| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
TULSA
First Half Results
WASHINGTON |
|
|
80
| 37
Final
49 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 651 | TULSA | 79 | | 652 | WASHINGTON | -2 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(52-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(58-26 since 1997.) (69%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(86-46 since 1997.) (65.2%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more.
(64-31 since 1997.) (67.4%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(55-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +19.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(43-17 since 1997.) (71.7%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(53-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(202-120 since 1997.) (62.7%, +70 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - off a loss against a division rival, on Friday nights.
(27-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(44-19 since 1997.) (69.8%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(30-11 since 1997.) (73.2%, +17.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(101-55 since 1997.) (64.7%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(45-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(28-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Over - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(28-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in July games.
(437-310 since 1997.) (58.5%, +96 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in May, June, or July games.
(936-736 since 1997.) (56%, +126.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a division game.
(932-724 since 1997.) (56.3%, +135.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(389-293 since 1997.) (57%, +66.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a division game against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(273-198 since 1997.) (58%, +55.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(120-74 since 1997.) (61.9%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(442-315 since 1997.) (58.4%, +95.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having won 4 of their last 5 games.
(236-160 since 1997.) (59.6%, +60 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(219-146 since 1997.) (60%, +58.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a home win, with a losing record.
(107-67 since 1997.) (61.5%, +33.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(225-152 since 1997.) (59.7%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(138-92 since 1997.) (60%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(728-560 since 1997.) (56.5%, +112 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(385-269 since 1997.) (58.9%, +89.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(245-165 since 1997.) (59.8%, +63.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a game where they covered the spread against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(172-107 since 1997.) (61.6%, +54.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(363-261 since 1997.) (58.2%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(103-58 since 1997.) (64%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(103-58 since 1997.) (64%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(103-58 since 1997.) (64%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(428-294 since 1997.) (59.3%, +104.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(318-207 since 1997.) (60.6%, +90.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(496-370 since 1997.) (57.3%, +89 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record.
(176-109 since 1997.) (61.8%, +56.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(121-73 since 1997.) (62.4%, +40.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in July games.
(437-310 since 1997.) (58.5%, +96 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in May, June, or July games.
(936-736 since 1997.) (56%, +126.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(589-433 since 1997.) (57.6%, +112.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%).
(93-48 since 1997.) (66%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(120-74 since 1997.) (61.9%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(103-58 since 1997.) (64%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(103-58 since 1997.) (64%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(103-58 since 1997.) (64%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(121-78 since 1997.) (60.8%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(53-20 since 1997.) (72.6%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(428-294 since 1997.) (59.3%, +104.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(318-207 since 1997.) (60.6%, +90.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after scoring 75 points or more.
(139-85 since 1997.) (62.1%, +45.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after one or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.).
(130-76 since 1997.) (63.1%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(279-199 since 1997.) (58.4%, +60.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(748-550 since 1997.) (57.6%, +143 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(285-169 since 1997.) (62.8%, +99.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(473-326 since 1997.) (59.2%, +114.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after playing a road game.
