| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
SEATTLE MINNESOTA |
|
| 165 | 92 Final 71 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Game 3- Bradenton, FL | | | | |
625 | SEATTLE | -360 | 626 | MINNESOTA | +280 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3 point shooting team - making >=33% of their attempts, in August or September games. (140-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +47.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games. (100-63 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - good rebounding team - giving up <=9 off. rebounds/game on the season, in August or September games. (111-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.7%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season, in August or September games. (147-96 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +45.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in August or September games. (79-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - with a winning record on the season, in August or September games. (101-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in August or September games. (101-68 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, in August or September games. (173-109 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +45.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in August or September games. (46-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.8%, +33.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (129-106 since 1997.) (54.9%, +46.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - good passing team, averaging >=17 assists/game on the season, in August or September games. (139-87 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +50.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (37-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.1%, +25.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (68-17 since 1997.) (80%, +38.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in August or September games. (62-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (62%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (29-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +23.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in August or September games. (67-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (65%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, on Sunday games. (51-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.2%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (47-18 since 1997.) (72.3%, +30.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (54-21 since 1997.) (72%, +30.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (50-20 since 1997.) (71.4%, +30.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival. (52-36 since 1997.) (59.1%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (31-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +23.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (43-14 since 1997.) (75.4%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (25-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.5%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (25-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.1%, +20.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (31-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (39-15 since 1997.) (72.2%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team. (41-18 since 1997.) (69.5%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (37-14 since 1997.) (72.5%, +25 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (36-14 since 1997.) (72%, +24.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (42-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.6%, +30.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (22-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71%, +20.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (22-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.9%, +17.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (37-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +25.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival. (38-16 since 1997.) (70.4%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (40-16 since 1997.) (71.4%, +23.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (21-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.8%, +17.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last seven games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (20-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.9%, +16.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 36 or more points total in their last five games, a marginal winning team (51% to 60%) playing a winning team after 15 or more games. (33-11 since 1997.) (75%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving two excellent FT shooting teams (>=80%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better. (55-39 since 1997.) (58.5%, +18.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (30-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +29.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (28-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +29.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, after a game - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (33-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.5%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games. (29-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.8%, +31 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (70-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (214-56 since 1997.) (79.3%, +72 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (239-89 since 1997.) (72.9%, +71.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games. (190-54 since 1997.) (77.9%, +64.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (142-38 since 1997.) (78.9%, +62.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (135-36 since 1997.) (78.9%, +60.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (211-81 since 1997.) (72.3%, +60.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (107-21 since 1997.) (83.6%, +58.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (119-28 since 1997.) (81%, +58.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (118-37 since 1997.) (76.1%, +58 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more. (136-34 since 1997.) (80%, +56 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more. (128-27 since 1997.) (82.6%, +53.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - a very good team (>=+7 PPG diff.) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG diff.) after 15 or more games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games. (107-26 since 1997.) (80.5%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off a win against a division rival, playing with 2 days rest. (89-32 since 1997.) (73.6%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - in the conference finals. (92-30 since 1997.) (75.4%, +38.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (34-3 over the last 5 seasons.) (91.9%, +27.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better against opponent after a game making 11 or more 3 point shots. (45-25 since 1997.) (64.3%, +26.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games. (27-3 since 1997.) (90%, +23 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (SEATTLE) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games. (31-11 since 1997.) (73.8%, +21.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive losses, playing with 2 days rest. (46-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +27.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (27-9 since 1997.) (75%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (27-9 since 1997.) (75%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against a good shooting team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (27-9 since 1997.) (75%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - playing with 2 days rest, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a marginal winning team (51% to 60%). (22-4 since 1997.) (84.6%, +18.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (SEATTLE) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after trailing their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half. (21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +15.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (48-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +27.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, winning between 51% and 60% of their games after 15 or more games. (37-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +21 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, playing with 2 days rest. (39-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +21.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (30-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.2%, +22.4 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE | 82 | | 30-68 | 43.8% | 9-23 | 39.9% | 13-16 | 83.1% | 42 | 11 | 14 | MINNESOTA | 83 | | 31-67 | 45.7% | 8-23 | 36.0% | 13-16 | 82.2% | 42 | 10 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 516 times, while SEATTLE won 452 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
SEATTLE is 28-13 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 79.2 | SEATTLE is 16-2 against the money line (+15.5 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 87.2, OPPONENT 76.3 | SEATTLE is 15-6 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.5, OPPONENT 76.3 | SEATTLE is 19-8 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 77.8 | SEATTLE is 20-8 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.8, OPPONENT 77.3 | SEATTLE is 191-147 against the money line (+36.3 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.0, OPPONENT 72.3 | SEATTLE is 14-6 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.7, OPPONENT 75.5 | SEATTLE is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.5, OPPONENT 74.7 | SEATTLE is 8-3 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.0, OPPONENT 74.3 | SEATTLE is 20-9 against the money line (+9.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.2, OPPONENT 80.7 | SEATTLE is 80-34 against the money line (+60.0 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 79.8, OPPONENT 74.2 | SEATTLE is 15-1 against the money line (+14.0 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 90.7, OPPONENT 76.7 | MINNESOTA is 12-16 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 79.3 | MINNESOTA is 53-65 against the money line (-41.1 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.4, OPPONENT 79.7 | MINNESOTA is 11-24 against the money line (-22.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 85.7 | MINNESOTA is 153-134 against the money line (-64.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 73.9 | MINNESOTA is 33-33 against the money line (-20.5 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 82.2 |
