | DALLAS | 79 | -4 | Over | 37 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 19-25 | 76.0% | 43 | 14 | 10 | 5/18/2016 | DALLAS | 87 | 152.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 8-30 | 26.7% | 19-20 | 95.0% | 42 | 14 | 12 | | WASHINGTON | 77 | -3 | Over | 35 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 2-12 | 16.7% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 49 | 10 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Williams is 36-28 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 13-17 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in home games in August or September games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 26-29 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in home games after a division game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 22-39 against the money line (-17.4 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 35-50 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 23-26 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 5-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 3-8 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 18-22 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 10-16 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 40-58 against the money line (-19.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 21-36 against the money line (-21.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 5-8 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 35-50 against the money line (-23.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 21-27 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Williams is 32-73 against the money line (-31.8 Units) in road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 30-72 against the money line (-32.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.0, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 21-57 against the money line (-28.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.8, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 9-26 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 74.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 7-18 against the money line (-14.1 Units) on Saturday games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 22-35 against the money line (-19.4 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 16-29 against the money line (-18.4 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 28-47 against the money line (-19.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.3, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 17-43 against the money line (-22.8 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 25-45 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 21-39 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 22-35 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 4-19 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.0, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 29-42 against the money line (-23.3 Units) off a road loss in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 34-60 against the money line (-27.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 30-51 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 25-46 against the money line (-25.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 22-41 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 41-66 against the money line (-28.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.9, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 34-54 against the money line (-21.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 28-47 against the money line (-23.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 22-42 against the money line (-25.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 21-36 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 32-55 against the money line (-23.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-32 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 18-37 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 10-22 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.5, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 17-32 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 14-40 against the money line (-23.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 78.1, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 10-36 against the money line (-27.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.3, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 8-28 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.9, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 32-52 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 37-58 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 26-41 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 12-21 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.3, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-14 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 10-16 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 21-38 against the money line (-18.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 13-31 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.1, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 14-38 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.0, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 10-28 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in road games after playing a game as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 75.2, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 11-32 against the money line (-20.3 Units) in road games after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 74.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 25-51 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 23-38 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 4-9 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.8, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 4-14 against the money line (-12.8 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 76.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 8-16 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.8, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 18-29 against the money line (-16.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 10-20 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 21-37 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 19-42 against the money line (-28.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.7, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 38-65 against the money line (-27.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.5, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 12-42 against the money line (-24.0 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 75.3, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 13-29 against the money line (-17.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.7, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 22-41 against the money line (-24.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 79.9, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 41-66 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 6-15 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-23 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 24-45 against the money line (-32.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 77.5, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 43-63 against the money line (-28.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Williams 79.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 5-22 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 6*) | Williams is 14-29 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 21-41 against the money line (-27.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 39-62 against the money line (-26.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.1, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 13-30 against the money line (-26.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 87.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 27-46 against the money line (-25.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 19-40 against the money line (-26.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 80.7, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 33-62 against the money line (-28.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 11-31 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Williams is 22-49 against the money line (-26.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 82.8, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 17-33 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 78.8, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 28-52 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of DALLAS. The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 29-19 against the money line (+13.5 Units) when playing on back-to-back days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.7, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 11-6 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 67-47 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 75.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 54-37 against the money line (+16.5 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 75.8, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 37-28 against the money line (+14.6 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.2, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-8 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 43-40 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 32-27 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 118-99 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 73-45 against the money line (+32.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 9-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 122-104 against the money line (+22.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 16-4 against the money line (+12.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 83.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 114 times, while the road underdog won straight up 67 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 24 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 08/25/2017 - Natasha Cloud doubtful Saturday vs. Dallas Wings ( Hip ) | [G] 07/16/2017 - Tayler Hill out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 7/3/2024 5:46:07 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|