| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 615 | CONNECTICUT | +120 | | 616 | WASHINGTON | -140 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(199-65 since 1997.) (75.4%, +73 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(198-71 since 1997.) (73.6%, +66.5 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(182-57 since 1997.) (76.2%, +65.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(174-59 since 1997.) (74.7%, +60.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(207-148 since 1997.) (58.3%, +59.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(166-58 since 1997.) (74.1%, +57.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(162-106 since 1997.) (60.4%, +57.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games.
(126-52 since 1997.) (70.8%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(95-32 since 1997.) (74.8%, +46.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(132-48 since 1997.) (73.3%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(93-32 since 1997.) (74.4%, +44.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(24-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(73-22 since 1997.) (76.8%, +40.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(71-22 since 1997.) (76.3%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season.
(47-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (77%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(65-20 since 1997.) (76.5%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(65-20 since 1997.) (76.5%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(59-17 since 1997.) (77.6%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(70-34 since 1997.) (67.3%, +33.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(88-54 since 1997.) (62%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(40-20 since 1997.) (66.7%, +32.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(57-17 since 1997.) (77%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more.
(49-12 since 1997.) (80.3%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more.
(49-12 since 1997.) (80.3%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(46-11 since 1997.) (80.7%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(44-11 since 1997.) (80%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(34-11 since 1997.) (75.6%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in July games.
(27-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +14 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - playing with 2 days rest, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(28-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points against opponent off a road win.
(18-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +10.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(85-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.4%, +23.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games against opponent hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(33-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.1%, +18.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(46-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +20.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(119-80 since 1997.) (59.8%, +51.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points.
(82-48 since 1997.) (63.1%, +39.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(94-68 since 1997.) (58%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(97-61 since 1997.) (61.4%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(101-67 since 1997.) (60.1%, +36.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(85-49 since 1997.) (63.4%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(68-34 since 1997.) (66.7%, +34.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(75-43 since 1997.) (63.6%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(44-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(69-38 since 1997.) (64.5%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, averaging 42 or more rebounds/game on the season.
(87-53 since 1997.) (62.1%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(85-53 since 1997.) (61.6%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(71-38 since 1997.) (65.1%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(52-20 since 1997.) (72.2%, +33.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - vs. division opponents, off an home win scoring 85 or more points.
(60-32 since 1997.) (65.2%, +33 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(59-30 since 1997.) (66.3%, +31.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(58-29 since 1997.) (66.7%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, in May, June, or July games.
(53-27 since 1997.) (66.2%, +30.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(43-17 since 1997.) (71.7%, +29.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(66-37 since 1997.) (64.1%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season.
(55-29 since 1997.) (65.5%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(48-20 since 1997.) (70.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(60-33 since 1997.) (64.5%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more.
(65-37 since 1997.) (63.7%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(57-32 since 1997.) (64%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(34-14 since 1997.) (70.8%, +27 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(34-14 since 1997.) (70.8%, +27 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(34-14 since 1997.) (70.8%, +27 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(48-25 since 1997.) (65.8%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(57-32 since 1997.) (64%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(25-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +21.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(54-28 since 1997.) (65.9%, +26.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(50-26 since 1997.) (65.8%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(27-16 since 1997.) (62.8%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(66-42 since 1997.) (61.1%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(39-14 since 1997.) (73.6%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(50-26 since 1997.) (65.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(24-13 since 1997.) (64.9%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(38-16 since 1997.) (70.4%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(35-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(43-21 since 1997.) (67.2%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(41-17 since 1997.) (70.7%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(39-17 since 1997.) (69.6%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(39-22 since 1997.) (63.9%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(46-24 since 1997.) (65.7%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(21-8 since 1997.) (72.4%, +23.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(21-8 since 1997.) (72.4%, +23.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(21-8 since 1997.) (72.4%, +23.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(49-28 since 1997.) (63.6%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(35-15 since 1997.) (70%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(48-26 since 1997.) (64.9%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(29-8 since 1997.) (78.4%, +22.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(37-15 since 1997.) (71.2%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(21-9 since 1997.) (70%, +22.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(21-9 since 1997.) (70%, +22.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(21-9 since 1997.) (70%, +22.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(47-26 since 1997.) (64.4%, +22.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(38-17 since 1997.) (69.1%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(33-12 since 1997.) (73.3%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(36-17 since 1997.) (67.9%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(33-18 since 1997.) (64.7%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(28-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 160 points or more in 3 straight games.
(34-16 since 1997.) (68%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(35-15 since 1997.) (70%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games.
(48-29 since 1997.) (62.3%, +19.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games.
