| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA
SAN ANTONIO |
|
|
155
| 68
Final
84 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 619 | ATLANTA | -155 | | 620 | SAN ANTONIO | +135 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in non-conference games, off a home loss.
(333-242 since 1997.) (57.9%, +54.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in non-conference games, off a home loss against a division rival.
(192-136 since 1997.) (58.5%, +53.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss.
(25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +24.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss.
(37-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.7%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(114-66 since 1997.) (63.3%, +47.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses.
(84-34 since 1997.) (71.2%, +46.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(143-70 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +58.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off an upset loss as a home favorite.
(57-24 since 1997.) (70.4%, +38.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going under the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, on Saturday games.
(97-59 since 1997.) (62.2%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in non-conference games, off 2 or more consecutive home losses.
(54-9 since 1997.) (85.7%, +37.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - good FT shooting team (76-80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games.
(65-29 since 1997.) (69.1%, +33.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a upset loss as a favorite.
(71-44 since 1997.) (61.7%, +29 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home loss against a division rival.
(45-20 since 1997.) (69.2%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher.
(59-33 since 1997.) (64.1%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite.
(33-14 since 1997.) (70.2%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(51-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +34.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - good free throw shooting team (76-80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better.
(26-4 since 1997.) (86.7%, +21.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(38-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +30.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's).
(38-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +30.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games.
(38-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.1%, +30.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after a loss by 10 points or more.
(33-14 since 1997.) (70.2%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(97-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.5%, +32.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(59-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(78-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +14.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(99-63 since 1997.) (61.1%, +44.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(157-117 since 1997.) (57.3%, +44.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more.
(101-63 since 1997.) (61.6%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(88-50 since 1997.) (63.8%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(47-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +22.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, on Saturday games.
(82-26 since 1997.) (75.9%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(89-56 since 1997.) (61.4%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(54-39 since 1997.) (58.1%, +33 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(69-37 since 1997.) (65.1%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(78-50 since 1997.) (60.9%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(59-28 since 1997.) (67.8%, +31.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, on Saturday games.
(66-23 since 1997.) (74.2%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(38-27 since 1997.) (58.5%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season.
(77-50 since 1997.) (60.6%, +28.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more.
(46-18 since 1997.) (71.9%, +28.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(40-30 since 1997.) (57.1%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(60-34 since 1997.) (63.8%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(44-17 since 1997.) (72.1%, +26.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(57-33 since 1997.) (63.3%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%), after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(39-20 since 1997.) (66.1%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor three point shooting team (<=30%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(35-21 since 1997.) (62.5%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(27-16 since 1997.) (62.8%, +24.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, a good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(31-20 since 1997.) (60.8%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(28-10 since 1997.) (73.7%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(28-10 since 1997.) (73.7%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(28-10 since 1997.) (73.7%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against a poor 3PT shooting team (<=30%) after 15+ games, after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(25-9 since 1997.) (73.5%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a loss against a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(44-48 over the last 5 seasons.) (47.8%, +40.7 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| ATLANTA | 78 | | 29-70 | 41.9% | 4-15 | 29.1% | 15-19 | 76.7% | 43 | 13 | 13 | | SAN ANTONIO | 77 | | 29-67 | 43.4% | 5-15 | 32.1% | 14-19 | 76.8% | 46 | 13 | 16 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 528 times, while SAN ANTONIO won 445 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 62-45 against the money line (+17.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.7, OPPONENT 80.1 | ATLANTA is 23-17 against the money line (+13.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 87.9, OPPONENT 86.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 62-71 against the money line (-36.5 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 80.8 | SAN ANTONIO is 3-27 against the money line (-21.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 82.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 44-66 against the money line (-31.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.6, OPPONENT 74.9 | SAN ANTONIO is 35-71 against the money line (-32.7 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.7, OPPONENT 77.7 | SAN ANTONIO is 69-105 against the money line (-51.2 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 2-10 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in home games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 80.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 20-49 against the money line (-40.5 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 78.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 25-56 against the money line (-27.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 80.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 7-44 against the money line (-29.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 85.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 31-81 against the money line (-43.1 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.1, OPPONENT 78.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 21-29 against the money line (-20.2 Units) in home games when they score 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 82.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 90-149 against the money line (-58.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.7, OPPONENT 75.9 |