(660-518 since 1997.) (56%, +90.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(729-515 since 1997.) (58.6%, +162.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| TULSA | 79 | | 40 | | 29-70 | 42.1% | 6-17 | 31.8% | 15-19 | 77.4% | 42 | 12 | 11 | | WASHINGTON | 82 | | 41 | | 31-67 | 45.5% | 6-17 | 32.8% | 15-18 | 82.6% | 44 | 11 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA covered the first half line 513 times, while WASHINGTON covered the first half line 438 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 522 games went over first half total, while 431 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 22-48 against the 1rst half line (-30.8 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.3, OPPONENT 36.0 | WASHINGTON is 36-61 against the 1rst half line (-31.1 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 38.6 | WASHINGTON is 75-140 against the 1rst half line (-79.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 40.6 | WASHINGTON is 72-109 against the 1rst half line (-47.9 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 37.1 | WASHINGTON is 26-44 against the 1rst half line (-22.4 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 36.5 |
|
TULSA is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.6, OPPONENT 42.6 | TULSA is 0-6 against the 1rst half line (-6.6 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.8, OPPONENT 46.2 | TULSA is 32-52 against the 1rst half line (-25.2 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.9, OPPONENT 43.0 | TULSA is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.1, OPPONENT 43.7 | TULSA is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.1, OPPONENT 43.7 | WASHINGTON is 67-41 against the 1rst half line (+21.9 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 35.9 | WASHINGTON is 21-11 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 37.1 | WASHINGTON is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.6, OPPONENT 39.1 | WASHINGTON is 22-10 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.8, OPPONENT 34.8 |
|
TULSA is 13-6 OVER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.5, OPPONENT 42.9 | TULSA is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.3, OPPONENT 45.6 | TULSA is 14-6 OVER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.1, OPPONENT 43.7 | TULSA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.5, OPPONENT 44.0 | TULSA is 14-6 OVER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.1, OPPONENT 43.7 | TULSA is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.6, OPPONENT 44.9 | TULSA is 31-15 OVER (+14.5 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 39.3, OPPONENT 42.6 |
|
WASHINGTON is 94-59 UNDER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.1 | WASHINGTON is 67-45 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.7 | WASHINGTON is 72-50 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.1 | WASHINGTON is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.2, OPPONENT 34.1 | WASHINGTON is 107-63 UNDER (+37.7 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.0 | WASHINGTON is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 30.7, OPPONENT 32.6 | WASHINGTON is 168-123 UNDER (+32.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.8 | WASHINGTON is 29-17 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 36.7 | WASHINGTON is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 36.2 | WASHINGTON is 89-64 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.7 | WASHINGTON is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 32.3 |
|
| | |
|
| TULSA | | | | WASHINGTON | -4.5 |  |
|
| | |
|
TULSA is 9-18 against the 1rst half line (-10.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.7, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 35.6, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.8, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 11-23 against the 1rst half line (-14.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.9, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 33.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.3, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 34.7, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-16 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 46-30 against the 1rst half line (+13.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.6, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-9 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 31-16 against the 1rst half line (+13.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 45-27 against the 1rst half line (+15.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.2, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.6, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 28-15 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.6, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.0, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.2, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 31.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 56-33 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-4 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-17 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 93-61 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 46-25 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 131-88 UNDER (+34.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 121-80 UNDER (+33.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 172-121 UNDER (+38.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 34-16 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-11 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 38-18 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 138-101 UNDER (+26.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 85-58 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-5 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 30.7, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 28-9 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 29-57 against the 1rst half line (-33.7 Units) in home games in July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 76-113 against the 1rst half line (-48.3 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-26 against the 1rst half line (-17.6 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.4, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-24 against the 1rst half line (-15.4 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-44 against the 1rst half line (-25.4 Units) in home games after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 47-78 against the 1rst half line (-38.8 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 35-60 against the 1rst half line (-31.0 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 55-78 against the 1rst half line (-30.8 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 22-41 against the 1rst half line (-23.1 Units) in home games off a home win since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.9, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 33-54 against the 1rst half line (-26.4 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-13 against the 1rst half line (-10.3 Units) in home games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 24-46 against the 1rst half line (-26.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-23 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 21-38 against the 1rst half line (-20.8 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 87-125 against the 1rst half line (-50.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 11-26 against the 1rst half line (-17.6 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
TULSA is 12-25 against the 1rst half line (-15.5 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.4, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 18-35 against the 1rst half line (-20.5 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.0, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.7, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 3-10 against the 1rst half line (-8.0 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 18-35 against the 1rst half line (-20.5 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.0, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 18-32 against the 1rst half line (-17.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.0, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 7-19 against the 1rst half line (-13.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.2, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-7 against the 1rst half line (-6.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 46.3 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 15-29 against the 1rst half line (-16.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.3, OPPONENT 42.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 6-14 against the 1rst half line (-9.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.7, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 10-22 against the 1rst half line (-14.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-20 against the 1rst half line (-16.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 8-19 against the 1rst half line (-12.9 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.4, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.4, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 3-10 against the 1rst half line (-8.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 44.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-18 against the 1rst half line (-13.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.0, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 22-35 against the 1rst half line (-16.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.3, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 21-37 against the 1rst half line (-19.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 35.6, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.7, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 3-10 against the 1rst half line (-8.0 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.8, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 36-25 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.4, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-13 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 30-15 against the 1rst half line (+13.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 25-12 against the 1rst half line (+11.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.2, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-7 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 15-8 OVER (+6.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.3, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.9, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 15-8 OVER (+6.2 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.3, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.8, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.1, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.4, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog this season.
