| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES
SEATTLE |
|
|
161.5
| 72
Final
79 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 657 | LOS ANGELES | -360 | | 658 | SEATTLE | +280 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(124-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.9%, +48.8 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning record on the season.
(43-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(49-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(45-29 since 1997.) (60.8%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(48-26 since 1997.) (64.9%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(56-29 since 1997.) (65.9%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(41-19 since 1997.) (68.3%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a road win.
(59-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +22 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(51-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.7%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(69-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(41-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(103-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(205-62 since 1997.) (76.8%, +96.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(182-39 since 1997.) (82.4%, +90.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(265-92 since 1997.) (74.2%, +84.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(235-63 since 1997.) (78.9%, +75.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(320-120 since 1997.) (72.7%, +74.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more.
(296-123 since 1997.) (70.6%, +70.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(146-40 since 1997.) (78.5%, +65.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 75 points or more.
(295-126 since 1997.) (70.1%, +64.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games.
(146-36 since 1997.) (80.2%, +64 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(106-24 since 1997.) (81.5%, +63.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(277-112 since 1997.) (71.2%, +63.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(84-16 since 1997.) (84%, +56.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(98-24 since 1997.) (80.3%, +56.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(123-36 since 1997.) (77.4%, +55.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(98-24 since 1997.) (80.3%, +52.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(97-19 since 1997.) (83.6%, +51.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(107-26 since 1997.) (80.5%, +50.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(98-40 since 1997.) (71%, +50 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game.
(155-48 since 1997.) (76.4%, +48.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(113-37 since 1997.) (75.3%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(180-68 since 1997.) (72.6%, +46.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(77-18 since 1997.) (81.1%, +45.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(97-62 since 1997.) (61%, +44.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(62-8 since 1997.) (88.6%, +44.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(77-19 since 1997.) (80.2%, +43.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(73-14 since 1997.) (83.9%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(69-13 since 1997.) (84.1%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(57-10 since 1997.) (85.1%, +39.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents.
(50-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +36.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win by 10 points or more, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(54-10 since 1997.) (84.4%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(53-7 since 1997.) (88.3%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win by 10 points or more, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(56-14 since 1997.) (80%, +36 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(121-61 since 1997.) (66.5%, +33.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games.
(56-12 since 1997.) (82.4%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(88-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, in August or September games.
(34-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(38-9 since 1997.) (80.9%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(71-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(71-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(71-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(37-14 since 1997.) (72.5%, +25.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(56-25 since 1997.) (69.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(46-20 since 1997.) (69.7%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(99-37 since 1997.) (72.8%, +24.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 90 points or more.
(44-20 since 1997.) (68.8%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(33-9 since 1997.) (78.6%, +18.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(37-12 since 1997.) (75.5%, +18.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games, on Friday nights.
(27-9 since 1997.) (75%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(69-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(69-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(69-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after beating the spread by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, with a losing record.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(32-11 since 1997.) (74.4%, +11.3 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| LOS ANGELES | 86 | | 34-67 | 50.1% | 6-16 | 40.3% | 12-15 | 78.7% | 41 | 10 | 13 | | SEATTLE | 78 | | 29-62 | 45.9% | 7-21 | 32.6% | 14-17 | 82.5% | 36 | 8 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 704 times, while SEATTLE won 274 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 15-1 against the money line (+13.7 Units) when they make 49% of their shots or better in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 90.5, OPPONENT 77.4 | LOS ANGELES is 81-50 against the money line (+19.4 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 74.4 | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 74.8 | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.6, OPPONENT 75.9 | LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.9, OPPONENT 76.0 | LOS ANGELES is 14-1 against the money line (+12.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 91.8, OPPONENT 78.6 | LOS ANGELES is 21-1 against the money line (+21.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 92.4, OPPONENT 77.6 | SEATTLE is 2-21 against the money line (-19.3 Units) when their opponents make 49% of their shots or better in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.0, OPPONENT 84.8 | SEATTLE is 52-68 against the money line (-28.8 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.6, OPPONENT 73.1 | SEATTLE is 4-13 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 85.4 | SEATTLE is 1-19 against the money line (-18.8 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.9, OPPONENT 89.2 | SEATTLE is 3-16 against the money line (-14.2 Units) when they grab 32 to 36 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.4, OPPONENT 82.8 | SEATTLE is 1-8 against the money line (-8.4 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.2, OPPONENT 83.1 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 43-71 against the money line (-78.3 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 79.5 | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in road games when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.8, OPPONENT 74.7 | LOS ANGELES is 33-55 against the money line (-45.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 11-13 against the money line (-16.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 85.4 | LOS ANGELES is 164-146 against the money line (-75.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 82.2 | SEATTLE is 80-43 against the money line (+21.6 Units) in home games in games where they attempt 77 to 83 shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 70.2 | SEATTLE is 78-44 against the money line (+30.4 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 72.7 | SEATTLE is 40-20 against the money line (+14.9 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.3, OPPONENT 70.5 | SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.8, OPPONENT 74.0 | SEATTLE is 112-88 against the money line (+25.8 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 80.7 | SEATTLE is 62-22 against the money line (+53.4 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 79.8, OPPONENT 73.0 | SEATTLE is 14-11 against the money line (+14.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.2, OPPONENT 80.6 | SEATTLE is 93-56 against the money line (+23.0 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 69.3 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 12-1 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 36-14 against the money line (+17.7 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-9 against the money line (+14.4 Units) in road games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 67.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 34-14 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 40-32 against the money line (+16.8 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 4-18 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 1-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 62-66 against the money line (-50.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 95-98 against the money line (-66.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 101-93 against the money line (-43.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 145-132 against the money line (-56.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-16 against the money line (-22.