| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
INDIANA WASHINGTON |
|
| 143 | 81 Final 76 |
|
|
| | |
|
Eastern Conference Playoffs - Best of 3 - Game 1 - IND leads 1-0 | | | | |
609 | INDIANA | +145 | 610 | WASHINGTON | -165 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (339-140 since 1997.) (70.8%, +88.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (264-101 since 1997.) (72.3%, +86.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (349-146 since 1997.) (70.5%, +86.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (269-106 since 1997.) (71.7%, +82.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (243-87 since 1997.) (73.6%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (254-102 since 1997.) (71.3%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (288-110 since 1997.) (72.4%, +77.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (260-107 since 1997.) (70.8%, +74.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (196-70 since 1997.) (73.7%, +73.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (195-73 since 1997.) (72.8%, +66.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (238-191 since 1997.) (55.5%, +64.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (198-70 since 1997.) (73.9%, +64.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (174-61 since 1997.) (74%, +62.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, on Saturday games. (74-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.2%, +41.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (179-61 since 1997.) (74.6%, +60.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (147-47 since 1997.) (75.8%, +58.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (154-52 since 1997.) (74.8%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (207-99 since 1997.) (67.6%, +56.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (132-40 since 1997.) (76.7%, +54.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (161-62 since 1997.) (72.2%, +53.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (153-68 since 1997.) (69.2%, +52.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (138-47 since 1997.) (74.6%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (123-39 since 1997.) (75.9%, +50.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (181-91 since 1997.) (66.5%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (142-53 since 1997.) (72.8%, +48.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (152-62 since 1997.) (71%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (145-70 since 1997.) (67.4%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (117-41 since 1997.) (74.1%, +44.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (104-30 since 1997.) (77.6%, +43.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (83-23 since 1997.) (78.3%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (79-19 since 1997.) (80.6%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (93-29 since 1997.) (76.2%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (118-73 since 1997.) (61.8%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (74-19 since 1997.) (79.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (83-23 since 1997.) (78.3%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (116-70 since 1997.) (62.4%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (90-42 since 1997.) (68.2%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss against a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (74-21 since 1997.) (77.9%, +34.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (71-20 since 1997.) (78%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (74-24 since 1997.) (75.5%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (46-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games against opponent after having won 3 of their last 4 games. (50-9 since 1997.) (84.7%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (63-17 since 1997.) (78.8%, +30.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (89-41 since 1997.) (68.5%, +30.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (100-61 since 1997.) (62.1%, +30.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (65-20 since 1997.) (76.5%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (68-30 since 1997.) (69.4%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after one or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games. (25-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.2%, +21.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, in a game involving two marginal losing teams (40 to 49%). (47-22 since 1997.) (68.1%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, in a game involving two marginal losing teams (40 to 49%) after 15 or more games. (44-20 since 1997.) (68.8%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after one or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG). (30-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +22.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (25-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +21.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (26-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +20.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +13.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (38-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.5%, +17.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (32-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +23.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (31-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games. (103-70 since 1997.) (59.5%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season. (247-220 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.9%, +41.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA | 72 | | 27-66 | 40.2% | 5-16 | 31.5% | 14-18 | 77.4% | 43 | 12 | 13 | WASHINGTON | 76 | | 28-63 | 44.0% | 5-16 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 42 | 9 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, WASHINGTON won the game straight up 592 times, while INDIANA won 386 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 23-11 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 71.9 | INDIANA is 73-50 against the money line (+22.4 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.3, OPPONENT 70.7 | INDIANA is 11-4 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 73.7 | WASHINGTON is 69-101 against the money line (-41.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.2 | WASHINGTON is 26-35 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.5 | WASHINGTON is 42-52 against the money line (-28.5 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 76.2 | WASHINGTON is 117-187 against the money line (-70.4 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 5-12 against the money line (-9.0 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 74.7 | WASHINGTON is 127-184 against the money line (-57.5 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.4 | WASHINGTON is 61-99 against the money line (-37.0 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.9 |
