| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
MINNESOTA
NEW YORK |
|
|
156.5
| 61
Final
70 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 669 | MINNESOTA | -220 | | 670 | NEW YORK | +180 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Sunday games.
(93-43 since 1997.) (68.4%, +41.2 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, on Sunday games.
(60-23 since 1997.) (72.3%, +35 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in non-conference games.
(31-22 since 1997.) (58.5%, +29.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 55 points or less.
(48-25 since 1997.) (65.8%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +17.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games.
(22-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +24.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off an home win scoring 85 or more points against opponent off a road win.
(19-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +11.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG).
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +24.6 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(218-72 since 1997.) (75.2%, +79 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(376-163 since 1997.) (69.8%, +77.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(193-46 since 1997.) (80.8%, +72.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(163-44 since 1997.) (78.7%, +70.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(150-29 since 1997.) (83.8%, +69.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(118-29 since 1997.) (80.3%, +62.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(96-21 since 1997.) (82.1%, +55.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 80 points or more.
(113-28 since 1997.) (80.1%, +55.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(110-29 since 1997.) (79.1%, +55.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(122-84 since 1997.) (59.2%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(175-64 since 1997.) (73.2%, +50.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(92-22 since 1997.) (80.7%, +48.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, in August or September games.
(45-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +36 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(180-108 since 1997.) (62.5%, +40.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(105-44 since 1997.) (70.5%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(140-54 since 1997.) (72.2%, +36.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(84-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.2%, +34.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(102-46 since 1997.) (68.9%, +31.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(26-4 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.7%, +21.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(69-43 since 1997.) (61.6%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +21.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(52-28 since 1997.) (65%, +25.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(40-15 since 1997.) (72.7%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(54-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.6%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games.
(58-44 since 1997.) (56.9%, +22.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half.
(28-10 since 1997.) (73.7%, +21.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(35-20 since 1997.) (63.6%, +19.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(47-32 since 1997.) (59.5%, +19.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games.
(34-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +15.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(38-13 since 1997.) (74.5%, +18.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(41-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.8%, +23.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games.
(35-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.8%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(32-17 since 1997.) (65.3%, +15.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(32-9 since 1997.) (78%, +15.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(54-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +32.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games.
(25-16 since 1997.) (61%, +14 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after beating the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games against opponent after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games.
(37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +14.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(47-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +29.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(35-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.4%, +14.4 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(42-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +14.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after beating the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(27-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.8%, +17.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(54-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +28.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| MINNESOTA | 81 | | 31-69 | 44.3% | 6-16 | 36.3% | 14-18 | 80.7% | 43 | 11 | 12 | | NEW YORK | 78 | | 29-70 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 13-17 | 78.0% | 45 | 13 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 588 times, while NEW YORK won 375 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
MINNESOTA is 210-67 against the money line (+101.5 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 87.2, OPPONENT 78.6 | NEW YORK is 70-95 against the money line (-39.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.7, OPPONENT 72.0 | NEW YORK is 4-8 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in home games when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 80.3 | NEW YORK is 6-10 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.0, OPPONENT 86.9 |
|
MINNESOTA is 74-93 against the money line (-44.3 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 74.2 | MINNESOTA is 7-5 against the money line (-25.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 79.4 | MINNESOTA is 111-103 against the money line (-47.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 74.4 | MINNESOTA is 43-56 against the money line (-39.0 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 79.7 | MINNESOTA is 18-10 against the money line (-31.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 88.8, OPPONENT 85.9 | MINNESOTA is 12-9 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 78.2 | NEW YORK is 46-26 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.3, OPPONENT 77.9 | NEW YORK is 17-10 against the money line (+12.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.8, OPPONENT 78.2 | NEW YORK is 13-2 against the money line (+15.4 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 86.9, OPPONENT 81.8 | NEW YORK is 14-8 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.5, OPPONENT 81.3 | NEW YORK is 85-61 against the money line (+28.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.5, OPPONENT 71.7 | NEW YORK is 86-69 against the money line (+22.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.5, OPPONENT 72.1 | NEW YORK is 125-109 against the money line (+30.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.6, OPPONENT 81.5 | NEW YORK is 77-23 against the money line (+61.3 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 73.6 | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in home games when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 88.6, OPPONENT 77.6 |
