| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
TULSA SAN ANTONIO |
|
| 163 | 93 Final 95 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
601 | TULSA | +155 | 602 | SAN ANTONIO | -175 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (335-137 since 1997.) (71%, +91.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (260-98 since 1997.) (72.6%, +89.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (344-143 since 1997.) (70.6%, +88.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss against a division rival. (264-103 since 1997.) (71.9%, +83.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (251-100 since 1997.) (71.5%, +79.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (257-105 since 1997.) (71%, +76.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (193-68 since 1997.) (73.9%, +75.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss against a division rival. (192-71 since 1997.) (73%, +68.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (167-58 since 1997.) (74.2%, +60.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (149-49 since 1997.) (75.3%, +57.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (131-44 since 1997.) (74.9%, +51.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (118-36 since 1997.) (76.6%, +50.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (174-86 since 1997.) (66.9%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (152-60 since 1997.) (71.7%, +49.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (138-65 since 1997.) (68%, +46.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (99-27 since 1997.) (78.6%, +45.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (133-51 since 1997.) (72.3%, +44.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (145-60 since 1997.) (70.7%, +43.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (111-40 since 1997.) (73.5%, +41.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (74-16 since 1997.) (82.2%, +41.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (107-63 since 1997.) (62.9%, +38 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (75-21 since 1997.) (78.1%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (105-60 since 1997.) (63.6%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (87-28 since 1997.) (75.7%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (84-35 since 1997.) (70.6%, +34.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (66-17 since 1997.) (79.5%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (83-38 since 1997.) (68.6%, +34.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss against a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (68-18 since 1997.) (79.1%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (75-21 since 1997.) (78.1%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (103-54 since 1997.) (65.6%, +33.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - off a win against a division rival, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (32-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (82-37 since 1997.) (68.9%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (68-21 since 1997.) (76.4%, +32.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (65-18 since 1997.) (78.3%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (89-51 since 1997.) (63.6%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (38-12 since 1997.) (76%, +29.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (59-17 since 1997.) (77.6%, +29.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (57-15 since 1997.) (79.2%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team after 15 or more games. (61-26 since 1997.) (70.1%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a losing record after 15 or more games. (76-49 since 1997.) (60.8%, +28.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a loss against a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (54-22 since 1997.) (71.1%, +26.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (36-10 since 1997.) (78.3%, +26.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (45-16 since 1997.) (73.8%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (51-24 since 1997.) (68%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival. (35-20 since 1997.) (63.6%, +26 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road loss against a division rival, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (37-11 since 1997.) (77.1%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (42-17 since 1997.) (71.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (52-25 since 1997.) (67.5%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (65-29 since 1997.) (69.1%, +23.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (27-3 since 1997.) (90%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games. (38-15 since 1997.) (71.7%, +21.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games. (26-5 since 1997.) (83.9%, +18.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game - attempting 20+ more free throws than opponent. (24-7 since 1997.) (77.4%, +18.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (23-7 since 1997.) (76.7%, +16.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (34-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.8%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest. (68-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +35 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season. (223-188 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.3%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (27-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +19.2 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games. (467-505 since 1997.) (48%, +102.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (265-269 since 1997.) (49.6%, +97.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (140-115 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (231-237 since 1997.) (49.4%, +81.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (138-103 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (91-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.2%, +50.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - long range shooting team - attempting 16 or more 3 point shots/game, in July games. (158-174 since 1997.) (47.6%, +69.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (152-125 since 1997.) (54.9%, +66.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (82-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.8%, +62.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (141-123 since 1997.) (53.4%, +61.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (62-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after scoring 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (59-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +35.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game, with a losing record. (36-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.8%, +40.2 units. Rating = 7*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (125-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.7%, +50.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (105-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.7%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games. (91-86 since 1997.) (51.4%, +48.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 90 points or more. (68-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +40.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more. (144-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.8%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, on Tuesday nights. (92-69 since 1997.) (57.1%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games. (88-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.4%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (77-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (41-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +35.7 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (70-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +34.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (50-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +35.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (54-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games. (88-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.7%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after being beaten by the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, in July games. (59-54 since 1997.) (52.2%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (112-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.7%, +58.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 90 points or more. (81-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +49 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games. (51-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.3%, +34.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (45-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (79-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +51.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (78-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 90 points or more. (61-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.7%, +40.