| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
ATLANTA SAN ANTONIO |
|
| 152 | 68 Final 97 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
607 | ATLANTA | -200 | 608 | SAN ANTONIO | +170 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (319-218 since 1997.) (59.4%, +71.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (337-211 since 1997.) (61.5%, +63.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss. (139-126 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.5%, +39.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more. (170-126 since 1997.) (57.4%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Sunday games. (102-56 since 1997.) (64.6%, +41.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (122-85 since 1997.) (58.9%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (78-33 since 1997.) (70.3%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a loss by 6 points or less. (55-37 since 1997.) (59.8%, +31 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a loss by 6 points or less. (40-23 since 1997.) (63.5%, +30.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points against opponent off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals. (20-10 since 1997.) (66.7%, +28.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a loss by 6 points or less. (22-17 since 1997.) (56.4%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games. (66-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a loss by 6 points or less. (23-10 since 1997.) (69.7%, +16 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (280-104 since 1997.) (72.9%, +83.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (219-84 since 1997.) (72.3%, +73.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (189-55 since 1997.) (77.5%, +69.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (161-57 since 1997.) (73.9%, +59.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (163-55 since 1997.) (74.8%, +58.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (125-40 since 1997.) (75.8%, +52.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (109-31 since 1997.) (77.9%, +51.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 75 points or more. (141-51 since 1997.) (73.4%, +51.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (128-51 since 1997.) (71.5%, +49.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, with a losing record. (57-6 since 1997.) (90.5%, +44.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (93-30 since 1997.) (75.6%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible team - outscored by their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after scoring 80 points or more. (89-31 since 1997.) (74.2%, +42.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (64-9 since 1997.) (87.7%, +42 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 15 points or more. (83-47 since 1997.) (63.8%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - averaging 9 or more steals/game on the season, on Sunday games. (54-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.1%, +18.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (74-44 since 1997.) (62.7%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - poor defensive team - shooting pct defense of >=44% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (32-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +18.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (35-10 since 1997.) (77.8%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (88-23 since 1997.) (79.3%, +24.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (106-49 since 1997.) (68.4%, +21.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a blowout loss by 20 points or more to a division rival against opponent off a road loss. (30-4 since 1997.) (88.2%, +20.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - off a blowout loss by 20 points or more to a division rival, a bad team (25% to 40%) playing a team with a winning record. (30-5 since 1997.) (85.7%, +19.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (43-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +25.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games. (66-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout loss by 20 points or more. (26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SAN ANTONIO) - after a blowout loss by 20 points or more against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +20.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (20-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +15.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a road loss, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (67-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA | 76 | | 30-68 | 44.0% | 3-13 | 26.6% | 12-16 | 72.9% | 46 | 11 | 14 | SAN ANTONIO | 73 | | 27-67 | 40.3% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 13-17 | 75.7% | 43 | 10 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 563 times, while SAN ANTONIO won 403 times. Edge against the money line=SAN ANTONIO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 79-101 against the money line (-36.8 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.0, OPPONENT 79.5 | SAN ANTONIO is 29-69 against the money line (-59.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.7, OPPONENT 77.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 53-77 against the money line (-47.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 76.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 30-52 against the money line (-33.6 Units) when they make 70% to 76% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.6, OPPONENT 75.0 | SAN ANTONIO is 35-52 against the money line (-24.9 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.5, OPPONENT 74.6 | SAN ANTONIO is 84-110 against the money line (-50.6 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 75.2 | SAN ANTONIO is 33-39 against the money line (-30.1 Units) in home games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.2, OPPONENT 80.1 | SAN ANTONIO is 1-6 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in home games when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 77.4 | SAN ANTONIO is 75-115 against the money line (-52.9 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.1, OPPONENT 74.6 |
|
ATLANTA is 14-15 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 76.2 | ATLANTA is 11-13 against the money line (-17.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 77.7 | ATLANTA is 10-11 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 77.2 | ATLANTA is 17-18 against the money line (-17.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 78.6 | ATLANTA is 15-20 against the money line (-21.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.3, OPPONENT 83.3 | SAN ANTONIO is 15-10 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 79.5, OPPONENT 78.1 |
|
| | |
|
SAN ANTONIO is 3-11 against the money line (-10.3 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.9, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 112-125 against the money line (-44.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 16-26 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 90-125 against the money line (-44.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 134-177 against the money line (-55.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 48-68 against the money line (-32.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 54-46 against the money line (-39.4 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 70-84 against the money line (-33.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 99-120 against the money line (-46.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 32-33 against the money line (-22.8 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.2, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 17-24 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 1-5 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 0-4 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in road games versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.0, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 12-14 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-5 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.0, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 12-15 against the money line (-13.1 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 8-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-11 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 11-14 against the money line (-13.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 1-10 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 73.5, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 1-9 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 25-14 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 16-6 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-2 against the money line (+5.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 68.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 168-222 against the money line (-68.1 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 99-95 against the money line (-47.2 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 76-70 against the money line (-43.