|
| | |
|
NEW YORK is 9-11 against the money line (-13.6 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 16-14 against the money line (-19.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.6, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 30-19 against the money line (-25.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 24-11 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 51-26 against the money line (-30.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 116-112 against the money line (-46.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 1-3 against the money line (-14.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 2-4 against the money line (-18.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 21-10 against the money line (-24.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 48-26 against the money line (-31.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-6 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 16-14 against the money line (-18.8 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 46-59 against the money line (-36.5 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-16 against the money line (-13.6 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-22 against the money line (-16.6 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 9-7 against the money line (-22.6 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-6 against the money line (-23.5 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 24-11 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 174-159 against the money line (-58.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-8 against the money line (-18.4 Units) in road games versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 80-70 against the money line (-40.3 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 11-4 against the money line (+8.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.1, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 17-9 against the money line (+10.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 38-21 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 9-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.8, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 124-105 against the money line (+22.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 50-28 against the money line (+14.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.6, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 9-5 against the money line (+11.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 54-41 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.7, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 28-19 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 17-12 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 44-28 against the money line (+14.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the money line (+7.6 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 82-38 against the money line (+32.6 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) after a game - shooting 50% or higher, allowing 35% or lower since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) after 2 straight games with 11 or more offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 60-25 against the money line (+19.2 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 78-34 against the money line (+22.1 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 6-16 against the money line (-15.5 Units) after a game with 55 or more rebounds since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 19-23 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.8, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 2-11 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after a game where they had 2 or less steals since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 69.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 39-52 against the money line (-27.7 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 8-11 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in road games in August or September games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 14-11 against the money line (-19.2 Units) on Sunday games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 29-15 against the money line (-31.9 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 29-15 against the money line (-31.9 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 47-76 against the money line (-31.0 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-7 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in road games after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in home games on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 85.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 28-18 against the money line (+10.2 Units) against Western conference opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 13-6 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season.
The average score was NEW YORK 83.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 28-18 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in non-conference games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 14-6 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 79.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 13-8 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.2, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 11-5 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 82.9, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 131-121 against the money line (+35.7 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.4, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 13-6 against the money line (+8.6 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 81.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 25-14 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in home games revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 117-97 against the money line (+23.0 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.4, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 122-99 against the money line (+19.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 84-56 against the money line (+21.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 61-36 against the money line (+22.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 45-25 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 45-26 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 80.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 8-4 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was NEW YORK 84.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 183-168 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.7, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 98-81 against the money line (+32.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.8, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 54-49 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 149-127 against the money line (+23.9 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 71.9, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 195-155 against the money line (+31.4 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was NEW YORK 72.1, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 22-5 | -4.7 | 14-13 | 13-13 | 85.3 | 45.3 | 47.2% | 43.2 | 74.4 | 36.9 | 42.0% | 38.5 | | Road Games | 10-3 | -3.5 | 9-4 | 7-5 | 86.1 | 46.6 | 47.1% | 43.4 | 77.1 | 38.2 | 43.5% | 37.2 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -14.7 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 79.8 | 44.4 | 45.0% | 46.0 | 68.0 | 34.6 | 39.2% | 36.