| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA SEATTLE |
|
| 147 | 73 Final 60 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
655 | MINNESOTA | -400 | 656 | SEATTLE | +300 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders. (102-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +47.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (193-84 since 1997.) (69.7%, +64.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (333-209 since 1997.) (61.4%, +60.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (141-55 since 1997.) (71.9%, +58.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (128-58 since 1997.) (68.8%, +51.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (100-45 since 1997.) (69%, +43.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (62-24 since 1997.) (72.1%, +34.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (50-32 since 1997.) (61%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals. (41-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.1%, +19.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (79-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (43-29 since 1997.) (59.7%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more. (24-16 since 1997.) (60%, +14 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (29-12 since 1997.) (70.7%, +13.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, playing with 2 days rest. (61-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.4%, +20 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (136-35 since 1997.) (79.5%, +82.6 units. Rating = 5*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (190-45 since 1997.) (80.9%, +76.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (171-54 since 1997.) (76%, +76.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (223-88 since 1997.) (71.7%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (118-21 since 1997.) (84.9%, +74.3 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (217-84 since 1997.) (72.1%, +71.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, with a losing record. (170-51 since 1997.) (76.9%, +67.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (148-35 since 1997.) (80.9%, +65.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (106-29 since 1997.) (78.5%, +54.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a home loss against a division rival, with a losing record. (225-80 since 1997.) (73.8%, +54.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (120-29 since 1997.) (80.5%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (108-31 since 1997.) (77.7%, +50.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (96-28 since 1997.) (77.4%, +49.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (139-51 since 1997.) (73.2%, +49.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a home loss by 10 points or more against opponent off a road win. (94-20 since 1997.) (82.5%, +48.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a home loss, on Tuesday nights. (144-97 since 1997.) (59.8%, +48 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins. (118-45 since 1997.) (72.4%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (91-21 since 1997.) (81.2%, +47.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (86-25 since 1997.) (77.5%, +46 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (97-30 since 1997.) (76.4%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a home loss by 10 points or more against opponent off a road win. (109-45 since 1997.) (70.8%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (69-16 since 1997.) (81.2%, +42.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (28-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.4%, +22.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a home loss by 10 points or more. (122-37 since 1997.) (76.7%, +40.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (82-34 since 1997.) (70.7%, +40.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an good defensive team (38-40.5%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (92-46 since 1997.) (66.7%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less. (96-31 since 1997.) (75.6%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (61-10 since 1997.) (85.9%, +38.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (69-26 since 1997.) (72.6%, +37.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better. (24-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +19.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (54-10 since 1997.) (84.4%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG). (69-33 since 1997.) (67.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better. (34-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.9%, +22.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win by 10 points or more, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (48-12 since 1997.) (80%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (73-20 since 1997.) (78.5%, +28.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (38-12 since 1997.) (76%, +28.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (53-27 since 1997.) (66.2%, +27.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (48-12 since 1997.) (80%, +21.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games. (43-20 since 1997.) (68.3%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 15 or more of their last 20 games, playing with 2 days rest. (35-17 since 1997.) (67.3%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (32-11 since 1997.) (74.4%, +19.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (25-4 since 1997.) (86.2%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG). (33-15 since 1997.) (68.8%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) after 15+ games. (23-9 since 1997.) (71.9%, +14 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA | 79 | | 32-66 | 48.3% | 3-10 | 33.7% | 12-15 | 77.6% | 40 | 8 | 12 | SEATTLE | 71 | | 25-61 | 41.4% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 15-18 | 81.8% | 39 | 9 | 16 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 690 times, while SEATTLE won 285 times. Edge against the money line=SEATTLE |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+12.2 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 69.4 | MINNESOTA is 15-4 against the money line (+10.8 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 76.7 | MINNESOTA is 41-14 against the money line (+15.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 73.8 | MINNESOTA is 17-0 against the money line (+18.5 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 68.7 | MINNESOTA is 18-2 against the money line (+14.9 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.9, OPPONENT 74.8 | MINNESOTA is 15-5 against the money line (+11.6 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 76.8 | MINNESOTA is 60-11 against the money line (+34.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.7, OPPONENT 75.8 | MINNESOTA is 35-8 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 75.4 | SEATTLE is 26-62 against the money line (-60.9 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 70.3, OPPONENT 75.9 | SEATTLE is 1-5 against the money line (-8.3 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 68.0, OPPONENT 79.0 | SEATTLE is 14-41 against the money line (-33.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 71.6, OPPONENT 79.7 | SEATTLE is 36-87 against the money line (-79.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 76.7, OPPONENT 84.7 |
|
