| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA
First Half Results
SAN ANTONIO |
|
|
76
| 40
Final
44 |
|
|
| | |
|
| Western Conference Playoffs - Best of 3 - Game 1 - MIN leads 1-0 | | |  | |
| 611 | MINNESOTA | -2 | | 612 | SAN ANTONIO | 76.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(60-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +27 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games.
(41-13 since 1997.) (75.9%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(174-109 since 1997.) (61.5%, +54.1 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(102-57 since 1997.) (64.2%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(136-73 since 1997.) (65.1%, +55.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(107-57 since 1997.) (65.2%, +44.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(71-37 since 1997.) (65.7%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher.
(111-63 since 1997.) (63.8%, +41.7 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by more than 6 points in three consecutive games.
(33-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.5%, +25.3 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(30-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(154-95 since 1997.) (61.8%, +49.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of 2 to 3.5 points vs. the first half line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off a home win against a division rival.
(24-9 since 1997.) (72.7%, +14.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(90-51 since 1997.) (63.8%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(53-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.7%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(94-51 since 1997.) (64.8%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(123-66 since 1997.) (65.1%, +50.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(95-50 since 1997.) (65.5%, +40 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(67-31 since 1997.) (68.4%, +32.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(104-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.7%, +35.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(78-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +39.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(64-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.6%, +38.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (SAN ANTONIO) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(48-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents.
(941-714 since 1997.) (56.9%, +155.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - vs. division opponents, after a division game.
(619-464 since 1997.) (57.2%, +108.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after a division game.
(957-739 since 1997.) (56.4%, +144.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after a division game against opponent after 2 consecutive division games.
(398-299 since 1997.) (57.1%, +69.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after a division game against opponent after 3 consecutive division games.
(279-201 since 1997.) (58.1%, +57.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(238-157 since 1997.) (60.3%, +65.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(123-67 since 1997.) (64.7%, +49.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(763-541 since 1997.) (58.5%, +167.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(347-239 since 1997.) (59.2%, +84.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(135-75 since 1997.) (64.3%, +52.5 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(89-45 since 1997.) (66.4%, +39.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(565-415 since 1997.) (57.7%, +108.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a losing record.
(269-184 since 1997.) (59.4%, +66.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(553-387 since 1997.) (58.8%, +127.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(286-193 since 1997.) (59.7%, +73.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(111-60 since 1997.) (64.9%, +45 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team.
(74-38 since 1997.) (66.1%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(604-421 since 1997.) (58.9%, +140.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a losing record.
(280-191 since 1997.) (59.4%, +69.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, off a road loss.
(235-158 since 1997.) (59.8%, +61.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a home win.
(238-164 since 1997.) (59.2%, +57.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss against a division rival against opponent off a win against a division rival.
(193-122 since 1997.) (61.3%, +58.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season.
(172-110 since 1997.) (61%, +51 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(230-155 since 1997.) (59.7%, +59.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(146-94 since 1997.) (60.8%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (SAN ANTONIO) - after 1 or more consecutive losses against opponent after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(400-289 since 1997.) (58.1%, +82.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents.
(941-714 since 1997.) (56.9%, +155.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(609-441 since 1997.) (58%, +123.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(140-89 since 1997.) (61.1%, +42.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season.
(689-494 since 1997.) (58.2%, +145.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season, on Saturday games.
(122-74 since 1997.) (62.2%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(466-337 since 1997.) (58%, +95.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(288-200 since 1997.) (59%, +68 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(151-99 since 1997.) (60.4%, +42.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival.
(475-340 since 1997.) (58.3%, +101 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(274-186 since 1997.) (59.6%, +69.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season.
(376-287 since 1997.) (56.7%, +60.3 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(442-326 since 1997.) (57.6%, +83.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(172-100 since 1997.) (63.2%, +62 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(98-52 since 1997.) (65.3%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents.
(103-58 since 1997.) (64%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(144-80 since 1997.) (64.3%, +56 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, in August or September games.
(84-44 since 1997.) (65.6%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, vs. division opponents.
(84-44 since 1997.) (65.6%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(788-551 since 1997.) (58.8%, +181.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(454-304 since 1997.) (59.9%, +119.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(298-198 since 1997.) (60.1%, +80.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team.
