| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON
First Half Results
TULSA |
|
|
76.5
| 55
Final
42 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 653 | WASHINGTON | 76.5 | | 654 | TULSA | -2 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(33-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (TULSA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(108-61 since 1997.) (63.9%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
 - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(43-20 since 1997.) (68.3%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(41-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(55-25 since 1997.) (68.8%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(33-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after having lost 4 of their last 5 games, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record.
(65-30 since 1997.) (68.4%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (TULSA) - after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(38-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.4%, +20.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of 2 to 5.5 points vs. the first half line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(25-6 since 1997.) (80.6%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in July games.
(430-294 since 1997.) (59.4%, +106.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - in May, June, or July games.
(929-720 since 1997.) (56.3%, +137 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a division game.
(927-715 since 1997.) (56.5%, +140.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(387-289 since 1997.) (57.2%, +69.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after a division game against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(273-195 since 1997.) (58.3%, +58.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - off a home loss against a division rival against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(26-8 since 1997.) (76.5%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - off a home loss against a division rival against opponent off a win against a division rival.
(52-25 since 1997.) (67.5%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(61-23 since 1997.) (72.6%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a win against a division rival.
(185-120 since 1997.) (60.7%, +53 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a road win.
(94-50 since 1997.) (65.3%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(153-94 since 1997.) (61.9%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, on Saturday games.
(143-90 since 1997.) (61.4%, +44 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses, in July games.
(208-133 since 1997.) (61%, +61.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(383-274 since 1997.) (58.3%, +81.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (TULSA) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(36-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +12.9 units. Rating = 0*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in July games.
(430-294 since 1997.) (59.4%, +106.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - in May, June, or July games.
(929-720 since 1997.) (56.3%, +137 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(585-427 since 1997.) (57.8%, +115.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog.
(123-78 since 1997.) (61.2%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off an upset win as an underdog.
(222-150 since 1997.) (59.7%, +57 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win against a division rival.
(153-82 since 1997.) (65.1%, +62.8 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win against a division rival, in July games.
(42-16 since 1997.) (72.4%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win against a division rival, in May, June, or July games.
(96-50 since 1997.) (65.8%, +41 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win against a division rival, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(51-22 since 1997.) (69.9%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win against a division rival against opponent off a home loss.
(37-14 since 1997.) (72.5%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a win against a division rival.
(455-328 since 1997.) (58.1%, +94.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a win against a division rival, in May, June, or July games.
(270-196 since 1997.) (57.9%, +54.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off an upset win as a road underdog.
(171-104 since 1997.) (62.2%, +56.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win.
(290-174 since 1997.) (62.5%, +98.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, in July games.
(97-48 since 1997.) (66.9%, +44.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, in May, June, or July games.
(195-119 since 1997.) (62.1%, +64.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - off a road win, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(70-36 since 1997.) (66%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in May, June, or July games.
(275-195 since 1997.) (58.5%, +60.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after playing a road game.
(658-507 since 1997.) (56.5%, +100.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(725-505 since 1997.) (58.9%, +169.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(184-115 since 1997.) (61.5%, +57.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(762-528 since 1997.) (59.1%, +181.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(234-136 since 1997.) (63.2%, +84.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (WASHINGTON) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(488-337 since 1997.) (59.2%, +117.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| WASHINGTON | 75 | | 38 | | 28-66 | 42.7% | 5-17 | 30.9% | 13-17 | 79.4% | 44 | 10 | 14 | | TULSA | 80 | | 40 | | 29-71 | 41.4% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 15-20 | 77.2% | 46 | 13 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, TULSA covered the first half line 490 times, while WASHINGTON covered the first half line 471 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 523 games went over first half total, while 477 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 20-10 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.1, OPPONENT 37.1 | WASHINGTON is 21-10 against the 1rst half line (+10.0 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.3, OPPONENT 34.5 | TULSA is 7-17 against the 1rst half line (-11.7 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.6, OPPONENT 42.6 | TULSA is 5-12 against the 1rst half line (-8.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.4, OPPONENT 43.6 |
|
WASHINGTON is 36-61 against the 1rst half line (-31.1 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 38.6 | WASHINGTON is 75-139 against the 1rst half line (-77.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 40.5 | WASHINGTON is 71-107 against the 1rst half line (-46.7 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 37.1 | WASHINGTON is 59-89 against the 1rst half line (-38.9 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 36.5 |
|
WASHINGTON is 17-6 OVER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.4, OPPONENT 41.7 | WASHINGTON is 17-5 OVER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.5, OPPONENT 40.8 | TULSA is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.6, OPPONENT 42.7 | TULSA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 40.4, OPPONENT 42.9 | TULSA is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.4, OPPONENT 43.6 | TULSA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.8, OPPONENT 46.8 | TULSA is 10-0 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was TULSA 41.5, OPPONENT 46.1 | TULSA is 29-14 OVER (+13.6 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 39.4, OPPONENT 42.4 |
