| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO
NEW YORK |
|
|
164.5
| 91
Final
83 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 643 | CHICAGO | +105 | | 644 | NEW YORK | -125 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(278-94 since 1997.) (74.7%, +79.9 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(273-90 since 1997.) (75.2%, +79.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(94-47 since 1997.) (66.7%, +42 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(94-47 since 1997.) (66.7%, +42 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after going under the total by more than 30 points in their previous game, with a winning record on the season.
(30-15 since 1997.) (66.7%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(71-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (64%, +36.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(78-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +37.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(88-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +43 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(84-92 over the last 5 seasons.) (47.7%, +56.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
|
- Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(90-48 since 1997.) (65.2%, +44 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(112-62 since 1997.) (64.4%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(124-83 since 1997.) (59.9%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(103-61 since 1997.) (62.8%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(110-70 since 1997.) (61.1%, +42.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 75 points or more.
(114-72 since 1997.) (61.3%, +42.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more.
(90-52 since 1997.) (63.4%, +39.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(99-62 since 1997.) (61.5%, +39.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(74-40 since 1997.) (64.9%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(82-48 since 1997.) (63.1%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more.
(70-38 since 1997.) (64.8%, +34 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(69-33 since 1997.) (67.6%, +33.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(54-21 since 1997.) (72%, +31.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games.
(40-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after going over the total by more than 24 points in their previous game, with a losing record.
(69-45 since 1997.) (60.5%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season.
(48-19 since 1997.) (71.6%, +29.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(34-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (68%, +18.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games.
(46-18 since 1997.) (71.9%, +27 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(46-21 since 1997.) (68.7%, +26.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(24-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.4%, +17.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(45-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game.
(38-16 since 1997.) (70.4%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(27-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +18.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential) against a poor team (-3 to -7 PPG differential), after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(24-7 since 1997.) (77.4%, +17.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(24-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (80%, +18.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(23-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +18.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher against opponent after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(62-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +30.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(32-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(27-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +19.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +17.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(27-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(30-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(29-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.5%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in June games.
(31-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +18.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent 3 point shooting team - making >=36% of their attempts, in June games.
(26-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +22.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(114-86 over the last 5 seasons.) (57%, +32.8 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | 80 | | 31-72 | 42.9% | 8-21 | 36.4% | 10-12 | 83.0% | 47 | 14 | 16 | | NEW YORK | 79 | | 29-71 | 40.8% | 6-21 | 26.8% | 15-19 | 82.9% | 45 | 14 | 13 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 503 times, while NEW YORK won 468 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 7-6 against the money line (+11.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.6, OPPONENT 89.7 | CHICAGO is 37-29 against the money line (+20.8 Units) when their opponents make 22% to 28% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 75.8 | CHICAGO is 9-7 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in road games when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.3, OPPONENT 87.5 | CHICAGO is 13-14 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 87.6 | CHICAGO is 13-13 against the money line (+15.0 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 88.0 | CHICAGO is 44-35 against the money line (+17.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.0, OPPONENT 78.5 | CHICAGO is 15-10 against the money line (+16.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.4, OPPONENT 90.5 | NEW YORK is 5-14 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.6, OPPONENT 83.8 | NEW YORK is 3-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.8, OPPONENT 84.3 | NEW YORK is 35-76 against the money line (-49.1 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 66.3, OPPONENT 71.1 | NEW YORK is 0-6 against the money line (-7.9 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.5, OPPONENT 90.2 | NEW YORK is 2-10 against the money line (-11.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.4, OPPONENT 79.8 | NEW YORK is 6-27 against the money line (-21.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.7, OPPONENT 87.3 | NEW YORK is 6-20 against the money line (-16.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.1, OPPONENT 85.0 |
|
CHICAGO is 126-178 against the money line (-61.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 81.6 | CHICAGO is 50-79 against the money line (-38.2 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 79.1 | CHICAGO is 43-79 against the money line (-32.1 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.0, OPPONENT 78.6 | CHICAGO is 35-66 against the money line (-33.0 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.6, OPPONENT 80.6 | CHICAGO is 39-56 against the money line (-34.9 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 79.2 | CHICAGO is 26-54 against the money line (-27.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 80.3 | CHICAGO is 67-183 against the money line (-133.8 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 87.7 | CHICAGO is 82-136 against the money line (-58.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 80.1 | NEW YORK is 8-0 against the money line (+9.7 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 87.1, OPPONENT 72.5 | NEW YORK is 125-94 against the money line (+45.1 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.3, OPPONENT 73.3 | NEW YORK is 91-76 against the money line (+19.8 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.9, OPPONENT 72.6 | NEW YORK is 135-130 against the money line (+25.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.7, OPPONENT 82.1 | NEW YORK is 82-29 against the money line (+61.