| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO NEW YORK |
|
| 155.5 | 86 Final 82 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
639 | CHICAGO | +550 | 640 | NEW YORK | -850 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (157-70 since 1997.) (69.2%, +51.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots against opponent after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better. (85-59 since 1997.) (59%, +37 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (50-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +33 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, team that had a losing record last season. (66-37 since 1997.) (64.1%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (42-12 since 1997.) (77.8%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - off a win against a division rival against opponent off a home loss. (30-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.3%, +22.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home loss, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (32-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +23.9 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points. (29-20 since 1997.) (59.2%, +34.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points. (24-17 since 1997.) (58.5%, +33.3 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO | 81 | | 31-71 | 43.6% | 7-23 | 30.7% | 12-16 | 77.7% | 43 | 8 | 12 | NEW YORK | 82 | | 30-68 | 44.0% | 10-26 | 36.4% | 12-14 | 86.7% | 43 | 7 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, NEW YORK won the game straight up 499 times, while CHICAGO won 470 times. Edge against the money line=CHICAGO |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 23-13 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 80.0 | CHICAGO is 12-3 against the money line (+11.1 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 80.5 | CHICAGO is 11-4 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.1, OPPONENT 75.7 | CHICAGO is 102-74 against the money line (+34.9 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 77.8 | CHICAGO is 90-79 against the money line (+24.3 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.7, OPPONENT 81.3 | CHICAGO is 20-12 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 87.0, OPPONENT 83.7 | CHICAGO is 27-26 against the money line (+17.9 Units) in road games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 79.4 | CHICAGO is 49-21 against the money line (+15.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.2, OPPONENT 82.3 | CHICAGO is 10-1 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in road games in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 77.1 | NEW YORK is 46-90 against the money line (-57.5 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 75.3, OPPONENT 79.9 | NEW YORK is 3-10 against the money line (-9.0 Units) in home games when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 79.7, OPPONENT 89.0 |
|
CHICAGO is 11-14 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 79.6 | CHICAGO is 9-18 against the money line (-18.6 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 82.9 | CHICAGO is 63-104 against the money line (-52.4 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.3 | CHICAGO is 26-27 against the money line (-20.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 87.9 | NEW YORK is 7-3 against the money line (+12.3 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 76.2 | NEW YORK is 143-130 against the money line (+39.6 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 75.2, OPPONENT 75.9 | NEW YORK is 158-160 against the money line (+25.6 Units) when they grab 7 or less offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.0, OPPONENT 74.2 | NEW YORK is 14-14 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.5, OPPONENT 82.8 | NEW YORK is 163-174 against the money line (+24.8 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 81.9, OPPONENT 83.2 | NEW YORK is 89-45 against the money line (+57.5 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 79.9, OPPONENT 76.4 | NEW YORK is 16-7 against the money line (+18.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 88.3, OPPONENT 81.5 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 28-18 against the money line (+13.3 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-12 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in road games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-13 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-13 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-13 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-16 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 24-14 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 22-13 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-5 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 88.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 23-14 against the money line (+11.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-13 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 23-12 against the money line (+15.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 24-14 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 21-14 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 15-11 against the money line (+18.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 82.7, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 17-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 17-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 16-17 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 17-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 17-17 against the money line (+13.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 17-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 12-9 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 17-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 17-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 16-8 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-8 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 16-8 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 82.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-7 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in June games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-11 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 16-5 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in road games after a division game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 14-6 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 42-17 against the money line (+18.1 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-4 against the money line (+8.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+7.8 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+7.2 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) off a home loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-1 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 89.6, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-4 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 17-9 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-4 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 6-14 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 79.9, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 5-13 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 3-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.2, OPPONENT 88.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 169-218 against the money line (-67.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 137-176 against the money line (-58.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-17 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 8-4 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in June games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 82.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 288-279 against the money line (+26.3 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 77-46 against the money line (+18.8 Units) in home games on Sunday games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 13-11 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 11-11 against the money line (+14.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.7, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+9.3 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 81.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 10-8 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 81.