| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES NEW YORK |
|
| 157.5 | 69 Final 83 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
623 | LOS ANGELES | -125 | 624 | NEW YORK | +105 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, in August or September games. (46-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +30.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (96-66 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +52.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (146-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +59.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season. (49-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off an upset win as an underdog. (109-74 since 1997.) (59.6%, +37.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog. (21-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +16.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (27-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (118-59 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +46.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), dominant rebounding team (>=+6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +14.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - dominant rebounding team (>=+6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (23-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +14.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (98-56 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.6%, +26.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (32-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games against opponent hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games. (33-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +15.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games. (46-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +16.9 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (200-66 since 1997.) (75.2%, +71.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (198-73 since 1997.) (73.1%, +63 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (207-148 since 1997.) (58.3%, +59.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (162-106 since 1997.) (60.4%, +57.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (173-62 since 1997.) (73.6%, +52.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (75-43 since 1997.) (63.6%, +43.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (138-52 since 1997.) (72.6%, +39.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (69-48 since 1997.) (59%, +38.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (44-9 since 1997.) (83%, +30.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more. (69-39 since 1997.) (63.9%, +30.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a combined score of 155 points or more. (63-34 since 1997.) (64.9%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (42-8 since 1997.) (84%, +29.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (49-18 since 1997.) (73.1%, +28.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (56-28 since 1997.) (66.7%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (41-9 since 1997.) (82%, +27.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (31-2 since 1997.) (93.9%, +27.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (70-45 since 1997.) (60.9%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (46-25 since 1997.) (64.8%, +26.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (20-7 since 1997.) (74.1%, +25.8 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (52-29 since 1997.) (64.2%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (57-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.6%, +33.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better. (44-23 since 1997.) (65.7%, +22 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (41-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.1%, +29.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (29-12 since 1997.) (70.7%, +19.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (74-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.8%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - off an upset win as a road underdog, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (40-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.8%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 79 | | 29-66 | 44.4% | 6-17 | 34.4% | 15-18 | 82.4% | 38 | 7 | 11 | NEW YORK | 80 | | 29-69 | 42.8% | 6-17 | 32.1% | 15-19 | 78.5% | 48 | 13 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, NEW YORK won the game straight up 495 times, while LOS ANGELES won 473 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 17-3 against the money line (+13.1 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.5, OPPONENT 78.9 | LOS ANGELES is 48-10 against the money line (+24.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.0, OPPONENT 78.2 | NEW YORK is 69-95 against the money line (-42.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 69.6, OPPONENT 72.1 | NEW YORK is 1-5 against the money line (-6.8 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.8, OPPONENT 87.0 | NEW YORK is 4-8 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in home games when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 80.3 | NEW YORK is 6-10 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 82.0, OPPONENT 86.9 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 2-10 against the money line (-22.3 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 74.6 | LOS ANGELES is 44-55 against the money line (-28.5 Units) in road games when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 75.9 | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-16.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.7, OPPONENT 86.7 | LOS ANGELES is 112-106 against the money line (-55.4 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 74.8 | LOS ANGELES is 184-156 against the money line (-85.4 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 82.1 | LOS ANGELES is 4-5 against the money line (-13.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 77.2 | NEW YORK is 15-10 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 78.9 | NEW YORK is 12-2 against the money line (+14.2 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 87.2, OPPONENT 82.7 | NEW YORK is 85-61 against the money line (+28.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.5, OPPONENT 71.7 | NEW YORK is 20-9 against the money line (+10.8 Units) when they grab more than 47 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 82.4, OPPONENT 77.4 | NEW YORK is 125-109 against the money line (+30.1 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 81.6, OPPONENT 81.5 | NEW YORK is 76-23 against the money line (+59.2 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 79.8, OPPONENT 73.7 | NEW YORK is 31-8 against the money line (+21.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 86.8, OPPONENT 80.8 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 8-3 against the money line (+7.6 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-4 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 8-11 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 70-72 against the money line (-62.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 109-106 against the money line (-76.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 110-99 against the money line (-54.2 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 158-139 against the money line (-64.8 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 135-119 against the money line (-51.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 199-175 against the money line (-63.6 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 138-121 against the money line (-56.