| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
INDIANA NEW YORK |
|
| 140 | 74 Final 53 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
651 | INDIANA | +105 | 652 | NEW YORK | -125 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders. (380-152 since 1997.) (71.4%, +93.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders. (80-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.6%, +43.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders. (214-70 since 1997.) (75.4%, +79.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders. (89-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +45 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders. (178-54 since 1997.) (76.7%, +69.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (159-49 since 1997.) (76.4%, +69 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (143-41 since 1997.) (77.7%, +65.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (166-69 since 1997.) (70.6%, +65.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (176-59 since 1997.) (74.9%, +63.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders. (192-86 since 1997.) (69.1%, +62.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (184-78 since 1997.) (70.2%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (161-52 since 1997.) (75.6%, +59.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (118-29 since 1997.) (80.3%, +59.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (90-15 since 1997.) (85.7%, +54.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (86-12 since 1997.) (87.8%, +52.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (149-80 since 1997.) (65.1%, +50.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (INDIANA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (82-19 since 1997.) (81.2%, +46.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (108-46 since 1997.) (70.1%, +44.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a losing team. (121-63 since 1997.) (65.8%, +42.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%), in July games. (64-22 since 1997.) (74.4%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (NEW YORK) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season. (76-39 since 1997.) (66.1%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%). (61-26 since 1997.) (70.1%, +30.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - an good offensive team (72-76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG), after leading in their previous game by 15 or more points at the half. (28-10 since 1997.) (73.7%, +18.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games. (230-235 since 1997.) (49.5%, +78.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games. (120-105 since 1997.) (53.3%, +53.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - after playing 2 consecutive home games, playing with 3 or more days rest. (91-82 since 1997.) (52.6%, +43.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (NEW YORK) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games. (41-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (NEW YORK) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Saturday games. (94-61 since 1997.) (60.6%, +39 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (INDIANA) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games. (69-62 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.7%, +42.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (INDIANA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (63-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +34.2 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA | 73 | | 27-68 | 40.4% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 12-15 | 80.9% | 41 | 11 | 14 | NEW YORK | 70 | | 28-66 | 41.9% | 4-13 | 31.9% | 11-14 | 78.3% | 46 | 12 | 18 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, INDIANA won the game straight up 558 times, while NEW YORK won 406 times. Edge against the money line=INDIANA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
INDIANA is 14-4 against the money line (+12.5 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.8, OPPONENT 71.1 | INDIANA is 65-42 against the money line (+20.2 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 73.2, OPPONENT 70.3 | INDIANA is 91-53 against the money line (+23.7 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 72.4, OPPONENT 68.7 | NEW YORK is 13-23 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.2, OPPONENT 78.9 | NEW YORK is 58-80 against the money line (-33.1 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 68.5, OPPONENT 71.1 | NEW YORK is 38-59 against the money line (-26.9 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.2, OPPONENT 74.3 | NEW YORK is 4-11 against the money line (-11.5 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 71.6, OPPONENT 75.9 |
|
INDIANA is 78-98 against the money line (-64.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 76.6, OPPONENT 76.5 | INDIANA is 0-4 against the money line (-7.6 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game this season. The average score was INDIANA 68.3, OPPONENT 79.0 | INDIANA is 7-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 75.4, OPPONENT 75.9 | NEW YORK is 16-9 against the money line (+10.4 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 74.2, OPPONENT 74.5 | NEW YORK is 59-26 against the money line (+19.2 Units) in home games in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.5, OPPONENT 68.2 | NEW YORK is 65-45 against the money line (+26.6 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.8, OPPONENT 69.8 | NEW YORK is 17-8 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 74.0, OPPONENT 71.2 |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 34-17 against the money line (+15.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 16-7 against the money line (+9.7 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 46-30 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 24-11 against the money line (+11.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 46-27 against the money line (+17.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 71-56 against the money line (+16.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was INDIANA 71.0, OPPONENT 69.4 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 5-13 against the money line (-9.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 72.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
NEW YORK is 51-16 against the money line (+31.5 Units) versus poor passing teams, averaging <14 assists/game since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.0, OPPONENT 64.7 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
