Login  | Free Registration
Sunday, 4/21/2024
GEICO 500 - FoxSheet

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.
WNBA : First Half Matchup
Tuesday 9/10/2013Line$ LineOU LineScore
MINNESOTA
 First Half Results
SEATTLE
-5  

+5  


72.5
 
40
Final
28

MINNESOTA (24 - 7) at SEATTLE (15 - 16)
View Previous GameView Next Game
Tuesday, 9/10/2013 10:05 PM
Board First Half
655MINNESOTA-5
656SEATTLE72.5
STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™
StatFox Super Situations favoring SEATTLE to cover the first half line
There are 14 situations with a total rating of 33 stars.
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(36-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.6%, +23.9 units. Rating = 3*)
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(91-50 since 1997.) (64.5%, +36 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(64-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(30-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +19 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(46-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.7%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*)
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(112-59 since 1997.) (65.5%, +47.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(33-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(48-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(28-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*)
- Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(46-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +21.8 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(40-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(46-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*)
- Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(40-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.2%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*)
- Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(88-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +34.1 units. Rating = 2*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring the game to go UNDER the first half total
There are 350 situations with a total rating of 846 stars.
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(201-131 since 1997.) (60.5%, +56.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(109-62 since 1997.) (63.7%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(718-495 since 1997.) (59.2%, +173.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(314-210 since 1997.) (59.9%, +83 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(116-65 since 1997.) (64.1%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(79-40 since 1997.) (66.4%, +35 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(78-41 since 1997.) (65.5%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(155-84 since 1997.) (64.9%, +62.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(525-378 since 1997.) (58.1%, +109.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(241-163 since 1997.) (59.7%, +61.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points against opponent off a road win.
(116-61 since 1997.) (65.5%, +48.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(381-260 since 1997.) (59.4%, +95 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, playing with 2 days rest.
(90-45 since 1997.) (66.7%, +40.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(63-26 since 1997.) (70.8%, +34.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(511-346 since 1997.) (59.6%, +130.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, playing with 2 days rest.
(121-69 since 1997.) (63.7%, +45.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(254-166 since 1997.) (60.5%, +71.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(92-51 since 1997.) (64.3%, +35.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(58-27 since 1997.) (68.2%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(114-54 since 1997.) (67.9%, +54.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent.
(385-253 since 1997.) (60.3%, +106.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record.
(189-110 since 1997.) (63.2%, +68 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(132-77 since 1997.) (63.2%, +47.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(60-24 since 1997.) (71.4%, +33.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(46-19 since 1997.) (70.8%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(44-16 since 1997.) (73.3%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a road win by 10 points or more.
(47-17 since 1997.) (73.4%, +28.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a road win.
(89-42 since 1997.) (67.9%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(112-63 since 1997.) (64%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(82-45 since 1997.) (64.6%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(58-21 since 1997.) (73.4%, +34.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a win against a division rival.
(177-111 since 1997.) (61.5%, +54.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a road win.
(89-47 since 1997.) (65.4%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival against opponent off a road win.
(42-18 since 1997.) (70%, +22.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, on Tuesday nights.
(115-68 since 1997.) (62.8%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(366-258 since 1997.) (58.7%, +82.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(125-74 since 1997.) (62.8%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(90-41 since 1997.) (68.7%, +44.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - in August or September games.
(277-186 since 1997.) (59.8%, +72.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - on Tuesday nights.
(127-78 since 1997.) (62%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents.
(502-331 since 1997.) (60.3%, +137.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(353-234 since 1997.) (60.1%, +95.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(238-154 since 1997.) (60.7%, +68.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off a road win against a division rival.
(68-25 since 1997.) (73.1%, +40.5 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off a win against a division rival.
(192-115 since 1997.) (62.5%, +65.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off a road win.
(83-43 since 1997.) (65.9%, +35.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after a division game.
(462-312 since 1997.) (59.7%, +118.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(226-144 since 1997.) (61.1%, +67.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(305-193 since 1997.) (61.2%, +92.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 3 consecutive division games.
(194-121 since 1997.) (61.6%, +60.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(148-91 since 1997.) (61.9%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(302-213 since 1997.) (58.6%, +67.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(47-20 since 1997.) (70.1%, +25 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(304-187 since 1997.) (61.9%, +98.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(449-274 since 1997.) (62.1%, +147.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(157-80 since 1997.) (66.2%, +69 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(80-38 since 1997.) (67.8%, +38.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game.
(34-9 since 1997.) (79.1%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(198-133 since 1997.) (59.8%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(242-121 since 1997.) (66.7%, +108.9 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(95-41 since 1997.) (69.9%, +49.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(53-16 since 1997.) (76.8%, +35.4 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(115-58 since 1997.) (66.5%, +51.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(215-131 since 1997.) (62.1%, +70.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(158-90 since 1997.) (63.7%, +59 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(64-28 since 1997.) (69.6%, +33.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(41-16 since 1997.) (71.9%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(29-7 since 1997.) (80.6%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(189-104 since 1997.) (64.5%, +74.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season.
(174-97 since 1997.) (64.2%, +67.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(123-70 since 1997.) (63.7%, +46 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(71-31 since 1997.) (69.6%, +36.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(48-22 since 1997.) (68.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(72-35 since 1997.) (67.3%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(30-8 since 1997.) (78.9%, +21.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(30-7 since 1997.) (81.1%, +22.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(142-80 since 1997.) (64%, +54 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season.
(139-75 since 1997.) (65%, +56.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(100-55 since 1997.) (64.5%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(59-21 since 1997.) (73.8%, +35.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(44-15 since 1997.) (74.6%, +27.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season.
(400-231 since 1997.) (63.4%, +145.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season, in August or September games.
(168-113 since 1997.) (59.8%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(275-160 since 1997.) (63.2%, +99 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in August or September games.
(168-113 since 1997.) (59.8%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(154-84 since 1997.) (64.7%, +61.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(106-57 since 1997.) (65%, +43.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a road win against a division rival.
(89-37 since 1997.) (70.6%, +48.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(54-16 since 1997.) (77.1%, +36.4 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(38-9 since 1997.) (80.9%, +28.1 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival.
(125-72 since 1997.) (63.5%, +45.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(82-36 since 1997.) (69.5%, +42.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival.
(260-152 since 1997.) (63.1%, +92.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(161-83 since 1997.) (66%, +69.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(107-61 since 1997.) (63.7%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, with a winning record on the season.
(75-35 since 1997.) (68.2%, +36.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite.
(80-40 since 1997.) (66.7%, +36 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, with a winning record on the season.
(63-28 since 1997.) (69.2%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a road win.
(163-86 since 1997.) (65.5%, +68.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(52-22 since 1997.) (70.3%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season.
(94-44 since 1997.) (68.1%, +45.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(63-23 since 1997.) (73.3%, +37.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(36-10 since 1997.) (78.3%, +25 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(23-2 since 1997.) (92%, +20.8 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after a win by 10 points or more.