(33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +19.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(52-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +33.5 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 82 | | 32-73 | 43.6% | 7-18 | 42.3% | 11-15 | 73.5% | 44 | 12 | 11 | | WASHINGTON | 86 | | 30-70 | 42.3% | 8-23 | 34.2% | 19-22 | 87.5% | 46 | 12 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 631 times, while CONNECTICUT won 351 times.
Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 26-26 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.7, OPPONENT 83.5 | CONNECTICUT is 87-68 against the money line (+18.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.7, OPPONENT 75.9 | CONNECTICUT is 16-10 against the money line (+14.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 78.0 | CONNECTICUT is 7-5 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 79.5 | CONNECTICUT is 74-42 against the money line (+27.2 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 74.7 | CONNECTICUT is 18-14 against the money line (+14.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.9, OPPONENT 82.7 | CONNECTICUT is 11-7 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 82.4 | CONNECTICUT is 115-99 against the money line (+28.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 74.2 | CONNECTICUT is 85-65 against the money line (+22.0 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.6, OPPONENT 74.3 | CONNECTICUT is 53-34 against the money line (+17.6 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 78.0 | CONNECTICUT is 12-5 against the money line (+9.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 81.8 | CONNECTICUT is 17-10 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 80.9 | WASHINGTON is 111-175 against the money line (-56.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 78.3 | WASHINGTON is 79-120 against the money line (-53.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 74.5 | WASHINGTON is 31-42 against the money line (-25.7 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.0, OPPONENT 76.7 | WASHINGTON is 1-9 against the money line (-12.3 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 82.3 | WASHINGTON is 26-88 against the money line (-59.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 79.8 | WASHINGTON is 3-8 against the money line (-7.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.5, OPPONENT 90.1 | WASHINGTON is 13-25 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 84.2 | WASHINGTON is 7-11 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.4, OPPONENT 81.2 | WASHINGTON is 13-24 against the money line (-14.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 83.2, OPPONENT 86.4 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 55-79 against the money line (-37.7 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.6, OPPONENT 73.7 | CONNECTICUT is 45-75 against the money line (-40.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.2, OPPONENT 77.2 | CONNECTICUT is 59-149 against the money line (-123.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 86.6 | CONNECTICUT is 31-105 against the money line (-98.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 90.5 | WASHINGTON is 62-57 against the money line (+23.4 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 73.1 | WASHINGTON is 21-11 against the money line (+15.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 88.4, OPPONENT 81.1 | WASHINGTON is 18-5 against the money line (+19.2 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 91.7, OPPONENT 80.4 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 9-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-8 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-10 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-11 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+7.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-9 against the money line (+16.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+7.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+14.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-10 against the money line (+12.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-7 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+5.7 Units) versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-2 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 91.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-11 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-20 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-9 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-11 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-20 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-16 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 80-148 against the money line (-66.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 129-206 against the money line (-61.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 24-32 against the money line (-20.1 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 43-53 against the money line (-25.8 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 1-9 against the money line (-8.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-15 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.2, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-14 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-11 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 8-15 against the money line (-10.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-13 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 207-310 against the money line (-104.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 0-4 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-6 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 5-11 against the money line (-11.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-15 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.8, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-18 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 27-74 against the money line (-37.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 45-116 against the money line (-50.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 74-129 against the money line (-50.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-13 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 21-7 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 41-47 against the money line (+16.0 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-16 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 64-49 against the money line (+16.5 Units) on Friday since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-9 against the money line (+18.6 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-10 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-8 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+7.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-5 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-17 against the money line (+21.8 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) off a home win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-6 against the money line (+11.8 Units) off a win by 20 points or more over a division rival since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.6, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-0 against the money line (+7.4 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-20 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.3, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-1 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-19 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-15 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-12 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-6 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-5 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-4 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-17 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-22 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-5 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-4 against the money line (+6.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-4 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-13 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-8 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+7.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 6-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after playing a home game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.0, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-26 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.5, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-11 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 5*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 272-401 against the money line (-120.3 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 0-5 against the money line (-7.1 Units) as a home favorite of -155 or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 77-81 against the money line (-49.1 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 160-175 against the money line (-72.5 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 109-120 against the money line (-44.0 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 3-11 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 108-119 against the money line (-54.5 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.1, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-11 against the money line (-10.1 Units) on Friday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 55-91 against the money line (-35.5 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 129-191 against the money line (-62.