MINNESOTA is 109-124 against the money line (-56.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 78.8 | MINNESOTA is 1-4 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 82.8 | MINNESOTA is 47-69 against the money line (-43.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.8, OPPONENT 74.1 | MINNESOTA is 10-10 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 78.1 | SEATTLE is 5-5 against the money line (+14.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 73.5, OPPONENT 79.3 | SEATTLE is 34-11 against the money line (+18.8 Units) in home games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.4, OPPONENT 68.4 | SEATTLE is 16-10 against the money line (+20.2 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 73.0, OPPONENT 72.4 | SEATTLE is 53-37 against the money line (+16.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 71.3 | SEATTLE is 8-8 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 70.0, OPPONENT 72.4 | SEATTLE is 11-6 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season. The average score was SEATTLE 72.8, OPPONENT 76.4 | SEATTLE is 22-7 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in home games when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 71.5, OPPONENT 67.7 | SEATTLE is 52-16 against the money line (+27.7 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 67.2 | SEATTLE is 6-2 against the money line (+10.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 81.8 | SEATTLE is 8-9 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was SEATTLE 70.4, OPPONENT 72.5 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 30-3 against the money line (+20.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 35-11 against the money line (+15.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the money line (+7.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-2 against the money line (+10.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 11-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 17-4 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 15-3 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 39-11 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-4 against the money line (+7.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 6-13 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 68.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 59-62 against the money line (-31.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 19-28 against the money line (-17.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 24-33 against the money line (-20.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.4, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 44-54 against the money line (-29.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.2, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 64-27 against the money line (+28.4 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.9, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 20-10 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-4 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 6-4 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots this season. The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 17-16 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-8 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 14-14 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 71.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 21-17 against the money line (+15.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 72.9, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 14-16 against the money line (+14.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 24-18 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 72.0, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 24-22 against the money line (+14.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.0, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-8 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 14-14 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 71.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 60-43 against the money line (+16.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.4, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 83-63 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 89-63 against the money line (+24.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-13 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 71.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 21-25 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 78-66 against the money line (+19.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-8 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 12-10 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 71.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 74-24 against the money line (+22.4 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 34-10 against the money line (+17.6 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-2 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 13-2 against the money line (+11.0 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 8-2 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after 2 consecutive division games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 13-4 against the money line (+8.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 39-11 against the money line (+19.4 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 33-7 against the money line (+21.7 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 27-5 against the money line (+19.7 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 9-3 against the money line (+6.5 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 32-10 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 63-19 against the money line (+23.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after playing a game as a road favorite this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 58-18 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 30-10 against the money line (+15.1 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 1-6 against the money line (-6.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more this season. The average score was SEATTLE 64.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-15 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 63.4, OPPONENT 66.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-16 against the money line (-12.6 Units) after a game where a team made 15% of their 3 point shots or worse since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 67.4, OPPONENT 68.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 11-9 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in road games after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-10 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 2-5 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.9, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 112-136 against the money line (-49.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-23 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in road games after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 69.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-29 against the money line (-26.3 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-9 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in road games after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-7 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-10 against the money line (-19.2 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 15-15 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in all games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 70.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 10-10 against the money line (+20.3 Units) as an underdog this season. The average score was SEATTLE 71.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 168-79 against the money line (+43.3 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.5, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 69-24 against the money line (+30.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 114-41 against the money line (+43.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 77.9, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 61-25 against the money line (+24.1 Units) in home games in August or September games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 76.0, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) on Tuesday this season. The average score was SEATTLE 75.2, OPPONENT 67.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 9-9 against the money line (+10.4 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-13 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season. The average score was SEATTLE 70.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 29-26 against the money line (+12.