| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS
SEATTLE |
|
|
175
| 84
Final
91 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 611 | DALLAS | +180 | | 612 | SEATTLE | -220 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(165-124 since 1997.) (57.1%, +56.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(195-114 since 1997.) (63.1%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(162-135 since 1997.) (54.5%, +48.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(93-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +24.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(106-35 since 1997.) (75.2%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(146-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.2%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(76-21 since 1997.) (78.4%, +40.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(116-45 since 1997.) (72%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite.
(30-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (93.8%, +27 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(114-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(72-34 since 1997.) (67.9%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(53-21 since 1997.) (71.6%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(66-31 since 1997.) (68%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(29-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.9%, +17 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(170-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +34.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents.
(57-15 since 1997.) (79.2%, +27.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(40-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +26.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(58-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +14.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite.
(36-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +29.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(24-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(48-29 since 1997.) (62.3%, +21.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games.
(32-20 since 1997.) (61.5%, +18.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a double digit win as a underdog of 6 points or more.
(22-8 since 1997.) (73.3%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a double digit win as a underdog of 6 points or more.
(23-7 since 1997.) (76.7%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(26-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +26.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(194-116 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.6%, +27.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last five games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season.
(28-14 since 1997.) (66.7%, +14.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(25-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +11.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(30-2 over the last 5 seasons.) (93.8%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more against opponent off a loss against a division rival.
(21-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +21.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(33-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(42-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +20.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season.
(59-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +39.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(28-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +14 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(42-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.4%, +36.3 units. Rating = 5*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a home blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more.
(26-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +16.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(30-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(108-84 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.2%, +15.8 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(138-97 since 1997.) (58.7%, +63.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(111-75 since 1997.) (59.7%, +53.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss.
(134-102 since 1997.) (56.8%, +51.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals.
(88-46 since 1997.) (65.7%, +37.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(54-34 since 1997.) (61.4%, +31.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals.
(57-34 since 1997.) (62.6%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(33-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(36-15 since 1997.) (70.6%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(36-15 since 1997.) (70.6%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(36-15 since 1997.) (70.6%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(24-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(28-17 since 1997.) (62.2%, +25.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, on Saturday games.
(44-23 since 1997.) (65.7%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(25-14 since 1997.) (64.1%, +24.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(41-23 since 1997.) (64.1%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a close home loss by 3 points or less, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(26-14 since 1997.) (65%, +24.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(34-15 since 1997.) (69.4%, +24 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(22-9 since 1997.) (71%, +23.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(22-9 since 1997.) (71%, +23.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(22-9 since 1997.) (71%, +23.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(22-10 since 1997.) (68.8%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game).
(22-10 since 1997.) (68.8%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (DALLAS) - good shooting team (43.5-46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(22-10 since 1997.) (68.8%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - after beating the spread by more than 12 points in two consecutive games against opponent after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +19.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (DALLAS) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(47-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +32.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, on Saturday games.
(30-13 since 1997.) (69.8%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(51-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(41-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less.
(60-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, on Saturday games.
(30-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.2%, +16.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| DALLAS | 83 | | 30-69 | 43.9% | 7-21 | 31.4% | 17-21 | 79.9% | 43 | 12 | 14 | | SEATTLE | 88 | | 31-69 | 45.7% | 8-24 | 34.8% | 16-20 | 83.1% | 42 | 11 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, SEATTLE won the game straight up 610 times, while DALLAS won 365 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 9-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 88.6, OPPONENT 77.7 | DALLAS is 11-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 92.1, OPPONENT 81.7 | DALLAS is 10-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 94.2, OPPONENT 82.3 | SEATTLE is 7-10 against the money line (-12.6 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 81.1 | SEATTLE is 13-22 against the money line (-25.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.6, OPPONENT 88.8 | SEATTLE is 9-19 against the money line (-25.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 87.5, OPPONENT 91.1 | SEATTLE is 20-20 against the money line (-15.9 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 86.9, OPPONENT 86.1 |
|