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 129-209 against the money line (-84.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 41-76 against the money line (-37.6 Units) after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 73-84 against the money line (-34.2 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 59-96 against the money line (-37.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-14 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 44-66 against the money line (-31.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-11 against the money line (-10.9 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.7, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 33-58 against the money line (-33.3 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 48-63 against the money line (-27.1 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 106-179 against the money line (-67.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 71-120 against the money line (-49.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 119-201 against the money line (-72.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-37 against the money line (-26.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 29-34 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 37-44 against the money line (-23.9 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 64-66 against the money line (-34.9 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-23 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 47-53 against the money line (-30.3 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-27 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 127-198 against the money line (-78.1 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 119-151 against the money line (-53.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 72.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 37-57 against the money line (-28.7 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 73.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-16 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-7 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.6, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 81.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 16-13 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 82.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 13-9 | +4 | 15-7 | 12-10 | 86.5 | 41.4 | 45.6% | 44.5 | 81.9 | 40.1 | 44.9% | 40.3 | | Road Games | 7-6 | +3.1 | 10-3 | 7-6 | 85.3 | 42.3 | 45.6% | 44.1 | 82.8 | 39.4 | 44.4% | 40.5 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 84.4 | 40.6 | 44.1% | 42.6 | 81.8 | 42.2 | 46.8% | 41.8 | | Division Games | 7-4 | +2.6 | 9-2 | 7-4 | 89.1 | 42.9 | 45.0% | 45.3 | 81.8 | 39.4 | 43.4% | 41.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.5 | 41.4 | 33-72 | 45.6% | 7-17 | 40.6% | 13-18 | 73.3% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80.9 | 40.5 | 29-68 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 16-20 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 85.3 | 42.3 | 33-72 | 45.6% | 7-17 | 44.3% | 12-16 | 71.4% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.9 | 40.1 | 30-66 | 44.9% | 6-17 | 36.7% | 16-20 | 79.9% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.8 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 44.0% | 6-17 | 33.0% | 16-20 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.8 | 39.4 | 29-66 | 44.4% | 7-18 | 38.4% | 18-22 | 81.5% | 40 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 13-9 | +0.3 | 10-11 | 11-11 | 82.4 | 44.4 | 41.2% | 43.2 | 79.4 | 39.8 | 41.9% | 43.9 | | Home Games | 8-2 | +2.4 | 5-4 | 5-5 | 84.4 | 43.3 | 41.1% | 46.1 | 77.6 | 38.7 | 41.7% | 41.7 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 80.8 | 43.8 | 40.1% | 44.4 | 82.2 | 40.0 | 41.8% | 47.2 | | Division Games | 9-2 | +7 | 7-3 | 3-8 | 81.5 | 44.0 | 40.0% | 47.5 | 74.2 | 37.4 | 39.1% | 45.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.4 | 44.4 | 28-69 | 41.2% | 7-22 | 31.6% | 19-21 | 86.9% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 16-21 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.4 | 43.3 | 28-68 | 41.1% | 7-23 | 32.0% | 21-24 | 84.9% | 46 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.4 | 39.8 | 29-70 | 41.9% | 6-17 | 35.0% | 15-18 | 81.2% | 44 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.5 | 40.3 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 77.6 | 38.7 | 29-70 | 41.7% | 6-17 | 36.5% | 13-16 | 80.7% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 5 | 12 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 70.9, WASHINGTON 70.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/23/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 94-89 | W | +170 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 38 | 8 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 39 | 14 | | 6/25/2017 | @ DALLAS | 82-96 | L | -210 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 35 | 18 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | | 6/27/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 79-87 | L | +120 | 28-77 | 36.4% | 51 | 14 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 39 | 9 | | 6/29/2017 | SEATTLE | 96-89 | W | -270 | 39-69 | 56.5% | 44 | 9 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 32 | 9 | | 7/1/2017 | @ INDIANA | 91-85 | W | -165 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 43 | 16 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 39 | 9 | | 7/5/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 89-56 | W | -360 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 48 | 13 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 38 | 18 | | 7/8/2017 | WASHINGTON | 96-92 | W | -155 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 40 | 7 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 40 | 13 | | 7/12/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 83-79 | W | -155 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 44 | 12 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 33 | 15 | | 7/13/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 77-87 | L | +220 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 45 | 18 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 44 | 15 | | 7/16/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 89-75 | W | | 36-72 | 50.0% | 45 | 9 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 40 | 14 | | 7/19/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 80-96 | L | -125 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 27 | 4 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 56 | 14 | | 7/25/2017 | CHICAGO | 93-72 | W | -300 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 52 | 11 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 36 | 18 | | 7/28/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/30/2017 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2017 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2017 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/18/2017 | DALLAS | 83-87 | L | -360 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 38 | 7 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 49 | 11 | | 6/23/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 76-93 | L | +375 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 34 | 17 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 49 | 12 | | 6/25/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 97-63 | W | -220 | 39-83 | 47.0% | 45 | 9 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 44 | 21 | | 6/27/2017 | SEATTLE | 100-70 | W | -210 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 35 | 10 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 39 | 23 | | 6/29/2017 | NEW YORK | 67-54 | W | -330 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 42 | 6 | 21-65 | 32.3% | 52 | 19 | | 7/2/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 69-76 | L | +200 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 39 | 11 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 48 | 9 | | 7/5/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 80-88 | L | -105 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 40 | 6 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 46 | 9 | | 7/8/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 92-96 | L | +135 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 40 | 13 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 40 | 7 | | 7/14/2017 | @ INDIANA | 72-58 | W | -300 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 45 | 14 | 18-66 | 27.3% | 51 | 16 | | 7/16/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 55-85 | L | +210 | 18-65 | 27.7% | 40 | 11 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 55 | 11 | | 7/19/2017 | ATLANTA | 100-96 | W | -165 | 37-89 | 41.6% | 53 | 12 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 43 | 12 | | 7/25/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-76 | W | -300 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 44 | 12 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 47 | 10 | | 7/28/2017 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/30/2017 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/4/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/6/2017 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2017 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| CONNECTICUT is 44-31 (+7.