(229-120 since 1997.) (65.6%, +97 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(291-199 since 1997.) (59.4%, +72.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 75 points or more.
(331-215 since 1997.) (60.6%, +94.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(392-266 since 1997.) (59.6%, +99.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season.
(186-121 since 1997.) (60.6%, +52.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season.
(168-87 since 1997.) (65.9%, +72.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(62-27 since 1997.) (69.7%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season.
(394-281 since 1997.) (58.4%, +84.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(290-184 since 1997.) (61.2%, +87.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season.
(83-40 since 1997.) (67.5%, +39 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(253-146 since 1997.) (63.4%, +92.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a win by 10 points or more.
(106-48 since 1997.) (68.8%, +53.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a blowout win by 15 points or more.
(55-24 since 1997.) (69.6%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(127-76 since 1997.) (62.6%, +43.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(103-53 since 1997.) (66%, +44.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(125-57 since 1997.) (68.7%, +62.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a win by 10 points or more.
(56-25 since 1997.) (69.1%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after scoring 75 points or more.
(66-29 since 1997.) (69.5%, +34.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(45-19 since 1997.) (70.3%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game.
(44-14 since 1997.) (75.9%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game, after a win by 10 points or more.
(26-6 since 1997.) (81.2%, +19.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game, after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(29-7 since 1997.) (80.6%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season.
(372-257 since 1997.) (59.1%, +89.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a win by 10 points or more.
(128-66 since 1997.) (66%, +55.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(28-7 since 1997.) (80%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after playing a road game.
(381-252 since 1997.) (60.2%, +103.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(419-240 since 1997.) (63.6%, +155 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(222-116 since 1997.) (65.7%, +94.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(146-73 since 1997.) (66.7%, +65.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(82-39 since 1997.) (67.8%, +39.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(57-25 since 1997.) (69.5%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(62-26 since 1997.) (70.5%, +33.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(33-8 since 1997.) (80.5%, +24.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(203-128 since 1997.) (61.3%, +62.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season.
(131-72 since 1997.) (64.5%, +51.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(48-18 since 1997.) (72.7%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(25-3 since 1997.) (89.3%, +21.7 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(441-249 since 1997.) (63.9%, +167.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games.
(150-83 since 1997.) (64.4%, +58.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 4 or more consecutive wins.
(90-48 since 1997.) (65.2%, +37.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(82-44 since 1997.) (65.1%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 5 or more consecutive wins.
(59-28 since 1997.) (67.8%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(58-28 since 1997.) (67.4%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents.
(859-646 since 1997.) (57.1%, +148.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off a road win against a division rival.
(107-46 since 1997.) (69.9%, +56.4 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off a road win.
(142-75 since 1997.) (65.4%, +59.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(547-396 since 1997.) (58%, +111.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential).
(62-31 since 1997.) (66.7%, +27.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(234-156 since 1997.) (60%, +62.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game.
(48-20 since 1997.) (70.6%, +26 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(342-241 since 1997.) (58.7%, +76.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(130-79 since 1997.) (62.2%, +43.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(69-30 since 1997.) (69.7%, +36 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game.
(31-8 since 1997.) (79.5%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread.
(364-246 since 1997.) (59.7%, +93.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(99-52 since 1997.) (65.6%, +41.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(251-158 since 1997.) (61.4%, +77.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(166-108 since 1997.) (60.6%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(103-56 since 1997.) (64.8%, +41.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(131-82 since 1997.) (61.5%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread.
(214-140 since 1997.) (60.5%, +60 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(155-95 since 1997.) (62%, +50.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(67-32 since 1997.) (67.7%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(45-21 since 1997.) (68.2%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(314-206 since 1997.) (60.4%, +87.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season.
(288-189 since 1997.) (60.4%, +80.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(203-134 since 1997.) (60.2%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(125-66 since 1997.) (65.4%, +52.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(81-44 since 1997.) (64.8%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread.
(144-89 since 1997.) (61.8%, +46.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(36-14 since 1997.) (72%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(115-58 since 1997.) (66.5%, +51.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(47-20 since 1997.) (70.1%, +25 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having covered 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(40-15 since 1997.) (72.7%, +23.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(243-157 since 1997.) (60.8%, +70.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season.
(234-147 since 1997.) (61.4%, +72.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(167-108 since 1997.) (60.7%, +48.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(104-49 since 1997.) (68%, +50.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(72-35 since 1997.) (67.3%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season.
(651-454 since 1997.) (58.9%, +151.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(440-312 since 1997.) (58.5%, +96.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(267-179 since 1997.) (59.9%, +70.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win against a division rival.
(146-74 since 1997.) (66.4%, +64.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(85-37 since 1997.) (69.7%, +44.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(58-25 since 1997.) (69.9%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(36-11 since 1997.) (76.6%, +23.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, on Tuesday nights.
(45-19 since 1997.) (70.3%, +24.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(136-80 since 1997.) (63%, +48 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival.
(433-306 since 1997.) (58.6%, +96.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(255-170 since 1997.) (60%, +68 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win by 10 points or more.
(117-66 since 1997.) (63.9%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win.
(277-161 since 1997.) (63.2%, +99.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season.
(162-85 since 1997.) (65.6%, +68.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(103-50 since 1997.) (67.3%, +48 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(70-35 since 1997.) (66.7%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(59-27 since 1997.) (68.6%, +29.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a win by 10 points or more.
(371-245 since 1997.) (60.2%, +101.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season.
(344-246 since 1997.) (58.3%, +73.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(419-298 since 1997.) (58.4%, +91.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a win by 10 points or more.
(170-102 since 1997.) (62.5%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(193-120 since 1997.) (61.7%, +61 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a win by 10 points or more.
(93-54 since 1997.) (63.3%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game.
(76-37 since 1997.) (67.3%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game, after a win by 10 points or more.
(45-21 since 1997.) (68.2%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game, after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(59-30 since 1997.) (66.3%, +26 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a win by 10 points or more.
(246-160 since 1997.) (60.6%, +70 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(688-476 since 1997.) (59.1%, +164.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days.
(168-105 since 1997.) (61.5%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(362-220 since 1997.) (62.2%, +120 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(242-143 since 1997.) (62.9%, +84.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(146-84 since 1997.) (63.5%, +53.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team after 15 or more games.
(93-55 since 1997.) (62.8%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(102-58 since 1997.) (63.8%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season.
(210-119 since 1997.) (63.8%, +79.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(136-78 since 1997.) (63.6%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(86-46 since 1997.) (65.2%, +35.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(71-34 since 1997.) (67.6%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(37-12 since 1997.) (75.5%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(725-496 since 1997.) (59.4%, +179.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(427-278 since 1997.) (60.6%, +121.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(279-183 since 1997.) (60.4%, +77.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(175-115 since 1997.) (60.3%, +48.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(406-289 since 1997.) (58.4%, +88.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(298-197 since 1997.) (60.2%, +81.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(189-128 since 1997.) (59.6%, +48.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(228-149 since 1997.) (60.5%, +64.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(190-120 since 1997.) (61.3%, +58 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - in August or September games.
(277-186 since 1997.) (59.8%, +72.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - on Tuesday nights.
(127-78 since 1997.) (62%, +41.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - playing with 2 days rest.