|
INDIANA is 16-22 against the money line (-12.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.6, OPPONENT 74.4 | INDIANA is 40-67 against the money line (-40.5 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.7, OPPONENT 74.4 | INDIANA is 80-89 against the money line (-45.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 81.7, OPPONENT 82.2 | WASHINGTON is 9-4 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 70.5 | WASHINGTON is 10-3 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 70.5 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 20-8 against the money line (+14.9 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 3*) | INDIANA is 5-0 against the money line (+6.3 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was INDIANA 74.6, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 21-11 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.5, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 32-15 against the money line (+16.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 40-29 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 43-30 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.5, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 26-13 against the money line (+15.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.8, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 24-16 against the money line (+8.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.9, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 5-0 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season this season. The average score was INDIANA 76.2, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 115-138 against the money line (-52.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 61-80 against the money line (-41.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 36-62 against the money line (-29.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 24-47 against the money line (-29.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 72-137 against the money line (-65.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 114-189 against the money line (-62.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 32-41 against the money line (-25.5 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 85-144 against the money line (-67.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 131-197 against the money line (-68.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 113-191 against the money line (-84.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 176-273 against the money line (-95.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 64-100 against the money line (-45.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 59-103 against the money line (-40.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 36-71 against the money line (-31.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 14-19 against the money line (-12.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 72.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 13-9 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was INDIANA 74.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 9-6 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 73.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 40-30 against the money line (+12.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 8-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) as a # 2 seed in the playoffs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 10-5 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 74.5, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 9-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was INDIANA 79.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 228-352 against the money line (-111.6 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 68-70 against the money line (-41.1 Units) as a home favorite of -250 or less since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 137-153 against the money line (-62.2 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 43-62 against the money line (-37.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 70-118 against the money line (-42.7 Units) in August or September games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 33-69 against the money line (-36.8 Units) on Saturday games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 147-226 against the money line (-83.7 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-15 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 87-147 against the money line (-65.0 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 56-100 against the money line (-49.7 Units) after 3 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 106-180 against the money line (-74.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 51-60 against the money line (-28.9 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 87-129 against the money line (-45.5 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-22 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 40-86 against the money line (-44.3 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 73-138 against the money line (-62.4 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 30-58 against the money line (-27.7 Units) off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.2, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 2-9 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in home games off a road loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-13 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in home games off a road loss over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 95-173 against the money line (-72.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 129-230 against the money line (-86.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 107-171 against the money line (-65.9 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 109-193 against the money line (-75.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 55-104 against the money line (-55.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 22-60 against the money line (-41.1 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 122-215 against the money line (-72.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 72-130 against the money line (-50.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 73-78 against the money line (-35.8 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.3, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 87-92 against the money line (-42.1 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.4, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 94-101 against the money line (-45.1 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.0, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 10-33 against the money line (-20.6 Units) in road games after a win by 6 points or less since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 141-144 against the money line (-57.