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 74.4 | NEW YORK is 25-15 against the money line (+16.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.5, OPPONENT 83.5 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 15-20 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-16 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-12 against the money line (+13.9 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.6, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 11-10 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.3, OPPONENT 90.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 14-15 against the money line (+14.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-16 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 88.5 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-15 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.5, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-15 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 5-19 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.7, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 8-23 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.2, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 5-16 against the money line (-14.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.6, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 3-11 against the money line (-10.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 7-23 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.3, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 3-9 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.4, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 8-23 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.2, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 4-23 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.0, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 89-96 against the money line (-50.2 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 77-119 against the money line (-51.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 91-150 against the money line (-58.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.4, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 95-152 against the money line (-52.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 31-73 against the money line (-46.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 23-34 against the money line (+17.9 Units) as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 87.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-5 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-8 against the money line (+13.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.8, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 12-12 against the money line (+16.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.1, OPPONENT 88.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 11-10 against the money line (+14.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.7, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 9-8 against the money line (+14.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.9, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-16 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.8, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-13 against the money line (+14.4 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-10 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 89.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-7 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 90.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 8-7 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 88.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-3 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.4, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 10-29 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-15 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-15 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-15 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 1-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.1, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 1-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 14-24 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.5, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) in home games after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 3-9 against the money line (-12.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.8, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 69-77 against the money line (-34.5 Units) after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 68.6, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 39-57 against the money line (-36.7 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-31 against the money line (-26.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 39-51 against the money line (-25.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-26 against the money line (-27.4 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 46-27 against the money line (+23.2 Units) on Wednesday since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.1, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 137-129 against the money line (+22.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 98-96 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 53-49 against the money line (+22.1 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 10-1 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in home games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 6*) | NEW YORK is 193-185 against the money line (+25.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 105-93 against the money line (+36.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 61-56 against the money line (+28.4 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 37-36 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 153-136 against the money line (+22.5 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.4, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 14-5 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in home games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 4-2 | +3 | 4-2 | 1-5 | 78.2 | 41.2 | 43.4% | 44.8 | 80.2 | 42.2 | 41.0% | 45.0 | | Road Games | 1-2 | -0.6 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 75.3 | 37.3 | 40.8% | 42.3 | 85.3 | 44.0 | 42.7% | 50.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 79.6 | 41.4 | 44.0% | 46.4 | 78.4 | 41.4 | 40.5% | 43.0 | | Division Games | 1-1 | +0.4 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 77.5 | 36.0 | 41.2% | 45.0 | 83.5 | 43.0 | 42.1% | 48.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 78.2 | 41.2 | 30-70 | 43.4% | 7-20 | 36.4% | 10-12 | 83.1% | 45 | 9 | 21 | 16 | 7 | 16 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 76.2 | 37.6 | 29-67 | 43.1% | 7-19 | 36.0% | 11-14 | 80.6% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.3 | 37.3 | 28-69 | 40.8% | 6-18 | 31.5% | 14-16 | 83.7% | 42 | 10 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.2 | 42.2 | 30-74 | 41.0% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 13-17 | 76.0% | 45 | 12 | 18 | 14 | 10 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.4 | 39.3 | 29-67 | 43.4% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 13-16 | 81.9% | 40 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 85.3 | 44.0 | 33-77 | 42.7% | 7-23 | 31.9% | 12-17 | 69.2% | 51 | 15 | 20 | 16 | 9 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 3-5 | +4.7 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 80.1 | 38.4 | 40.6% | 44.0 | 85.5 | 43.9 | 43.4% | 46.5 | | Home Games | 2-3 | +2.2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 80.2 | 39.8 | 42.1% | 47.4 | 80.0 | 38.0 | 39.2% | 45.0 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +8.4 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 82.2 | 42.2 | 42.1% | 41.4 | 86.6 | 46.2 | 43.9% | 46.2 | | Division Games | 0-3 | -3.6 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 80.7 | 37.0 | 40.1% | 45.7 | 89.0 | 44.7 | 46.3% | 42.3 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.1 | 38.4 | 29-71 | 40.6% | 6-21 | 28.8% | 16-20 | 82.3% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 9 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.6 | 37.4 | 28-70 | 40.4% | 6-20 | 32.4% | 15-18 | 80.8% | 43 | 10 | 18 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.2 | 39.8 | 30-71 | 42.1% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 14-17 | 82.6% | 47 | 10 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 85.5 | 43.9 | 31-71 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 17-21 | 80.1% | 46 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 80.4 | 40.2 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 7-19 | 34.8% | 14-17 | 80.8% | 44 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 80.0 | 38.0 | 28-72 | 39.2% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 80.2% | 45 | 11 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 73.3, NEW YORK 71.