(184-123 since 1997.) (59.9%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents.
(502-331 since 1997.) (60.3%, +137.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(331-211 since 1997.) (61.1%, +98.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents, after 2 consecutive division games.
(223-143 since 1997.) (60.9%, +65.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents, off a loss against a division rival.
(170-104 since 1997.) (62%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents, off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals.
(64-32 since 1997.) (66.7%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a division game.
(526-328 since 1997.) (61.6%, +165.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(230-132 since 1997.) (63.5%, +84.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a division game against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(162-88 since 1997.) (64.8%, +65.2 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(354-227 since 1997.) (60.9%, +104.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 2 consecutive division games against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(129-63 since 1997.) (67.2%, +59.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(286-165 since 1997.) (63.4%, +104.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%).
(203-133 since 1997.) (60.4%, +56.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games.
(163-101 since 1997.) (61.7%, +51.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - an average offensive team (65-72 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG).
(70-38 since 1997.) (64.8%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(91-48 since 1997.) (65.5%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive unders.
(425-277 since 1997.) (60.5%, +120.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(154-72 since 1997.) (68.1%, +74.8 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(266-182 since 1997.) (59.4%, +65.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games.
(254-172 since 1997.) (59.6%, +64.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(73-32 since 1997.) (69.5%, +37.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games.
(54-24 since 1997.) (69.2%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread.
(95-53 since 1997.) (64.2%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a losing record.
(267-175 since 1997.) (60.4%, +74.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(179-115 since 1997.) (60.9%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(115-67 since 1997.) (63.2%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(62-32 since 1997.) (66%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a home loss versus opponent.
(94-54 since 1997.) (63.5%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(426-234 since 1997.) (64.5%, +168.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(168-97 since 1997.) (63.4%, +61.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(113-68 since 1997.) (62.4%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(64-29 since 1997.) (68.8%, +32.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(43-19 since 1997.) (69.4%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(150-90 since 1997.) (62.5%, +51 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(45-18 since 1997.) (71.4%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a win against a division rival.
(151-85 since 1997.) (64%, +57.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite.
(52-21 since 1997.) (71.2%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(92-43 since 1997.) (68.1%, +44.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(269-149 since 1997.) (64.4%, +105.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(113-63 since 1997.) (64.2%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(83-46 since 1997.) (64.3%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(43-18 since 1997.) (70.5%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(231-127 since 1997.) (64.5%, +91.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, playing with 2 days rest.
(54-24 since 1997.) (69.2%, +27.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a losing record.
(106-59 since 1997.) (64.2%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(41-15 since 1997.) (73.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite.
(36-13 since 1997.) (73.5%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a loss where team scored less than 60 points.
(107-60 since 1997.) (64.1%, +41 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(297-161 since 1997.) (64.8%, +119.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(135-71 since 1997.) (65.5%, +56.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(105-60 since 1997.) (63.6%, +39 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(47-21 since 1997.) (69.1%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival.
(113-64 since 1997.) (63.8%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(37-10 since 1997.) (78.7%, +26 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a win against a division rival.
(113-65 since 1997.) (63.5%, +41.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a road win.
(71-26 since 1997.) (73.2%, +42.4 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent.
(234-119 since 1997.) (66.3%, +103.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record.
(100-51 since 1997.) (66.2%, +43.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(72-34 since 1997.) (67.9%, +34.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(32-9 since 1997.) (78%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a win against a division rival.
(80-41 since 1997.) (66.1%, +34.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off a road win by 10 points or more.
(30-9 since 1997.) (76.9%, +20.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(96-43 since 1997.) (69.1%, +48.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent.
(101-54 since 1997.) (65.2%, +41.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a loss against a division rival.
(255-165 since 1997.) (60.7%, +73.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a road win against a division rival.
(37-9 since 1997.) (80.4%, +27.1 units. Rating = 4*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a win against a division rival.
(106-54 since 1997.) (66.2%, +46.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a road win.
(56-23 since 1997.) (70.9%, +30.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, on Tuesday nights.
(28-6 since 1997.) (82.4%, +21.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival against opponent off a road win.
(29-7 since 1997.) (80.6%, +21.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(125-74 since 1997.) (62.8%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more.
(324-215 since 1997.) (60.1%, +87.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after a win by 10 points or more.
(100-51 since 1997.) (66.2%, +43.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(150-91 since 1997.) (62.2%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a win by 10 points or more.
(52-22 since 1997.) (70.3%, +27.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(63-27 since 1997.) (70%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a loss by 10 points or more.
(185-119 since 1997.) (60.9%, +54.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(34-11 since 1997.) (75.6%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a loss by 10 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(87-46 since 1997.) (65.4%, +36.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts.
(378-267 since 1997.) (58.6%, +84.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game.
(212-135 since 1997.) (61.1%, +63.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game.
(295-197 since 1997.) (60%, +78.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good 3 point shooting team - making 5 or more 3 point shots/game, on Tuesday nights.
(55-26 since 1997.) (67.9%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws.
(292-182 since 1997.) (61.6%, +91.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, on Tuesday nights.
(59-25 since 1997.) (70.2%, +31.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after playing a home game.
(384-242 since 1997.) (61.3%, +117.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread.
(378-252 since 1997.) (60%, +100.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(62-32 since 1997.) (66%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after a game where they failed to cover the spread against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(199-123 since 1997.) (61.8%, +63.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(178-112 since 1997.) (61.4%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games against opponent after a game where they covered the spread.
(104-58 since 1997.) (64.2%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive losses.
(378-257 since 1997.) (59.5%, +95.3 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(219-133 since 1997.) (62.2%, +72.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(74-34 since 1997.) (68.5%, +36.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive losses.
(191-123 since 1997.) (60.8%, +55.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest.
(54-21 since 1997.) (72%, +30.9 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - vs. division opponents.
(859-646 since 1997.) (57.1%, +148.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after a division game.
(878-664 since 1997.) (56.9%, +147.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(366-263 since 1997.) (58.2%, +76.7 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after a division game against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(257-179 since 1997.) (58.9%, +60.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after 2 consecutive division games.
(601-455 since 1997.) (56.9%, +100.5 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(529-392 since 1997.) (57.4%, +97.8 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(109-59 since 1997.) (64.9%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(78-40 since 1997.) (66.1%, +34 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(60-26 since 1997.) (69.8%, +31.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games.
(42-16 since 1997.) (72.4%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SEATTLE) - with a losing record.
(483-356 since 1997.) (57.6%, +91.4 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(265-143 since 1997.) (65%, +107.7 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(174-92 since 1997.) (65.4%, +72.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(98-54 since 1997.) (64.5%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(242-144 since 1997.) (62.7%, +83.6 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games.
(91-46 since 1997.) (66.4%, +40.4 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(184-102 since 1997.) (64.3%, +71.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(117-64 since 1997.) (64.6%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(138-75 since 1997.) (64.8%, +55.5 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(118-62 since 1997.) (65.6%, +49.8 units. Rating = 3*)
Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is between 65.5 and 70.5 points (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(74-38 since 1997.) (66.1%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™
 ProjectionShooting   3pt Shots Free ThrowsRebounding 
TeamsScoreEdgeHalfEdgeFGM-APct.FGM-APct.FTM-APct.Tot.OFFTO
MINNESOTA79 39 32-6648.3%3-1033.7%12-1577.6%40812
SEATTLE71 36 25-6141.4%6-1833.6%15-1881.8%39916