DALLAS is 7-15 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.5, OPPONENT 88.9 | DALLAS is 27-46 against the money line (-22.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.5, OPPONENT 90.0 | DALLAS is 15-42 against the money line (-33.4 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.9, OPPONENT 92.8 | SEATTLE is 85-50 against the money line (+26.5 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.5, OPPONENT 73.5 | SEATTLE is 44-23 against the money line (+15.6 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.6, OPPONENT 71.4 | SEATTLE is 76-57 against the money line (+32.9 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 74.3 | SEATTLE is 93-39 against the money line (+30.6 Units) in home games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.5, OPPONENT 71.7 | SEATTLE is 10-2 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 89.2, OPPONENT 77.8 | SEATTLE is 24-12 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.3, OPPONENT 78.4 | SEATTLE is 106-50 against the money line (+29.9 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 71.8 | SEATTLE is 8-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in home games when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.8, OPPONENT 78.0 | SEATTLE is 14-6 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.9, OPPONENT 77.5 | SEATTLE is 13-3 against the money line (+12.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 91.3, OPPONENT 82.4 | SEATTLE is 11-1 against the money line (+12.9 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 94.8, OPPONENT 82.6 |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 6-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 93.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-5 against the money line (+6.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 88.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 6-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 93.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-5 against the money line (+6.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 88.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 6-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was DALLAS 93.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 10-5 against the money line (+6.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 88.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 9-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was DALLAS 89.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 21-24 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-15 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 3-6 against the money line (-10.6 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-18 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.6, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 4-9 against the money line (-14.5 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.2, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 21-23 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 19-21 against the money line (-18.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 20-24 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 16-22 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 15-19 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.4, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 13-24 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.2, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-3 against the money line (+6.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 7-2 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 81-55 against the money line (+25.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 87.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 102-77 against the money line (+25.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 148-120 against the money line (+27.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 45-33 against the money line (+17.5 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 85-48 against the money line (+24.2 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 16-9 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 4-0 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 65.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 124-106 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 92-62 against the money line (+21.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 6-1 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.0, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 6-0 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 91.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-0 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.8, OPPONENT 66.4 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 6-2 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 76-47 against the money line (+20.7 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 53-32 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 28-26 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 86.4, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-4 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was DALLAS 87.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 21-17 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 87.4, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 10-13 against the money line (-14.9 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 7-13 against the money line (-13.3 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 18-29 against the money line (-29.0 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 10-13 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 22-23 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 16-19 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.7, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 12-14 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 7-15 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 89.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 1-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 90.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 4-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.5, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 2-9 against the money line (-10.3 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.6, OPPONENT 93.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 1-9 against the money line (-11.3 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 92.0 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 3-15 against the money line (-12.3 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 90.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 182-64 against the money line (+37.4 Units) as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 214-117 against the money line (+39.5 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 160-79 against the money line (+39.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 131-76 against the money line (+27.8 Units) in home games vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-4 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 87.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-2 against the money line (+6.5 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 87.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in home games off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.8, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in home games off a home loss over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 82-38 against the money line (+28.1 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.7, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 7-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 87.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 93-49 against the money line (+22.8 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.9, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-5 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 7-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 87.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 70-28 against the money line (+23.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 52-22 against the money line (+18.5 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 37-13 against the money line (+17.4 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 27-16 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 26-16 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 83.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 38-18 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in home games after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 24-12 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in home games after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 12-8 | +5.8 | 14-6 | 13-6 | 87.3 | 44.8 | 44.8% | 46.0 | 80.8 | 41.4 | 42.0% | 40.3 | | Road Games | 5-5 | +1.5 | 7-3 | 8-2 | 85.4 | 42.4 | 43.0% | 47.0 | 84.2 | 43.8 | 41.6% | 43.5 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +6 | 5-0 | 4-1 | 97.6 | 49.8 | 50.9% | 48.4 | 76.8 | 41.4 | 41.0% | 34.4 | | Division Games | 6-7 | +0.3 | 9-4 | 8-4 | 84.2 | 43.6 | 43.3% | 43.8 | 81.3 | 42.9 | 43.9% | 40.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 87.3 | 44.8 | 30-68 | 44.8% | 7-21 | 30.8% | 20-25 | 79.6% | 46 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 80.8 | 40.2 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 85.4 | 42.4 | 29-68 | 43.0% | 7-23 | 30.6% | 19-25 | 79.3% | 47 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.8 | 41.4 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.2 | 40.4 | 30-67 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.2 | 43.8 | 29-71 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 20-25 | 79.0% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 21 | 8 | 11 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 15-6 | +3.9 | 11-9 | 11-9 | 87.0 | 43.1 | 47.0% | 42.0 | 79.8 | 38.7 | 42.8% | 40.1 | | Home Games | 9-4 | -2.9 | 5-7 | 6-7 | 85.2 | 42.5 | 45.6% | 43.2 | 79.6 | 39.3 | 42.6% | 41.1 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.6 | 3-1 | 2-3 | 85.6 | 43.4 | 47.5% | 43.6 | 77.2 | 35.8 | 39.8% | 41.0 | | Division Games | 6-5 | -1.8 | 6-5 | 6-4 | 87.5 | 42.7 | 47.3% | 40.1 | 81.1 | 38.7 | 44.0% | 39.