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after scoring 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (35-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +26.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last three games. (31-17 since 1997.) (64.6%, +31.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (72-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +49.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (36-15 since 1997.) (70.6%, +31.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 90 points or more. (59-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +36.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after one or more consecutive overs, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (64-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher. (50-30 since 1997.) (62.5%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in July games. (52-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +36.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games. (28-15 since 1997.) (65.1%, +29.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (46-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +32.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 90 points or more. (64-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +43.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 90 points or more. (43-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +29.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (35-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +32.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (46-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after scoring 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (37-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.7%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 90 points or more. (23-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 90 points or more. (36-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.7%, +40.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +21.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (33-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.3%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games. (53-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (TULSA) - after scoring 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (24-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +29.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +21 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (49-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +32.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after going over the total by more than 24 points in their previous game against opponent after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games. (31-13 since 1997.) (70.5%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (35-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (52-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +31.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (47-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (61%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +21.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (57-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (TULSA) - after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (25-12 since 1997.) (67.6%, +19.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +26.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (32-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (46-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +30.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 90 points or more. (43-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 90 points or more. (48-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.2%, +41.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (43-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest. (68-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +35 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (40-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +21.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (28-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (70%, +22.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - off a win against a division rival, in July games. (38-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.9%, +28.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (TULSA) - off a home win against a division rival, in July games. (23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
TULSA | 81 | | 31-67 | 45.6% | 6-17 | 32.4% | 14-19 | 76.9% | 43 | 11 | 14 | SAN ANTONIO | 85 | | 30-67 | 45.2% | 8-18 | 42.5% | 17-20 | 82.3% | 40 | 9 | 11 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, SAN ANTONIO won the game straight up 594 times, while TULSA won 380 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
TULSA is 21-19 against the money line (+15.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 87.4, OPPONENT 85.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 49-48 against the money line (-31.4 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.3, OPPONENT 80.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 30-63 against the money line (-38.7 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 79.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 17-24 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in home games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.8, OPPONENT 77.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 0-4 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.0, OPPONENT 83.8 | SAN ANTONIO is 22-25 against the money line (-20.4 Units) in home games when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 77.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 7-19 against the money line (-12.5 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 80.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 20-42 against the money line (-23.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 80.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 2-12 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 85.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 89-115 against the money line (-48.1 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 75.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 3-13 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 68.6, OPPONENT 79.5 |
|
TULSA is 10-28 against the money line (-20.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 80.0, OPPONENT 84.6 | TULSA is 3-12 against the money line (-9.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 74.8, OPPONENT 79.2 | TULSA is 3-12 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when their opponents make 43% or more of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 81.3, OPPONENT 90.0 | TULSA is 4-15 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 76.1, OPPONENT 82.0 | TULSA is 8-27 against the money line (-18.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 82.7, OPPONENT 88.5 | TULSA is 6-20 against the money line (-13.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 84.0, OPPONENT 91.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 13-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 85.2, OPPONENT 76.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 17-9 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they make 43% or more of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 83.2, OPPONENT 76.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 4-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.6, OPPONENT 76.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 13-9 against the money line (+15.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 84.1, OPPONENT 80.8 | SAN ANTONIO is 7-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 88.6, OPPONENT 82.0 |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 79-84 against the money line (-38.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 19-22 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 0-4 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.0, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 64-58 against the money line (-43.8 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-19 against the money line (-15.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-9 against the money line (-8.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.6, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 94-129 against the money line (-43.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-6 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 1-5 against the money line (-8.4 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-9 against the money line (-8.3 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 52-69 against the money line (-28.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-6 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.4, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 30-28 against the money line (-29.0 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 105-127 against the money line (-44.