The average score was TULSA 42.2, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.9, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 40.3, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.9, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.1, OPPONENT 45.5 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.6, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.0, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.6, OPPONENT 44.2 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.8, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.1, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.1, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.9, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.3, OPPONENT 45.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.6, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 325-234 UNDER (+67.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-1 UNDER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-2 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 12-1 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.9, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 30.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 103-74 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total in July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 66-38 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total on Friday since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a division game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.5, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 82-50 UNDER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.0, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 47-23 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 20-6 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 32.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 24-8 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.1, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 96-66 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 41-16 UNDER (+23.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 45-22 UNDER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.2, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 34-12 UNDER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 30.9, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 29.9, OPPONENT 31.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 14-3 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 19-6 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.5, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 30.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 12-2 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 134-98 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 89-63 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 151-110 UNDER (+30.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.7, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 46-26 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 23-10 UNDER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 75-52 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 29-13 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 70-46 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 46-26 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.3, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 108-77 UNDER (+23.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 95-64 UNDER (+24.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 22-9 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 21-7 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 8-16 | -6.8 | 14-10 | 18-6 | 83.0 | 39.3 | 43.9% | 42.5 | 85.0 | 42.6 | 47.6% | 39.6 | | Road Games | 3-9 | -4.6 | 8-4 | 11-1 | 83.9 | 37.7 | 45.4% | 42.4 | 88.7 | 42.7 | 47.9% | 40.4 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.6 | 2-3 | 5-0 | 85.8 | 40.4 | 45.0% | 39.2 | 92.0 | 46.4 | 51.5% | 39.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.0 | 39.3 | 30-69 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 31.7% | 17-22 | 77.4% | 42 | 11 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.6 | 38.3 | 29-66 | 44.2% | 5-15 | 32.9% | 14-18 | 78.8% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 83.9 | 37.7 | 31-69 | 45.4% | 6-17 | 34.3% | 15-21 | 73.4% | 42 | 12 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.0 | 42.6 | 31-65 | 47.6% | 5-12 | 38.4% | 18-23 | 80.9% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.5 | 38.9 | 29-65 | 44.8% | 5-14 | 35.2% | 15-19 | 79.7% | 40 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 88.7 | 42.7 | 32-67 | 47.9% | 5-13 | 38.1% | 19-23 | 81.4% | 40 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 11-13 | -0.7 | 12-12 | 10-14 | 74.6 | 36.3 | 43.1% | 42.7 | 75.1 | 36.9 | 41.8% | 41.5 | | Home Games | 5-7 | -4.6 | 5-7 | 4-8 | 72.9 | 34.0 | 41.2% | 44.4 | 73.7 | 34.6 | 41.5% | 41.6 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +5.4 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 81.8 | 40.2 | 46.3% | 39.8 | 75.8 | 39.8 | 42.4% | 39.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 74.6 | 36.3 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 5-17 | 30.0% | 13-16 | 82.1% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78 | 38.5 | 29-66 | 44.0% | 5-14 | 33.5% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.9 | 34.0 | 27-66 | 41.2% | 5-17 | 27.1% | 13-16 | 82.5% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.1 | 36.9 | 28-68 | 41.8% | 5-14 | 33.7% | 14-19 | 74.4% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.3 | 38.9 | 29-66 | 44.0% | 5-14 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 77.6% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.7 | 34.6 | 28-67 | 41.5% | 4-14 | 33.1% | 14-18 | 73.4% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 71, WASHINGTON 70.3 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/15/2014 | SEATTLE | 85-79 | 41-39 | -3.5 | L | 72 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 8 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 29 | 11 | | 6/19/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 77-87 | 36-46 | 3.5 | L | 77.5 | O | 30-69 | 43.5% | 45 | 14 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 44 | 14 | | 6/20/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 80-91 | 38-45 | 6.