| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
WASHINGTON |
|
|
158.5
| 95
Final
62 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 653 | LOS ANGELES | -250 | | 654 | WASHINGTON | +200 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(261-108 since 1997.) (70.7%, +79.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(261-108 since 1997.) (70.7%, +79.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(261-108 since 1997.) (70.7%, +79.3 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(261-108 since 1997.) (70.7%, +79.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(261-108 since 1997.) (70.7%, +79.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(261-108 since 1997.) (70.7%, +79.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(305-132 since 1997.) (69.8%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(305-132 since 1997.) (69.8%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(86-45 since 1997.) (65.6%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(28-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(22-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +18.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots.
(20-6 since 1997.) (76.9%, +15.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(24-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (47.1%, +20.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(93-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +25.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a upset loss as a favorite, on Wednesday nights.
(26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(47-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road loss, playing with 2 days rest.
(128-154 since 1997.) (45.4%, +52.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(158-119 since 1997.) (57%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(173-63 since 1997.) (73.3%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after playing a road game, playing with 2 days rest.
(59-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.8%, +24.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(138-53 since 1997.) (72.3%, +37.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games.
(25-15 since 1997.) (62.5%, +33.6 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(18-7 since 1997.) (72%, +31.3 units. Rating = 6*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(79-53 since 1997.) (59.8%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(61-36 since 1997.) (62.9%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(37-7 since 1997.) (84.1%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(50-31 since 1997.) (61.7%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(31-12 since 1997.) (72.1%, +21.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(25-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +10.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games.
(30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +16.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - hot team - having won 15 or more of their last 20 games, playing with 2 days rest.
(44-22 since 1997.) (66.7%, +14.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - playing with 2 days rest, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(22-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +16.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 77 | | 29-66 | 44.6% | 5-16 | 31.9% | 13-16 | 82.0% | 39 | 8 | 11 | | WASHINGTON | 81 | | 29-69 | 41.6% | 7-22 | 32.1% | 17-20 | 84.6% | 46 | 14 | 12 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 627 times, while LOS ANGELES won 352 times.
Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 72.2 | WASHINGTON is 113-176 against the money line (-56.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.1, OPPONENT 78.3 | WASHINGTON is 81-121 against the money line (-53.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 74.5 | WASHINGTON is 5-11 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 86.3 | WASHINGTON is 32-42 against the money line (-24.7 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 76.8 | WASHINGTON is 72-114 against the money line (-47.3 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 74.8 | WASHINGTON is 34-43 against the money line (-26.9 Units) in home games when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 76.8 | WASHINGTON is 49-96 against the money line (-63.4 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.4 | WASHINGTON is 23-35 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 80.8 | WASHINGTON is 15-25 against the money line (-14.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.4, OPPONENT 85.8 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 44-55 against the money line (-28.5 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 75.9 | LOS ANGELES is 14-16 against the money line (-17.2 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 72.0 | LOS ANGELES is 9-16 against the money line (-14.5 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.6, OPPONENT 75.8 | LOS ANGELES is 8-14 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 79.6 | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-17.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.2, OPPONENT 86.4 | LOS ANGELES is 25-25 against the money line (-32.9 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 76.7 | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 80.8 | LOS ANGELES is 112-106 against the money line (-55.4 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 74.8 | LOS ANGELES is 71-75 against the money line (-42.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 75.8 | LOS ANGELES is 184-156 against the money line (-85.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 82.1 | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-19.2 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 75.3 | WASHINGTON is 64-57 against the money line (+25.4 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 73.2 | WASHINGTON is 8-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 84.8, OPPONENT 77.9 | WASHINGTON is 23-11 against the money line (+17.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 88.6, OPPONENT 81.1 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 76-56 against the money line (+24.4 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 56-38 against the money line (+20.9 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-3 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 80-148 against the money line (-66.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 129-206 against the money line (-61.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 61-99 against the money line (-39.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-15 against the money line (-10.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 93-142 against the money line (-48.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 69-109 against the money line (-41.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-12 against the money line (-13.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 9-16 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 134-218 against the money line (-94.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 27-58 against the money line (-29.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 40-81 against the money line (-33.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-16 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 27-74 against the money line (-37.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 45-116 against the money line (-50.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 77-130 against the money line (-49.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 54-94 against the money line (-39.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-13 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 110-100 against the money line (-55.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 158-140 against the money line (-66.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-10 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 199-176 against the money line (-65.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 138-122 against the money line (-58.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-23 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-14 against the money line (-13.6 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 62-79 against the money line (-63.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-14 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-19 against the money line (-19.5 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-10 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-10 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 190-150 against the money line (-77.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-15 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-10 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-22 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-12 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 86.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 12-1 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-13 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after 2 straight games where opponent was called for 15 or less fouls since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 275-402 against the money line (-119.3 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 162-175 against the money line (-70.5 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 84-138 against the money line (-51.1 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 30-51 against the money line (-28.2 Units) on Wednesday since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-21 against the money line (-19.5 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 166-242 against the money line (-98.1 Units) after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 132-192 against the money line (-61.