The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total.
In 1000 simulated games, SEATTLE covered the first half line 538 times, while MINNESOTA covered the first half line 422 times.
No Edge.
In 1000 simulated games, 614 games went over first half total, while 386 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over

Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring MINNESOTA to cover the first half line
MINNESOTA is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.3, OPPONENT 35.1
MINNESOTA is 114-81 against the 1rst half line (+24.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.2, OPPONENT 38.5
MINNESOTA is 12-5 against the 1rst half line (+6.5 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.9, OPPONENT 35.7
SEATTLE is 28-58 against the 1rst half line (-35.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.4, OPPONENT 36.7
SEATTLE is 42-84 against the 1rst half line (-50.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 41.4

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring SEATTLE to cover the first half line
MINNESOTA is 46-70 against the 1rst half line (-31.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.9, OPPONENT 36.2
SEATTLE is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in home games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 41.0, OPPONENT 30.9

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the OVER against the first half total
MINNESOTA is 32-21 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in up-tempo games where they attempt 64 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.2, OPPONENT 38.7
MINNESOTA is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.9, OPPONENT 39.2
MINNESOTA is 17-7 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.9, OPPONENT 39.0
MINNESOTA is 14-6 OVER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 45.0, OPPONENT 38.8
MINNESOTA is 36-23 OVER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.2, OPPONENT 37.8
SEATTLE is 18-5 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 39.1
SEATTLE is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 41.5
SEATTLE is 95-60 OVER (+29.0 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.1, OPPONENT 38.4

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring the UNDER against the first half total
MINNESOTA is 75-42 UNDER (+28.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.1, OPPONENT 36.0
MINNESOTA is 75-44 UNDER (+26.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.8, OPPONENT 34.1
MINNESOTA is 69-38 UNDER (+27.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 34.9
MINNESOTA is 152-105 UNDER (+36.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 35.2
MINNESOTA is 58-34 UNDER (+20.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 33.3
MINNESOTA is 167-119 UNDER (+36.1 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.6
MINNESOTA is 61-40 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.3, OPPONENT 34.8
MINNESOTA is 88-56 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.3, OPPONENT 34.6
MINNESOTA is 99-62 UNDER (+30.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.6, OPPONENT 35.5
SEATTLE is 30-17 UNDER (+11.3 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they attempt 57 to 63 shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 35.5
SEATTLE is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 36.3
SEATTLE is 19-6 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.1, OPPONENT 34.0
SEATTLE is 9-1 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 34.9
SEATTLE is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.4, OPPONENT 31.4
SEATTLE is 145-94 UNDER (+41.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.3, OPPONENT 33.8
SEATTLE is 77-32 UNDER (+41.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.9, OPPONENT 34.1
SEATTLE is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.6, OPPONENT 34.2
SEATTLE is 78-50 UNDER (+23.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 34.6
SEATTLE is 63-27 UNDER (+33.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.5, OPPONENT 33.6
SEATTLE is 169-97 UNDER (+62.3 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 33.9