INDIANA is 18-8 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 78.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 11-6 against the money line (+8.2 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 79.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | INDIANA is 14-4 against the money line (+13.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was INDIANA 77.2, OPPONENT 70.2 - (Rating = 4*) | NEW YORK is 4-13 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 72.9, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 6-12 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 72.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
INDIANA is 1-6 against the money line (-7.9 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was INDIANA 66.4, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 2-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season. The average score was INDIANA 66.3, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 2-7 against the money line (-7.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was INDIANA 67.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | INDIANA is 1-6 against the money line (-7.5 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread this season. The average score was INDIANA 65.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | INDIANA is 1-6 against the money line (-7.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses this season. The average score was INDIANA 65.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 68-50 against the money line (+20.6 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 72.3, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 96-73 against the money line (+37.4 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.2, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 53-43 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 71.4, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 1*) | NEW YORK is 10-2 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 73.0, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 2*) | NEW YORK is 34-30 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.4, OPPONENT 70.6 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 91-42 against the money line (+22.4 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was NEW YORK 70.0, OPPONENT 65.2 - (Rating = 0*) | NEW YORK is 10-1 against the money line (+10.9 Units) in home games after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was NEW YORK 77.4, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 4-8 | -7.6 | 4-8 | 2-10 | 68.7 | 35.6 | 39.0% | 38.5 | 71.5 | 34.3 | 44.4% | 41.2 | Road Games | 1-3 | -3.1 | 1-3 | 0-4 | 66.7 | 32.7 | 39.4% | 41.0 | 69.7 | 33.0 | 42.8% | 38.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 70.2 | 33.8 | 40.3% | 39.6 | 68.6 | 32.0 | 42.4% | 37.6 | Division Games | 1-6 | -7.8 | 1-6 | 1-6 | 66.4 | 36.7 | 37.3% | 38.3 | 73.0 | 34.1 | 46.1% | 42.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.7 | 35.6 | 25-64 | 39.0% | 5-15 | 35.2% | 13-17 | 79.2% | 38 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.5 | 39.1 | 29-68 | 42.3% | 5-14 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 78.6% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 66.7 | 32.7 | 25-65 | 39.4% | 4-14 | 26.8% | 12-15 | 78.7% | 41 | 10 | 13 | 21 | 11 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.5 | 34.3 | 27-60 | 44.4% | 4-13 | 31.8% | 14-18 | 78.4% | 41 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 16 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 77.2 | 38.3 | 29-68 | 42.3% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 77.3% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.7 | 33.0 | 24-55 | 42.8% | 4-13 | 33.3% | 18-23 | 77.2% | 38 | 7 | 13 | 16 | 9 | 17 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 6-7 | -0.4 | 7-6 | 5-7 | 73.5 | 34.4 | 42.6% | 46.8 | 77.2 | 37.7 | 39.8% | 43.2 | Home Games | 5-2 | +3 | 4-3 | 2-5 | 73.4 | 31.7 | 42.2% | 49.6 | 72.4 | 32.3 | 36.2% | 43.9 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.4 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 74.6 | 35.0 | 42.7% | 44.4 | 80.6 | 39.4 | 44.4% | 38.2 | Division Games | 3-4 | +0.8 | 3-4 | 2-4 | 70.3 | 33.4 | 39.7% | 47.4 | 77.0 | 38.9 | 39.3% | 44.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.5 | 34.4 | 29-67 | 42.6% | 4-12 | 36.1% | 12-16 | 74.5% | 47 | 11 | 16 | 17 | 6 | 18 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 76.5 | 38.5 | 29-67 | 42.8% | 4-13 | 33.8% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.4 | 31.7 | 29-68 | 42.2% | 4-12 | 29.8% | 12-17 | 72.5% | 50 | 12 | 15 | 17 | 7 | 18 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.2 | 37.7 | 29-72 | 39.8% | 6-20 | 30.2% | 14-17 | 78.3% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 76.7 | 38.7 | 29-68 | 42.2% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 78.4% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.4 | 32.3 | 26-72 | 36.2% | 6-20 | 31.9% | 14-17 | 80.0% | 44 | 12 | 14 | 18 | 11 | 14 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 70, NEW YORK 70.5 |
| | |
|
|
6/5/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 68-75 | L | -210 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 39 | 17 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 40 | 21 | 6/8/2013 | PHOENIX | 67-82 | L | -175 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 40 | 13 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 48 | 14 | 6/12/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 61-73 | L | -165 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 37 | 11 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 47 | 17 | 6/16/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 60-64 | L | +100 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 39 | 10 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 44 | 16 | 6/22/2013 | CHICAGO | 61-71 | L | +200 | 20-63 | 31.7% | 35 | 9 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 48 | 14 | 6/25/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 60-76 | L | +650 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 48 | 23 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 32 | 15 | 6/28/2013 | TULSA | 80-69 | W | -155 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 40 | 13 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 40 | 17 | 6/30/2013 | SEATTLE | 71-63 | W | -210 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 37 | 20 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 28 | 17 | 7/6/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 78-66 | W | -200 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 34 | 8 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 42 | 21 | 7/11/2013 | MINNESOTA | 62-69 | L | +155 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 39 | 15 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 46 | 8 | 7/13/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/19/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/21/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/23/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2013 