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.3 | 45.3 | 32-68 | 47.2% | 6-16 | 35.9% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 43 | 10 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.6 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 86.1 | 46.6 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 6-16 | 37.1% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 43 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.4 | 36.9 | 28-67 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 12-16 | 79.8% | 38 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.1 | 38.2 | 29-66 | 43.5% | 5-17 | 31.4% | 14-17 | 82.2% | 37 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 16-12 | -1.2 | 14-14 | 14-13 | 80.0 | 41.2 | 42.4% | 47.9 | 79.1 | 40.7 | 41.2% | 40.4 | | Home Games | 9-4 | +3 | 7-6 | 6-6 | 82.5 | 41.8 | 43.2% | 48.5 | 77.2 | 38.2 | 40.5% | 39.5 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4.5 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 80.6 | 45.2 | 41.7% | 48.4 | 75.8 | 38.8 | 39.6% | 42.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.0 | 41.2 | 29-69 | 42.4% | 6-17 | 33.1% | 16-20 | 77.8% | 48 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.8 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 16-20 | 79.9% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.5 | 41.8 | 29-68 | 43.2% | 6-17 | 33.6% | 18-23 | 80.1% | 48 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.1 | 40.7 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 17-21 | 80.5% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 10 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 16-20 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 77.2 | 38.2 | 28-68 | 40.5% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 15-20 | 77.8% | 40 | 8 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 70.7, NEW YORK 72.1 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/14/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 88-71 | W | -270 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 39 | 13 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 40 | 14 | | 7/16/2017 | PHOENIX | 81-66 | W | | 26-62 | 41.9% | 38 | 11 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 42 | 15 | | 7/19/2017 | DALLAS | 100-74 | W | | 38-67 | 56.7% | 52 | 17 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 36 | 13 | | 7/25/2017 | NEW YORK | 76-75 | W | -750 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 36 | 10 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 46 | 11 | | 7/28/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 90-80 | W | -330 | 37-66 | 56.1% | 36 | 14 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 35 | 17 | | 7/30/2017 | SEATTLE | 93-82 | W | -850 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 45 | 10 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 33 | 11 | | 8/3/2017 | ATLANTA | 69-54 | W | -750 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 42 | 17 | 23-73 | 31.5% | 46 | 22 | | 8/6/2017 | @ INDIANA | 82-84 | L | -1050 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 19 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 38 | 19 | | 8/8/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 81-72 | W | -330 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 45 | 12 | 27-74 | 36.5% | 43 | 11 | | 8/11/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 64-70 | L | -220 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 41 | 16 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 38 | 15 | | 8/16/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 61-62 | L | -300 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 49 | 11 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 38 | 12 | | 8/18/2017 | INDIANA | 111-52 | W | | 42-71 | 59.2% | 50 | 12 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 27 | 19 | | 8/20/2017 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/22/2017 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/30/2017 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/14/2017 | CHICAGO | 68-78 | L | -300 | 27-77 | 35.1% | 58 | 10 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 39 | 7 | | 7/16/2017 | WASHINGTON | 85-55 | W | -270 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 55 | 11 | 18-65 | 27.7% | 40 | 11 | | 7/19/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 96-80 | W | +105 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 56 | 14 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 27 | 4 | | 7/25/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 75-76 | L | +500 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 46 | 11 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 36 | 10 | | 7/28/2017 | @ INDIANA | 85-84 | W | -250 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 50 | 15 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 24 | 10 | | 7/30/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 86-82 | W | -165 | 35-77 | 45.5% | 46 | 16 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 39 | 14 | | 8/1/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-93 | L | -500 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 37 | 14 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 42 | 13 | | 8/4/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 74-87 | L | +325 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 43 | 13 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 44 | 6 | | 8/8/2017 | INDIANA | 81-76 | W | -450 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 49 | 12 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 13 | | 8/11/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 83-77 | W | +120 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 44 | 11 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 48 | 10 | | 8/13/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 83-69 | W | +120 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 47 | 11 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 32 | 10 | | 8/18/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | 82-70 | W | +210 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 59 | 12 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 48 | 8 | | 8/20/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/23/2017 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2017 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2017 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/3/2017 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| NEW YORK is 18-16 (+4.8 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
| NEW YORK is 3-4 (+4.9 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| MINNESOTA is 10-7 (+7.6 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 2-1 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
