| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA WASHINGTON |
|
| 160 | 63 Final 87 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
653 | MINNESOTA | -400 | 654 | WASHINGTON | +300 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in non-conference games, off a home loss. (311-216 since 1997.) (59%, +90.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival. (177-126 since 1997.) (58.4%, +59.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (97-27 since 1997.) (78.2%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home loss against a division rival against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite. (42-13 since 1997.) (76.4%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (36-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +15 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off an upset loss by 10 points or more as a home favorite. (20-6 since 1997.) (76.9%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (39-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (59-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, in non-conference games. (20-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +14.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in non-conference games. (26-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (90-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in non-conference games, off a home loss. (311-216 since 1997.) (59%, +90.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (286-118 since 1997.) (70.8%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more. (288-120 since 1997.) (70.6%, +78.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (295-290 since 1997.) (50.4%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more. (270-106 since 1997.) (71.8%, +78.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (279-258 since 1997.) (52%, +66.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (181-62 since 1997.) (74.5%, +65.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record. (195-65 since 1997.) (75%, +64.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (194-191 since 1997.) (50.4%, +60.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (235-96 since 1997.) (71%, +60.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game. (150-44 since 1997.) (77.3%, +57.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (170-63 since 1997.) (73%, +57 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (151-54 since 1997.) (73.7%, +56.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws. (171-70 since 1997.) (71%, +55 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (156-53 since 1997.) (74.6%, +54.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season. (139-50 since 1997.) (73.5%, +53.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (81-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (112-69 since 1997.) (61.9%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a losing record. (70-20 since 1997.) (77.8%, +38.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (92-32 since 1997.) (74.2%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 10 points or more. (80-46 since 1997.) (63.5%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after allowing 80 points or more. (89-25 since 1997.) (78.1%, +35.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (62-19 since 1997.) (76.5%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (47-10 since 1997.) (82.5%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 90 points or more. (45-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.6%, +24.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (35-10 since 1997.) (77.8%, +20.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, with a losing record. (22-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +20.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (26-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +23.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (44-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.9%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after trailing in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half. (23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +14 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA | 80 | | 31-68 | 45.5% | 4-13 | 31.5% | 14-17 | 80.2% | 44 | 10 | 13 | WASHINGTON | 76 | | 27-65 | 41.3% | 6-18 | 35.7% | 16-19 | 80.0% | 41 | 9 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 602 times, while WASHINGTON won 380 times. Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 27-7 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 71.4 | MINNESOTA is 85-26 against the money line (+71.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.2, OPPONENT 72.5 | MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 74.5 | MINNESOTA is 13-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 78.1 | MINNESOTA is 24-2 against the money line (+19.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 74.1 | WASHINGTON is 57-70 against the money line (-31.1 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.3, OPPONENT 76.9 | WASHINGTON is 9-18 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.1, OPPONENT 78.1 | WASHINGTON is 32-95 against the money line (-68.5 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 77.8 | WASHINGTON is 68-105 against the money line (-42.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 46-59 against the money line (-34.9 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.6, OPPONENT 73.7 | WASHINGTON is 129-201 against the money line (-73.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 74.2 | WASHINGTON is 24-83 against the money line (-55.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.0, OPPONENT 79.7 | WASHINGTON is 2-9 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 85.8 | WASHINGTON is 68-108 against the money line (-40.0 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 73.9 | WASHINGTON is 48-61 against the money line (-31.0 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.4, OPPONENT 82.6 | WASHINGTON is 6-15 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 77.7 |
|
MINNESOTA is 61-76 against the money line (-43.4 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 74.2 | MINNESOTA is 97-100 against the money line (-46.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 74.0 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 24-5 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 123-195 against the money line (-58.9 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 141-213 against the money line (-72.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 193-294 against the money line (-100.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 43-108 against the money line (-46.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-42 against the money line (-26.0 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-14 against the money line (-12.7 Units) vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 40-84 against the money line (-39.0 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 10-16 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 12-1 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in all games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 12-1 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in May, June, or July games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 41-17 against the money line (+14.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 38-26 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in road games after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.6, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) off an upset loss by 15 points or more as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 98-53 against the money line (+24.