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.7, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-6 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season. The average score was SEATTLE 71.9, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 11-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in home games after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 73.1, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 21-17 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 12-3 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 66.1 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 12-11 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.6, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-4 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 72.3, OPPONENT 64.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 62-42 against the money line (+22.5 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-3 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in home games after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 79.7, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 85-43 against the money line (+21.1 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 5-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in home games revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 72.8, OPPONENT 66.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 69-29 against the money line (+28.8 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.7, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 19-9 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in home games triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 67.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 5-4 against the money line (+11.3 Units) off a loss against a division rival this season. The average score was SEATTLE 68.2, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 17-12 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 71.7, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 20-17 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 72.5, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-3 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in home games after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 77.7, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 25-24 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 71.1, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 73.0, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 10-10 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season. The average score was SEATTLE 70.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-5 against the money line (+13.1 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was SEATTLE 69.9, OPPONENT 67.4 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 54-46 against the money line (+17.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 72.1, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 9-6 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was SEATTLE 68.7, OPPONENT 67.3 - (Rating = 5*) | SEATTLE is 4-1 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was SEATTLE 71.2, OPPONENT 65.6 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 12-6 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 76.2, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-3 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 79.7, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 24-7 | +5.8 | 19-12 | 13-18 | 83.3 | 42.8 | 47.5% | 43.5 | 73.8 | 37.6 | 40.5% | 40.2 | Road Games | 10-5 | -3.2 | 8-7 | 6-9 | 79.0 | 40.3 | 45.6% | 44.6 | 76.1 | 39.2 | 40.8% | 40.9 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 82.4 | 42.8 | 51.5% | 42.8 | 66.4 | 32.8 | 38.0% | 37.2 | Division Games | 17-3 | +11 | 13-7 | 7-13 | 83.8 | 42.6 | 47.8% | 44.0 | 73.8 | 37.6 | 40.7% | 39.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.3 | 42.8 | 33-69 | 47.5% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 14-18 | 78.5% | 44 | 10 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.8 | 37.8 | 29-67 | 42.8% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.0 | 40.3 | 32-70 | 45.6% | 4-11 | 32.7% | 12-15 | 76.1% | 45 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.8 | 37.6 | 27-67 | 40.5% | 6-18 | 32.1% | 14-18 | 78.0% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.7 | 37.3 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 32.1% | 15-19 | 78.3% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.1 | 39.2 | 27-66 | 40.8% | 5-17 | 31.1% | 17-22 | 78.7% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 15-16 | +14 | 16-14 | 13-18 | 70.6 | 35.0 | 41.9% | 38.2 | 73.5 | 36.4 | 43.8% | 38.7 | Home Games | 8-7 | -0.2 | 9-6 | 6-9 | 70.5 | 36.8 | 42.7% | 37.4 | 71.5 | 36.0 | 44.1% | 38.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.1 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 69.6 | 34.0 | 41.9% | 36.6 | 75.6 | 36.2 | 44.7% | 38.8 | Division Games | 9-10 | +10.4 | 9-10 | 9-10 | 71.2 | 35.7 | 41.5% | 39.1 | 76.5 | 38.3 | 46.1% | 37.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.6 | 35.0 | 25-60 | 41.9% | 6-17 | 33.1% | 15-18 | 81.3% | 38 | 8 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.5 | 37.8 | 28-67 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.5 | 36.8 | 25-59 | 42.7% | 5-17 | 30.8% | 15-19 | 80.1% | 37 | 7 | 13 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.5 | 36.4 | 27-62 | 43.8% | 4-13 | 30.0% | 15-19 | 79.1% | 39 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 76.8 | 38 | 29-67 | 42.8% | 5-14 | 32.4% | 15-19 | 77.9% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.5 | 36.0 | 27-62 | 44.1% | 3-13 | 27.1% | 13-17 | 79.4% | 38 | 8 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 69.2, SEATTLE 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
8/2/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 85-63 | W | | 38-71 | 53.5% | 46 | 11 | 25-73 | 34.2% | 39 | 13 | 8/4/2013 | SEATTLE | 90-72 | W | -1050 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 43 | 9 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 39 | 18 | 8/6/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 93-80 | W | -600 | 39-68 | 57.4% | 40 | 10 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 33 | 12 | 8/8/2013 | WASHINGTON | 75-79 | L | | 29-67 | 43.3% | 31 | 11 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 48 | 16 | 8/11/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 86-94 | L | -125 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 41 | 16 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 39 | 14 | 8/16/2013 | TULSA | 77-83 | L | | 27-60 | 45.0% | 34 | 14 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 38 | 17 | 8/18/2013 | NEW YORK | 88-57 | W | | 34-72 | 47.2% | 42 | 7 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 44 | 14 | 8/20/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 75-88 | L | -140 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 43 | 19 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 40 | 13 | 8/22/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 91-77 | W | -500 | 38-66 | 57.6% | 27 | 9 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 39 | 15 | 8/24/2013 | INDIANA | 84-77 | W | -500 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 35 | 13 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 31 | 13 | 8/27/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 73-47 | W | -400 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 54 | 15 | 18-72 | 25.0% | 50 | 12 | 8/31/2013 | SEATTLE | 97-74 | W | -750 | 41-71 | 57.7% | 36 | 7 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 32 | 14 | 9/4/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 83-74 | W | -330 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 44 | 9 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 40 | 13 | 9/7/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 75-60 | W | -360 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 45 | 11 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 33 | 11 | 9/10/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/12/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/14/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/1/2013 | PHOENIX | 88-79 | W | +170 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 11 