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/25/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | 71-89 | L | +155 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 37 | 15 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 55 | 20 | | 6/1/2019 | SEATTLE | 83-79 | W | -140 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 42 | 19 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 43 | 13 | | 6/5/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | 85-103 | L | +550 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 37 | 17 | 43-86 | 50.0% | 47 | 11 | | 6/9/2019 | SEATTLE | 78-71 | W | +105 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 56 | 20 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 34 | 11 | | 6/11/2019 | PHOENIX | 82-75 | W | +155 | 32-73 | 43.8% | 44 | 14 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 41 | 13 | | 6/15/2019 | @ INDIANA | 70-64 | W | +145 | 22-68 | 32.4% | 53 | 10 | 26-78 | 33.3% | 50 | 10 | | 6/19/2019 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/21/2019 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/23/2019 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2019 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2019 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/24/2019 | INDIANA | 80-81 | L | -165 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 46 | 16 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 48 | 9 | | 6/1/2019 | @ INDIANA | 77-92 | L | +135 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 49 | 16 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 43 | 15 | | 6/4/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 73-78 | L | +170 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 50 | 16 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 50 | 12 | | 6/7/2019 | WASHINGTON | 85-94 | L | +350 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 42 | 17 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 36 | 7 | | 6/9/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 88-78 | W | +450 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 55 | 9 | 28-79 | 35.4% | 54 | 12 | | 6/12/2019 | MINNESOTA | 75-69 | W | +135 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 44 | 17 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 37 | 21 | | 6/14/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 65-100 | L | +650 | 22-68 | 32.4% | 27 | 15 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 57 | 19 | | 6/15/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | 98-92 | W | +450 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 39 | 9 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 47 | 14 | | 6/19/2019 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/22/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/28/2019 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2019 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2019 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/5/2019 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| NEW YORK is 26-24 (-1.6 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 3-4 (+1.2 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| CHICAGO is 11-14 (+2.6 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK since 1997 |
| |
| CHICAGO is 2-2 (+1.7 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/15/2018 | CHICAGO | 84 | 163.5 | Over | 47 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 28 | 8 | 17 | | | NEW YORK | 107 | -5 | SU ATS | 53 | 41-67 | 61.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 20-26 | 76.9% | 44 | 11 | 14 | 7/1/2018 | NEW YORK | 97 | 165.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 29-37 | 78.4% | 47 | 11 | 13 | | | CHICAGO | 94 | -3 | Over | 45 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 12-30 | 40.0% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 48 | 6 | 15 | 6/29/2018 | CHICAGO | 103 | 162 | SU ATS | 52 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 11-21 | 52.4% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 34 | 5 | 13 | | | NEW YORK | 99 | -3.5 | Over | 55 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 38 | 13 | 11 | 5/20/2018 | NEW YORK | 76 | -6.5 | Over | 40 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 9-25 | 36.0% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 38 | 8 | 8 | | | CHICAGO | 80 | 154 | SU ATS | 38 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 6-13 | 46.2% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 49 | 9 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Smith is 10-29 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in all games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.7, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 6-15 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in home games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 6-15 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 6-15 against the money line (-11.4 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 1-9 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.1, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Smith is 1-8 against the money line (-8.1 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Smith is 2-8 against the money line (-7.1 Units) in home games after playing a road game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.0, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Smith is 5-19 against the money line (-13.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.7, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Smith is 8-23 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.2, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 5-16 against the money line (-14.1 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.6, OPPONENT 88.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Smith is 3-11 against the money line (-10.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Smith is 7-23 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.3, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 3-9 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in home games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.4, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Smith is 8-23 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.2, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Smith is 4-23 against the money line (-18.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.0, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 144 times, while the road underdog won straight up 115 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 8 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 06/19/2019 - Chloe Jackson is downgraded to OUT Wednesday vs NY Liberty ( Ankle ) | | [C] 06/11/2019 - Astou Ndour is out indefinitely ( Personal ) | | [G] 06/11/2019 - Jamierra Faulkner is out indefinitely ( Knee ) | | [FW] 06/11/2019 - Katie Lou Samuelson is out indefinitely ( Hand ) | |
| [G] 06/12/2019 - Bria Hartley is out indefinitely ( Personal ) | | [G] 06/12/2019 - Rebecca Allen is out indefinitely ( Hand ) | | [C] 05/24/2019 - Kiah Stokes is out indefinitely ( Personal ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/17/2024 12:35:28 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|