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 11-18 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 58-79 against the money line (-38.1 Units) against Eastern conference opponents since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 99-145 against the money line (-56.8 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.5, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 1-6 against the money line (-6.3 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games this season. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.7, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 79-125 against the money line (-55.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 89-126 against the money line (-55.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 4-12 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 58-79 against the money line (-38.1 Units) in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-12 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 33-45 against the money line (-29.1 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-21 against the money line (-16.0 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-18 against the money line (-13.2 Units) off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 70.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-13 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 3-8 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 81-116 against the money line (-49.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 8-17 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.3, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-22 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 6-14 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 7-21 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 69.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 50-60 against the money line (-28.1 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.6, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SAN ANTONIO is 58-93 against the money line (-39.8 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 78-109 against the money line (-45.6 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SAN ANTONIO is 9-16 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 71.3, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
ATLANTA is 3-6 against the money line (-9.1 Units) as a road favorite this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 4-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.2, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-11 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in August or September games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 19-32 against the money line (-28.4 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 20-33 against the money line (-18.7 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-13 against the money line (-11.0 Units) off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-8 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 52-67 against the money line (-32.2 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in road games after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 70.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 0-6 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.2, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-8.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-11 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 5*) | ATLANTA is 3-7 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-24 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 77.4, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 12-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.2, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SAN ANTONIO is 38-19 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in home games after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 17-16 | -9.9 | 16-16 | 16-17 | 77.2 | 40.3 | 42.5% | 44.0 | 74.7 | 37.7 | 41.8% | 43.7 | Road Games | 4-12 | -13.4 | 5-11 | 7-9 | 72.9 | 39.4 | 40.9% | 43.7 | 78.6 | 40.3 | 44.7% | 43.2 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3.7 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 77.8 | 40.8 | 40.7% | 46.2 | 76.2 | 39.2 | 41.5% | 45.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.2 | 40.3 | 30-69 | 42.5% | 3-13 | 26.7% | 15-20 | 74.4% | 44 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.4 | 37.4 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-14 | 32.7% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.9 | 39.4 | 29-70 | 40.9% | 3-13 | 22.5% | 12-17 | 71.9% | 44 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.7 | 37.7 | 28-66 | 41.8% | 4-12 | 32.6% | 16-20 | 78.7% | 44 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.8 | 36.9 | 28-66 | 41.8% | 5-14 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.6 | 40.3 | 29-66 | 44.7% | 4-11 | 35.8% | 16-20 | 78.8% | 43 | 9 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 11-22 | -0.9 | 16-17 | 12-21 | 71.4 | 34.9 | 39.7% | 39.8 | 78.2 | 37.6 | 45.8% | 43.5 | Home Games | 7-9 | +0.2 | 8-8 | 6-10 | 73.1 | 36.4 | 40.5% | 40.6 | 76.8 | 37.0 | 44.6% | 43.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 69.4 | 35.6 | 38.5% | 40.4 | 81.6 | 36.8 | 46.9% | 43.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.4 | 34.9 | 27-67 | 39.7% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 12-16 | 74.3% | 40 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.8 | 37.6 | 28-67 | 42.1% | 5-15 | 32.1% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.1 | 36.4 | 27-67 | 40.5% | 5-17 | 31.4% | 13-18 | 73.5% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.2 | 37.6 | 30-65 | 45.8% | 5-14 | 34.3% | 14-18 | 80.6% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 76.8 | 38 | 28-66 | 43.3% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.8 | 37.0 | 29-64 | 44.6% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 14-18 | 80.1% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ATLANTA 70.1, SAN ANTONIO 69.5 |
| | |
|
|
8/10/2013 | @ INDIANA | 66-80 | L | +120 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 29 | 14 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 38 | 13 | 8/11/2013 | NEW YORK | 82-88 | L | -360 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 34 | 8 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 50 | 16 | 8/14/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 86-88 | L | -165 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 48 | 10 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 38 | 13 | 8/16/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 88-57 | W | -450 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 38 | 17 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 47 | 21 | 8/18/2013 | WASHINGTON | 76-58 | W | -300 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 50 | 17 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 45 | 17 | 8/20/2013 | MINNESOTA | 88-75 | W | +120 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 40 | 13 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 43 | 19 | 8/23/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 64-74 | L | -140 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 50 | 14 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 42 | 9 | 8/24/2013 | CHICAGO | 56-67 | L | -175 | 20-70 | 28.6% | 47 | 22 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 53 | 20 | 8/28/2013 | WASHINGTON | 80-85 | L | -270 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 51 | 16 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 44 | 16 | 8/31/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 68-85 | L | +220 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 17 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 46 | 8 | 9/2/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 92-82 | W | +135 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 34 | 12 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 41 | 15 | 9/4/2013 | INDIANA | 89-80 | W | -200 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 59 | 16 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 44 | 15 | 9/6/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 70-57 | W | -200 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 41 | 15 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 45 | 18 | 9/8/2013 | PHOENIX | 71-79 | L | -200 | 25-78 | 32.1% | 40 | 12 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 52 | 28 | 9/11/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-78 | L | -270 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 48 | 25 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 41 | 16 | 9/13/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 82-87 | L | +220 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 7 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 43 | 12 | 9/15/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/6/2013 | MINNESOTA | 80-93 | L | +400 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 33 | 12 | 39-68 | 57.4% | 40 | 10 | 8/9/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 77-56 | W | +220 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 34 | 10 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 33 | 20 | 8/11/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 63-69 | L | +180 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 38 | 10 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 56 | 11 | 8/17/2013 | PHOENIX | 88-82 | W | +210 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 31 | 9 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 41 | 15 | 8/21/2013 | @ INDIANA | 63-80 | L | +280 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 