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-13 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-18 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-13 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in road games vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.7, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 131-103 against the money line (-59.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 190-149 against the money line (-75.6 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-16 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 183-181 against the money line (-69.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-11 against the money line (-18.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 98-76 against the money line (-61.6 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-1 against the money line (+5.8 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was NEW YORK 86.1, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 12-5 against the money line (+8.9 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 79.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 10-4 against the money line (+7.5 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was NEW YORK 82.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 16-9 against the money line (+9.2 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 79.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-2 against the money line (+5.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season. The average score was NEW YORK 83.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 122-105 against the money line (+19.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 195-157 against the money line (+34.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 33-22 against the money line (+13.9 Units) in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.4, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.0, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-1 against the money line (+14.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.3, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 7*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) off a road win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-3 against the money line (+12.4 Units) off a win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 3*) | NEW YORK is 3-8 against the money line (-8.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more this season. The average score was NEW YORK 76.6, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 0-6 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 76.5, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 4-8 against the money line (-13.8 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 78.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 1-4 against the money line (-8.0 Units) off a road win this season. The average score was NEW YORK 81.2, OPPONENT 87.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 7-15 against the money line (-13.7 Units) after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 65.9, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 5-8 against the money line (-10.5 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was NEW YORK 80.2, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 93-96 against the money line (-42.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 69.6, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 37-52 against the money line (-31.0 Units) after 5 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 69-82 against the money line (-35.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-26 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 93-81 against the money line (-54.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 139-104 against the money line (-75.5 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 113-75 against the money line (-52.5 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-16 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-13 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-11 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-11 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-8 against the money line (-13.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-14 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-10 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 69-33 against the money line (+21.8 Units) in home games on Sunday games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.5, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 150-129 against the money line (+22.8 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 12-6 against the money line (+6.6 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season. The average score was NEW YORK 83.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 150-129 against the money line (+22.8 Units) in non-conference games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.1, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 133-112 against the money line (+27.8 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.9, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 66-29 against the money line (+21.3 Units) in home games after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.2, OPPONENT 69.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 130-121 against the money line (+34.5 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.4, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) in home games double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 84.6, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 116-97 against the money line (+21.8 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.3, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 127-107 against the money line (+33.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 74.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 80-73 against the money line (+19.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 75.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 43-35 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 77.5, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 147-125 against the money line (+30.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 73.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 64-49 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 76.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 82-56 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 75.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 59-36 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 76.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 148-127 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.9, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 19-7 | -5.3 | 15-11 | 9-17 | 83.2 | 43.0 | 47.5% | 38.8 | 76.6 | 38.2 | 43.4% | 39.2 | Road Games | 7-6 | -6.8 | 7-6 | 6-7 | 82.2 | 41.3 | 47.8% | 36.5 | 80.4 | 38.4 | 44.9% | 40.8 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.1 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 83.2 | 41.6 | 47.3% | 40.2 | 74.0 | 39.6 | 39.7% | 40.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.2 | 43.0 | 31-65 | 47.5% | 5-16 | 33.9% | 16-20 | 81.9% | 39 | 7 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.8 | 41.8 | 30-68 | 44.5% | 6-17 | 34.0% | 16-20 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 82.2 | 41.3 | 31-64 | 47.8% | 5-16 | 33.8% | 16-19 | 82.7% | 36 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.6 | 38.2 | 28-65 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 14-18 | 79.5% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.9 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 17-21 | 80.6% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.4 | 38.4 | 30-66 | 44.9% | 6-16 | 37.8% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 41 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 14-12 | -4.4 | 12-14 | 14-11 | 79.8 | 40.9 | 42.4% | 47.5 | 79.8 | 40.9 | 41.5% | 40.4 | Home Games | 8-4 | +1.8 | 6-6 | 6-5 | 82.4 | 41.6 | 43.2% | 48.6 | 77.9 | 38.4 | 40.4% | 40.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -2.8 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 81.0 | 46.0 | 43.1% | 43.8 | 83.0 | 42.2 | 43.7% | 42.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.8 | 40.9 | 29-69 | 42.4% | 5-17 | 32.6% | 16-20 | 78.2% | 47 | 10 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 16-20 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.4 | 41.6 | 29-67 | 43.2% | 5-16 | 32.3% | 19-24 | 79.6% | 49 | 11 | 16 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.8 | 40.9 | 28-68 | 41.5% | 7-18 | 35.9% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 40 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 82.2 | 41.3 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 77.9 | 38.4 | 28-69 | 40.4% | 7-19 | 34.8% | 16-20 | 77.0% | 40 | 8 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.3, NEW YORK 71.8 |