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 56-21 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 34-10 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 34-10 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 254-379 against the money line (-111.1 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 150-167 against the money line (-69.3 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 99-112 against the money line (-40.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 99-115 against the money line (-58.9 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 114-177 against the money line (-58.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 73-122 against the money line (-50.5 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 40-62 against the money line (-31.1 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 57-89 against the money line (-43.9 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 23-56 against the money line (-44.3 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 106-186 against the money line (-71.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 62-118 against the money line (-46.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-21 against the money line (-15.8 Units) in home games after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 33-39 against the money line (-24.2 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 56-59 against the money line (-30.6 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 20-29 against the money line (-21.5 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 39-54 against the money line (-24.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-28 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 121-206 against the money line (-75.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 135-227 against the money line (-68.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 188-188 against the money line (-61.8 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.1, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 163-154 against the money line (-61.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 68-64 against the money line (-37.6 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 54-72 against the money line (-29.7 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 125-149 against the money line (-55.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-4 against the money line (+8.6 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-4 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 82.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 13-1 | +10.1 | 9-5 | 7-7 | 85.8 | 44.5 | 47.9% | 41.4 | 75.2 | 38.0 | 41.8% | 39.2 | Road Games | 8-0 | +8.4 | 6-2 | 4-4 | 87.5 | 46.0 | 48.7% | 42.0 | 75.6 | 40.9 | 41.6% | 38.1 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.2 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 82.8 | 44.2 | 48.5% | 42.8 | 77.2 | 40.2 | 42.4% | 36.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.8 | 44.5 | 32-68 | 47.9% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 16-20 | 82.5% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 9 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 83 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 5-16 | 32.9% | 18-23 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 87.5 | 46.0 | 33-68 | 48.7% | 4-13 | 34.3% | 17-20 | 84.0% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 21 | 9 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.2 | 38.0 | 27-65 | 41.8% | 5-18 | 28.5% | 15-19 | 80.1% | 39 | 7 | 15 | 21 | 7 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 83.7 | 41.5 | 30-66 | 44.5% | 6-17 | 33.2% | 19-23 | 80.7% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.6 | 40.9 | 27-65 | 41.6% | 5-16 | 28.5% | 17-21 | 80.0% | 38 | 6 | 14 | 21 | 7 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 7-8 | +2.8 | 7-7 | 13-2 | 81.5 | 39.8 | 42.5% | 42.7 | 84.7 | 42.5 | 44.5% | 42.5 | Home Games | 2-6 | -4.9 | 3-5 | 6-2 | 78.0 | 39.5 | 42.9% | 41.1 | 82.2 | 43.0 | 45.9% | 40.1 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.6 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 87.0 | 42.4 | 44.3% | 38.4 | 81.4 | 42.2 | 44.1% | 44.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.5 | 39.8 | 28-65 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 20-25 | 79.1% | 43 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.9 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 5-16 | 32.9% | 19-23 | 79.5% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 78.0 | 39.5 | 28-65 | 42.9% | 6-17 | 34.6% | 17-22 | 76.1% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.7 | 42.5 | 30-68 | 44.5% | 6-18 | 32.3% | 18-23 | 79.7% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 83.9 | 41.5 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 5-16 | 32.0% | 18-23 | 78.9% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 82.2 | 43.0 | 30-65 | 45.9% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 81.3% | 40 | 8 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 71.9, WASHINGTON 71.3 |
| | |
|
|
5/18/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 97-80 | W | -165 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 41 | 9 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 41 | 12 | 5/22/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 78-71 | W | -500 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 11 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 42 | 15 | 5/25/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 85-78 | W | -175 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 40 | 21 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 30 | 19 | 5/27/2016 | INDIANA | 74-71 | W | -850 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 41 | 14 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 44 | 14 | 5/31/2016 | @ NEW YORK | 79-69 | W | -250 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 41 | 13 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 41 | 19 | 6/4/2016 | DALLAS | 80-63 | W | -850 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 42 | 13 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 45 | 18 | 6/7/2016 | PHOENIX | 89-81 | W | -600 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 37 | 9 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 46 | 12 | 6/10/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 110-78 | W | -330 | 38-69 | 55.1% | 37 | 10 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 47 | 18 | 6/11/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 83-76 | W | -330 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 46 | 19 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 32 | 13 | 6/14/2016 | INDIANA | 87-63 | W | | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 11 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 42 | 12 | 6/19/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 96-84 | W | -650 | 41-73 | 56.2% | 37 | 10 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 33 | 14 | 6/21/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-69 | W | +135 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 51 | 14 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 39 | 17 | 6/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 76-94 | L | -220 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 38 | 18 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 37 | 14 | 6/26/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2016 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2016 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/18/2016 | DALLAS | 77-87 | L | -155 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 49 | 15 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 42 | 12 | 5/20/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 67-97 | L | +250 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 21 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 36 | 11 | 5/21/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 84-76 | W | +200 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 48 | 20 