(190-130 since 1997.) (59.4%, +47 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(440-325 since 1997.) (57.5%, +82.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(319-216 since 1997.) (59.6%, +81.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a losing record.
(68-36 since 1997.) (65.4%, +28.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | 80 | | 40 | | 32-67 | 47.7% | 4-11 | 33.5% | 12-16 | 79.0% | 43 | 8 | 12 | | SAN ANTONIO | 80 | | 40 | Over | 31-70 | 43.9% | 7-19 | 36.4% | 12-14 | 82.3% | 40 | 9 | 10 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, SAN ANTONIO covered the first half line 573 times, while MINNESOTA covered the first half line 389 times.
Edge against first half line=SAN ANTONIO | In 1000 simulated games, 642 games went over first half total, while 358 games went under first half total.
Edge against first half total=Over |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 15-6 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.2, OPPONENT 36.6 | MINNESOTA is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 47.7, OPPONENT 41.5 | MINNESOTA is 15-4 against the 1rst half line (+10.6 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.6, OPPONENT 38.8 | MINNESOTA is 130-94 against the 1rst half line (+26.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.3, OPPONENT 38.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 44-65 against the 1rst half line (-27.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 37.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 39-60 against the 1rst half line (-27.0 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 38.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 43-67 against the 1rst half line (-30.7 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 36.8 | SAN ANTONIO is 16-33 against the 1rst half line (-20.3 Units) in home games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 38.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 1-8 against the 1rst half line (-7.8 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 41.5 |
|
MINNESOTA is 13-32 against the 1rst half line (-22.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 44.0 | MINNESOTA is 54-78 against the 1rst half line (-31.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 36.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 34-20 against the 1rst half line (+12.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 41.2, OPPONENT 38.9 |
|
MINNESOTA is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 39.9 | MINNESOTA is 26-14 OVER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.0, OPPONENT 38.7 | MINNESOTA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 45.0, OPPONENT 46.4 | MINNESOTA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 45.8, OPPONENT 41.7 | MINNESOTA is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.9, OPPONENT 40.3 | MINNESOTA is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.1, OPPONENT 43.4 | MINNESOTA is 9-2 OVER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 45.7, OPPONENT 44.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 22-8 OVER (+13.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 43.0, OPPONENT 39.4 |
|
MINNESOTA is 80-48 UNDER (+27.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.1, OPPONENT 36.1 | MINNESOTA is 80-51 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.5, OPPONENT 34.4 | MINNESOTA is 73-42 UNDER (+26.8 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.3, OPPONENT 35.2 | MINNESOTA is 165-117 UNDER (+36.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 35.4 | MINNESOTA is 106-70 UNDER (+29.0 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.1, OPPONENT 35.8 | SAN ANTONIO is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 37.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 51-27 UNDER (+21.3 Units) the 1rst half total when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.2, OPPONENT 36.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 57-36 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.9, OPPONENT 36.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 15-4 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 37.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 26-15 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 40.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 12-5 UNDER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 38.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 93-63 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 36.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 17-6 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 40.1 |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | -0.5 | | | SAN ANTONIO | | |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.7, OPPONENT 34.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 12-5 against the 1rst half line (+6.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 40.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 30-18 against the 1rst half line (+10.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-9 against the 1rst half line (+10.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.6, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 16-5 against the 1rst half line (+10.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 38-26 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.9, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 10-3 against the 1rst half line (+6.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 69-99 against the 1rst half line (-39.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-2 against the 1rst half line (+7.8 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.4, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
SAN ANTONIO is 15-5 OVER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 42.4, OPPONENT 42.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 131-97 UNDER (+24.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.8, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 115-73 UNDER (+34.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 166-113 UNDER (+41.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 72-50 UNDER (+17.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 96-63 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 140-95 UNDER (+35.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.2, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 63-39 UNDER (+20.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.8, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 88-63 UNDER (+18.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.5, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 104-64 UNDER (+33.6 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.4, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 147-93 UNDER (+44.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.4, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 40-21 UNDER (+16.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.2, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 59-33 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.3, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 132-89 UNDER (+34.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 187-127 UNDER (+47.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.8, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 182-123 UNDER (+46.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 265-179 UNDER (+68.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 68-40 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.7, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 46-28 UNDER (+15.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 57-35 UNDER (+18.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 22-12 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-5 UNDER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-7 UNDER (+7.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 20-10 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 44-24 UNDER (+17.