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-24 against the money line (-28.2 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 123-111 against the money line (-46.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-17 against the money line (-18.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-23 against the money line (-22.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 29-30 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 89-70 against the money line (-39.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-8 against the money line (-14.0 Units) vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 114-92 against the money line (-47.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 166-136 against the money line (-66.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 160-168 against the money line (-58.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-15 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-20 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 70-36 against the money line (+26.7 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.4, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 95-53 against the money line (+27.2 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.4, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 88-66 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 128-100 against the money line (+26.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-6 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus excellent shooting teams - making >=48% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.8, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 111-61 against the money line (+28.7 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.2, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 79-36 against the money line (+30.0 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 67.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 108-57 against the money line (+29.0 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 105-59 against the money line (+23.8 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 147-84 against the money line (+25.9 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 65-35 against the money line (+19.4 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 76.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 159-137 against the money line (+27.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 94-59 against the money line (+22.0 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 63-38 against the money line (+20.0 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 13-6 against the money line (+8.8 Units) on Friday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-4 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 37-26 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-14 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after a game giving up 4 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 32-20 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-12 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-9 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 5-11 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 4-10 against the money line (-7.4 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.4, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-18 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 10-19 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 4-13 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 1-12 against the money line (-12.0 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 1-10 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 49-85 against the money line (-33.4 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 2-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 2-8 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 4-11 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-15 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 12-28 against the money line (-21.7 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-42 against the money line (-30.1 Units) in road games when playing with 3 or more days rest since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 131-114 against the money line (-48.9 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-25 against the money line (-23.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-16 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-31 against the money line (-21.3 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-30 against the money line (-26.5 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-24 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-6.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-12 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-7.4 Units) in road games after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 191-106 against the money line (+38.8 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 137-68 against the money line (+39.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 69-32 against the money line (+24.2 Units) in home games in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.4, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 62-51 against the money line (+20.8 Units) on Friday since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.1, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 121-70 against the money line (+27.1 Units) in home games vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 102-53 against the money line (+22.3 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 79-43 against the money line (+25.5 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.3, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 83-45 against the money line (+25.8 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 99-86 against the money line (+36.8 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.9, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 72-31 against the money line (+23.0 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 78.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 56-19 against the money line (+24.7 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 40-14 against the money line (+19.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 80.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 26-6 against the money line (+18.5 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 92-58 against the money line (+27.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.9, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 112-107 against the money line (+37.6 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 70.9, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 147-133 against the money line (+35.1 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.8, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 140-142 against the money line (+24.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.5, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 13-4 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in home games after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 77.5, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 21-3 | +11.6 | 13-11 | 14-10 | 85.9 | 41.9 | 49.6% | 38.5 | 75.8 | 37.5 | 43.3% | 40.0 | | Road Games | 10-2 | +4.2 | 8-4 | 8-4 | 86.4 | 42.4 | 48.9% | 40.9 | 76.5 | 38.0 | 43.2% | 39.5 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -3.6 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 85.2 | 43.4 | 49.4% | 41.8 | 83.4 | 43.8 | 45.7% | 34.6 | | Division Games | 7-1 | +5.2 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 83.0 | 40.0 | 48.7% | 36.1 | 70.5 | 34.7 | 42.1% | 40.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.9 | 41.9 | 32-65 | 49.6% | 6-16 | 39.3% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 39 | 7 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.7 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-16 | 34.0% | 17-22 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 86.4 | 42.4 | 32-66 | 48.9% | 7-17 | 40.2% | 15-19 | 81.9% | 41 | 7 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.8 | 37.5 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 5-16 | 29.8% | 13-17 | 77.1% | 40 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.6 | 40.5 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 5-16 | 33.4% | 17-21 | 79.6% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.5 | 38.0 | 29-68 | 43.2% | 5-16 | 30.3% | 13-18 | 72.8% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 9-15 | -2.4 | 11-13 | 12-11 | 80.0 | 39.8 | 46.0% | 37.4 | 81.2 | 40.3 | 44.7% | 40.9 | | Home Games | 6-7 | -1.1 | 6-7 | 9-3 | 84.3 | 43.0 | 47.6% | 37.9 | 81.2 | 41.4 | 44.7% | 41.4 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 81.0 | 39.0 | 46.3% | 36.8 | 76.6 | 38.8 | 43.6% | 42.2 | | Division Games | 4-7 | +1.2 | 6-5 | 5-6 | 77.9 | 39.5 | 44.1% | 38.5 | 81.4 | 42.5 | 45.8% | 38.