| | |
|
|
7/6/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-88 | L | +210 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 32 | 17 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 46 | 15 | 7/8/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 69-81 | L | -220 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 36 | 11 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 36 | 18 | 7/13/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 87-77 | W | -300 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 44 | 15 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 45 | 18 | 7/17/2017 | INDIANA | 80-62 | W | | 34-64 | 53.1% | 41 | 12 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 27 | 16 | 7/20/2017 | CHICAGO | 80-82 | L | -850 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 35 | 11 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 38 | 12 | 7/25/2017 | SEATTLE | 68-60 | W | -450 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 48 | 11 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 37 | 18 | 7/28/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-73 | W | -650 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 33 | 8 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 33 | 12 | 7/30/2017 | DALLAS | 95-74 | W | -850 | 40-71 | 56.3% | 50 | 15 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 32 | 12 | 8/4/2017 | NEW YORK | 87-74 | W | -450 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 44 | 6 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 43 | 13 | 8/6/2017 | @ DALLAS | 79-85 | L | -270 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 36 | 15 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 54 | 15 | 8/11/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 70-64 | W | +180 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 38 | 15 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 41 | 16 | 8/13/2017 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2017 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/22/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/24/2017 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/6/2017 | @ SEATTLE | 79-70 | W | +155 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 51 | 11 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 40 | 14 | 7/9/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 69-81 | L | +175 | 28-79 | 35.4% | 46 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 46 | 17 | 7/14/2017 | CHICAGO | 68-78 | L | -300 | 27-77 | 35.1% | 58 | 10 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 39 | 7 | 7/16/2017 | WASHINGTON | 85-55 | W | -270 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 55 | 11 | 18-65 | 27.7% | 40 | 11 | 7/19/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 96-80 | W | +105 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 56 | 14 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 27 | 4 | 7/25/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 75-76 | L | +500 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 46 | 11 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 36 | 10 | 7/28/2017 | @ INDIANA | 85-84 | W | -250 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 50 | 15 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 24 | 10 | 7/30/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 86-82 | W | -165 | 35-77 | 45.5% | 46 | 16 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 39 | 14 | 8/1/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-93 | L | -500 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 37 | 14 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 42 | 13 | 8/4/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 74-87 | L | +325 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 43 | 13 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 44 | 6 | 8/8/2017 | INDIANA | 81-76 | W | -450 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 49 | 12 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 13 | 8/11/2017 | @ ATLANTA | 83-77 | W | +120 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 44 | 11 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 48 | 10 | 8/13/2017 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/18/2017 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/20/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/23/2017 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2017 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2017 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
NEW YORK is 21-24 (+3.1 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 5-2 (+2.8 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
NEW YORK is 12-11 (-0.1 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 2-1 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
8/4/2017 | NEW YORK | 74 | 158.5 | Over | 44 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 5-22 | 22.7% | 11-18 | 61.1% | 43 | 6 | 13 | | LOS ANGELES | 87 | -9 | SU ATS | 44 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 17-22 | 77.3% | 44 | 5 | 6 | 5/30/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 90 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 23-27 | 85.2% | 38 | 7 | 11 | | NEW YORK | 75 | 152.5 | Over | 38 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 39 | 11 | 18 | 7/3/2016 | NEW YORK | 67 | 160 | Under | 38 | 29-76 | 38.2% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 5-6 | 83.3% | 46 | 17 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 44 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 33 | 3 | 14 | 6/7/2016 | NEW YORK | 77 | 151 | Over | 38 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 20-22 | 90.9% | 37 | 7 | 17 | | LOS ANGELES | 100 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 51 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 41 | 10 | 9 | 5/21/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 79 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 34 | 31-88 | 35.2% | 5-21 | 23.8% | 12-14 | 85.7% | 57 | 10 | 11 | | NEW YORK | 72 | 158 | Under | 34 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 14-20 | 70.0% | 61 | 14 | 15 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 150-102 against the money line (+37.0 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 121-79 against the money line (+25.1 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.9, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-1 against the money line (+8.6 Units) off a road win against a division rival as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 22-8 against the money line (+13.8 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 67-45 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 72.9, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 176-134 against the money line (+28.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 126-63 against the money line (+37.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 78.