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 17-6 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.9, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 21-10 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 31-18 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 21-10 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 30-16 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 18-7 UNDER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 14-6 UNDER (+7.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 24-12 UNDER (+10.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 37-20 UNDER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 26-14 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-7 UNDER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 23-12 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 19-10 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 19-9 UNDER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 43-31 against the 1rst half line (+8.9 Units) versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.7, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 40-26 against the 1rst half line (+11.4 Units) as a favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.2, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 15-8 against the 1rst half line (+6.2 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.7, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 30-19 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.1, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.0, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 16-8 against the 1rst half line (+7.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-5 against the 1rst half line (+8.5 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 11-4 against the 1rst half line (+6.6 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.5, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 95-128 against the 1rst half line (-45.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.7, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.0, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 19-35 against the 1rst half line (-19.5 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 0-8 against the 1rst half line (-8.8 Units) in home games red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 43.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-11 against the 1rst half line (-9.1 Units) in home games after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.0, OPPONENT 42.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-9 against the 1rst half line (-7.9 Units) in home games after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 49-72 against the 1rst half line (-30.2 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 25-46 against the 1rst half line (-25.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.8, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 17-34 against the 1rst half line (-20.4 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.8, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 36-62 against the 1rst half line (-32.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-18 against the 1rst half line (-14.8 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.1, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 15-34 against the 1rst half line (-22.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) in home games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 41.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 42.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 21-38 against the 1rst half line (-20.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 46-68 against the 1rst half line (-28.8 Units) in home games after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 14-28 against the 1rst half line (-16.8 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 76-104 against the 1rst half line (-38.4 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-29 against the 1rst half line (-18.9 Units) in road games after a win by 6 points or less since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 32.0, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 73-102 against the 1rst half line (-39.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 123-159 against the 1rst half line (-51.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 15-8 against the 1rst half line (+6.2 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.8, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 18-7 against the 1rst half line (+10.3 Units) as a home underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 14-7 against the 1rst half line (+6.3 Units) after a division game this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.4, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 17-9 against the 1rst half line (+7.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.7, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 29-17 OVER (+10.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite vs. the 1rst half line over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-2 OVER (+5.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 45.7, OPPONENT 41.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.2, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.2, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.6, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.9, OPPONENT 43.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 47.8, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 OVER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.9, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 45.5, OPPONENT 45.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 14-4 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 40.2, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 320-231 UNDER (+65.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 107-67 UNDER (+33.3 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 30-18 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.5, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 201-140 UNDER (+47.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 132-86 UNDER (+37.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.4, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 89-56 UNDER (+27.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 consecutive division games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 157-115 UNDER (+30.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-6 UNDER (+6.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 120-74 UNDER (+38.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 162-103 UNDER (+48.7 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 112-83 UNDER (+20.7 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 107-63 UNDER (+37.7 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 69-43 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a home win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 23-13 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 38-22 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 UNDER (+7.7 Units) the 1rst half total off a no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 60-39 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a home win since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 135-102 UNDER (+22.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.4, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.6, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 134-100 UNDER (+24.0 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.4, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 103-75 UNDER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.7, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 167-122 UNDER (+32.8 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.3, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 124-93 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.9, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 150-113 UNDER (+25.