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | SAN ANTONIO is 1-6 against the money line (-6.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.1, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 9-18 against the money line (-12.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 75.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 4-10 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 75.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-7 against the money line (-8.8 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 73.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 3-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 73.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 3-8 against the money line (-8.9 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 72.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-14 against the money line (-9.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 79.0, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | TULSA is 2-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 77.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-8 against the money line (-8.9 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 76.1, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 6-29 against the money line (-22.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997. The average score was TULSA 77.3, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 6-16 against the money line (-12.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.2, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 6-15 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 79.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 24-10 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
TULSA is 16-13 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 80.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 12-9 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after having lost 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was TULSA 80.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 98-67 against the money line (-44.0 Units) as a favorite since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 77-56 against the money line (-45.1 Units) as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 31-27 against the money line (-24.1 Units) as a home favorite of -165 to -250 since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 104-101 against the money line (-51.4 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 81-76 against the money line (-47.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 26-47 against the money line (-30.6 Units) on Tuesday since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 107-152 against the money line (-52.9 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 64-105 against the money line (-49.3 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 84-130 against the money line (-56.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 1-5 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 1-6 against the money line (-7.2 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.0, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-12 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 36-48 against the money line (-29.7 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 38-49 against the money line (-30.3 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in home games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.3, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 90-123 against the money line (-43.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-12 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.1, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 58-82 against the money line (-36.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 2-7 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 0-4 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in home games after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-10 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.9, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 79-101 against the money line (-38.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 24-29 against the money line (-25.3 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-11 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.2, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 1-5 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 82.0, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 13-26 against the money line (-19.8 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 54-64 against the money line (-30.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 50-93 against the money line (-41.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.8, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 65-99 against the money line (-37.5 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.9, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 20-37 against the money line (-28.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 85-115 against the money line (-43.4 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 36-47 against the money line (-29.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 5-14 against the money line (-15.7 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 25-41 against the money line (-21.6 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
TULSA is 22-69 against the money line (-39.6 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was TULSA 77.5, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 8-17 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 77.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 3-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 76.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 10-22 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 2-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after failing to cover 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997. The average score was TULSA 72.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 1-7 against the money line (-6.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points this season. The average score was TULSA 76.8, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was TULSA 82.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 9-28 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 79.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | TULSA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was TULSA 82.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 8-22 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 79.8, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was TULSA 82.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 4-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more this season. The average score was TULSA 82.2, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 4-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was TULSA 82.2, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 8-14 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 79.2, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 10-23 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 80.5, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 6-14 against the money line (-11.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 79.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | TULSA is 4-11 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was TULSA 78.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 8-15 | -5.8 | 13-10 | 17-6 | 82.6 | 39.5 | 43.5% | 43.0 | 84.5 | 42.9 | 47.3% | 39.6 | Road Games | 3-8 | -3.6 | 7-4 | 10-1 | 83.1 | 38.0 | 44.7% | 43.5 | 88.1 | 43.2 | 47.3% | 40.4 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.8 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 82.4 | 40.4 | 43.0% | 41.2 | 88.6 | 47.2 | 49.5% | 38.4 | Division Games | 4-11 | -5.8 | 9-6 | 12-3 | 81.3 | 40.3 | 43.2% | 42.9 | 84.4 | 42.6 | 48.1% | 37.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.6 | 39.5 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 6-17 | 31.6% | 17-22 | 77.2% | 43 | 12 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.3 | 38.2 | 29-66 | 44.0% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 14-18 | 78.7% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 83.1 | 38.0 | 31-69 | 44.7% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 15-21 | 72.7% | 43 | 12 | 15 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 84.5 | 42.9 | 31-65 | 47.3% | 5-12 | 38.5% | 19-23 | 80.9% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 78.3 | 38.8 | 29-65 | 44.8% | 5-14 | 35.1% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 88.1 | 43.2 | 32-67 | 47.3% | 5-13 | 38.2% | 19-24 | 81.4% | 40 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 11-12 | +0.8 | 12-11 | 12-11 | 77.2 | 38.0 | 42.7% | 36.3 | 79.7 | 39.2 | 47.6% | 42.1 | Home Games | 4-6 | -5.9 | 3-7 | 7-3 | 78.9 | 38.2 | 41.5% | 35.8 | 80.2 | 41.2 | 48.2% | 42.9 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.6 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 73.8 | 38.4 | 43.4% | 33.4 | 81.8 | 40.0 | 47.4% | 40.4 | Division Games | 6-9 | -1.2 | 5-10 | 11-4 | 77.7 | 37.9 | 42.6% | 35.5 | 83.1 | 40.7 | 49.7% | 42.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.2 | 38.0 | 28-66 | 42.7% | 7-18 | 38.3% | 14-17 | 82.1% | 36 | 8 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.5 | 38.6 | 29-66 | 43.8% | 5-14 | 34.1% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 78.9 | 38.2 | 28-67 | 41.5% | 7-18 | 38.8% | 16-18 | 89.1% | 36 | 9 | 19 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.7 | 39.2 | 31-64 | 47.6% | 5-14 | 33.1% | 14-17 | 78.3% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 78.7 | 38.9 | 29-66 | 44.8% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.2 | 41.2 | 32-66 | 48.2% | 5-16 | 31.8% | 12-15 | 77.1% | 43 | 10 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TULSA 71.2, SAN ANTONIO 71.7 |