STATFOX POWERLINE™
 Power Rating
 EstimateEdge
MINNESOTA-4 
SEATTLE  
STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™
StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring MINNESOTA to cover the first half line
There are 2 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.
MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 11-4 against the 1rst half line (+6.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.1, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring SEATTLE to cover the first half line
There are 22 trends with a total rating of 13 stars.
MINNESOTA is 10-20 against the 1rst half line (-12.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.9, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 15-25 against the 1rst half line (-12.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.0, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 16-27 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.9, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 4-15 against the 1rst half line (-12.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.6, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 2*)
MINNESOTA is 5-17 against the 1rst half line (-13.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 18-6 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.5, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 13-4 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.9, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 24-14 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 22-11 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.6, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 27-14 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.4, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.0, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 19-7 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.3, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.7, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.4, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 34-21 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 18-9 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 22-11 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.6, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.1, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 17-8 against the 1rst half line (+8.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 23-11 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.2, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the OVER against the first half total
There are 2 trends with a total rating of 0 stars.
MINNESOTA is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.6, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 24-12 OVER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring the UNDER against the first half total
There are 30 trends with a total rating of 23 stars.
MINNESOTA is 105-66 UNDER (+32.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 153-103 UNDER (+39.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 85-57 UNDER (+22.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.1, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 126-86 UNDER (+31.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.9, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 25-9 UNDER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor passing teams, averaging <=14 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 32.2, OPPONENT 30.6 - (Rating = 2*)
MINNESOTA is 43-17 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor passing teams, averaging <=14 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 32.2, OPPONENT 31.2 - (Rating = 2*)
MINNESOTA is 88-56 UNDER (+26.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 127-81 UNDER (+37.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 31-16 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.7, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 47-25 UNDER (+19.5 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 117-81 UNDER (+27.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.5, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 169-115 UNDER (+42.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.2, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 164-111 UNDER (+41.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 243-162 UNDER (+64.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 60-35 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.5, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 134-98 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 142-109 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 150-114 UNDER (+24.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 116-79 UNDER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 115-79 UNDER (+28.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 164-110 UNDER (+43.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 152-113 UNDER (+27.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 228-154 UNDER (+58.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.4, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 61-40 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.3, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 84-60 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 46-23 UNDER (+20.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 57-36 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 139-91 UNDER (+38.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 62-38 UNDER (+20.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.5, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 85-50 UNDER (+30.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™
StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring MINNESOTA to cover the first half line
There are 1 trends with a total rating of 2 stars.
SEATTLE is 2-10 against the 1rst half line (-9.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 30.1, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 2*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring SEATTLE to cover the first half line
There are 47 trends with a total rating of 27 stars.
MINNESOTA is 10-21 against the 1rst half line (-13.1 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.9, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 15-26 against the 1rst half line (-13.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 27-46 against the 1rst half line (-23.6 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.7, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 9-21 against the 1rst half line (-14.1 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 3-10 against the 1rst half line (-8.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.5, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 11-24 against the 1rst half line (-15.4 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 18-32 against the 1rst half line (-17.2 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.9, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.3, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) after covering 6 or 7 of their last 8 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.4, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 6-16 against the 1rst half line (-11.6 Units) off a road win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.5, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 64-95 against the 1rst half line (-40.5 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 35-60 against the 1rst half line (-31.0 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) in road games after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 22-34 against the 1rst half line (-15.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 28-45 against the 1rst half line (-21.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 6-13 against the 1rst half line (-8.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.6, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 14-26 against the 1rst half line (-14.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 6-21 against the 1rst half line (-17.1 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 3*)
MINNESOTA is 98-141 against the 1rst half line (-57.1 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 104-148 against the 1rst half line (-58.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 49-71 against the 1rst half line (-29.1 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 104-144 against the 1rst half line (-54.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 53-79 against the 1rst half line (-33.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 9-20 against the 1rst half line (-13.0 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.5, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 30-49 against the 1rst half line (-23.9 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.3, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 16-32 against the 1rst half line (-19.2 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.9, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 32-17 against the 1rst half line (+13.3 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 22-11 against the 1rst half line (+9.9 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 29-17 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) in home games in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.0, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.9, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 23-13 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.4, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 33-18 against the 1rst half line (+13.2 Units) in home games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.6, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 25-10 against the 1rst half line (+14.0 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.0, OPPONENT 31.7 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.0, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 14-4 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.3, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.6, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) off a home loss over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 40.2, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.3, OPPONENT 29.5 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.0, OPPONENT 31.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 31.4 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 22-8 against the 1rst half line (+13.2 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.9, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 64-34 against the 1rst half line (+26.6 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.8, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 30-17 against the 1rst half line (+11.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 32.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 26-12 against the 1rst half line (+12.8 Units) in home games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.8, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total
There are 10 trends with a total rating of 6 stars.
MINNESOTA is 41-26 OVER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.0, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.9, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 18-7 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.2, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 23-11 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a division game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.5, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 22-12 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.0, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 18-9 OVER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.2, OPPONENT 41.2 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 25-14 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.8, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 18-8 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.1, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 42.3 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 25-14 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.3, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total
There are 49 trends with a total rating of 44 stars.
MINNESOTA is 297-209 UNDER (+67.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 144-107 UNDER (+26.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.6, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 61-36 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing with 2 days rest since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 193-129 UNDER (+51.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 120-78 UNDER (+34.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.8, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 81-51 UNDER (+24.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.5, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 78-52 UNDER (+20.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 140-104 UNDER (+25.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 148-112 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 107-64 UNDER (+36.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 71-37 UNDER (+30.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.2, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*)
MINNESOTA is 80-47 UNDER (+28.3 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.4, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 94-59 UNDER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 60-31 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 2*)
MINNESOTA is 116-83 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.9, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*)
MINNESOTA is 89-59 UNDER (+24.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.3, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 147-104 UNDER (+32.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 145-87 UNDER (+49.3 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*)
MINNESOTA is 76-39 UNDER (+33.1 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.3, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 2*)
MINNESOTA is 38-15 UNDER (+21.5 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.3, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*)
MINNESOTA is 150-94 UNDER (+46.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 81-49 UNDER (+27.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*)
MINNESOTA is 44-26 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.7, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 62-39 UNDER (+19.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 135-93 UNDER (+32.7 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.3, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 138-106 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 15-6 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total on Tuesday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 190-129 UNDER (+48.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.3, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 82-54 UNDER (+22.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 149-100 UNDER (+39.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 141-106 UNDER (+24.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 127-93 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 90-62 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.2, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 63-42 UNDER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.8, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.2, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.1, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 3*)
SEATTLE is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.6, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 85-59 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.0, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 97-71 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a blowout loss by 15 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.4, OPPONENT 31.6 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 138-78 UNDER (+52.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 32.7, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 72-43 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.4, OPPONENT 32.9 - (Rating = 1*)
SEATTLE is 29-15 UNDER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 31.0, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 137-100 UNDER (+27.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game since 1997.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.0, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 6-0 UNDER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after 2 straight games where they had 5 or less steals over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.0, OPPONENT 30.3 - (Rating = 0*)
SEATTLE is 10-2 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.1, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 2*)
SEATTLE is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses this season.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.1, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 3*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS
MINNESOTA - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games24-7+5.819-1213-1883.342.847.5%43.573.837.640.5%40.2
Road Games10-5-3.28-76-979.040.345.6%44.676.139.240.8%40.9
Last 5 Games5-0+54-12-382.442.851.5%42.866.432.838.0%37.2
Division Games17-3+1113-77-1383.842.647.8%44.073.837.640.7%39.2
MINNESOTA Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)83.342.833-6947.5%4-1136.4%14-1878.5%441021168125
vs opponents surrendering76.837.829-6742.8%5-1432.5%15-1978.2%431016188134
Team Stats (Road Games)79.040.332-7045.6%4-1132.7%12-1576.1%451018188135
Stats Against (All Games)73.837.627-6740.5%6-1832.1%14-1878.0%40917186143
vs opponents averaging75.737.328-6642.4%5-1532.1%15-1978.3%42916188144
Stats Against (Road Games)76.139.227-6640.8%5-1731.1%17-2278.7%41916176134