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/5/2013 | INDIANA | 75-68 | W | +175 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 40 | 21 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 39 | 17 | 6/7/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 56-75 | L | +450 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 40 | 19 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 53 | 13 | 6/9/2013 | ATLANTA | 76-67 | W | +200 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 49 | 15 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 43 | 18 | 6/14/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 78-68 | W | -110 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 63 | 16 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 43 | 11 | 6/23/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 77-78 | L | -270 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 55 | 21 | 35-91 | 38.5% | 49 | 11 | 6/26/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 74-87 | L | +300 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 47 | 17 | 33-79 | 41.8% | 44 | 4 | 6/28/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 67-62 | W | +155 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 52 | 21 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 36 | 7 | 7/2/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 87-94 | L | +550 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 43 | 13 | 34-74 | 45.9% | 44 | 7 | 7/4/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 89-97 | L | +650 | 36-75 | 48.0% | 34 | 14 | 40-62 | 64.5% | 29 | 15 | 7/7/2013 | CHICAGO | 64-93 | L | +135 | 24-72 | 33.3% | 48 | 15 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 44 | 10 | 7/9/2013 | SEATTLE | 66-57 | W | -300 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 45 | 17 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 38 | 18 | 7/13/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/18/2013 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/20/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/23/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/25/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
INDIANA is 35-24 (+8.0 Units) against the money line versus NEW YORK since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 5-7 (-0.3 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
NEW YORK is 18-13 (+1.6 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA since 1997 |
| |
NEW YORK is 4-2 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus INDIANA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/5/2013 | INDIANA | 68 | -5 | Under | 36 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 39 | 9 | 17 | | NEW YORK | 75 | 147.5 | SU ATS | 30 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 24-29 | 82.8% | 40 | 4 | 21 | 8/30/2012 | INDIANA | 76 | -4 | SU ATS | 30 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 34 | 5 | 8 | | NEW YORK | 63 | 149.5 | Under | 26 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 2-3 | 66.7% | 40 | 7 | 21 | 7/10/2012 | NEW YORK | 82 | 152 | ATS | 43 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 9-9 | 100.0% | 37 | 13 | 13 | | INDIANA | 84 | -11.5 | SU Over | 52 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 32 | 7 | 13 | 6/3/2012 | INDIANA | 72 | -3.5 | Over | 42 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 40 | 11 | 21 | | NEW YORK | 87 | 150.5 | SU ATS | 53 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 9-19 | 47.4% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 39 | 13 | 16 | 6/2/2012 | NEW YORK | 68 | 153.5 | Over | 36 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 40 | 17 | 13 | | INDIANA | 91 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 13-26 | 50.0% | 22-27 | 81.5% | 42 | 11 | 12 |
|
| | |
|
Lin is 84-54 against the money line (+12.3 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 73-47 against the money line (+14.4 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 48-34 against the money line (+10.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 78.3, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 36-24 against the money line (+15.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 35-23 against the money line (+12.1 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 12-8 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.7, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 45-19 against the money line (+30.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.4, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Lin is 19-10 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 100-71 against the money line (+9.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 64-38 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 75.6, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 96-66 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 28-17 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 79.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 96-66 against the money line (+7.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Lin is 18-11 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 77.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 19-5 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus poor ball handling teams - committing >=17 turnovers/game as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 80.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Lin is 5-21 against the money line (-15.9 Units) as a road underdog of +135 or less as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 70.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Lin is 14-40 against the money line (-20.3 Units) as a road underdog of +200 or less as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 74.4, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Lin is 25-25 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of INDIANA. The average score was INDIANA 76.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Bill is 14-3 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in home games after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Bill 72.2, OPPONENT 66.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 124 times, while the road underdog won straight up 96 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog won the game straight up 10 times, while the home favorite won the game straight up 8 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 06/21/2013 - Katie Douglas out indefinitely ( Back ) | [C] 06/21/2013 - Jessica Davenport out for season ( Tibia ) | [G] 05/21/2013 - Jeanette Pohlen out indefinitely ( Knee ) | [F] 07/11/2013 - Jessica Breland "?" Saturday vs NY Liberty ( Ankle ) | |
[G] 06/09/2013 - Essence Carson out for season ( Knee ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/24/2024 7:10:21 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|