| | |
|
|
6/13/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 69-67 | W | +155 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 42 | 6 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 47 | 13 | 6/15/2014 | SEATTLE | 85-79 | W | -270 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 40 | 8 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 29 | 11 | 6/19/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 77-87 | L | +210 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 45 | 14 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 44 | 14 | 6/20/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 80-91 | L | +500 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 54 | 5 | 34-66 | 51.5% | 35 | 8 | 6/22/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 105-99 | W | +120 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 43 | 17 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 42 | 14 | 6/25/2014 | @ INDIANA | 107-102 | W | +170 | 39-78 | 50.0% | 46 | 14 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 45 | 12 | 6/28/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 89-92 | L | -115 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 47 | 16 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 46 | 11 | 6/29/2014 | PHOENIX | 77-80 | L | +170 | 24-77 | 31.2% | 50 | 12 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 33 | 13 | 7/1/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 74-90 | L | +120 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 34 | 9 | 36-68 | 52.9% | 52 | 14 | 7/3/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 96-83 | W | +155 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 52 | 12 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 38 | 12 | 7/5/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 76-78 | L | -165 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 42 | 11 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 43 | 14 | 7/8/2014 | INDIANA | 76-78 | L | -115 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 41 | 15 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 36 | 11 | 7/10/2014 | MINNESOTA | 85-91 | L | +135 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 36 | 10 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 40 | 12 | 7/12/2014 | WASHINGTON | 74-91 | L | -165 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 42 | 10 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 48 | 13 | 7/16/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 82-93 | L | +300 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 16 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 39 | 8 | 7/17/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 95-90 | W | -115 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 43 | 10 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 29 | 12 | 7/22/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/27/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/31/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2014 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/13/2014 | SEATTLE | 72-79 | L | -250 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 36 | 12 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 32 | 16 | 6/14/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 101-74 | W | +120 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 29 | 11 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 35 | 19 | 6/19/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 87-82 | W | +135 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 45 | 6 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 47 | 12 | 6/22/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-69 | W | +210 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 30 | 10 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 47 | 22 | 6/24/2014 | WASHINGTON | 70-81 | L | -250 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 37 | 8 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 9 | 6/26/2014 | ATLANTA | 79-81 | L | +135 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 37 | 16 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 46 | 13 | 6/29/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-65 | W | +120 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 42 | 7 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 43 | 12 | 7/1/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 74-71 | W | +145 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 33 | 15 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 47 | 19 | 7/3/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 84-91 | L | +280 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 43 | 12 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 38 | 7 | 7/5/2014 | @ INDIANA | 71-70 | W | +155 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 39 | 11 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 42 | 14 | 7/9/2014 | NEW YORK | 80-66 | W | -175 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 36 | 10 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 42 | 15 | 7/11/2014 | SEATTLE | 67-88 | L | -210 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 25 | 11 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 36 | 11 | 7/13/2014 | @ PHOENIX | 61-90 | L | +300 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 38 | 16 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 39 | 13 | 7/17/2014 | @ TULSA | 90-95 | L | -105 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 29 | 12 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 43 | 10 | 7/22/2014 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/26/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/29/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/1/2014 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/3/2014 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
TULSA is 22-22 (+3.1 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 7-3 (+4.8 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
TULSA is 12-10 (+8.7 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 3-1 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus TULSA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/17/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 90 | 160.5 | Over | 45 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 11-21 | 52.4% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 29 | 7 | 12 | | TULSA | 95 | -1 | SU ATS | 38 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 3-8 | 37.5% | 32-39 | 82.1% | 43 | 10 | 10 | 5/28/2014 | TULSA | 79 | 158 | ATS | 46 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 36 | 8 | 20 | | SAN ANTONIO | 82 | -5 | SU Over | 42 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 10-15 | 66.7% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 32 | 8 | 18 | 5/17/2014 | TULSA | 76 | 155 | ATS | 35 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 20-29 | 69.0% | 52 | 17 | 15 | | SAN ANTONIO | 80 | -6.5 | SU Over | 33 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 21-23 | 91.3% | 45 | 14 | 10 | 9/8/2013 | TULSA | 98 | 147.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 38-69 | 55.1% | 11-26 | 42.3% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 36 | 8 | 12 | | SAN ANTONIO | 65 | -2 | Over | 43 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 12-21 | 57.1% | 43 | 10 | 14 | 8/30/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 74 | 147.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 36 | 6 | 12 | | TULSA | 65 | -6.5 | Under | 28 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 1-14 | 7.1% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 43 | 14 | 12 | 8/23/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 67 | 149 | ATS | 22 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 45 | 12 | 15 | | TULSA | 73 | -7 | SU Under | 40 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 30 | 5 | 9 | 8/4/2013 | TULSA | 65 | -1.5 | Under | 35 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 13-25 | 52.0% | 51 | 9 | 19 | | SAN ANTONIO | 69 | 151.