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 130-209 against the money line (-83.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 24-41 against the money line (-25.1 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-21 against the money line (-19.5 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 60-96 against the money line (-36.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 45-86 against the money line (-51.9 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 47-67 against the money line (-30.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-17 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-59 against the money line (-44.3 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 10-31 against the money line (-29.7 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 67.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 13-28 against the money line (-22.9 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 5-11 against the money line (-9.9 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 25-29 against the money line (-21.1 Units) in home games off a home win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 3-7 against the money line (-11.6 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 79-94 against the money line (-40.3 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 109-180 against the money line (-66.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 74-121 against the money line (-48.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 30-42 against the money line (-22.1 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 22-34 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-37 against the money line (-26.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 73-130 against the money line (-46.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-10 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 6-10 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 65-66 against the money line (-33.9 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-23 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-13 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 48-53 against the money line (-29.3 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-31 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 1-9 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 66.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 5*) | WASHINGTON is 121-152 against the money line (-53.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 40-58 against the money line (-27.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-7 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.9, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-5 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in home games after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-13 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 16-12 against the money line (-16.8 Units) as a road favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-28 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 69-83 against the money line (-36.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-6 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after a non-conference game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-7 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-27 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 93-82 against the money line (-55.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-17 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-13 against the money line (-15.1 Units) off a road loss over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-10 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-20 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-5 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.4, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 85.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-6 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-13 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 24-9 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.7, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 19-8 | -6.7 | 15-12 | 9-18 | 82.7 | 42.7 | 47.3% | 38.6 | 76.8 | 38.4 | 43.4% | 39.5 | | Road Games | 7-7 | -8.2 | 7-7 | 6-8 | 81.2 | 40.9 | 47.4% | 36.1 | 80.6 | 38.8 | 44.8% | 41.3 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.3 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 80.0 | 40.8 | 44.6% | 40.0 | 76.0 | 41.4 | 39.7% | 43.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.7 | 42.7 | 31-65 | 47.3% | 5-16 | 33.6% | 16-19 | 82.1% | 39 | 6 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.7 | 41.7 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 6-17 | 34.0% | 16-20 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 81.2 | 40.9 | 30-64 | 47.4% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 83.1% | 36 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.8 | 38.4 | 28-65 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 14-18 | 79.8% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 17-20 | 80.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.6 | 38.8 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 6-16 | 38.5% | 14-18 | 78.7% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 16-10 | +1.3 | 13-12 | 13-13 | 82.7 | 44.3 | 41.9% | 44.0 | 79.0 | 39.3 | 42.0% | 42.9 | | Home Games | 10-2 | +4.4 | 7-4 | 7-5 | 85.7 | 43.7 | 42.6% | 46.2 | 78.0 | 38.4 | 42.1% | 40.5 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 84.2 | 43.4 | 44.4% | 47.8 | 76.4 | 35.0 | 42.6% | 39.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.7 | 44.3 | 29-68 | 41.9% | 7-22 | 32.3% | 18-22 | 84.8% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 16-20 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.7 | 43.7 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 8-23 | 33.9% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 46 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.0 | 39.3 | 29-70 | 42.0% | 6-17 | 34.5% | 14-18 | 80.1% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 5 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.2 | 40.5 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 78.0 | 38.4 | 29-70 | 42.1% | 6-18 | 36.3% | 13-16 | 79.1% | 40 | 8 | 19 | 21 | 5 | 12 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.2, WASHINGTON 70.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/8/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 69-81 | L | -220 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 36 | 11 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 36 | 18 | | 7/13/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 87-77 | W | -300 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 44 | 15 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 45 | 18 | | 7/17/2017 | INDIANA | 80-62 | W | | 34-64 | 53.1% | 41 | 12 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 27 | 16 | | 7/20/2017 | CHICAGO | 80-82 | L | -850 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 35 | 11 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 38 | 12 | | 7/25/2017 | SEATTLE | 68-60 | W | -450 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 48 | 11 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 37 | 18 | | 7/28/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-73 | W | -650 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 33 | 8 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 33 | 12 | | 7/30/2017 | DALLAS | 95-74 | W | -850 | 40-71 | 56.3% | 50 | 15 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 32 | 12 | | 8/4/2017 | NEW YORK | 87-74 | W | -450 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 44 | 6 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 43 | 13 | | 8/6/2017 | @ DALLAS | 79-85 | L | -270 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 36 | 15 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 54 | 15 | | 8/11/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 70-64 | W | +180 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 38 | 15 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 41 | 16 | | 8/13/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 69-83 | L | -140 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 32 | 10 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 47 | 11 | | 8/16/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2017 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/22/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/24/2017 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/8/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 92-96 | L | +135 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 40 | 13 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 40 | 7 | | 7/14/2017 | @ INDIANA | 72-58 | W | -300 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 45 | 14 | 18-66 | 27.3% | 51 | 16 | | 7/16/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 55-85 | L | +210 | 18-65 | 27.7% | 40 | 11 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 55 | 11 | | 7/19/2017 | ATLANTA | 100-96 | W | -165 | 37-89 | 41.6% | 53 | 12 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 43 | 12 | | 7/25/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-76 | W | -300 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 44 | 12 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 47 | 10 | | 7/30/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 77-70 | W | -125 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 58 | 12 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 38 | 6 | | 8/4/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 74-76 | L | -200 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 43 | 11 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 42 | 10 | | 8/6/2017 | PHOENIX | 85-80 | W | -155 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 55 | 12 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 36 | 9 | | 8/12/2017 | INDIANA | 100-80 | W | -400 | 34-59 | 57.6% | 39 | 11 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 33 | 10 | | 8/16/2017 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2017 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2017 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2017 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 12-28 (-6.5 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 6-1 (+5.