|
ATLANTA is 35-46 against the money line (-21.6 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 82.2 | ATLANTA is 42-69 against the money line (-53.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 82.4 | ATLANTA is 10-16 against the money line (-16.7 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 79.5 | ATLANTA is 11-18 against the money line (-19.0 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 80.0 | ATLANTA is 45-59 against the money line (-26.6 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 82.1 | ATLANTA is 112-133 against the money line (-53.8 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.7, OPPONENT 85.2 | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 86.9 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 21-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ more fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 96-116 against the money line (-41.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 26-31 against the money line (-20.9 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 30-79 against the money line (-51.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-27 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.3, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 140-186 against the money line (-60.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 99-166 against the money line (-61.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 165-241 against the money line (-73.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 76-76 against the money line (-43.6 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 127-180 against the money line (-58.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 3-11 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-40 against the money line (-22.6 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 89-106 against the money line (-46.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-15 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 92-109 against the money line (-49.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 132-157 against the money line (-68.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 36-56 against the money line (-40.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 14-24 against the money line (-12.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.2, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 41-69 against the money line (-42.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-11 against the money line (-9.5 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 82-95 against the money line (-50.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.9, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 119-136 against the money line (-65.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 45-46 against the money line (-27.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.3, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 18-26 against the money line (-13.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 20-16 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 36-30 against the money line (-30.1 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 80-101 against the money line (-46.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 111-140 against the money line (-62.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 5-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 91.0, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 206-305 against the money line (-91.7 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 124-136 against the money line (-58.7 Units) in home games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 101-111 against the money line (-54.7 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 43-55 against the money line (-34.4 Units) in home games against Eastern conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-38 against the money line (-24.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 40-77 against the money line (-33.8 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 43-55 against the money line (-34.4 Units) in home games in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 97-147 against the money line (-54.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 46-73 against the money line (-30.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 63-101 against the money line (-41.0 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 47-82 against the money line (-49.1 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 37-62 against the money line (-27.8 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 25-38 against the money line (-29.2 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 80-139 against the money line (-48.5 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 51-66 against the money line (-28.2 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 31-45 against the money line (-27.9 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 20-34 against the money line (-26.5 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-32 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 22-36 against the money line (-32.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 31-43 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 19-26 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 77-112 against the money line (-45.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 51-77 against the money line (-46.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 38-50 against the money line (-32.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 40-51 against the money line (-30.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 31-55 against the money line (-30.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 20-27 against the money line (-23.6 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-15 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 50-71 against the money line (-29.8 Units) in home games after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 50-67 against the money line (-34.0 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 99-144 against the money line (-48.6 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 15-28 against the money line (-23.1 Units) in home games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 171-190 against the money line (-71.2 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 108-70 against the money line (-60.5 Units) as a favorite since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 67-72 against the money line (-35.6 Units) in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-19 against the money line (-16.1 Units) when playing on back-to-back days since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-10 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 21-33 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-10 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 30-39 against the money line (-21.4 Units) off a home loss since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 119-136 against the money line (-49.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 86-108 against the money line (-52.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 49-60 against the money line (-28.