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 53 | 16 | 5/26/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 84-82 | W | +170 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 49 | 16 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 35 | 11 | 5/29/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 77-93 | L | +280 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 40 | 6 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 41 | 9 | 6/1/2016 | CHICAGO | 78-86 | L | +155 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 42 | 13 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 35 | 12 | 6/3/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 72-98 | L | +400 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 32 | 14 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 45 | 11 | 6/5/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 86-79 | W | +350 | 28-74 | 37.8% | 49 | 7 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 45 | 8 | 6/8/2016 | @ DALLAS | 87-79 | W | +155 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 52 | 15 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 43 | 10 | 6/11/2016 | MINNESOTA | 76-83 | L | +250 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 32 | 13 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 46 | 19 | 6/14/2016 | @ CONNECTICUT | 109-106 | W | -155 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 42 | 18 | 39-86 | 45.3% | 55 | 19 | 6/18/2016 | ATLANTA | 95-65 | W | -175 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 40 | 12 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 38 | 21 | 6/22/2016 | INDIANA | 76-62 | W | -200 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 37 | 13 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 44 | 18 | 6/24/2016 | PHOENIX | 79-91 | L | -140 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 41 | 11 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 40 | 9 | 6/26/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
WASHINGTON is 14-16 (+7.1 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 2-3 (+2.1 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
WASHINGTON is 8-9 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 2-1 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/11/2016 | MINNESOTA | 83 | -7.5 | SU Over | 45 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 20-25 | 80.0% | 46 | 8 | 19 | | WASHINGTON | 76 | 158.5 | ATS | 47 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 5-22 | 22.7% | 11-11 | 100.0% | 32 | 6 | 13 | 8/19/2015 | WASHINGTON | 79 | 147 | SU ATS | 36 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 43 | 10 | 10 | | MINNESOTA | 61 | -9.5 | Under | 34 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 1-6 | 16.7% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 41 | 11 | 14 | 8/16/2015 | MINNESOTA | 69 | -4 | Under | 40 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 48 | 12 | 8 | | WASHINGTON | 77 | 147 | SU ATS | 49 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 42 | 9 | 8 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 160-73 against the money line (+34.8 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 135-44 against the money line (+25.4 Units) as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 60-36 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 68-32 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 50-18 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 101-46 against the money line (+28.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 71-28 against the money line (+19.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 64-27 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 57-26 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 54-21 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 46-21 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 111-49 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 91-40 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 77-32 against the money line (+20.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 64-24 against the money line (+16.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 113-50 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 84-34 against the money line (+23.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 45-19 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 129-48 against the money line (+41.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 81-29 against the money line (+32.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 84-33 against the money line (+32.5 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 65-31 against the money line (+17.7 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 71-24 against the money line (+25.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 30-7 against the money line (+20.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 64-31 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 83-41 against the money line (+19.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 111-59 against the money line (+19.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 31-9 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 45-12 against the money line (+26.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 86-37 against the money line (+31.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 114-54 against the money line (+30.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 45-13 against the money line (+20.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 66-22 against the money line (+31.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 55-29 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 76-43 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 7-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 9-21 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 3-11 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Thibault is 84-61 against the money line (+18.1 Units) in June games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 40-38 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 21-21 against the money line (+10.5 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 21-21 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 78.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 60-24 against the money line (+27.3 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 78.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 122-94 against the money line (+27.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 85-64 against the money line (+20.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 77.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 49-33 against the money line (+19.0 Units) off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Thibault is 27-10 against the money line (+16.1 Units) in home games after a loss by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 78.6, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 10-4 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 81.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Thibault is 23-3 against the money line (+19.2 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 81.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Thibault is 32-28 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 111-90 against the money line (+23.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 76.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 15-9 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Thibault is 125-110 against the money line (+24.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 74.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Thibault is 88-68 against the money line (+18.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Thibault 74.1, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 23 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/28/2024 2:14:51 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|