| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
NEW YORK |
|
|
162
| 78
Final
63 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Game 1 | | |  | |
| 609 | CONNECTICUT | +300 | | 610 | NEW YORK | -400 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(183-38 since 1997.) (82.8%, +76.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in August or September games.
(180-37 since 1997.) (82.9%, +74.1 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(229-142 since 1997.) (61.7%, +59.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(212-100 since 1997.) (67.9%, +57.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, in August or September games.
(173-60 since 1997.) (74.2%, +57.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(149-68 since 1997.) (68.7%, +44.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, in August or September games.
(78-53 since 1997.) (59.5%, +22.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better.
(24-8 since 1997.) (75%, +19.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(24-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +16.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a blowout win by 15 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games.
(35-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.4%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(36-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(202-146 since 1997.) (58%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days.
(65-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (47.1%, +38.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(72-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 78 | | 30-70 | 42.5% | 8-22 | 34.8% | 11-14 | 76.0% | 40 | 8 | 12 | | NEW YORK | 89 | | 32-70 | 45.7% | 11-31 | 35.8% | 14-17 | 82.8% | 48 | 10 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, NEW YORK won the game straight up 769 times, while CONNECTICUT won 215 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 28-14 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 76.0 | CONNECTICUT is 30-9 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.8, OPPONENT 77.2 | CONNECTICUT is 11-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 80.8 | CONNECTICUT is 77-47 against the money line (+20.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 77.6 | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in road games when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 79.3 | NEW YORK is 49-90 against the money line (-54.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.8, OPPONENT 79.9 | NEW YORK is 22-28 against the money line (-17.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.5, OPPONENT 87.5 | NEW YORK is 13-13 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in home games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.0, OPPONENT 85.2 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 8-14 against the money line (-29.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 81.8 | CONNECTICUT is 9-9 against the money line (-16.7 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.2, OPPONENT 82.1 | CONNECTICUT is 15-13 against the money line (-19.1 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 78.7 | CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-21.2 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 82.5 | CONNECTICUT is 92-105 against the money line (-38.8 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.6, OPPONENT 75.1 | CONNECTICUT is 7-13 against the money line (-27.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 87.6 | CONNECTICUT is 3-11 against the money line (-26.5 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 90.9 | CONNECTICUT is 11-9 against the money line (-18.8 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 81.3 | CONNECTICUT is 55-73 against the money line (-44.7 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.4, OPPONENT 78.1 | CONNECTICUT is 14-10 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 81.3 | NEW YORK is 141-70 against the money line (+92.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.0, OPPONENT 73.9 | NEW YORK is 14-4 against the money line (+13.8 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.5, OPPONENT 77.0 | NEW YORK is 17-3 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.9, OPPONENT 78.8 | NEW YORK is 22-16 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.4, OPPONENT 83.1 | NEW YORK is 28-19 against the money line (+9.3 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.2, OPPONENT 82.7 | NEW YORK is 19-8 against the money line (+15.6 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.8, OPPONENT 81.3 | NEW YORK is 112-68 against the money line (+54.6 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.1, OPPONENT 74.1 | NEW YORK is 17-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.8, OPPONENT 81.2 | NEW YORK is 40-12 against the money line (+22.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 90.3, OPPONENT 81.5 | NEW YORK is 23-2 against the money line (+17.5 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 93.5, OPPONENT 81.5 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 26-13 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-13 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-13 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 128-113 against the money line (+23.4 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-13 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-12 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in road games versus bad pressure defensive teams - forcing <=12 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-13 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-13 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-12 against the money line (+10.6 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 11-14 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in home games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.2, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 35-23 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-23 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 34-23 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-23 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-7 against the money line (-15.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-10 against the money line (-15.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-10 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-23 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-10 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-13 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-6 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-20 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 48-63 against the money line (-33.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-23 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 33-22 against the money line (-22.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 43-27 against the money line (-24.6 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 35-23 against the money line (-22.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-7 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-20 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 13-3 against the money line (+11.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.1, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 8-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 90.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 9-8 against the money line (+15.8 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.2, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 23-12 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 30-16 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.1, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 22-3 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 43-24 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 22-3 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 43-24 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 22-3 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 42-23 against the money line (+18.