|
WASHINGTON is 96-67 UNDER (+22.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.4 | WASHINGTON is 94-58 UNDER (+30.2 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.1 | WASHINGTON is 67-45 UNDER (+17.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.7 | WASHINGTON is 71-49 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.1 | WASHINGTON is 167-122 UNDER (+32.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.8 | WASHINGTON is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 36.2 | WASHINGTON is 89-64 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.7 | WASHINGTON is 8-2 UNDER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 34.9 | TULSA is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.9, OPPONENT 37.4 | TULSA is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 33.2, OPPONENT 37.2 |
|
| | | | |
|
WASHINGTON is 11-1 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 44-28 against the 1rst half line (+13.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.4, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-0 against the 1rst half line (+9.0 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.1, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-1 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.6, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-0 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.0, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 34-21 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-14 against the 1rst half line (+10.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in home games versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 43.2, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.8, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.2, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.6, OPPONENT 43.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 56-32 UNDER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-17 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.3, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 61-40 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 93-60 UNDER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 82-57 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 131-86 UNDER (+36.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 100-73 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 151-106 UNDER (+34.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 120-78 UNDER (+34.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 171-118 UNDER (+41.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 255-174 UNDER (+63.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=46% since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.7, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 136-95 UNDER (+31.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 65-44 UNDER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.0, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 137-98 UNDER (+29.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 84-56 UNDER (+22.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.9, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.4, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 34-23 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.2, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 24-14 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.1, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in road games after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 23-9 against the 1rst half line (+13.1 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 40-24 against the 1rst half line (+13.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.2, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 30-15 against the 1rst half line (+13.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.8, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 27-15 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.6, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) in home games in July games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.3, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 18-34 against the 1rst half line (-19.4 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 35.9, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 34.2, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) in home games after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 35.6, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 18-34 against the 1rst half line (-19.4 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 35.9, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 17-29 against the 1rst half line (-14.9 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.0, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 14-26 against the 1rst half line (-14.6 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.3, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 37.4, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 20-37 against the 1rst half line (-20.7 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.6, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 14-29 against the 1rst half line (-17.9 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.3, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 9-25 against the 1rst half line (-18.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 36.6, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 9-19 against the 1rst half line (-11.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.1, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 5-17 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 38.6, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 4-11 against the 1rst half line (-8.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season.
The average score was TULSA 38.5, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 36.8, OPPONENT 43.4 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) in home games after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was TULSA 37.2, OPPONENT 44.9 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 2-8 against the 1rst half line (-6.8 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was TULSA 37.7, OPPONENT 44.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 18-35 against the 1rst half line (-20.5 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 54-78 against the 1rst half line (-31.8 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 25-42 against the 1rst half line (-21.2 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.1, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 30-54 against the 1rst half line (-29.4 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 86-123 against the 1rst half line (-49.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.8, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games against Western conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.8, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.8, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 13-6 OVER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.5, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 13-6 OVER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.5, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.9, OPPONENT 44.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was TULSA 39.3, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog this season.