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 31-79 | 39.2% | 54 | 5 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 35 | 8 | | 6/22/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 105-99 | 38-48 | 1.5 | L | 79 | O | 37-74 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 42 | 14 | | 6/25/2014 | @ INDIANA | 107-102 | 36-51 | 2.5 | L | 74.5 | O | 39-78 | 50.0% | 46 | 14 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 45 | 12 | | 6/28/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 89-92 | 32-47 | -0.5 | L | 79 | P | 31-74 | 41.9% | 47 | 16 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 11 | | 6/29/2014 | PHOENIX | 77-80 | 37-31 | 2.5 | W | 81.5 | U | 24-77 | 31.2% | 50 | 12 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 33 | 13 | | 7/1/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 74-90 | 35-46 | 1.5 | L | 77.5 | O | 28-70 | 40.0% | 34 | 9 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 52 | 14 | | 7/3/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 96-83 | 43-40 | 2 | W | 79 | O | 35-73 | 47.9% | 52 | 12 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 38 | 12 | | 7/5/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 76-78 | 35-37 | -2 | L | 81.5 | U | 27-67 | 40.3% | 42 | 11 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 14 | | 7/8/2014 | INDIANA | 76-78 | 34-41 | -0.5 | L | 76 | U | 25-59 | 42.4% | 41 | 15 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 11 | | 7/10/2014 | MINNESOTA | 85-91 | 49-55 | 1.5 | L | 81.5 | O | 31-72 | 43.1% | 36 | 10 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 40 | 12 | | 7/12/2014 | WASHINGTON | 74-91 | 42-55 | -2 | L | 76.5 | O | 28-71 | 39.4% | 42 | 10 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 48 | 13 | | 7/16/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 82-93 | 39-40 | 5 | W | 82.5 | U | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 16 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 39 | 8 | | 7/17/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 95-90 | 38-45 | -0.5 | L | 79 | O | 30-60 | 50.0% | 43 | 10 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 29 | 12 | | 7/22/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 93-95 | 34-37 | 2 | L | 80.5 | U | 37-71 | 52.1% | 31 | 8 | 38-70 | 54.3% | 41 | 9 | | 7/25/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2014 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/15/2014 | ATLANTA | 67-75 | 32-40 | 2 | L | 76 | U | 26-62 | 41.9% | 42 | 19 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 52 | 17 | | 6/18/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 73-83 | 39-34 | 4 | W | 75.5 | U | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 14 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 45 | 10 | | 6/20/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 65-75 | 34-43 | 4.5 | L | 75.5 | O | 23-64 | 35.9% | 39 | 9 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 44 | 10 | | 6/22/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 86-89 | 41-45 | 2 | L | 69.5 | O | 36-69 | 52.2% | 35 | 11 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 45 | 8 | | 6/24/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-70 | 36-33 | 3 | W | 75 | U | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 9 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 37 | 8 | | 6/27/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 69-63 | 31-33 | -1.5 | L | 73.5 | U | 27-68 | 39.7% | 48 | 13 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 36 | 14 | | 6/29/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 65-73 | 32-40 | -1.5 | L | 73.5 | U | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 12 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 42 | 7 | | 7/2/2014 | INDIANA | 77-80 | 29-42 | -2 | L | 71 | P | 27-63 | 42.9% | 37 | 14 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 38 | 17 | | 7/5/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 73-86 | 40-40 | 5 | W | 76 | O | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 15 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 48 | 8 | | 7/9/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 72-65 | 41-37 | 2 | W | 76 | O | 23-63 | 36.5% | 41 | 12 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 50 | 15 | | 7/12/2014 | @ TULSA | 91-74 | 55-42 | 2 | W | 76.5 | O | 34-70 | 48.6% | 48 | 13 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 42 | 10 | | 7/15/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 78-90 | 33-48 | 6 | L | 77.5 | O | 32-68 | 47.1% | 34 | 12 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 39 | 12 | | 7/17/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 79-75 | 34-34 | 4 | W | 76 | U | 29-59 | 49.2% | 40 | 22 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 26 | 19 | | 7/23/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 89-75 | 38-38 | -2 | L | 73 | O | 32-64 | 50.0% | 36 | 12 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 42 | 11 | | 7/25/2014 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/8/2014 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/10/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 30-21 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 26 of 48 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 4-1 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 4 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 14-11 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 13 of 25 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 2-0 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 1 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/12/2014 | WASHINGTON | 91 | 156 | SU ATS | 55 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 48 | 13 | 13 | | | TULSA | 74 | -3.5 | Over | 42 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 13-22 | 59.1% | 42 | 10 | 10 | 6/30/2013 | TULSA | 61 | 159.5 | Under | 34 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 8-31 | 25.8% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 40 | 14 | 15 | | | WASHINGTON | 84 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 21-27 | 77.8% | 62 | 17 | 18 | 5/27/2013 | WASHINGTON | 95 | 157 | SU ATS | 47 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 26-38 | 68.4% | 50 | 7 | 14 | | | TULSA | 90 | -6.5 | Over | 46 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 44 | 9 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Fred is 12-3 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.8, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.6, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 77-104 against the 1rst half line (-37.