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 10-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 91.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 5*) | NEW YORK is 10-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 90.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 22-3 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 43-24 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 19-3 against the money line (+12.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 90.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 40-23 against the money line (+15.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 20-3 against the money line (+13.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.7, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 38-21 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 22-3 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 43-24 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 9-1 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 5*) | NEW YORK is 10-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 16-8 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.3, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 22-3 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 42-24 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 22-3 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 39-22 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 22-3 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 43-24 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 22-3 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 41-22 against the money line (+26.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 19-3 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 22-4 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.9, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 24-10 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-15 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-15 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 29-15 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 15-6 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in road games after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.6, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 50-27 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+6.9 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-2 against the money line (+5.6 Units) after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-4 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 171-148 against the money line (+21.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 135-110 against the money line (+27.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 78-58 against the money line (+32.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 75-63 against the money line (+21.4 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 128-111 against the money line (+22.9 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games off an road win where they scored 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-5 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.2, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 38-9 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-0 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in road games after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.5, OPPONENT 68.7 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 21-7 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-3 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 6*) | CONNECTICUT is 26-9 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-7 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 37-25 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in road games after scoring 90 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-3 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-5 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-3 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-4 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-8 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in home games on Sunday games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 2-7 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.2, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 39-50 against the money line (-31.2 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 15-12 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.5, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 13-12 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.2, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 21-21 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 13-17 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.9, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 13-17 against the money line (-23.3 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 11-9 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 15-16 against the money line (-19.1 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 26-36 against the money line (-26.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.5, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-7 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.4, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-7 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 35-29 against the money line (-28.2 Units) in home games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.6, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 14-11 against the money line (-20.6 Units) on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-23.3 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 10*) | CONNECTICUT is 33-21 against the money line (-28.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-7 against the money line (-15.8 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 17-15 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 36-22 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.4, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-5 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 7-7 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after a win by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-13 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-12 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-13 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-11 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 18-15 against the money line (-19.5 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-12 against the money line (-21.2 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-8 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-11 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 46-29 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.5, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 21-6 against the money line (+15.2 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 30-22 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after a division game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 8-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after 2 consecutive division games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.7, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 12-1 against the money line (+11.3 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 93.2, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 6*) | NEW YORK is 26-17 against the money line (+8.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.3, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 18-3 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 18-2 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 23-8 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 24-7 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 24-3 against the money line (+16.5 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 91.1, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 25-3 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 90.