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 14-12 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 81.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 11-9 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 83.5, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 15-12 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 222-195 against the money line (+27.9 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 8-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 84.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 12-10 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 80.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 3-3 | +1.3 | 5-1 | 1-5 | 76.0 | 39.3 | 41.1% | 46.8 | 75.7 | 37.0 | 40.1% | 41.8 | Road Games | 2-1 | +2.3 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 72.3 | 36.7 | 38.4% | 46.0 | 72.7 | 34.0 | 39.2% | 45.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.4 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 75.8 | 38.4 | 40.7% | 48.6 | 77.6 | 39.0 | 41.4% | 40.6 | Division Games | 0-3 | -3 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 70.0 | 34.0 | 39.2% | 46.7 | 77.0 | 38.3 | 41.9% | 41.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.0 | 39.3 | 29-71 | 41.1% | 7-20 | 37.3% | 10-13 | 76.5% | 47 | 9 | 20 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 40.9 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 8-23 | 33.3% | 16-19 | 83.1% | 44 | 9 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.3 | 36.7 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 9-12 | 77.8% | 46 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.7 | 37.0 | 27-67 | 40.1% | 7-21 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 80.5% | 42 | 6 | 18 | 14 | 7 | 14 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 81 | 40.9 | 28-67 | 42.2% | 8-24 | 33.5% | 16-19 | 84.7% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.7 | 34.0 | 25-63 | 39.2% | 5-18 | 30.2% | 18-23 | 78.3% | 45 | 7 | 16 | 13 | 7 | 16 | 8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 4-1 | +2.6 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 79.6 | 40.2 | 45.0% | 41.4 | 74.4 | 38.8 | 39.4% | 42.6 | Home Games | 2-0 | +1 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 85.5 | 47.0 | 47.8% | 43.0 | 69.0 | 36.5 | 35.3% | 43.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.6 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 79.6 | 40.2 | 45.0% | 41.4 | 74.4 | 38.8 | 39.4% | 42.6 | Division Games | 3-1 | +0.6 | 2-2 | 1-3 | 78.0 | 38.7 | 44.1% | 42.2 | 73.5 | 38.7 | 39.7% | 42.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.6 | 40.2 | 29-65 | 45.0% | 10-26 | 36.4% | 11-14 | 82.4% | 41 | 6 | 23 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.9 | 39.7 | 28-67 | 42.3% | 8-22 | 33.9% | 17-21 | 80.3% | 44 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.5 | 47.0 | 32-68 | 47.8% | 11-25 | 45.1% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 43 | 9 | 26 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.4 | 38.8 | 28-70 | 39.4% | 7-21 | 35.0% | 12-15 | 78.9% | 43 | 9 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 77.3 | 37.5 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 7-22 | 32.4% | 14-18 | 78.0% | 44 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 69.0 | 36.5 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 6-21 | 30.2% | 14-18 | 78.4% | 43 | 11 | 12 | 15 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 72.8, NEW YORK 67.8 |
| | |
|
|
5/19/2023 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-66 | W | +175 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 38 | 12 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 48 | 20 | 5/21/2023 | @ PHOENIX | 75-69 | W | +155 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 48 | 11 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 39 | 18 | 5/26/2023 | WASHINGTON | 69-71 | L | +175 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 43 | 21 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 41 | 15 | 5/28/2023 | DALLAS | 94-88 | W | -140 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 55 | 16 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 40 | 10 | 5/30/2023 | @ ATLANTA | 65-83 | L | +145 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 52 | 15 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 48 | 9 | 6/2/2023 | NEW YORK | 76-77 | L | +375 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 45 | 13 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 35 | 11 | 6/4/2023 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/6/2023 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/9/2023 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/11/2023 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/15/2023 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/18/2023 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/19/2023 | @ WASHINGTON | 64-80 | L | -140 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 48 | 20 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 38 | 12 | 5/21/2023 | INDIANA | 90-73 | W | | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 17 | 26-73 | 35.6% | 45 | 15 | 5/27/2023 | CONNECTICUT | 81-65 | W | -270 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 43 | 13 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 42 | 14 | 5/30/2023 | @ SEATTLE | 86-78 | W | +200 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 38 | 13 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 43 | 7 | 6/2/2023 | @ CHICAGO | 77-76 | W | -550 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 35 | 11 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 45 | 13 | 6/4/2023 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/7/2023 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/9/2023 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/11/2023 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/13/2023 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/18/2023 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
NEW YORK is 30-34 (-3.8 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 4-7 (+1.1 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
CHICAGO is 16-15 (+5.9 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK since 1997 |
| |
CHICAGO is 4-1 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/2/2023 | NEW YORK | 77 | -10 | SU Under | 35 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 35 | 3 | 11 | | CHICAGO | 76 | 158.5 | ATS | 43 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 5-7 | 71.4% | 45 | 10 | 13 | 8/23/2022 | CHICAGO | 90 | -7 | SU ATS | 54 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 8-27 | 29.6% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 43 | 8 | 7 | | NEW YORK | 72 | 167 | Under | 42 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 5-6 | 83.3% | 39 | 5 | 14 | 8/20/2022 | NEW YORK | 62 | 169.5 | Under | 28 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 3-20 | 15.0% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 34 | 3 | 19 | | CHICAGO | 100 | -9 | SU ATS | 52 | 40-78 | 51.3% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 14-14 | 100.0% | 46 | 10 | 10 | 8/17/2022 | NEW YORK | 98 | 167.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 11-25 | 44.0% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 38 | 6 | 8 | | CHICAGO | 91 | -10 | Over | 45 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 7-25 | 28.0% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 45 | 8 | 10 | 7/29/2022 | NEW YORK | 81 | 166 | | 46 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 7-26 | 26.9% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 39 | 7 | 18 | | CHICAGO | 89 | -8 | SU Over | 44 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 22-27 | 81.5% | 42 | 8 | 13 | 7/23/2022 | CHICAGO | 80 | -4 | Under | 39 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 3-24 | 12.5% | 23-29 | 79.3% | 45 | 12 | 8 | | NEW YORK | 83 | 164 | SU ATS | 37 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 49 | 11 | 19 | 6/12/2022 | CHICAGO | 88 | -7 | SU Over | 44 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 45 | 12 | 12 | | NEW YORK | 86 | 159 | ATS | 45 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 11-23 | 47.8% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 33 | 2 | 14 | 5/11/2022 | NEW YORK | 50 | 165 | Under | 17 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 36 | 6 | 14 | | CHICAGO | 83 | -5 | SU ATS | 36 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 10-22 | 45.5% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 44 | 7 | 7 |