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.1, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-3 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.1, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 17-18 | 0 | 21-13 | 17-18 | 74.3 | 37.1 | 41.7% | 40.3 | 75.1 | 35.6 | 44.2% | 40.9 | Road Games | 9-8 | +5.6 | 12-5 | 10-7 | 73.6 | 36.7 | 41.7% | 40.3 | 74.7 | 35.4 | 44.6% | 40.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 3-1 | 2-3 | 75.2 | 40.6 | 42.9% | 42.0 | 70.4 | 31.2 | 45.5% | 36.8 | Division Games | 13-10 | +5.7 | 12-10 | 11-12 | 73.3 | 36.0 | 41.2% | 41.1 | 73.8 | 35.2 | 43.6% | 42.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 74.3 | 37.1 | 27-64 | 41.7% | 5-15 | 34.4% | 16-21 | 75.6% | 40 | 10 | 14 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.1 | 38.1 | 29-67 | 43.2% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 14-19 | 77.3% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.6 | 36.7 | 26-63 | 41.7% | 5-15 | 31.2% | 16-21 | 77.3% | 40 | 10 | 15 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.1 | 35.6 | 27-61 | 44.2% | 4-12 | 30.6% | 17-22 | 78.4% | 41 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 76.9 | 37.9 | 29-67 | 43.5% | 4-14 | 32.4% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 74.7 | 35.4 | 27-60 | 44.6% | 3-12 | 25.8% | 18-24 | 76.7% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 16-19 | -2.6 | 15-17 | 13-22 | 74.2 | 35.8 | 42.5% | 43.4 | 73.9 | 36.1 | 41.2% | 42.5 | Home Games | 8-9 | -4.8 | 7-8 | 4-13 | 73.1 | 34.8 | 41.2% | 44.5 | 71.8 | 34.6 | 40.9% | 41.9 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5 | 0-3 | 2-3 | 71.0 | 32.0 | 37.9% | 43.8 | 75.8 | 33.4 | 43.8% | 44.6 | Division Games | 11-12 | -2.7 | 10-11 | 8-15 | 72.7 | 34.9 | 41.9% | 43.8 | 71.2 | 35.2 | 40.4% | 43.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 74.2 | 35.8 | 28-65 | 42.5% | 5-17 | 31.8% | 13-17 | 80.0% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.2 | 38 | 29-66 | 43.7% | 5-14 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.1 | 34.8 | 27-65 | 41.2% | 5-17 | 29.0% | 14-18 | 79.7% | 45 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.9 | 36.1 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 4-13 | 31.6% | 13-18 | 73.4% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 76.6 | 37.9 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 4-13 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 77.1% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.8 | 34.6 | 27-67 | 40.9% | 4-13 | 30.1% | 13-18 | 73.2% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 69.6, WASHINGTON 69.5 |
| | |
|
|
7/15/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 78-86 | L | +120 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 34 | 15 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 37 | 12 | 7/17/2014 | CHICAGO | 82-64 | W | -210 | 35-74 | 47.3% | 39 | 8 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 44 | 21 | 7/22/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 57-60 | L | -165 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 48 | 18 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 38 | 11 | 7/26/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 75-68 | W | +100 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 42 | 8 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 35 | 11 | 7/28/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 73-77 | L | +170 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 31 | 15 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 40 | 16 | 7/31/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 76-67 | W | -140 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 38 | 14 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 27 | 18 | 8/2/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 69-79 | L | +450 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 47 | 9 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 41 | 5 | 8/5/2014 | MINNESOTA | 64-66 | L | +170 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 36 | 9 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 52 | 10 | 8/8/2014 | WASHINGTON | 61-74 | L | -210 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 38 | 10 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 44 | 10 | 8/10/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 90-76 | W | -110 | 35-61 | 57.4% | 33 | 11 | 29-53 | 54.7% | 27 | 14 | 8/14/2014 | NEW YORK | 76-63 | W | -250 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 45 | 14 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 41 | 17 | 8/16/2014 | CHICAGO | 71-67 | W | -165 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 11 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 38 | 12 | 8/17/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 61-73 | L | +170 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 43 | 17 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 38 | 10 | 8/21/2014 | WASHINGTON | 78-73 | W | -210 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 45 | 10 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 40 | 16 | 8/23/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/15/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 78-90 | L | +400 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 34 | 12 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 39 | 12 | 7/17/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 79-75 | W | +250 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 40 | 22 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 26 | 19 | 7/23/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 89-75 | W | -175 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 36 | 12 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 11 | 7/25/2014 | TULSA | 82-77 | W | -210 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 52 | 14 | 30-84 | 35.7% | 52 | 11 | 7/27/2014 | ATLANTA | 77-67 | W | +135 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 44 | 15 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 42 | 15 | 7/29/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 76-80 | L | +135 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 48 | 13 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 54 | 13 | 8/3/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 65-76 | L | +170 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 45 | 19 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 43 | 8 | 8/5/2014 | NEW YORK | 79-46 | W | -165 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 43 | 14 | 17-59 | 28.8% | 40 | 16 | 8/8/2014 | @ INDIANA | 74-61 | W | +175 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 44 | 10 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 38 | 10 | 8/10/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 81-89 | L | -155 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 48 | 18 | 33-81 | 40.7% | 63 | 20 | 8/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 69-72 | L | +135 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 37 | 6 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 48 | 14 | 8/15/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 71-67 | W | -220 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 46 | 16 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 36 | 12 | 8/16/2014 | NEW YORK | 61-73 | L | -250 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 48 | 16 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 31 | 8 | 8/21/2014 | @ INDIANA | 73-78 | L | +175 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 40 | 16 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 45 | 10 | 8/23/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
INDIANA is 40-19 (+14.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 8-5 (+0.1 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
INDIANA is 19-10 (+13.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
INDIANA is 4-2 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/21/2014 | WASHINGTON | 73 | 140.5 | | 36 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 40 | 6 | 16 | | INDIANA | 78 | -5 | SU Over | 30 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 45 | 12 | 10 | 8/8/2014 | WASHINGTON | 74 | 143 | SU ATS | 37 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 44 | 8 | 10 | | INDIANA | 61 | -5 | Under | 29 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 38 | 13 | 10 | 7/2/2014 | INDIANA | 80 | 144 | SU ATS | 42 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 38 | 7 | 17 | | WASHINGTON | 77 | -4 | Over | 29 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 2-17 | 11.8% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 37 | 11 | 14 | 6/6/2014 | INDIANA | 64 | 141.5 | SU ATS | 26 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 38 | 10 | 11 | | WASHINGTON | 61 | -4.5 | Under | 35 | 18-61 | 29.5% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 23-25 | 92.0% | 51 | 15 | 17 | 5/23/2014 | WASHINGTON | 79 | 146.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 51 | 9 | 12 | | INDIANA | 63 | -4 | Under | 30 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 39 | 9 | 8 | 9/10/2013 | WASHINGTON | 69 | 142.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 46 | 14 | 15 | | INDIANA | 67 | -6 | Under | 37 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 41 | 12 | 9 | 7/21/2013 | INDIANA | 65 | 144.5 | SU ATS | 30 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 44 | 11 | 12 | | WASHINGTON | 52 | -4.5 | Under | 16 | 17-55 | 30.9% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 40 | 4 | 15 | 7/19/2013 | WASHINGTON | 70 | 147 | | 31 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 38 | 8 | 21 | | INDIANA | 77 | -5 | SU ATS | 32 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 22-23 | 95.7% | 41 | 16 | 13 | 6/16/2013 | INDIANA | 60 | 143 | Under | 31 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 39 | 8 | 10 | | WASHINGTON | 64 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 44 | 6 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Lin is 153-119 against the money line (+1.7 Units) in all games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 109-71 against the money line (+22.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.2, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 100-73 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after a division game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 33-31 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 95-63 against the money line (+21.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 19-11 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 74.8, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 8-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) as a # 2 seed in the playoffs as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 66-36 against the money line (+25.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 73-54 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 48-25 against the money line (+18.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 67-36 against the money line (+20.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 54-33 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 79-45 against the money line (+19.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 127-97 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 26-25 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 74.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 33-34 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 74.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 90-65 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 125-93 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 38-22 against the money line (+17.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 50-31 against the money line (+20.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 19-11 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 29-17 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Lin is 85-79 against the money line (-24.2 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 107-80 against the money line (+24.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 77-56 against the money line (+19.5 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 78.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 54-21 against the money line (+20.2 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.2, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 71-42 against the money line (+20.6 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 22-11 against the money line (+13.2 Units) off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 74.3, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 16-10 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 98-73 against the money line (+28.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 61-34 against the money line (+27.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 98-78 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 39-30 against the money line (+14.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 49-31 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 73.5, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 180 times, while the road underdog won straight up 118 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 16 times, while the road underdog won straight up 13 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/1/2024 9:56:44 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|