7/25/2017 | NEW YORK | 75 | 165 | ATS | 37 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 46 | 10 | 11 | | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -11.5 | SU Under | 45 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 10-11 | 90.9% | 36 | 9 | 10 | 5/18/2017 | MINNESOTA | 90 | -5 | SU ATS | 43 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 50 | 6 | 11 | | | NEW YORK | 71 | 161 | | 40 | 24-68 | 35.3% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 43 | 8 | 11 | 7/15/2016 | NEW YORK | 70 | 157.5 | Over | 36 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 42 | 10 | 13 | | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 40 | 10 | 6 | 6/29/2016 | NEW YORK | 95 | 156.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 35-82 | 42.7% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 17-18 | 94.4% | 50 | 12 | 16 | | | MINNESOTA | 92 | -13 | Over | 43 | 34-80 | 42.5% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 46 | 10 | 17 | 5/31/2016 | MINNESOTA | 79 | -6 | SU ATS | 46 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 41 | 3 | 13 | | | NEW YORK | 69 | 153.5 | Under | 31 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 2-7 | 28.6% | 21-29 | 72.4% | 41 | 6 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Reeve is 194-85 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 39-13 against the money line (+23.8 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 68-12 against the money line (+43.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 5*) | Reeve is 94-32 against the money line (+27.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 51-10 against the money line (+23.3 Units) off an home win scoring 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 85.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 87-27 against the money line (+24.5 Units) off a home win as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 146-59 against the money line (+27.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 115-44 against the money line (+26.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 51-11 against the money line (+24.8 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 65-16 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 110-39 against the money line (+28.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 161-60 against the money line (+19.0 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 119-38 against the money line (+24.1 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 106-32 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 99-35 against the money line (+21.4 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 102-39 against the money line (+21.1 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 140-56 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 29-11 against the money line (+12.4 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 21-23 against the money line (-14.6 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 24-26 against the money line (-33.5 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 15-18 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after a game with 55 or more rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 24-27 against the money line (-14.9 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.2, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 9-13 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 29-45 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.5, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Reeve is 33-32 against the money line (-26.0 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 44-41 against the money line (-29.5 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 25-24 against the money line (-22.6 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 34-30 against the money line (-24.0 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 4-6 against the money line (-12.4 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 5-7 against the money line (-14.3 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 39-35 against the money line (-23.2 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 89-81 against the money line (+4.8 Units) in all games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 24-16 against the money line (+10.9 Units) on Sunday games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 56-42 against the money line (+15.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 17-9 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 36-24 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 29-16 against the money line (+14.7 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 24-11 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 78.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 37-18 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in home games double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.3, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 109-69 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 76-44 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 55-29 against the money line (+20.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 77.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 116-97 against the money line (+27.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 73-59 against the money line (+26.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.1, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 43-32 against the money line (+19.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 62-47 against the money line (+22.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 34-26 against the money line (+20.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 46-39 against the money line (+20.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 75.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 56-48 against the money line (+13.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 21-17 against the money line (+9.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 76.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 33-23 against the money line (+17.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 77.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 38-28 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 73.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 52-43 against the money line (+7.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 50-43 against the money line (+7.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 55-33 against the money line (+17.1 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 76.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 47-39 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 75.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 12-11 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK.
The average score was NEW YORK 74.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 53-49 against the money line (+21.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 74.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 84-57 against the money line (+26.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Lambeer 73.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 45 times, while the home underdog won straight up 28 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 13 times, while the home underdog won straight up 4 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [F] 08/18/2017 - Rebekkah Brunson out indefinitely ( Ankle ) | | [G] 08/03/2017 - Lindsay Whalen out indefinitely ( Hand ) | |
| [G] 05/19/2017 - Brittany Boyd out for season ( Achilles ) | | [G] 05/13/2017 - Shoni Schimmel out for season ( Personal ) | | [G] 05/13/2017 - Tanisha Wright out for season ( Personal ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/16/2024 10:20:26 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|