|
| | |
|
Wade is 29-30 against the money line (+17.4 Units) as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.3, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 37-26 against the money line (+18.5 Units) in road games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 37-26 against the money line (+18.5 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 37-26 against the money line (+18.5 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 23-12 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in June games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 25-17 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in road games in May, June, or July games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 82.4, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 27-12 against the money line (+10.7 Units) on Sunday games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 31-17 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games after a division game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 48-24 against the money line (+20.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 59-29 against the money line (+22.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 42-23 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 22-12 against the money line (+11.5 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 17-9 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 39-25 against the money line (+14.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 36-23 against the money line (+12.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 26-17 against the money line (+10.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 18-12 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.7, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 27-19 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 9-4 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in road games after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 40-32 against the money line (+16.6 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 8-5 against the money line (+9.8 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.0, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 17-12 against the money line (+10.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.0, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 39-30 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 34-25 against the money line (+11.3 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 22-11 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 87.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 26-15 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 87.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 41-29 against the money line (+14.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 30-22 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 84.4, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 58-46 against the money line (-34.3 Units) in home games in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 18-22 against the money line (-21.0 Units) in home games after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 61-53 against the money line (-32.8 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 56-51 against the money line (-34.0 Units) in home games after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.8, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 81-92 against the money line (-42.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.3, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 42-40 against the money line (-31.1 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.0, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 49-40 against the money line (-30.4 Units) in home games after playing a road game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Wade is 6-10 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO. The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 55-30 against the money line (+27.8 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 83.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 8-4 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in June games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 82.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 13-11 against the money line (+11.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.4, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 11-11 against the money line (+14.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.7, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 71-44 against the money line (+20.0 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 50-27 against the money line (+23.7 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 83.2, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 7-2 against the money line (+9.3 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 81.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 37-19 against the money line (+20.0 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 28-13 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 81.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 10-8 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 81.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 25-11 against the money line (+14.3 Units) off a no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 80.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 14-12 against the money line (+11.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 81.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 11-9 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 83.5, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 113-80 against the money line (+21.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 83.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 15-12 against the money line (+10.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.9, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 122-74 against the money line (+32.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 83.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 95-55 against the money line (+37.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 83.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 75-40 against the money line (+34.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 84.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 56-30 against the money line (+26.5 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 84.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 48-22 against the money line (+24.0 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 83.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Brondello is 31-15 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 82.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 8-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 84.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 12-10 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 15-11 against the money line (+18.4 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 82.7, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Brondello is 17-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 17-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 16-17 against the money line (+13.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 17-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 17-17 against the money line (+13.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Brondello is 17-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 117-76 against the money line (+26.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 83.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 12-9 against the money line (+9.7 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 83.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 17-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 17-18 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Brondello is 80-41 against the money line (+24.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Brondello 83.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 21 times, while the road underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 1 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 08/16/2022 - Li Yueru is out indefinitely ( Personal ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/28/2024 3:14:11 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|