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 13-7 (+4.2 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 2-1 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/2/2017 | WASHINGTON | 69 | 167.5 | Under | 47 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 4-19 | 21.1% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 39 | 10 | 11 | | | LOS ANGELES | 76 | -6 | SU ATS | 30 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 48 | 10 | 9 | 5/19/2017 | WASHINGTON | 89 | 164.5 | Over | 48 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 18-19 | 94.7% | 29 | 8 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 99 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 59 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 10-21 | 47.6% | 21-22 | 95.5% | 32 | 5 | 11 | 7/22/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 95 | -9 | SU ATS | 49 | 34-61 | 55.7% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 19-23 | 82.6% | 41 | 10 | 11 | | | WASHINGTON | 75 | 157 | Over | 37 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 7-26 | 26.9% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 26 | 2 | 10 | 7/10/2016 | WASHINGTON | 82 | 156.5 | Over | 42 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 32 | 9 | 13 | | | LOS ANGELES | 93 | -10 | SU ATS | 44 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 38 | 9 | 12 | 5/20/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 97 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 36 | 2 | 11 | | | WASHINGTON | 67 | 157.5 | Over | 31 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 41 | 7 | 21 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 150-103 against the money line (+35.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.1, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 121-80 against the money line (+23.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 14-5 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 74-61 against the money line (+17.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 71.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 14-3 against the money line (+9.5 Units) versus excellent ball handling teams - committing <=12 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 26-28 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in home games after a division game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 16-29 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 13-30 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 19-25 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 4-15 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Thibault is 6-14 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 2-10 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Thibault is 11-16 against the money line (-14.4 Units) off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 14-16 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 23-29 against the money line (-20.5 Units) off 2 or more consecutive home wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 73.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 17-23 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 10-14 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 28-32 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 16-24 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 23-35 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 17-25 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 9-20 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 10-19 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 20-34 against the money line (-20.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 34-47 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Agler is 18-15 against the money line (-19.2 Units) as a road favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 26-28 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in road games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 26-27 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 6-11 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games in August or September games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 17-24 against the money line (-24.0 Units) on Wednesday in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 70.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 14-16 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in road games after a non-conference game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 13-29 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 70.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 30-38 against the money line (-40.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 72.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 30-47 against the money line (-25.4 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 70.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 4-6 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 14-11 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 21-17 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 12-13 against the money line (-15.1 Units) off a road loss as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 13-17 against the money line (-18.0 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 7-12 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 4-16 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 69.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 18-20 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 4-8 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 9-13 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-12 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 14-17 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 21-23 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 12-17 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 17-23 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-14 against the money line (-13.6 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 12-16 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 29-19 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 13-19 against the money line (-19.5 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 11-27 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 69.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 4-10 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 11-13 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 15-15 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 12-17 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 18-22 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 10-14 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 15-17 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 15-12 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 13-16 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 37-28 against the money line (+10.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 46-42 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 32-29 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 130-107 against the money line (+21.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 13-8 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in home games revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 42-37 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 31-24 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 31-24 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 13-9 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 20-14 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 43-37 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 10-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 21-17 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the home underdog won straight up 3 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 2 times, while the home underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 08/13/2017 - Essence Carson "?" Wednesday vs. Wash Mystics ( Elbow ) | | [G] 08/13/2017 - Riquna Williams "?" Wednesday vs. Wash Mystics ( Knee ) | |
| [F] 08/01/2017 - Elena Delle Donne out indefinitely ( Thumb ) | | [G] 07/16/2017 - Tayler Hill out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/3/2024 4:54:12 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|