SEATTLE - Current Season Performance
 Straight UpAgainst SpreadTeamOpponent
 W-LUnitsW-LO-UScoreHalfFG PctReb.ScoreHalfFG PctReb.
All Games15-16+1416-1413-1870.635.041.9%38.273.536.443.8%38.7
Home Games8-7-0.29-66-970.536.842.7%37.471.536.044.1%38.3
Last 5 Games2-3-1.11-43-269.634.041.9%36.675.636.244.7%38.8
Division Games9-10+10.49-109-1071.235.741.5%39.176.538.346.1%37.7
SEATTLE Team Statistics
 Shooting    3pt ShootingFree Throws Rebounding 
 PPGHalfFGM-APctFGM-APCTFTM-APctTotOffAstPFStlTOBk
Team Stats (All Games)70.635.025-6041.9%6-1733.1%15-1881.3%38814186142
vs opponents surrendering76.537.828-6742.5%5-1532.7%15-1978.2%431016188144
Team Stats (Home Games)70.536.825-5942.7%5-1730.8%15-1980.1%37713166142
Stats Against (All Games)73.536.427-6243.8%4-1330.0%15-1979.1%39916188124
vs opponents averaging76.83829-6742.8%5-1432.4%15-1977.9%421017188134
Stats Against (Home Games)71.536.027-6244.1%3-1327.1%13-1779.4%38815188134
Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 69.2,  SEATTLE 70.2
SCHEDULE AND RESULTS
MINNESOTA - Season Results Against the First Half Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreHalfLineATSTot.O/UShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
8/2/2013SAN ANTONIO85-6339-33-8L78U38-7153.5%461125-7334.2%3913
8/4/2013SEATTLE90-7246-32-7.5W72.5O37-7350.7%43926-6341.3%3918
8/6/2013@ SAN ANTONIO93-8045-40-6L75.5O39-6857.4%401030-6744.8%3312
8/8/2013WASHINGTON75-7940-45-8.5L80O29-6743.3%311131-6845.6%4816
8/11/2013@ CHICAGO86-9441-40-1T79O32-7443.2%411628-6443.7%3914
8/16/2013TULSA77-8342-44-8.5L75.5O27-6045.0%341429-5850.0%3817
8/18/2013NEW YORK88-5743-34-9T75.5O34-7247.2%42720-6431.2%4414
8/20/2013@ ATLANTA75-8841-52-1.5L78O29-7041.4%431931-6547.7%4013
8/22/2013@ CONNECTICUT91-7750-35-5.5W76.5O38-6657.6%27931-6547.7%3915
8/24/2013INDIANA84-7737-35-5.5L72.5U37-6457.8%351329-6346.0%3113
8/27/2013@ NEW YORK73-4739-21-5W75U31-6944.9%541518-7225.0%5012
8/31/2013SEATTLE97-7453-42-6.5W73.5O41-7157.7%36726-6142.6%3214
9/4/2013LOS ANGELES83-7445-33-4W79U32-6350.8%44930-7142.3%4013
9/7/2013@ SEATTLE75-6040-33-4.5W73P31-6746.3%451121-5935.6%3311
9/10/2013@ SEATTLE              
9/12/2013@ LOS ANGELES              
9/14/2013CHICAGO              