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.0, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 169-109 UNDER (+49.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.3, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 26-16 UNDER (+8.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 43-26 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 33-19 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 30-15 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 22-12 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 36-17 UNDER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 11-2 UNDER (+8.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 120-88 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-3 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 26-14 UNDER (+10.6 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 23-13 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 45-26 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 18-9 UNDER (+8.1 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 117-82 UNDER (+26.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 85-51 UNDER (+28.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 64-32 UNDER (+28.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 50-21 UNDER (+26.9 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 127-93 UNDER (+24.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 86-58 UNDER (+22.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 10-3 UNDER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 91-61 UNDER (+23.9 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 44-27 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 15-8 UNDER (+6.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.3, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 11-4 UNDER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.0, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 17-8 UNDER (+8.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.6, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 44-26 UNDER (+15.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.3, OPPONENT 34.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 22-11 UNDER (+9.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-1 UNDER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 131-99 UNDER (+22.1 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 26-9 | +8.5 | 18-17 | 20-15 | 81.8 | 41.1 | 46.8% | 43.1 | 77.4 | 39.5 | 42.6% | 39.5 | | Road Games | 10-7 | -0.7 | 9-8 | 11-6 | 80.6 | 43.2 | 47.3% | 41.3 | 79.0 | 41.8 | 43.7% | 38.6 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3.8 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 77.4 | 40.4 | 45.0% | 41.2 | 78.4 | 39.0 | 43.5% | 40.6 | | Division Games | 16-7 | +2.2 | 13-10 | 13-10 | 81.5 | 41.7 | 47.3% | 41.8 | 77.2 | 39.2 | 43.0% | 38.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.8 | 41.1 | 32-67 | 46.8% | 4-11 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.7 | 38.2 | 29-66 | 44.5% | 4-14 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 78.6% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.6 | 43.2 | 31-66 | 47.3% | 4-12 | 33.8% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 2 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.4 | 39.5 | 29-69 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 34.7% | 12-16 | 78.0% | 39 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.3 | 37.9 | 29-66 | 43.8% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 14-18 | 78.5% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.0 | 41.8 | 29-67 | 43.7% | 6-17 | 37.4% | 14-17 | 79.8% | 39 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 16-19 | -0.9 | 18-17 | 20-15 | 78.0 | 37.7 | 43.2% | 37.8 | 79.8 | 38.8 | 47.4% | 41.2 | | Home Games | 8-9 | -6 | 7-10 | 12-5 | 80.6 | 38.3 | 42.6% | 38.5 | 80.2 | 39.9 | 47.6% | 41.4 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.7 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 80.8 | 41.0 | 45.4% | 42.4 | 78.2 | 37.8 | 46.7% | 36.8 | | Division Games | 9-14 | -3.1 | 9-14 | 16-7 | 78.1 | 36.8 | 43.1% | 37.6 | 82.4 | 39.6 | 48.8% | 41.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.0 | 37.7 | 29-67 | 43.2% | 7-18 | 36.0% | 13-16 | 82.0% | 38 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.3 | 38.3 | 29-67 | 43.7% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 14-18 | 78.5% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.6 | 38.3 | 29-69 | 42.6% | 7-20 | 36.5% | 15-17 | 87.8% | 38 | 10 | 19 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.8 | 38.8 | 31-65 | 47.4% | 4-13 | 32.3% | 14-17 | 79.1% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 78 | 38.5 | 29-66 | 44.4% | 4-14 | 32.6% | 15-19 | 78.2% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.2 | 39.9 | 32-66 | 47.6% | 4-14 | 30.8% | 13-16 | 78.9% | 41 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 69.6, SAN ANTONIO 72.3 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/16/2014 | TULSA | 93-82 | 40-39 | -5 | L | 82.5 | U | 34-70 | 48.6% | 39 | 8 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 16 | | 7/22/2014 | ATLANTA | 112-108 | 52-48 | -2.5 | W | 81 | O | 42-86 | 48.8% | 58 | 21 | 42-93 | 45.2% | 45 | 14 | | 7/25/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 88-78 | 42-36 | -5 | W | 80 | U | 36-66 | 54.5% | 41 | 11 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 34 | 8 | | 7/27/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-65 | 39-28 | -3 | W | 80 | U | 31-64 | 48.4% | 49 | 12 | 24-73 | 32.9% | 42 | 10 | | 7/31/2014 | PHOENIX | 75-67 | 39-36 | -1 | W | 82.5 | U | 29-77 | 37.7% | 61 | 13 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 43 | 13 | | 8/2/2014 | @ TULSA | 84-75 | 33-32 | -3.5 | L | 82.5 | U | 33-69 | 47.8% | 43 | 11 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 34 | 12 | | 8/5/2014 | @ INDIANA | 66-64 | 38-44 | -2.5 | L | 75 | O | 27-68 | 39.7% | 52 | 10 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 36 | 9 | | 8/7/2014 | CHICAGO | 74-64 | 30-24 | -5 | W | 78.5 | U | 28-71 | 39.4% | 52 | 6 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 45 | 11 | | 8/9/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 80-82 | 42-43 | 2.5 | W | 78.5 | O | 32-66 | 48.5% | 38 | 10 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 40 | 8 | | 8/12/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 63-71 | 36-29 | -4.5 | W | 78.5 | U | 27-63 | 42.9% | 36 | 10 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 40 | 7 | | 8/15/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 76-92 | 47-50 | -1 | L | 76 | O | 28-61 | 45.9% | 36 | 12 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 39 | 6 | | 8/16/2014 | TULSA | 80-63 | 37-43 | -4 | L | 80.5 | U | 30-75 | 40.0% | 60 | 11 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 44 | 15 | | 8/21/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 88-84 | 40-30 | -6 | W | 76.5 | U | 36-75 | 48.0% | 36 | 8 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 40 | 15 | | 8/23/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/17/2014 | @ TULSA | 90-95 | 45-38 | 0.5 | W | 79 | O | 33-64 | 51.6% | 29 | 12 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 43 | 10 | | 7/22/2014 | TULSA | 95-93 | 37-34 | -2 | W | 80.5 | U | 38-70 | 54.3% | 41 | 9 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 31 | 8 | | 7/25/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-88 | 36-42 | 5 | L | 80 | U | 33-75 | 44.0% | 34 | 8 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 41 | 11 | | 7/26/2014 | INDIANA | 68-75 | 38-41 | -1 | L | 73.5 | O | 20-53 | 37.7% | 35 | 11 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 42 | 8 | | 7/29/2014 | CHICAGO | 92-74 | 48-37 | -2 | W | 75 | O | 38-75 | 50.7% | 41 | 11 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 36 | 14 | | 8/1/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 