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 26-31 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in August or September games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 73.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 30-45 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 74.2, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 0-6 against the money line (-15.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in a win over a division rival as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.5, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 23-27 against the money line (-16.1 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 74.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 4-9 against the money line (-16.5 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Lambeer is 16-20 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.5, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 26-33 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 75.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 7-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 75.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 37-44 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 74.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 18-21 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive wins as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 75.6, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 8-13 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 74.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 27-45 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 75.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Agler is 18-14 against the money line (-17.8 Units) as a road favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-18 against the money line (-13.7 Units) as a road favorite of -155 or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 69.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 26-27 against the money line (-17.3 Units) in road games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 26-26 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 3-7 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games on Sunday games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.7, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 13-28 against the money line (-17.5 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 70.9, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 10-10 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in road games after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 21-16 against the money line (-22.5 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 7-24 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games off an upset win as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 66.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 36-25 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 11-14 against the money line (-21.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 10-11 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 7-10 against the money line (-16.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 9-14 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 7-10 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 4-7 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 17-22 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 10-13 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 13-18 against the money line (-18.1 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 11-12 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 12-16 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 18-21 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 10-13 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 15-11 against the money line (-18.8 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 50-53 against the money line (-30.4 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 23-16 against the money line (+9.7 Units) on Sunday games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 55-42 against the money line (+14.7 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.4, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 36-18 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in home games double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.1, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 49-38 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 25-9 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 78.0, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 114-76 against the money line (+34.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 36-25 against the money line (+16.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 78.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 55-34 against the money line (+17.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 77.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 53-29 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 77.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 36-20 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 78.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 114-97 against the money line (+24.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 73.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 71-59 against the money line (+23.6 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 73.0, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 52-43 against the money line (+18.5 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 35-27 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 73.5, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 41-32 against the money line (+16.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 60-47 against the money line (+18.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 76.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 32-26 against the money line (+17.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 44-39 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 75.7, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 55-48 against the money line (+12.4 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 76.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 33-22 against the money line (+18.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 77.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Lambeer is 32-23 against the money line (+16.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 77.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 36-28 against the money line (+7.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of NEW YORK. The average score was NEW YORK 73.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 40-30 against the money line (+26.4 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.2, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Lambeer is 51-49 against the money line (+18.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 74.0, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Lambeer is 82-57 against the money line (+22.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Lambeer 73.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 84 times, while the home underdog won straight up 57 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home underdog won the game straight up 9 times, while the road favorite won the game straight up 7 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[F] 08/11/2017 - Essence Carson "?" Sunday vs New York Liberty ( Elbow ) | [G] 08/11/2017 - Riquna Williams "?" Sunday vs New York Liberty ( Knee ) | |
[G] 05/19/2017 - Brittany Boyd out for season ( Achilles ) | [G] 05/13/2017 - Shoni Schimmel out for season ( Personal ) | [G] 05/13/2017 - Tanisha Wright out for season ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/25/2024 6:29:11 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|