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 41 | 7 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Fred is 15-7 against the money line (+10.6 Units) off a home win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 24-9 against the money line (+19.2 Units) off a home win in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 10-3 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 80.8, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 31-17 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 145-164 against the money line (-31.8 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 81-52 against the money line (-32.4 Units) as a favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 61-41 against the money line (-33.7 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 23-21 against the money line (-19.6 Units) as a home favorite of -165 to -250 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 81-72 against the money line (-35.1 Units) in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 71-62 against the money line (-34.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 23-34 against the money line (-22.4 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 48-43 against the money line (-27.6 Units) in home games after a division game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 52-70 against the money line (-27.2 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 69-88 against the money line (-29.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 21-36 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 67-81 against the money line (-27.5 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 43-46 against the money line (-19.1 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 30-35 against the money line (-19.1 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 44-66 against the money line (-25.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 28-33 against the money line (-21.3 Units) in home games revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 21-29 against the money line (-16.6 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 38-33 against the money line (-21.2 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 72-90 against the money line (-27.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 37-47 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 47-62 against the money line (-25.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 20-26 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 5-9 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in home games after allowing 90 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 41-50 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 72-76 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 22-21 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.0, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 54-67 against the money line (-19.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 26-31 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 11-21 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 40-44 against the money line (-19.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 34-64 against the money line (-27.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.0, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 30-35 against the money line (-23.3 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 15-24 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 42-40 against the money line (-25.0 Units) in home games after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 30-33 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 18-23 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.7, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 5-13 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 22-31 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 29-25 against the money line (-25.4 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a losing record as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 10-11 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in home games when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 33-31 against the money line (-26.2 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 71-73 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 104-107 against the money line (-33.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 41-59 against the money line (-27.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 62-88 against the money line (-46.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 75-91 against the money line (-28.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 114-131 against the money line (-36.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 15-16 against the money line (-25.2 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 39-51 against the money line (-19.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 46-54 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 23-39 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 71.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 98-93 against the money line (-27.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.8, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 55-55 against the money line (-21.3 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 63-70 against the money line (-24.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 91-100 against the money line (-30.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 28-30 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 81.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 13-28 against the money line (-17.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 25-44 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fred is 16-34 against the money line (-19.7 Units) in road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 14-33 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.9, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 7-21 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.4, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 7-15 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 73.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 4-18 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.8, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-11 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 71.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 1-7 against the money line (-6.8 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 76.8, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 82.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 82.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 9-15 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 79.2, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 7-17 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.6, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 13-23 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 79.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 82.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 4-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 82.2, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 4-13 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of TULSA. The average score was TULSA 82.2, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 16-26 against the money line (-23.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 3-17 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 71.9, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 1-8 against the money line (-9.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.6, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 3-16 against the money line (-15.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.6, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 12-28 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 73.5, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 6-13 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-11 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 73.7, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 13-22 against the money line (-26.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 22-31 against the money line (-27.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 4-10 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 8-15 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 80.2, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 9-19 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 17-30 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.4, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 7-21 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 78.1, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 46-38 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 101-93 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 16-7 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in home games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 188 times, while the road underdog won straight up 111 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 13 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 12 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 8:53:59 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|