79-89 | 30-43 | -2.5 | L | 76.5 | U | 32-78 | 41.0% | 39 | 11 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 44 | 13 | | 8/3/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 65-71 | 21-36 | 0 | L | 73.5 | U | 24-60 | 40.0% | 36 | 11 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 45 | 11 | | 8/7/2014 | PHOENIX | 73-78 | 29-34 | 5 | T | 79 | U | 30-84 | 35.7% | 52 | 9 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 50 | 10 | | 8/8/2014 | @ TULSA | 62-79 | 37-36 | 2 | W | 80.5 | U | 24-64 | 37.5% | 41 | 14 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 43 | 9 | | 8/10/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 82-76 | 37-31 | 1.5 | W | 76 | U | 30-72 | 41.7% | 49 | 8 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 35 | 9 | | 8/15/2014 | MINNESOTA | 92-76 | 50-47 | 1 | W | 76 | O | 33-70 | 47.1% | 39 | 6 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 36 | 12 | | 8/17/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 84-72 | 51-35 | 4 | W | 75 | O | 36-74 | 48.6% | 43 | 11 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 34 | 15 | | 8/21/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 84-88 | 30-40 | 6 | L | 76.5 | U | 35-68 | 51.5% | 40 | 15 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 36 | 8 | | 8/23/2014 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| SAN ANTONIO is 33-33 versus the first half line when playing against MINNESOTA since 1997 | | 37 of 61 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 8-7 versus the first half line when playing against MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons | | 9 of 15 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 17-14 versus the first half line when playing against MINNESOTA since 1997 | | 14 of 28 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| SAN ANTONIO is 4-3 versus the first half line when playing against MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons | | 5 of 7 games in this series have gone OVER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/21/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 84 | 155.5 | ATS | 30 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 6-15 | 40.0% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 40 | 7 | 15 | | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -10.5 | SU Over | 40 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 36 | 13 | 8 | 8/15/2014 | MINNESOTA | 76 | -1.5 | Over | 47 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 36 | 6 | 12 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 92 | 155 | SU ATS | 50 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 10-22 | 45.5% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 39 | 11 | 6 | 7/25/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 78 | 162 | Over | 36 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 4-4 | 100.0% | 34 | 9 | 8 | | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 41 | 7 | 11 | 7/3/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 84 | 156.5 | ATS | 35 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 19-23 | 82.6% | 43 | 9 | 12 | | | MINNESOTA | 91 | -8 | SU Over | 41 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 28-34 | 82.4% | 38 | 6 | 7 | 6/1/2014 | MINNESOTA | 87 | -3 | SU ATS | 52 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 44 | 9 | 11 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 79 | 155.5 | Over | 45 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 29 | 6 | 10 | 5/30/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 72 | 157 | Over | 39 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 14-28 | 50.0% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 36 | 10 | 17 | | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 45 | 9 | 9 | 8/6/2013 | MINNESOTA | 93 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 39-68 | 57.4% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 40 | 5 | 10 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 80 | 154 | Over | 40 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 8/2/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 63 | 157.5 | Under | 33 | 25-73 | 34.2% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 39 | 9 | 13 | | | MINNESOTA | 85 | -14 | SU ATS | 39 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 1-5 | 20.0% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 46 | 9 | 11 | 7/19/2013 | MINNESOTA | 87 | -10 | SU ATS | 46 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 40 | 10 | 12 | | | SAN ANTONIO | 71 | 159.5 | Under | 31 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 44 | 13 | 16 | 6/11/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 72 | 160.5 | Under | 36 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 36 | 13 | 12 | | | MINNESOTA | 87 | -14 | SU ATS | 35 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 6-10 | 60.0% | 25-26 | 96.2% | 48 | 11 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Cheryl is 103-88 against the 1rst half line (+6.2 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 72-51 against the 1rst half line (+15.9 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.9, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 39-26 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 27-16 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.0, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 55-42 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.8, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.7, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 50-36 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.9, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 21-10 against the 1rst half line (+10.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 18-9 against the 1rst half line (+8.1 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 61-45 against the 1rst half line (+11.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.9, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 34-22 against the 1rst half line (+9.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 49-34 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 64-47 against the 1rst half line (+12.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 30-18 against the 1rst half line (+10.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.7, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 39-26 against the 1rst half line (+10.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.7, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 72-88 against the 1rst half line (-24.8 Units) versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 62-78 against the 1rst half line (-23.8 Units) in a home game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.6, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 34-53 against the 1rst half line (-24.3 Units) in home games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 14-25 against the 1rst half line (-13.5 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) in home games after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.9, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 31-43 against the 1rst half line (-16.3 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.3, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.5, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 39-58 against the 1rst half line (-24.8 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 36-52 against the 1rst half line (-21.2 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 25-36 against the 1rst half line (-14.6 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 23-38 against the 1rst half line (-18.8 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 13-24 against the 1rst half line (-13.4 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 8-18 against the 1rst half line (-11.8 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 58-74 against the 1rst half line (-23.