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 87.0 | 43.1 | 32-67 | 47.0% | 8-23 | 35.2% | 15-19 | 82.8% | 42 | 9 | 21 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.2 | 42.5 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 8-23 | 34.4% | 15-18 | 80.4% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.8 | 38.7 | 30-70 | 42.8% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 14-17 | 80.3% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.7 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 16-20 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 79.6 | 39.3 | 30-71 | 42.6% | 7-19 | 35.4% | 13-16 | 81.0% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 72.9, SEATTLE 71.4 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/8/2018 | @ INDIANA | 89-83 | W | -300 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 46 | 13 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 44 | 9 | | 6/12/2018 | PHOENIX | 72-75 | L | -115 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 43 | 12 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 44 | 17 | | 6/15/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 77-67 | W | -330 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 48 | 12 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 36 | 11 | | 6/19/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 83-91 | L | +300 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 40 | 22 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 41 | 12 | | 6/22/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 101-72 | W | +170 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 46 | 11 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 27 | 12 | | 6/24/2018 | SEATTLE | 76-97 | L | -125 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 32 | 13 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 46 | 15 | | 6/26/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 83-87 | L | +350 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 47 | 17 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 39 | 12 | | 6/27/2018 | @ LAS VEGAS | 97-91 | W | -120 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 40 | 11 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 47 | 13 | | 7/1/2018 | MINNESOTA | 72-76 | L | +145 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 43 | 16 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 42 | 13 | | 7/3/2018 | CHICAGO | 108-85 | W | -270 | 45-79 | 57.0% | 40 | 13 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 15 | | 7/5/2018 | INDIANA | 90-63 | W | -550 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 60 | 18 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 27 | 12 | | 7/8/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 97-87 | W | -165 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 53 | 9 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 40 | 6 | | 7/10/2018 | PHOENIX | 101-72 | W | -140 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 45 | 14 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 33 | 21 | | 7/12/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 92-77 | W | +200 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 44 | 11 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 34 | 13 | | 7/14/2018 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/17/2018 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2018 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2018 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2018 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/7/2018 | @ LOS ANGELES | 88-63 | W | +280 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 40 | 16 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 35 | 17 | | 6/10/2018 | ATLANTA | 64-67 | L | -330 | 25-74 | 33.8% | 57 | 17 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 43 | 14 | | 6/12/2018 | CHICAGO | 96-85 | W | -600 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 40 | 13 | 32-78 | 41.0% | 39 | 9 | | 6/15/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 103-92 | W | -125 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 43 | 8 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 39 | 10 | | 6/19/2018 | LAS VEGAS | 77-89 | L | -600 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 40 | 8 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 54 | 9 | | 6/22/2018 | INDIANA | 72-63 | W | -750 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 42 | 19 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 41 | 15 | | 6/24/2018 | @ DALLAS | 97-76 | W | +105 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 46 | 15 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 32 | 13 | | 6/26/2018 | @ MINNESOTA | 79-91 | L | +250 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 33 | 11 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 48 | 11 | | 6/28/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 81-72 | W | -155 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 43 | 12 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 12 | | 7/1/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 84-70 | W | -220 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 41 | 10 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 49 | 14 | | 7/3/2018 | @ NEW YORK | 77-62 | W | -200 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 42 | 12 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 39 | 12 | | 7/6/2018 | @ ATLANTA | 95-86 | W | -200 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 49 | 13 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 41 | 11 | | 7/8/2018 | WASHINGTON | 97-91 | W | -250 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 39 | 10 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 37 | 8 | | 7/10/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 75-77 | L | -140 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 47 | 21 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 39 | 12 | | 7/14/2018 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/18/2018 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2018 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/22/2018 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/24/2018 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| DALLAS is 23-25 (+3.2 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 4-4 (+0.4 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| DALLAS is 9-12 (+2.8 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 2-1 (+0.9 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/24/2018 | SEATTLE | 97 | 173 | SU ATS | 49 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 13-29 | 44.8% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 46 | 8 | 15 | | | DALLAS | 76 | -2 | | 42 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 19-25 | 76.0% | 32 | 5 | 13 | 6/2/2018 | SEATTLE | 90 | 172 | Over | 36 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 35 | 9 | 12 | | | DALLAS | 94 | -3 | SU ATS | 53 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 26-33 | 78.8% | 42 | 12 | 14 | 8/4/2017 | SEATTLE | 80 | 175 | Under | 42 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 17-23 | 73.9% | 32 | 5 | 9 | | | DALLAS | 93 | 0 | SU ATS | 55 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 16-26 | 61.5% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 50 | 16 | 14 | 7/28/2017 | DALLAS | 93 | 172.5 | Over | 45 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 10-24 | 41.7% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 38 | 9 | 15 | | | SEATTLE | 109 | -6 | SU ATS | 60 | 40-65 | 61.5% | 11-15 | 73.3% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 31 | 6 | 12 | 7/1/2017 | SEATTLE | 89 | 171.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 45 | 7 | 17 | | | DALLAS | 69 | -4 | Under | 38 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 1-17 | 5.9% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 41 | 12 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Williams is 20-10 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 82.5, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 46-35 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.1, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 28-19 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 16-11 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 10-3 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 7-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 5 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 81.