SEATTLE - Season Results Against the First Half Line
 Team StatsOpp Stats
DateOpponentScoreHalfLineATSTot.O/UShotsPctREBTOShotsPctREBTO
8/1/2013PHOENIX88-7941-442.5L74O30-6844.1%431130-6943.5%4010
8/4/2013@ MINNESOTA72-9032-467.5L72.5O26-6341.3%391837-7350.7%439
8/6/2013@ PHOENIX80-6531-306W76U27-6839.7%481122-5540.0%3715
8/9/2013SAN ANTONIO56-7729-47-3.5L70O21-5438.9%332030-6050.0%3410
8/11/2013SAN ANTONIO69-6341-26-3W68.5U26-6838.2%561123-6833.8%3810
8/15/2013CHICAGO66-7939-291W70U28-5848.3%271632-6450.0%4110
8/17/2013INDIANA77-7040-39-1T65.5O24-5048.0%281121-5637.5%435
8/20/2013LOS ANGELES77-5751-373W72.5O28-5749.1%461623-6137.7%3315
8/23/2013@ PHOENIX81-7344-345W74O25-5942.4%371324-5147.1%3316
8/25/2013@ SAN ANTONIO64-7024-340L69U19-5335.8%361525-6240.3%4414
8/27/2013@ SAN ANTONIO72-7131-31-1L67.5U27-5747.4%431724-6139.3%3510
8/29/2013CONNECTICUT78-6540-23-4W69U23-4748.9%391823-6137.7%3412
8/31/2013@ MINNESOTA74-9742-536.5L73.5O26-6142.6%321441-7157.7%367
9/7/2013MINNESOTA60-7533-404.5L73P21-5935.6%331131-6746.3%4511
9/10/2013MINNESOTA              
9/12/2013@ TULSA              
9/14/2013TULSA              
HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY
All games in this series since 1997
MINNESOTA is 30-22 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE since 1997
31 of 52 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997
Games over the last 3 seasons
MINNESOTA is 9-4 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons
7 of 13 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

All games played at SEATTLE since 1997
MINNESOTA is 14-11 versus the first half line when playing against SEATTLE since 1997
14 of 24 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997
Games played at SEATTLE over the last 3 seasons.
SEATTLE is 3-3 versus the first half line when playing against MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons
3 of 5 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons

 Shooting   3pt shotsFree ThrowsRebounds 
DateTeamsScoreLineResultHalfFGM-APctFGM-APctFTM-APctTot.OFFTO
9/7/2013MINNESOTA75-8SU ATS4031-6746.3%3-933.3%10-1190.9%451011
 SEATTLE60148 Under3321-5935.6%2-1612.5%16-1984.2%33811
8/31/2013SEATTLE74149 Over4226-6142.6%8-2433.3%14-1687.5%32614
 MINNESOTA97-11.5SU ATS5341-7157.7%6-1060.0%9-1090.0%36107
8/4/2013SEATTLE72146.5 Over3226-6341.3%8-2729.6%12-1675.0%391118
 MINNESOTA90-13SU ATS4637-7350.7%2-728.6%14-1973.7%43109
10/2/2012SEATTLE72147 ATS3527-6243.5%6-1637.5%12-1675.0%3798
 MINNESOTA73-10.5SU Under3627-6045.0%4-944.4%15-1883.3%3898
9/30/2012MINNESOTA79-5.5 Over3725-7732.5%3-1618.7%26-3281.2%551215
 SEATTLE86146SU ATS3631-7740.3%9-2142.9%15-2171.4%551216
9/28/2012SEATTLE70148.5 ATS2725-6339.7%7-2429.2%13-2356.5%40612
 MINNESOTA78-10.5SU Under3326-5646.4%4-1040.0%22-2878.6%44313
8/21/2012MINNESOTA86-10.5SU ATS5235-7050.0%11-1957.9%5-862.5%451013
 SEATTLE73150 Over4326-6142.6%3-1520.0%18-2378.3%33313
6/17/2012MINNESOTA62-9.5 Under2924-6437.5%3-1225.0%11-1668.7%471115
 SEATTLE65144.5SU ATS4325-5743.9%7-1643.7%8-1457.1%36516
6/6/2012SEATTLE55145.5 Under3019-5733.3%4-2218.2%13-1968.4%35715
 MINNESOTA79-10SU ATS4329-5354.7%6-1442.9%15-2560.0%43715
5/27/2012SEATTLE71143 Over2425-6637.9%14-3441.2%7-1353.8%38815
 MINNESOTA84-11.5SU ATS3730-6744.8%8-1457.1%16-1888.9%481316
COACHING TRENDS
StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring MINNESOTA to cover the first half line
There are 3 trends with a total rating of 0 stars.
Cheryl is 54-40 against the 1rst half line (+10.0 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.3, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.1, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 26-16 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.8, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring SEATTLE to cover the first half line
There are 59 trends with a total rating of 46 stars.
Cheryl is 20-36 against the 1rst half line (-19.6 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 24-36 against the 1rst half line (-15.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 14-24 against the 1rst half line (-12.4 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.9, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.6, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 7-16 against the 1rst half line (-10.6 Units) after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) in road games after a blowout win by 15 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 42.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 45-60 against the 1rst half line (-21.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 35-52 against the 1rst half line (-22.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.9, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 30-42 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 33-52 against the 1rst half line (-24.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 23-42 against the 1rst half line (-23.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 2*)
Cheryl is 17-30 against the 1rst half line (-16.0 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 33-48 against the 1rst half line (-19.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 30-42 against the 1rst half line (-16.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 20-32 against the 1rst half line (-15.2 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.0, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 9-20 against the 1rst half line (-13.0 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.5, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 64-44 against the 1rst half line (+15.6 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 40-20 against the 1rst half line (+18.0 Units) in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.6, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 58-39 against the 1rst half line (+15.1 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.3, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 32-20 against the 1rst half line (+10.0 Units) in home games in August or September games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.8, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 41-29 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) in home games vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.9, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 43-31 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) in home games after a division game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.3, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 67-51 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 36-23 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 27-14 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.8, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 24-14 against the 1rst half line (+8.6 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.3, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 33-19 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.2, OPPONENT 33.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 24-11 against the 1rst half line (+11.9 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.8, OPPONENT 33.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 29-13 against the 1rst half line (+14.7 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.0, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) off a home loss against a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.1, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 19-8 against the 1rst half line (+10.2 Units) in home games off a loss against a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 16-3 against the 1rst half line (+12.7 Units) off a home loss as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.3, OPPONENT 32.6 - (Rating = 4*)
Brian is 43-26 against the 1rst half line (+14.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 48-28 against the 1rst half line (+17.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 58-45 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 56-42 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 28-13 against the 1rst half line (+13.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 51-29 against the 1rst half line (+19.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 23-8 against the 1rst half line (+14.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 31.9 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 32-18 against the 1rst half line (+12.2 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.8, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 22-12 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.9, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 43-29 against the 1rst half line (+11.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 67-50 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 39-26 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.8, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 96-79 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 44-29 against the 1rst half line (+12.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.3, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 65-42 against the 1rst half line (+18.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 43-28 against the 1rst half line (+12.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 62-46 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 61-47 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 92-73 against the 1rst half line (+11.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 39-26 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 93-78 against the 1rst half line (+7.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 34-20 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 36-24 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.9, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 83-70 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 37-24 against the 1rst half line (+10.6 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 39.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 28-14 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 37.2, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 38-21 against the 1rst half line (+14.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.9, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the OVER against the first half total
There are 23 trends with a total rating of 15 stars.
Cheryl is 26-13 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.0, OPPONENT 39.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 42-28 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 42-28 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 21-9 OVER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.3, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 27-16 OVER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.3, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 52-40 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 20-9 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 50-33 OVER (+13.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 45-28 OVER (+14.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.9, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 15-6 OVER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 34-22 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 23-12 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.4, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 12-4 OVER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 26-15 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 40.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 19-10 OVER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.4, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 25-15 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.6, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 21-11 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 41.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 25-15 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*)
Cheryl is 11-2 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.7, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Cheryl is 14-5 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.3, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Cheryl is 27-15 OVER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*)
Cheryl is 33-22 OVER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*)