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 40-52 against the 1rst half line (-17.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.9, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 13-23 against the 1rst half line (-12.3 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.7, OPPONENT 38.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 31-47 against the 1rst half line (-20.7 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.8, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 33-51 against the 1rst half line (-23.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 5-15 against the 1rst half line (-11.5 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.9, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 14-27 against the 1rst half line (-15.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 5-13 against the 1rst half line (-9.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 12-22 against the 1rst half line (-12.2 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 24-38 against the 1rst half line (-17.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 10-24 against the 1rst half line (-16.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.1, OPPONENT 41.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 28-40 against the 1rst half line (-16.0 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 14-27 against the 1rst half line (-15.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 69-83 against the 1rst half line (-22.3 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 26-39 against the 1rst half line (-16.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 30-46 against the 1rst half line (-20.6 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Cheryl is 18-29 against the 1rst half line (-13.9 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 12-22 against the 1rst half line (-12.2 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 10-19 against the 1rst half line (-10.9 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 52-65 against the 1rst half line (-19.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 47-63 against the 1rst half line (-22.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 33-50 against the 1rst half line (-22.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 101-77 against the 1rst half line (+16.3 Units) as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 13-5 against the 1rst half line (+7.5 Units) as a home underdog of 2 to 3 points vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.2, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 109-96 against the 1rst half line (+3.4 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 62-44 against the 1rst half line (+13.6 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 51-30 against the 1rst half line (+18.0 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.1, OPPONENT 33.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 91-73 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 84-71 against the 1rst half line (+5.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 35-23 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 60-42 against the 1rst half line (+13.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 82-64 against the 1rst half line (+11.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.9, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 52-34 against the 1rst half line (+14.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 39.0, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Cheryl is 36-20 OVER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 20-8 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total as a road favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.3, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 55-37 OVER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 55-37 OVER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 47-31 OVER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 70.5 as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.6, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 24-14 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 37-23 OVER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a division game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 25-14 OVER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 34-22 OVER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 21-10 OVER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.2, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 20-10 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games off a home win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 18-6 OVER (+11.4 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.2, OPPONENT 41.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 45-31 OVER (+10.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 29-18 OVER (+9.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.0, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 53-38 OVER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.8, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 58-39 OVER (+15.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.8, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 25-11 OVER (+12.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.6, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 19-9 OVER (+9.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.6, OPPONENT 41.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 32-21 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.0, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 25-15 OVER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 34-23 OVER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 40.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 24-14 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 42-30 OVER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 40.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 16-7 OVER (+8.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.9, OPPONENT 40.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 43-31 OVER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 40.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 28-17 OVER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 41.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 40-25 OVER (+12.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 42.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 31-19 OVER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.2, OPPONENT 43.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Cheryl is 19-10 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 6 points or less as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 54-42 UNDER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 32-21 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 39-24 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 52-38 UNDER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.0, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 182-135 UNDER (+33.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.2, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 101-73 UNDER (+20.7 Units) the 1rst half total as an underdog vs. the 1rst half line as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.5, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 86-73 UNDER (+5.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 101-73 UNDER (+20.7 Units) the 1rst half total in August or September games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.9, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 61-35 UNDER (+22.5 Units) the 1rst half total on Saturday games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.8, OPPONENT 32.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 184-130 UNDER (+41.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.4, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 178-129 UNDER (+36.1 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.9, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 92-75 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.0, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 92-77 UNDER (+7.