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.0 | 39.8 | 29-62 | 46.0% | 7-20 | 35.1% | 16-19 | 82.6% | 37 | 6 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 40.6 | 30-67 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 34.0% | 17-21 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.3 | 43.0 | 30-64 | 47.6% | 8-21 | 37.5% | 16-19 | 81.7% | 38 | 6 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.2 | 40.3 | 30-68 | 44.7% | 5-16 | 34.8% | 15-18 | 79.7% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.6 | 40.2 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 5-16 | 32.8% | 17-21 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 81.2 | 41.4 | 31-70 | 44.7% | 6-16 | 37.6% | 12-16 | 76.8% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.2, SEATTLE 71.7 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/17/2016 | @ ATLANTA | 74-91 | L | -450 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 42 | 12 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 47 | 9 | | 7/19/2016 | @ INDIANA | 82-92 | L | -210 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 35 | 19 | 33-59 | 55.9% | 25 | 9 | | 7/22/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | 95-75 | W | -450 | 34-61 | 55.7% | 41 | 11 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 26 | 10 | | 8/26/2016 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/28/2016 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/2/2016 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2016 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2016 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2016 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2016 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/17/2016 | CHICAGO | 88-91 | L | +100 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 35 | 12 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 48 | 13 | | 7/20/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 83-69 | W | -400 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 45 | 11 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 36 | 10 | | 7/22/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 72-79 | L | +500 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 32 | 14 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 46 | 11 | | 8/26/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/28/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/31/2016 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/2/2016 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2016 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/7/2016 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2016 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SEATTLE is 35-39 (+14.6 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| SEATTLE is 4-6 (+3.9 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| SEATTLE is 23-16 (+9.4 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 3-2 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/15/2016 | SEATTLE | 66 | 152.5 | Over | 26 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 39 | 5 | 24 | | | LOS ANGELES | 96 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 26 | 5 | 10 | 8/11/2015 | SEATTLE | 85 | 148.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 37 | 3 | 9 | | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | -13 | Over | 48 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 35 | 7 | 13 | 7/15/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 61 | -3 | Under | 37 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 8-12 | 66.7% | 41 | 3 | 21 | | | SEATTLE | 68 | 146.5 | SU ATS | 35 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 31 | 7 | 11 | 6/14/2015 | SEATTLE | 60 | 144 | SU ATS | 24 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 38 | 4 | 12 | | | LOS ANGELES | 54 | -2 | Under | 34 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 5-9 | 55.6% | 39 | 2 | 12 | 6/6/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 61 | 146 | Over | 32 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 4-22 | 18.2% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 40 | 8 | 8 | | | SEATTLE | 86 | -4 | SU ATS | 35 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 45 | 6 | 6 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 35-20 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 79.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 51-41 against the money line (+15.8 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 72.1, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 88-62 against the money line (+28.6 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.5, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 43-26 against the money line (+23.2 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 25-12 against the money line (+13.9 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 66-53 against the money line (+21.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 128-92 against the money line (+43.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.0, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 16-4 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 8-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 31-14 against the money line (+23.9 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.5, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 68-58 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 70.7, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 27-9 against the money line (+15.3 Units) off a road win by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.6, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 80-55 against the money line (+32.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.7, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 38-26 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.0, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 14-4 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 35-16 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after a blowout win by 15 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.6, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 19-7 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.3, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 40-18 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 58-27 against the money line (+24.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 78.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 26-8 against the money line (+16.0 Units) after scoring 90 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 80.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 26-12 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.5, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 73-45 against the money line (+19.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.2, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 27-12 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.7, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 27-12 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 24-9 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 110-96 against the money line (+22.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 62-31 against the money line (+27.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 88-50 against the money line (+36.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 76.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 106-74 against the money line (+22.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 104-79 against the money line (+24.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 153-121 against the money line (+38.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 40-21 against the money line (+14.9 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.9, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 27-14 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in road games vs. poor rebounding teams - outrebounded by opponents by 3+ per game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.9, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 155-109 against the money line (+31.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 71-38 against the money line (+26.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 104-52 against the money line (+48.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 77.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 135-120 against the money line (+20.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 74.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 72-57 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 103-82 against the money line (+32.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 5-11 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 72.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 7-18 against the money line (-12.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 10-19 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 4-13 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 1-10 against the money line (-10.8 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 68.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Boucek is 7-19 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 2-8 against the money line (-9.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 8-19 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 5-15 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 4-18 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 71.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Boucek is 1-10 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Agler is 3-9 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 70.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 6*) | Agler is 25-44 against the money line (-22.0 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 68.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 3-13 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 69.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 4-9 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 1-6 against the money line (-6.7 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 4-9 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 5-12 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 1-6 against the money line (-7.4 Units) in road games after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 20-32 against the money line (-26.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Boucek is 5-0 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 78.0, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Boucek is 25-12 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Boucek 80.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 32 times, while the home underdog won straight up 2 times.
Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 5 times, while the home underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [G] 08/21/2016 - Sue Bird probable Friday vs. LA Sparks ( Knee ) | | [F] 07/22/2016 - Ramu Tokashiki probable Friday vs. LA Sparks ( Personal ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 6/28/2024 11:46:20 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|