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 24-4 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 22-4 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 8-3 against the money line (+13.3 Units) off a home win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 20-12 against the money line (+10.0 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 14-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 16-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) off a home win over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 19-16 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.8, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 18-10 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.1, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 40-18 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 37-15 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 33-15 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.9, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 26-5 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 90.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 41-18 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 26-5 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 90.6, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 26-5 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 90.2, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 27-11 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 24-6 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 18-11 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 36-18 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 31-11 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 25-8 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 19-6 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 9-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 23-12 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 12-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 29-11 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 20-9 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 5*) | NEW YORK is 14-7 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 29-14 | -8.8 | 22-19 | 22-19 | 82.8 | 42.8 | 44.8% | 42.1 | 78.5 | 39.3 | 43.4% | 40.8 | | Road Games | 15-6 | +6 | 11-8 | 9-11 | 80.7 | 42.8 | 44.4% | 41.3 | 77.9 | 40.9 | 41.7% | 42.0 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -7 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 84.4 | 42.8 | 47.1% | 42.8 | 75.6 | 36.4 | 43.5% | 37.2 | | Division Games | 14-6 | +1.2 | 12-6 | 9-11 | 81.6 | 42.2 | 43.1% | 43.6 | 78.2 | 38.2 | 42.9% | 42.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 82.8 | 42.8 | 30-68 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 36.8% | 15-19 | 76.4% | 42 | 8 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 83.3 | 42.6 | 30-69 | 44.1% | 8-22 | 35.0% | 15-18 | 80.1% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.7 | 42.8 | 29-66 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 35.3% | 15-20 | 75.5% | 41 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.5 | 39.3 | 28-65 | 43.4% | 7-21 | 32.0% | 15-19 | 78.7% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 42 | 30-69 | 43.9% | 8-22 | 34.3% | 15-18 | 80.1% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.9 | 40.9 | 27-65 | 41.7% | 7-22 | 31.0% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 35-8 | +7.3 | 21-21 | 24-19 | 89.1 | 46.2 | 45.7% | 45.4 | 80.1 | 41.2 | 42.1% | 40.3 | | Home Games | 17-5 | -9.5 | 10-11 | 14-8 | 90.0 | 47.3 | 45.9% | 45.3 | 81.1 | 41.5 | 42.5% | 40.4 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -2.5 | 1-4 | 5-0 | 91.6 | 47.6 | 44.7% | 44.8 | 86.4 | 45.6 | 45.4% | 41.6 | | Division Games | 18-4 | -3.9 | 12-10 | 15-7 | 90.0 | 47.7 | 45.7% | 45.8 | 80.4 | 40.8 | 41.8% | 40.9 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 89.1 | 46.2 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 11-30 | 37.1% | 14-17 | 82.6% | 45 | 9 | 24 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.7 | 42 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-22 | 34.7% | 15-19 | 79.9% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 90.0 | 47.3 | 32-70 | 45.9% | 11-30 | 37.7% | 14-17 | 83.1% | 45 | 9 | 24 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.1 | 41.2 | 30-71 | 42.1% | 7-22 | 33.3% | 13-16 | 79.1% | 40 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 42 | 30-68 | 43.9% | 7-22 | 34.5% | 15-19 | 79.8% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 81.1 | 41.5 | 30-71 | 42.5% | 8-23 | 33.7% | 13-18 | 76.0% | 40 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71.8, NEW YORK 70.1 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/18/2023 | DALLAS | 75-95 | L | -200 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 46 | 12 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 49 | 12 | | 8/20/2023 | @ CHICAGO | 79-73 | W | -250 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 42 | 11 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 37 | 10 | | 8/22/2023 | @ WASHINGTON | 68-64 | W | -175 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 33 | 13 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 47 | 20 | | 8/24/2023 | NEW YORK | 90-95 | L | +180 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 41 | 11 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 47 | 11 | | 8/27/2023 | LOS ANGELES | 83-68 | W | -250 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 48 | 19 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 31 | 14 | | 8/31/2023 | PHOENIX | 84-74 | W | | 24-55 | 43.6% | 39 | 11 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 30 | 10 | | 9/1/2023 | @ NEW YORK | 58-89 | L | +250 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 34 | 13 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 45 | 15 | | 9/5/2023 | LOS ANGELES | 90-76 | W | -550 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 41 | 15 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 32 | 13 | | 9/8/2023 | INDIANA | 76-59 | W | -550 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 48 | 17 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 33 | 13 | | 9/10/2023 | CHICAGO | 91-102 | L | -500 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 44 | 10 | 39-72 | 54.2% | 43 | 17 | | 9/13/2023 | MINNESOTA | 90-60 | W | -450 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 45 | 11 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 38 | 19 | | 9/17/2023 | MINNESOTA | 75-82 | L | -500 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 37 | 10 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 40 | 7 | | 9/20/2023 | @ MINNESOTA | 90-75 | W | -220 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 40 | 8 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 32 | 10 | | 9/24/2023 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/26/2023 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/15/2023 | @ LAS VEGAS | 82-63 | W | +220 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 62 | 16 | 23-69 | 33.3% | 33 | 9 | | 8/17/2023 | @ LAS VEGAS | 75-88 | L | +220 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 39 | 15 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 44 | 8 | | 8/18/2023 | @ PHOENIX | 85-63 | W | -850 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 46 | 12 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 44 | 14 | | 8/24/2023 | @ CONNECTICUT | 95-90 | W | -220 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 47 | 11 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 41 | 11 | | 8/26/2023 | @ MINNESOTA | 111-76 | W | -450 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 41 | 6 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 33 | 13 | | 8/28/2023 | LAS VEGAS | 94-85 | W | -125 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 49 | 13 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 39 | 11 | | 9/1/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 89-58 | W | -330 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 45 | 15 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 34 | 13 | | 9/3/2023 | @ CHICAGO | 86-69 | W | -400 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 48 | 14 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 39 | 15 | | 9/5/2023 | @ DALLAS | 94-93 | W | -270 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 40 | 12 | 37-76 | 48.7% | 45 | 12 | | 9/7/2023 | LOS ANGELES | 96-89 | W | | 35-69 | 50.7% | 40 | 17 