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 40 | 10 | 8/4/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 72-90 | L | +650 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 39 | 18 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 43 | 9 | 8/6/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 80-65 | W | +375 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 48 | 11 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 37 | 15 | 8/9/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 56-77 | L | -300 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 33 | 20 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 34 | 10 | 8/11/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 69-63 | W | -220 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 56 | 11 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 38 | 10 | 8/15/2013 | CHICAGO | 66-79 | L | +105 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 27 | 16 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 41 | 10 | 8/17/2013 | INDIANA | 77-70 | W | -120 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 28 | 11 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 43 | 5 | 8/20/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 77-57 | W | +200 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 46 | 16 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 33 | 15 | 8/23/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 81-73 | W | +325 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 37 | 13 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 33 | 16 | 8/25/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 64-70 | L | -110 | 19-53 | 35.8% | 36 | 15 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 44 | 14 | 8/27/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 72-71 | W | -120 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 43 | 17 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 35 | 10 | 8/29/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 78-65 | W | -330 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 39 | 18 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 34 | 12 | 8/31/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | 74-97 | L | +500 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 32 | 14 | 41-71 | 57.7% | 36 | 7 | 9/7/2013 | MINNESOTA | 60-75 | L | +280 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 33 | 11 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 45 | 11 | 9/10/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/12/2013 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/14/2013 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
SEATTLE is 28-26 (+6.5 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 11-3 (+4.0 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
SEATTLE is 19-7 (+12.6 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
SEATTLE is 3-3 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/7/2013 | MINNESOTA | 75 | -8 | SU ATS | 40 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 45 | 10 | 11 | | SEATTLE | 60 | 148 | Under | 33 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 2-16 | 12.5% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 33 | 8 | 11 | 8/31/2013 | SEATTLE | 74 | 149 | Over | 42 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 8-24 | 33.3% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 32 | 6 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 97 | -11.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 41-71 | 57.7% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 36 | 10 | 7 | 8/4/2013 | SEATTLE | 72 | 146.5 | Over | 32 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 8-27 | 29.6% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 39 | 11 | 18 | | MINNESOTA | 90 | -13 | SU ATS | 46 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 43 | 10 | 9 | 10/2/2012 | SEATTLE | 72 | 147 | ATS | 35 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 37 | 9 | 8 | | MINNESOTA | 73 | -10.5 | SU Under | 36 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 38 | 9 | 8 | 9/30/2012 | MINNESOTA | 79 | -5.5 | Over | 37 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 26-32 | 81.2% | 55 | 12 | 15 | | SEATTLE | 86 | 146 | SU ATS | 36 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 55 | 12 | 16 | 9/28/2012 | SEATTLE | 70 | 148.5 | ATS | 27 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 7-24 | 29.2% | 13-23 | 56.5% | 40 | 6 | 12 | | MINNESOTA | 78 | -10.5 | SU Under | 33 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 22-28 | 78.6% | 44 | 3 | 13 | 8/21/2012 | MINNESOTA | 86 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 52 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 5-8 | 62.5% | 45 | 10 | 13 | | SEATTLE | 73 | 150 | Over | 43 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 33 | 3 | 13 | 6/17/2012 | MINNESOTA | 62 | -9.5 | Under | 29 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 47 | 11 | 15 | | SEATTLE | 65 | 144.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 36 | 5 | 16 | 6/6/2012 | SEATTLE | 55 | 145.5 | Under | 30 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 4-22 | 18.2% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 35 | 7 | 15 | | MINNESOTA | 79 | -10 | SU ATS | 43 | 29-53 | 54.7% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 15-25 | 60.0% | 43 | 7 | 15 | 5/27/2012 | SEATTLE | 71 | 143 | Over | 24 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 14-34 | 41.2% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 38 | 8 | 15 | | MINNESOTA | 84 | -11.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 48 | 13 | 16 |
|
| | |
|
Cheryl is 87-45 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 40-15 against the money line (+21.8 Units) in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 19-7 against the money line (+10.6 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 24-9 against the money line (+14.8 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 56-27 against the money line (+17.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 29-9 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 40-12 against the money line (+20.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 33-8 against the money line (+20.7 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 27-5 against the money line (+19.7 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Cheryl is 28-6 against the money line (+21.4 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 5*) | Cheryl is 13-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 33-12 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 32-10 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 24-6 against the money line (+13.4 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 10-2 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Cheryl is 66-26 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 38-9 against the money line (+17.0 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 63-25 against the money line (+17.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 18-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 11-4 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 15-4 against the money line (+11.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Cheryl is 13-3 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 41-20 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 53-26 against the money line (+12.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 43-21 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 40-18 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 53-24 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 70-35 against the money line (+15.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 47-22 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 33-22 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 4-15 against the money line (-13.9 Units) revenging 2 straight losses versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 65.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Brian is 129-84 against the money line (+50.3 Units) in all games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 83-22 against the money line (+49.5 Units) in home games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.5, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 5*) | Brian is 47-13 against the money line (+25.