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 44-66 against the 1rst half line (-28.6 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 35.6, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 8-20 against the 1rst half line (-14.0 Units) in home games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 39.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 42-66 against the 1rst half line (-30.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.5, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 28-49 against the 1rst half line (-25.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 15-29 against the 1rst half line (-16.9 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 35.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 27-45 against the 1rst half line (-22.5 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.8, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Fred is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 46.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.4, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.4, OPPONENT 44.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.7, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.9, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 36-25 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.4, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 23-13 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) after a division game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.1, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 18-9 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fred is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 38.3, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 32-13 OVER (+17.7 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.3, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 24-11 OVER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.7, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 22-8 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.4, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 40.4, OPPONENT 44.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 42.2, OPPONENT 46.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 28-14 OVER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 38.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 18-3 OVER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 40.2, OPPONENT 43.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 39.8, OPPONENT 43.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 39.1, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 37.8, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 35-19 OVER (+14.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 39.3, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 25-12 OVER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 39.5, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Mike is 17-2 UNDER (+14.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 31.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Mike is 15-2 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Mike is 12-1 UNDER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.9, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Mike is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 30.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 21-8 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 21-8 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games in May, June, or July games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a division game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.2, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win against a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 29.9, OPPONENT 31.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 14-3 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Mike is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.6, OPPONENT 30.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 12-2 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Mike is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 31.7, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 22-9 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.4, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 21-7 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 31.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 43-26 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 36.2, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 41-20 UNDER (+19.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 34.7, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 61-29 UNDER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 35.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 71-42 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 35.4, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 26-11 UNDER (+13.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 33.2, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 39-15 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 34.4, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.5, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 38-22 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 37.9, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 27-13 UNDER (+12.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 34.3, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 39-17 UNDER (+20.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 34.8, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 94 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 77 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 10 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 8 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 7 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 4 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 3 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite covered the first half line 1 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times. | | Since 1997, 4 games went under the first half total, while 2 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 0 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 07/23/2014 - Jelena Milovanovic "?" Friday vs. Tulsa Shock ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/5/2024 9:43:55 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|