38 | 19 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 35 | 12 | 8/23/2013 | @ TULSA | 67-73 | L | +220 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 45 | 15 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 30 | 9 | 8/25/2013 | SEATTLE | 70-64 | W | -110 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 44 | 14 | 19-53 | 35.8% | 36 | 15 | 8/27/2013 | SEATTLE | 71-72 | L | +100 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 35 | 10 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 43 | 17 | 8/30/2013 | @ TULSA | 74-65 | W | +210 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 36 | 12 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 43 | 12 | 8/31/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 67-80 | L | +300 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 44 | 13 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 46 | 10 | 9/6/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 80-83 | L | +400 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 40 | 12 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 52 | 16 | 9/8/2013 | TULSA | 65-98 | L | -125 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 43 | 14 | 38-69 | 55.1% | 36 | 12 | 9/13/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 61-82 | L | +400 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 39 | 11 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 40 | 10 | 9/15/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
ATLANTA is 6-5 (+1.7 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 3-2 (+1.4 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
ATLANTA is 2-3 (+0.1 Units) against the money line versus SAN ANTONIO since 1997 |
| |
SAN ANTONIO is 2-0 (+2.2 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/30/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 67 | 154 | Over | 40 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 32 | 8 | 21 | | ATLANTA | 93 | -12 | SU ATS | 49 | 36-64 | 56.2% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 45 | 8 | 18 | 7/13/2012 | ATLANTA | 70 | 152.5 | Over | 37 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 36 | 9 | 20 | | SAN ANTONIO | 91 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 37 | 12 | 9 | 6/8/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 57 | 166 | ATS | 28 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 36 | 6 | 15 | | ATLANTA | 60 | -4.5 | SU Under | 28 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 0-7 | 0.0% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 50 | 11 | 22 |
|
| | |
|
Fred is 10-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 9-2 against the money line (+7.1 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 77.5, OPPONENT 67.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 133-152 against the money line (-34.3 Units) in all games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 76-66 against the money line (-30.9 Units) in home games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 66-56 against the money line (-30.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 43-68 against the money line (-40.9 Units) in August or September games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Dan is 50-53 against the money line (-17.6 Units) against Eastern conference opponents as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.5, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 80-95 against the money line (-26.0 Units) after a division game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 46-65 against the money line (-29.3 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 64-83 against the money line (-29.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 71-83 against the money line (-32.0 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 15-30 against the money line (-20.8 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 50-53 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 72.5, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 48-61 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 27-32 against the money line (-18.5 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 40-62 against the money line (-26.6 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 36-50 against the money line (-17.1 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 60-67 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 13-14 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.6, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 63-83 against the money line (-33.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 32-42 against the money line (-19.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 41-57 against the money line (-27.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 17-25 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 36-40 against the money line (-17.2 Units) in home games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 26-32 against the money line (-23.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Dan is 63-72 against the money line (-21.5 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 38-57 against the money line (-22.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 25-31 against the money line (-21.8 Units) versus poor 3 point shooting teams - making <=30% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Dan 71.4, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 66-70 against the money line (-24.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 96-100 against the money line (-36.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 38-53 against the money line (-22.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 64-74 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 71-87 against the money line (-28.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 75.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 106-121 against the money line (-34.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 74.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 42-53 against the money line (-21.9 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 90-83 against the money line (-25.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 59-67 against the money line (-27.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 77.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 85-93 against the money line (-32.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 76.8, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Dan is 26-27 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 80.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fred is 5-13 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 5-13 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 4-10 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-8 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games in August or September games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 1-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games in non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 73.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 2-6 against the money line (-8.4 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 3-8 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 72.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 3-8 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 1-7 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 1-7 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 3-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 72.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 5-11 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 3-7 against the money line (-9.7 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 0-5 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games versus poor shooting teams - making <=40% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 71.4, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 9-13 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 3-11 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 3-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 10-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 3-12 against the money line (-13.6 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Fred is 6-10 against the money line (-12.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 9-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 8-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 3-11 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 1-9 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Dan is 38-35 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 73.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Dan is 13-4 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in home games after 2 straight losses by 10 points or more as the coach of SAN ANTONIO. The average score was SAN ANTONIO 78.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 54 times, while the home underdog won straight up 20 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 8 times, while the home underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 09/06/2013 - Danielle Robinson out indefinitely ( Knee ) | [G] 09/05/2013 - Davellyn Whyte out for season ( Foot ) | [G] 07/08/2013 - Becky Hammon out for season ( Knee ) | [F] 05/23/2013 - Sophia Young out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/25/2024 2:22:15 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|