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 34 | 11 | | 9/10/2023 | WASHINGTON | 88-90 | L | -550 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 41 | 10 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 39 | 8 | | 9/15/2023 | WASHINGTON | 90-75 | W | -550 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 51 | 10 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 41 | 7 | | 9/19/2023 | WASHINGTON | 90-85 | W | -600 | 34-81 | 42.0% | 52 | 13 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 49 | 14 | | 9/24/2023 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/26/2023 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| NEW YORK is 47-52 (+1.3 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| NEW YORK is 6-5 (+4.8 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| NEW YORK is 27-21 (-1.6 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| NEW YORK is 3-2 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/1/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 58 | 160.5 | Under | 32 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 34 | 6 | 13 | | | NEW YORK | 89 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 45 | 8 | 15 | 8/24/2023 | NEW YORK | 95 | -5.5 | SU Over | 34 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 8-31 | 25.8% | 21-26 | 80.8% | 47 | 12 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 90 | 162 | ATS | 48 | 36-76 | 47.4% | 11-32 | 34.4% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 41 | 6 | 11 | 6/27/2023 | NEW YORK | 89 | -5 | SU ATS | 47 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 44 | 6 | 9 | | | CONNECTICUT | 81 | 168 | Over | 43 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 43 | 8 | 5 | 5/27/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 65 | 165 | Under | 38 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 8-23 | 34.8% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 42 | 10 | 14 | | | NEW YORK | 81 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 32 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 9-22 | 40.9% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 43 | 11 | 13 | 7/19/2022 | NEW YORK | 63 | 161.5 | Under | 35 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 9-27 | 33.3% | 6-6 | 100.0% | 35 | 6 | 18 | | | CONNECTICUT | 82 | -5 | SU ATS | 39 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 5-11 | 45.5% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 45 | 8 | 12 | 6/22/2022 | NEW YORK | 81 | 163 | SU ATS | 51 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 13-32 | 40.6% | 6-8 | 75.0% | 40 | 5 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 77 | -10.5 | Under | 42 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 45 | 8 | 10 | 5/17/2022 | CONNECTICUT | 92 | -9 | SU ATS | 51 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 25-28 | 89.3% | 36 | 5 | 17 | | | NEW YORK | 65 | 155 | Over | 32 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 33 | 5 | 29 |
|
| | |
|
White is 36-25 against the money line (+17.8 Units) in road games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 36-25 against the money line (+17.8 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 34-19 against the money line (+20.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 15-5 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 25-12 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 24-16 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 76.8, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 8-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 82.0, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 10-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 23-15 against the money line (+13.4 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 23-14 against the money line (+16.8 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 15-9 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 11-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.7, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 19-10 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.5, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 13-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 15-7 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 19-8 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 23-10 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 23-12 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 32-21 against the money line (+17.1 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 28-18 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 77.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 16-8 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 27-17 against the money line (+12.9 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 32-19 against the money line (+17.1 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 16-11 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 29-14 against the money line (+17.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 25-12 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 28-19 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 78.7, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 21-13 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 81.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 9-3 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.4, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 63-51 against the money line (-33.2 Units) in home games after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 81.9, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 15-12 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.5, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 13-12 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.2, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 21-21 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 40-45 against the money line (-48.5 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.3, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 50-44 against the money line (-44.4 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.2, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 11-9 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 6-7 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.4, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 8-7 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 19-20 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in home games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
White is 7-10 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 79.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 3-7 against the money line (-23.3 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 9*) | White is 5-7 against the money line (-15.8 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 4-5 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 7-7 against the money line (-15.8 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 18-13 against the money line (-18.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.7, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 24-23 against the money line (-23.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was White 80.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 12-8 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 16-11 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.4, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 7-7 against the money line (-15.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | White is 14-10 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 82.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | White is 11-10 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | White is 17-13 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 46-29 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in all games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.5, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 21-6 against the money line (+15.2 Units) in August or September games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 16-8 against the money line (+14.1 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 26-17 against the money line (+8.