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 43-20 UNDER (+21.0 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.1, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 27-12 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 24-13 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 39-24 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 48-30 UNDER (+15.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 36.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 91-67 UNDER (+17.3 Units) the 1rst half total after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 47-33 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 60-32 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total after having won 3 of their last 4 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 33.9, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 49-32 UNDER (+13.8 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 103-65 UNDER (+31.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 77-48 UNDER (+24.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 32-20 UNDER (+10.0 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 64-47 UNDER (+12.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 89-55 UNDER (+28.5 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.3, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 55-37 UNDER (+14.3 Units) the 1rst half total off a road loss as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.0, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 92-63 UNDER (+22.7 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 68-38 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 50-22 UNDER (+25.8 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 37-15 UNDER (+20.5 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 94-77 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 65-49 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 51-33 UNDER (+14.7 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.6, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 20-8 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 79-56 UNDER (+17.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 91-68 UNDER (+16.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.9, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 50-36 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 63-45 UNDER (+13.5 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 27-14 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.7, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.3, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 23-12 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 78-53 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.2, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 39-24 UNDER (+12.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 39-25 UNDER (+11.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 97-73 UNDER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 62-40 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 45-21 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 33.4, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 32-14 UNDER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 32.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 22-9 UNDER (+12.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 5 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 31.3, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 72-49 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 25-15 UNDER (+8.5 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.1, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 90-63 UNDER (+20.7 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 38-26 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.2, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 92-60 UNDER (+26.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.7, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 41-26 UNDER (+12.4 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 93-71 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.1, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 137-96 UNDER (+31.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.7, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 92-57 UNDER (+29.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.7, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 112-81 UNDER (+22.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 96-80 UNDER (+8.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 37-22 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.6, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 50-37 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 33-20 UNDER (+11.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 49-36 UNDER (+9.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.4, OPPONENT 39.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 13-5 UNDER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.7, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 86-71 UNDER (+7.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.0, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 122-102 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.5, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 65-45 UNDER (+15.5 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.1, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 94-66 UNDER (+21.4 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 64-43 UNDER (+16.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 35.1, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 100-59 UNDER (+35.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 34.9, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 97-82 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.8, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 144-113 UNDER (+19.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 52-33 UNDER (+15.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.3, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 58-40 UNDER (+14.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.4, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 49-29 UNDER (+17.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 34.6, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 79-64 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 38.3, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 114-92 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 37.8, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 49-28 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Dan 35.1, OPPONENT 35.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 46-33 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO.
The average score was SAN ANTONIO 36.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home underdog covered the first half line 52 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 44 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog covered the first half line 10 times, while the road favorite covered the first half line 7 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 15 games went under the first half total, while 6 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 6 games went under the first half total, while 3 games went over the first half total. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite covered the first half line 4 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 2 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite covered the first half line 3 times, while the home underdog covered the first half line 1 times. | | Since 1997, 3 games went under the first half total, while 2 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/30/2024 9:08:47 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|