The average score was TULSA 39.7, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was TULSA 41.6, OPPONENT 43.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 13-6 UNDER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 205-153 UNDER (+36.7 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 102-71 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total in July games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 13-6 UNDER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.6, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 199-140 UNDER (+45.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 130-90 UNDER (+31.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 153-118 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 96-63 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 24-8 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.8, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 130-77 UNDER (+45.3 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.4, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 40-21 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.7, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-2 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset win as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 35-17 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 14-2 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 23-13 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 131-88 UNDER (+34.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.0, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 138-99 UNDER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 151-112 UNDER (+27.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 8-0 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.9, OPPONENT 31.8 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was WASHINGTON 32.4, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 8-12 | -4.6 | 9-11 | 7-13 | 72.6 | 35.5 | 42.0% | 43.3 | 74.4 | 36.1 | 41.1% | 42.4 | | Road Games | 4-5 | +1 | 5-4 | 4-5 | 74.1 | 37.9 | 43.9% | 41.1 | 75.3 | 38.4 | 40.9% | 43.4 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.7 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 71.2 | 34.6 | 40.4% | 42.6 | 73.4 | 38.4 | 41.9% | 42.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 72.6 | 35.5 | 27-65 | 42.0% | 5-17 | 27.8% | 13-16 | 82.2% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.2 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 77.8% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.1 | 37.9 | 28-64 | 43.9% | 5-17 | 30.7% | 13-16 | 82.1% | 41 | 8 | 16 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.4 | 36.1 | 28-68 | 41.1% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 14-19 | 73.8% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.5 | 38.5 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-14 | 34.0% | 15-20 | 77.2% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.3 | 38.4 | 29-70 | 40.9% | 5-14 | 33.1% | 14-18 | 74.8% | 43 | 11 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 7-13 | -4.2 | 12-8 | 14-6 | 82.4 | 39.5 | 43.5% | 43.0 | 83.5 | 42.3 | 46.9% | 39.7 | | Home Games | 4-6 | -1.6 | 5-5 | 5-5 | 81.6 | 41.1 | 42.0% | 42.6 | 79.4 | 41.1 | 46.7% | 38.9 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.2 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 81.4 | 39.2 | 42.8% | 41.0 | 84.0 | 43.8 | 47.9% | 41.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.4 | 39.5 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 32.1% | 16-21 | 77.1% | 43 | 12 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.2 | 37.9 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-15 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 79.0% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.6 | 41.1 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 5-18 | 29.1% | 18-22 | 82.8% | 43 | 12 | 16 | 21 | 6 | 11 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 83.5 | 42.3 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 4-11 | 37.1% | 19-23 | 80.5% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 78 | 38.5 | 29-65 | 44.7% | 5-13 | 35.2% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 79.4 | 41.1 | 29-62 | 46.7% | 3-9 | 33.7% | 18-23 | 80.0% | 39 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70.4, TULSA 70.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/5/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 74-66 | 38-30 | -1 | W | 73.5 | U | 30-58 | 51.7% | 49 | 15 | 26-76 | 34.2% | 38 | 9 | | 6/6/2014 | INDIANA | 61-64 | 35-26 | -2.5 | W | 70 | U | 18-61 | 29.5% | 51 | 17 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 38 | 11 | | 6/8/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 64-81 | 32-54 | 2.5 | L | 70.5 | O | 19-57 | 33.3% | 33 | 13 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 45 | 13 | | 6/10/2014 | PHOENIX | 66-81 | 37-37 | 2 | W | 74.5 | U | 29-68 | 42.6% | 41 | 15 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 35 | 9 | | 6/13/2014 | CHICAGO | 79-68 | 38-34 | -3.5 | W | 73 | U | 33-70 | 47.1% | 45 | 14 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 44 | 13 | | 6/15/2014 | ATLANTA | 67-75 | 32-40 | 2 | L | 76 | U | 26-62 | 41.9% | 42 | 19 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 52 | 17 | | 6/18/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 73-83 | 39-34 | 4 | W | 75.5 | U | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 14 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 45 | 10 | | 6/20/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 65-75 | 34-43 | 4.5 | L | 75.5 | O | 23-64 | 35.9% | 39 | 9 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 44 | 10 | | 6/22/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 86-89 | 41-45 | 2 | L | 69.5 | O | 36-69 | 52.2% | 35 | 11 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 45 | 8 | | 6/24/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-70 | 36-33 | 3 | W | 75 | U | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 9 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 37 | 8 | | 6/27/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 69-63 | 31-33 | -1.5 | L | 73.5 | U | 27-68 | 39.7% | 48 | 13 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 36 | 14 | | 6/29/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 65-73 | 32-40 | -1.5 | L | 73.5 | U | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 12 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 42 | 7 | | 7/2/2014 | INDIANA | 77-80 | 29-42 | -2 | L | 71 | P | 27-63 | 42.9% | 37 | 14 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 38 | 17 | | 7/5/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 73-86 | 40-40 | 5 | W | 76 | O | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 15 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 48 | 8 | | 7/9/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 72-65 | 41-37 | 2 | W | 76 | O | 23-63 | 36.5% | 41 | 12 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 50 | 15 | | 7/12/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/15/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/23/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2014 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/6/2014 | PHOENIX | 94-78 | 50-33 | 3 | W | 80.5 | O | 35-68 | 51.5% | 42 | 14 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 33 | 15 | | 6/10/2014 | NEW YORK | 72-57 | 42-29 | -2 | W | 76 | U | 28-68 | 41.2% | 46 | 9 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 45 | 10 | | 6/13/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 69-67 | 43-39 | 2 | W | 77 | O | 26-73 | 35.6% | 42 | 6 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 47 | 13 | | 6/15/2014 | SEATTLE | 85-79 | 41-39 | -3.5 | L | 72 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 8 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 29 | 11 | | 6/19/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 77-87 | 36-46 | 3.5 | L | 77.5 | O | 30-69 | 43.5% | 45 | 14 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 44 | 14 | | 6/20/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 