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 6-18 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-18 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 26-37 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 118-126 against the money line (-50.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-15 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 79-92 against the money line (-43.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 77-103 against the money line (-58.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-37 against the money line (-24.6 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-0 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in home games in August or September games this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 85.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-9 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 10-17 | -4.8 | 11-15 | 14-13 | 80.0 | 39.6 | 41.2% | 44.0 | 82.2 | 42.1 | 43.2% | 46.0 | | Road Games | 3-10 | -4.2 | 5-7 | 8-5 | 79.2 | 40.1 | 41.0% | 43.3 | 86.1 | 42.6 | 43.3% | 45.2 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5.6 | 0-5 | 2-3 | 71.8 | 37.2 | 37.1% | 46.4 | 80.2 | 44.4 | 43.7% | 44.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.0 | 39.6 | 29-71 | 41.2% | 5-16 | 28.7% | 17-22 | 76.8% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.3 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.2 | 40.1 | 29-71 | 41.0% | 5-18 | 27.1% | 16-20 | 79.3% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.2 | 42.1 | 29-68 | 43.2% | 5-18 | 29.8% | 18-22 | 80.7% | 46 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 16-20 | 80.4% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 86.1 | 42.6 | 30-69 | 43.3% | 7-21 | 31.0% | 20-24 | 85.6% | 45 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 6-22 | -4.1 | 15-13 | 15-13 | 74.9 | 37.0 | 42.7% | 42.5 | 82.2 | 40.0 | 44.9% | 40.6 | | Home Games | 5-10 | +0.1 | 6-9 | 10-5 | 77.9 | 38.7 | 43.4% | 42.8 | 82.5 | 40.3 | 46.1% | 39.4 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +5.7 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 78.8 | 43.6 | 42.3% | 45.8 | 82.0 | 43.2 | 45.9% | 40.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 74.9 | 37.0 | 28-66 | 42.7% | 5-14 | 34.2% | 13-18 | 76.0% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 16-20 | 80.2% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.9 | 38.7 | 30-68 | 43.4% | 5-14 | 37.2% | 14-17 | 78.8% | 43 | 10 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 82.2 | 40.0 | 30-66 | 44.9% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 79.4% | 41 | 9 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.6 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 80.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 82.5 | 40.3 | 31-67 | 46.1% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 39 | 9 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 71.3, SAN ANTONIO 71.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/5/2017 | @ DALLAS | 84-94 | L | +170 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 44 | 20 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 48 | 20 | | 7/7/2017 | INDIANA | 89-68 | W | +100 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 40 | 13 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 36 | 15 | | 7/9/2017 | DALLAS | 98-78 | W | -155 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 42 | 5 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 64 | 17 | | 7/12/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 84-89 | L | +220 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 35 | 10 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 44 | 13 | | 7/15/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 84-90 | L | +210 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 40 | 12 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 37 | 13 | | 7/18/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 88-75 | W | -500 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 51 | 10 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 48 | 16 | | 7/19/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 96-100 | L | +145 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 43 | 12 | 37-89 | 41.6% | 53 | 12 | | 7/25/2017 | PHOENIX | 99-91 | W | -250 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 58 | 18 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 44 | 19 | | 7/28/2017 | MINNESOTA | 80-90 | L | +250 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 35 | 17 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 36 | 14 | | 7/30/2017 | WASHINGTON | 70-77 | L | +105 | 30-77 | 39.0% | 38 | 6 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 58 | 12 | | 8/3/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 54-69 | L | +500 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 46 | 22 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 42 | 17 | | 8/5/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 86-91 | L | -125 | 35-83 | 42.2% | 57 | 12 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 31 | 6 | | 8/8/2017 | MINNESOTA | 72-81 | L | +250 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 43 | 11 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 45 | 12 | | 8/11/2017 | NEW YORK | 77-83 | L | -140 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 48 | 10 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 44 | 11 | | 8/12/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2017 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/19/2017 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/23/2017 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/26/2017 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/5/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 56-89 | L | +280 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 38 | 18 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 48 | 13 | | 7/7/2017 | PHOENIX | 77-92 | L | +400 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 35 | 15 | 32-55 | 58.2% | 38 | 17 | | 7/12/2017 | @ INDIANA | 79-72 | W | +280 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 42 | 13 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 34 | 10 | | 7/16/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 75-89 | L | | 33-71 | 46.5% | 40 | 14 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 45 | 9 | | 7/18/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 75-88 | L | +350 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 48 | 16 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 51 | 10 | | 7/20/2017 | INDIANA | 85-61 | W | +175 | 33-55 | 60.0% | 39 | 15 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 30 | 16 | | 7/25/2017 | WASHINGTON | 76-85 | L | +220 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 47 | 10 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 44 | 12 | | 7/28/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 73-85 | L | +450 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 33 | 12 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 33 | 8 | | 7/30/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 64-81 | L | +325 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 51 | 18 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 40 | 13 | | 8/1/2017 | NEW YORK | 93-81 | W | +350 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 42 | 13 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 37 | 14 | | 8/4/2017 | WASHINGTON | 76-74 | W | +170 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 42 | 10 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 43 | 11 | | 8/5/2017 | SEATTLE | 87-80 | W | +250 