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring the UNDER against the first half total
There are 64 trends with a total rating of 64 stars.
Brian is 127-87 UNDER (+31.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 54-37 UNDER (+13.3 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 60-47 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 46-28 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total is 65.5 to 70.5 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 36.5, OPPONENT 32.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 55-40 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 38.3, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 54-41 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 29-17 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total on Tuesday as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 77-60 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 75-56 UNDER (+13.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 53-38 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.5, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 45-29 UNDER (+13.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 83-59 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 98-67 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 58-43 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 37-19 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.5, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 105-72 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 63-38 UNDER (+21.2 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.2, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 64-29 UNDER (+32.1 Units) the 1rst half total after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.5, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 25-14 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.8, OPPONENT 32.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 16-6 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a home loss versus opponent as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.7, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 85-50 UNDER (+30.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.6, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 61-35 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.9, OPPONENT 33.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 43-20 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.4, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 26-12 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.2, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 26-6 UNDER (+19.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a home loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.7, OPPONENT 31.3 - (Rating = 4*)
Brian is 28-16 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total off a loss against a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.2, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 23-10 UNDER (+12.0 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.6, OPPONENT 31.1 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total in home games off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.1, OPPONENT 32.5 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 38-12 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.2, OPPONENT 31.1 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 48-23 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 3*)
Brian is 50-30 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 12-4 UNDER (+7.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 33.0 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a blowout loss by 15 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cheryl 33.7, OPPONENT 30.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 38-19 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.3, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 51-36 UNDER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 34.6, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 41-22 UNDER (+16.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.4, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 103-58 UNDER (+39.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.5, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 22-6 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where they had 5 or less steals in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 32.4, OPPONENT 31.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 59-37 UNDER (+18.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 25-15 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 49-30 UNDER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.4, OPPONENT 33.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 46-20 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.2, OPPONENT 31.5 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 52-39 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 49-30 UNDER (+16.0 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.7, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 93-61 UNDER (+25.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 35.1, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 49-36 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 69-52 UNDER (+11.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.6, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 103-73 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 59-46 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 68-42 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.1, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 63-46 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 101-59 UNDER (+36.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.3, OPPONENT 33.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 98-67 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*)
Brian is 46-32 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.9, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 68-47 UNDER (+16.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 35.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 32-18 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 33.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 68-54 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 101-71 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.2, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 55-30 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 33.6, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 61-48 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.7, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*)
Brian is 89-63 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 66-47 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE.
The average score was SEATTLE 36.9, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*)
Brian is 47-29 UNDER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brian 34.5, OPPONENT 33.8 - (Rating = 0*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™
Here is a summary of past results against the first half line in games where the line movement was similar to:
Opening First Half Line = 5, Closing First Half Line = 5
Since 1997, the road favorite covered the first half line 11 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 5 times.
Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 5 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 2 times.

Here is a summary of past over/under results in games where the first half total movement was similar to:
Opening First Half Total = 72.5, Closing First Half Total = 72.5
Since 1997, 43 games went over the first half total, while 31 games went under the first half total.
Over the last 3 seasons, 13 games went over the first half total, while 4 games went under the first half total.
Edge against the first half total=Over

Here is a summary of past ATS and Over/Under results in games where the first half line and first half total were similar to:
Closing First Half Line = 5, Closing First Half Total = 72.5
Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 2 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 0 times.
Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 1 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 0 times.
Since 1997, 2 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total.
Over the last 3 seasons, 1 games went under the first half total, while 0 games went over the first half total.
KEY PLAYER INJURIES
MINNESOTA
No significant injuries.
SEATTLE
[C] 05/25/2013 - Ann Wauters out for season ( Personal )
[F] 05/25/2013 - Lauren Jackson out for season ( Hamstring )
[G] 05/25/2013 - Sue Bird out for season ( Knee )

Last Updated: 4/19/2024 6:29:40 PM EST.


You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.