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is between 140 and 149.5 points as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 67.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 74-20 against the money line (+43.1 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.6, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 54-39 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in August or September games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 29-18 against the money line (+10.3 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 33-20 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 85-50 against the money line (+41.0 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 78-55 against the money line (+22.9 Units) after a division game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 53-39 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.0, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 46-30 against the money line (+25.2 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 86-56 against the money line (+36.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 74-46 against the money line (+35.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 16-7 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brian 72.2, OPPONENT 65.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 62-35 against the money line (+28.6 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 15-4 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in home games after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.1, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 70-49 against the money line (+21.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 27-8 against the money line (+19.7 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.1, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 34-23 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.9, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 28-11 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 67.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 26-11 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.6, OPPONENT 69.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 79.2, OPPONENT 66.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 49-35 against the money line (+18.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.6, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 24-10 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 12-7 against the money line (+8.0 Units) revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 37-23 against the money line (+18.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 8-3 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in home games triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.0, OPPONENT 67.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 18-9 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in home games off a loss against a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.9, OPPONENT 68.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 46-23 against the money line (+30.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 50-30 against the money line (+27.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 17-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 11-2 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 66.5 - (Rating = 6*) | Brian is 50-39 against the money line (+29.8 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 61-42 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 57-40 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 23-17 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.1, OPPONENT 70.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 48-33 against the money line (+23.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.2, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 20-10 against the money line (+21.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 71.4, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 25-14 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.4, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 17-6 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 77.1, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 46-49 against the money line (+13.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 22-12 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.1, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 8-3 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 44-30 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 68-50 against the money line (+24.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 19-7 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in home games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 80.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 49-39 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 27-20 against the money line (+21.1 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 77.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 37-26 against the money line (+32.1 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 77.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 13-10 against the money line (+15.0 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 77.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 72-48 against the money line (+24.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 105-71 against the money line (+41.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 46-28 against the money line (+30.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 64-44 against the money line (+34.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 43-28 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.8, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 65-42 against the money line (+27.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 72.7, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 65-44 against the money line (+21.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 97-68 against the money line (+36.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 31-18 against the money line (+18.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 42-27 against the money line (+24.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 18-8 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in home games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.7, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brian is 62-55 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 72-49 against the money line (+22.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.7, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 103-68 against the money line (+38.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 19-10 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 76.2, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 9-4 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 73.3, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 66-44 against the money line (+23.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 92-62 against the money line (+36.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brian is 47-36 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brian is 67-50 against the money line (+27.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 75.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brian is 27-16 against the money line (+22.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.2, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Brian is 37-23 against the money line (+30.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 74.8, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 16 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 7 times, while the home underdog won straight up 0 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[C] 05/25/2013 - Ann Wauters out for season ( Personal ) | [F] 05/25/2013 - Lauren Jackson out for season ( Hamstring ) | [G] 05/25/2013 - Sue Bird out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 1:39:36 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|