80-91 | 38-45 | 6.5 | L | 80.5 | O | 31-79 | 39.2% | 54 | 5 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 35 | 8 | | 6/22/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 105-99 | 38-48 | 1.5 | L | 79 | O | 37-74 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 42 | 14 | | 6/25/2014 | @ INDIANA | 107-102 | 36-51 | 2.5 | L | 74.5 | O | 39-78 | 50.0% | 46 | 14 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 45 | 12 | | 6/28/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 89-92 | 32-47 | -0.5 | L | 79 | P | 31-74 | 41.9% | 47 | 16 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 11 | | 6/29/2014 | PHOENIX | 77-80 | 37-31 | 2.5 | W | 81.5 | U | 24-77 | 31.2% | 50 | 12 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 33 | 13 | | 7/1/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 74-90 | 35-46 | 1.5 | L | 77.5 | O | 28-70 | 40.0% | 34 | 9 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 52 | 14 | | 7/3/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 96-83 | 43-40 | 2 | W | 79 | O | 35-73 | 47.9% | 52 | 12 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 38 | 12 | | 7/5/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 76-78 | 35-37 | -2 | L | 81.5 | U | 27-67 | 40.3% | 42 | 11 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 14 | | 7/8/2014 | INDIANA | 76-78 | 34-41 | -0.5 | L | 76 | U | 25-59 | 42.4% | 41 | 15 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 11 | | 7/10/2014 | MINNESOTA | 85-91 | 49-55 | 1.5 | L | 81.5 | O | 31-72 | 43.1% | 36 | 10 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 40 | 12 | | 7/12/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/16/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| WASHINGTON is 29-21 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 26 of 47 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| WASHINGTON is 3-1 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 3 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| WASHINGTON is 15-10 versus the first half line when playing against TULSA since 1997 | | 13 of 22 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| TULSA is 1-1 versus the first half line when playing against WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons | | 1 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/30/2013 | TULSA | 61 | 159.5 | Under | 34 | 17-70 | 24.3% | 8-31 | 25.8% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 40 | 14 | 15 | | | WASHINGTON | 84 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 21-27 | 77.8% | 62 | 17 | 18 | 5/27/2013 | WASHINGTON | 95 | 157 | SU ATS | 47 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 26-38 | 68.4% | 50 | 7 | 14 | | | TULSA | 90 | -6.5 | Over | 46 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 44 | 9 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Mike is 34-23 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.2, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 24-14 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.5, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 18-8 against the 1rst half line (+9.2 Units) as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.1, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 19-9 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.9, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in road games after a division game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.8, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 35-20 against the 1rst half line (+13.0 Units) in road games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.1, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 36-20 against the 1rst half line (+14.0 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 39.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 11-1 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Mike is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.9, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 10-1 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.6, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Mike is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 37.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 8-0 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.0, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Mike is 22-10 against the 1rst half line (+11.0 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of TULSA.
The average score was TULSA 37.5, OPPONENT 44.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Mike is 34-53 against the 1rst half line (-24.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.7, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Mike is 100-72 OVER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.3, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games against Western conference opponents as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.8, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in non-conference games as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 40.8, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 25-10 OVER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after having lost 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 39.0, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 58-37 OVER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.4, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 35-18 OVER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 38.2, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 62-30 OVER (+29.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 37.6, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 38.8, OPPONENT 43.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 38-22 OVER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 39.4, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 39.2, OPPONENT 45.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 26-12 OVER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 38.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 17-3 OVER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 40.2, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 34-19 OVER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Fred 38.6, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Mike is 150-117 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Mike 36.1, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 12-2 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total off an upset win as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Mike is 14-2 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.6, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Mike is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 34.0, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 23-13 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 36.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 22-6 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 35.0, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Mike is 21-4 UNDER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of WASHINGTON.
The average score was WASHINGTON 33.9, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 148 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 142 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 11 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 10 times. |
|
|
| |
|
Since 1997, 14 games went under the first half total, while 5 games went over the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Under | | Over the last 3 seasons, 3 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite covered the first half line 5 times, while the road underdog covered the first half line 4 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 3 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 1 times. | | Since 1997, 6 games went under the first half total, while 3 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| [F] 07/11/2014 - Jelena Milovanovic doubtful Saturday vs. Tulsa Shock ( Knee ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/3/2024 7:41:45 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|