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 11-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 11-3 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Brondello is 18-3 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 18-2 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 28-5 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after having won 20 or more of their last 25 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 86.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 23-8 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 24-7 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 29-10 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 27-6 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 25-5 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Brondello is 22-4 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 89.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 8-3 against the money line (+13.3 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.8, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 14-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 16-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) off a home win as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 19-16 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.8, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 79-58 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 84.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 18-10 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.1, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 40-18 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.9, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 37-15 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.0, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 33-15 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.9, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 30-14 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.2, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 41-18 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 148-80 against the money line (+36.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 84.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 121-61 against the money line (+41.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 84.9, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 101-46 against the money line (+39.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 85.6, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 82-40 against the money line (+29.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 85.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 73-36 against the money line (+20.2 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 85.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 36-15 against the money line (+19.8 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 27-11 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 70-35 against the money line (+30.5 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 85.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 24-6 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 18-11 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 36-18 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 31-11 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 25-8 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.9, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 54-23 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 83.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 45-13 against the money line (+26.8 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 84.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 19-6 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 9-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a home favorite as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 23-12 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 12-5 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 71-40 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Brondello 82.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 29-11 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 20-9 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 5*) | Brondello is 14-7 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 20-13 against the money line (+23.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.5, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 13-10 against the money line (+14.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 9-8 against the money line (+15.8 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.2, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 23-12 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 30-16 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 8-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 34-16 against the money line (+24.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 43-24 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 34-16 against the money line (+24.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 43-24 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 33-15 against the money line (+25.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 42-23 against the money line (+18.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 16-9 against the money line (+19.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.7, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 17-11 against the money line (+22.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.2, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 34-16 against the money line (+24.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 43-24 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.5, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 31-16 against the money line (+21.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 40-23 against the money line (+15.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 31-15 against the money line (+19.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 38-21 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 34-16 against the money line (+24.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 43-24 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 13-9 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 15-13 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 16-8 against the money line (+14.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.3, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 34-16 against the money line (+24.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 42-24 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 33-15 against the money line (+23.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 39-22 against the money line (+17.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 11-8 against the money line (+15.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.2, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 13-10 against the money line (+20.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.9, OPPONENT 84.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 34-16 against the money line (+24.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.8, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 43-24 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 34-15 against the money line (+26.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Brondello is 41-22 against the money line (+26.1 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 25-13 against the money line (+16.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.2, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 29-17 against the money line (+21.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.8, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 43 times, while the road underdog won straight up 11 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the road underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 07/24/2022 - Jasmine Thomas is out for season ( ACL ) | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 7/26/2024 9:14:55 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|