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 35-24 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 79.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 13-5 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 104-94 against the money line (-42.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 76.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 125-159 against the money line (-70.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 72.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 26-47 against the money line (-30.5 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 73.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 11-15 against the money line (-23.8 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 69.5, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 77-89 against the money line (-40.7 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 72.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 50-53 against the money line (-32.1 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 72.8, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 44-42 against the money line (-34.7 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 77.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 31-29 against the money line (-25.8 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 77.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 22-23 against the money line (-26.0 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 79.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 62-53 against the money line (-35.3 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 77.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 26-28 against the money line (-28.8 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 79.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 15-15 against the money line (-21.0 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 72.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 64-105 against the money line (-44.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 71.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 27-55 against the money line (-29.8 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 72.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 31-63 against the money line (-33.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 74.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 30-66 against the money line (-29.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 73.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 82-75 against the money line (-45.3 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 76.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 67-110 against the money line (-53.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 71.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 104-157 against the money line (-74.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 72.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 15-20 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in home games vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 72.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 90-117 against the money line (-42.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 75.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 18-33 against the money line (-21.8 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 72.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 31-49 against the money line (-32.9 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 73.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 10-26 against the money line (-17.4 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 71.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 80-66 against the money line (-43.7 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 77.9, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 41-36 against the money line (-29.5 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 80.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 30-69 against the money line (-40.4 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 72.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 5-22 against the money line (-16.5 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 67.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 126-166 against the money line (-60.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 75.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 42-50 against the money line (-31.2 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 79.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 22-34 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 72.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Williams is 15-29 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in July games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Williams is 37-51 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after a division game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 18-30 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 8-20 against the money line (-15.8 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 3-12 against the money line (-10.5 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.3, OPPONENT 90.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 6-26 against the money line (-18.0 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.4, OPPONENT 89.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 44-68 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 39-57 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.0, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 23-41 against the money line (-21.0 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.4, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 15-39 against the money line (-23.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 79.0, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-17 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 7-24 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 27-45 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 23-38 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 42-60 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 29-44 against the money line (-18.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 51-73 against the money line (-22.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 31-48 against the money line (-27.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 79.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 17-41 against the money line (-22.4 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 79.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 13-25 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 77.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 29-44 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 67-89 against the money line (-41.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 81.6, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 20-32 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.4, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 37-51 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 27-43 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 45-69 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.3, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 17-34 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Williams is 31-56 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of DALLAS.
The average score was DALLAS 83.6, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Williams is 9-32 against the money line (-20.1 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 76.4, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Williams is 15-47 against the money line (-25.9 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Williams 78.3, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 11-4 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 87.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 35-18 against the money line (+14.9 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 71.6, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 26-11 against the money line (+16.8 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Hughes 73.2, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 7-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 87.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 7-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 87.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 260 times, while the road underdog won straight up 99 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the road underdog won straight up 8 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 07/14/2018 - Kaleena Mosqueda-Lewis left last game, is "?" Saturday vs Dallas Wings ( Concussion ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/4/2024 3:43:37 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|