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 6-3 (+3.4 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 20-16 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 3-1 (+1.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/8/2017 | WASHINGTON | 92 | 168 | Over | 58 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 9-16 | 56.2% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 40 | 8 | 13 | | | CONNECTICUT | 96 | -3 | SU ATS | 43 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 40 | 11 | 7 | 5/31/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 76 | 162.5 | ATS | 32 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 49 | 13 | 10 | | | WASHINGTON | 78 | -7.5 | SU Under | 34 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 26-29 | 89.7% | 48 | 12 | 9 | 9/18/2016 | CONNECTICUT | 87 | 167 | SU ATS | 41 | 35-80 | 43.7% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 54 | 14 | 10 | | | WASHINGTON | 78 | -2.5 | Under | 39 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 21-29 | 72.4% | 42 | 3 | 12 | 6/14/2016 | WASHINGTON | 109 | -3 | SU | 44 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 10-24 | 41.7% | 31-33 | 93.9% | 42 | 7 | 18 | | | CONNECTICUT | 106 | 162.5 | Over | 42 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 7-25 | 28.0% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 55 | 12 | 19 | 5/21/2016 | WASHINGTON | 84 | 156 | SU ATS | 32 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 29-39 | 74.4% | 48 | 7 | 20 | | | CONNECTICUT | 76 | -6 | Over | 37 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 3-21 | 14.3% | 19-29 | 65.5% | 53 | 13 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 10-5 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in July games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 15-10 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after a division game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-20 against the money line (+13.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-5 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 4-0 against the money line (+7.4 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-20 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-16 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-13 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 16-11 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.5, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 5-1 against the money line (+7.4 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.7, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-19 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-15 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 16-12 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 23-23 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 22-20 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 20-18 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-17 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 21-22 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 19-16 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 17-12 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 15-9 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.2, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 21-14 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 16-13 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 13-8 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 15-12 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 8-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 89.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 14-11 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 9-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 9-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 15-8 against the money line (+13.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.4, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 14-10 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.6, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 14-11 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 22-18 against the money line (+17.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 15-9 against the money line (+16.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 23-16 against the money line (+21.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.0, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 11-5 against the money line (+14.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Miller is 14-10 against the money line (+12.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-7 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.6, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 22-13 against the money line (+20.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.2, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 14-12 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 15-11 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 24-20 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 13-9 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 14-11 against the money line (+13.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 22-20 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.1, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 13-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.0, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 19-20 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 12-6 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 90.2, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 12-10 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-16 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 18-19 against the money line (-14.8 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 12-18 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 13-28 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.6, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 21-37 against the money line (-16.4 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 26-32 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 33-48 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 15-23 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 16-24 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 20-34 against the money line (-17.2 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 16-20 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 4-8 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 74.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 34-47 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 31-46 against the money line (-22.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 17-24 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Thibault is 192-142 against the money line (+25.6 Units) in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 77.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 15-9 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in home games after a non-conference game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 34-27 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 45-42 against the money line (+9.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 77.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 19-13 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 129-107 against the money line (+20.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 76.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 49-38 against the money line (+19.1 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Thibault 79.4, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 39-36 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 78.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 28-23 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 79.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 29-24 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 80.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 20-17 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog won the game straight up 6 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 5 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 1 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 05/13/2017 - Chiney Ogwumike out for season ( Achilles ) | |
| [G] 07/16/2017 - Tayler Hill out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/7/2024 7:29:57 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|