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 56 | 22 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 44 | 17 | | 8/10/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 74-94 | L | +220 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 38 | 17 | 38-67 | 56.7% | 36 | 12 | | 8/12/2017 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2017 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/22/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SAN ANTONIO is 9-12 (-1.4 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 3-4 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 6-4 (+1.5 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 2-1 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/18/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 75 | 152.5 | Over | 39 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 48 | 10 | 16 | | | ATLANTA | 88 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 34-41 | 82.9% | 51 | 13 | 10 | 5/31/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 70 | 159 | ATS | 39 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 49 | 10 | 21 | | | ATLANTA | 77 | -7.5 | SU Under | 36 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 18-25 | 72.0% | 46 | 13 | 13 | 9/13/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 71 | 158.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 48 | 6 | 16 | | | ATLANTA | 67 | -8.5 | Under | 25 | 23-75 | 30.7% | 2-18 | 11.1% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 52 | 17 | 11 | 6/25/2016 | ATLANTA | 69 | -5 | Under | 37 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 41 | 8 | 13 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 73 | 159.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 49 | 13 | 10 | 5/14/2016 | ATLANTA | 73 | -7 | SU ATS | 27 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 48 | 8 | 15 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 63 | 150 | Under | 30 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 50 | 8 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Cooper is 53-27 against the money line (+22.5 Units) on Saturday games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 75.2, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 173-96 against the money line (+37.0 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 76.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 34-15 against the money line (+14.3 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 80.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 23-7 against the money line (+19.7 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 78.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Cooper is 24-13 against the money line (+15.9 Units) off a home loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 77.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 62-41 against the money line (+16.3 Units) off a loss against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 78.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 10-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) off an upset loss as a home favorite as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 55-34 against the money line (+19.7 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 77.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 24-11 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 78.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 29-18 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 76.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 42-17 against the money line (+21.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Cooper 79.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Cooper is 63-70 against the money line (-30.3 Units) in all games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 39-28 against the money line (-33.3 Units) as a favorite as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 22-43 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in road games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 22-43 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 20-41 against the money line (-18.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 16-25 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in August or September games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 6-15 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 3-10 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 41-54 against the money line (-24.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 34-48 against the money line (-27.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 45-51 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 31-39 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 22-28 against the money line (-22.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 12-23 against the money line (-23.4 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Cooper is 27-41 against the money line (-29.4 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 20-27 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 43-48 against the money line (-23.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 14-28 against the money line (-13.9 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 40-43 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 31-34 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 5-8 against the money line (-15.0 Units) when playing against a terrible team (Win Pct. <=25%) as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 34-35 against the money line (-35.8 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 20-21 against the money line (-16.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 30-41 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 45-59 against the money line (-30.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 19-32 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 32-42 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 28-41 against the money line (-20.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 45-58 against the money line (-26.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.3, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 20-32 against the money line (-21.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 33-47 against the money line (-29.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.0, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 10-22 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 20-33 against the money line (-26.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 29-40 against the money line (-21.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 44-58 against the money line (-30.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 20-26 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.5, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cooper is 30-40 against the money line (-24.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cooper is 11-14 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Cooper is 30-40 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cooper is 41-56 against the money line (-24.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 81.2, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 84 times, while the home underdog won straight up 51 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 6 times, while the home underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 05/13/2017 - Angel McCoughtry out indefinitely ( Personal ) | |
| [F] 08/10/2017 - Erika de Souza "?" Saturday vs Atlanta Dream ( Leg ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/19/2024 6:20:08 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|