|
SEATTLE is 48-92 against the money line (-77.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.6, OPPONENT 78.5 | SEATTLE is 68-80 against the money line (-35.1 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 73.8, OPPONENT 75.0 | SEATTLE is 9-15 against the money line (-11.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.5, OPPONENT 86.2 | SEATTLE is 5-10 against the money line (-9.6 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.4, OPPONENT 89.7 | MINNESOTA is 111-38 against the money line (+82.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 74.2 | MINNESOTA is 12-3 against the money line (+10.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.6, OPPONENT 77.3 | MINNESOTA is 25-13 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.2, OPPONENT 80.7 | MINNESOTA is 11-4 against the money line (+6.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 89.5, OPPONENT 82.7 |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 38-21 against the money line (+18.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 132-113 against the money line (+20.5 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 193-172 against the money line (+28.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 74.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 11-5 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 17-6 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 36-14 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 18-8 against the money line (+14.1 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 29-14 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 41-21 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 22-7 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 15-5 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-2 against the money line (+8.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 53-42 against the money line (+23.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 80.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-5 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 34-13 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 17-8 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-2 against the money line (+8.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 14-2 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 87.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 12-1 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 87.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 6*) | SEATTLE is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 13-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 87.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 19-11 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-23 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 25-29 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 4-10 against the money line (-14.3 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 7-12 against the money line (-13.3 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 17-23 against the money line (-16.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-24 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-25 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 27-33 against the money line (-24.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-20 against the money line (-16.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-26 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 18-23 against the money line (-17.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 156-161 against the money line (-70.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 222-219 against the money line (-91.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-25 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 313-289 against the money line (-94.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 1-5 against the money line (-6.6 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.7, OPPONENT 93.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 1-6 against the money line (-7.6 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.1, OPPONENT 92.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 20-26 against the money line (-19.4 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 53-79 against the money line (-35.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 84-113 against the money line (-41.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 16-34 against the money line (-21.4 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-58 against the money line (-43.3 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 7-21 against the money line (-16.4 Units) vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 18-26 against the money line (-21.4 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 221-197 against the money line (-70.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-22 against the money line (-18.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-20 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
SEATTLE is 9-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 89.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 16-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in all games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 87.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 263-100 against the money line (+42.5 Units) as a favorite since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 78.1, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 11-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) as a road favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 88.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 21-17 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in road games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 21-17 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 15-2 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in August or September games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 10-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 16-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was SEATTLE 87.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 16-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 87.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 19-6 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 15-2 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after 3 consecutive division games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 10-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 14-7 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.4, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 40-19 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 24-10 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 39-23 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was SEATTLE 75.4, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 12-5 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 89.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 17-6 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 17-11 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.2, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 17-7 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 36-17 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 22-9 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 33-11 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 20-5 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in road games after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 87.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 15-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 88.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 14-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) off a win against a division rival this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 16-5 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 80.0, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 7-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 78.0, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 20-7 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-2 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 15-2 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 6*) | SEATTLE is 10-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 81.7, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 23-4 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 7*) | SEATTLE is 19-6 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 15-2 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 14-2 against the money line (+10.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 13-2 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 9-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in road games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.9, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 16-9 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | SEATTLE is 19-9 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 26-9 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 15-7 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 83.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game this season. The average score was SEATTLE 87.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 3*) | SEATTLE is 16-5 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 17-6 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 16-3 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 9-2 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.8, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 19-6 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 16-4 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 85.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | SEATTLE is 14-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was SEATTLE 88.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 19-2 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 88.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | SEATTLE is 11-1 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 86.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 4*) | SEATTLE is 9-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 1-4 against the money line (-8.4 Units) on Sunday games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 84-74 against the money line (-42.7 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 237-224 against the money line (-80.1 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 214-186 against the money line (-82.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 27-58 against the money line (-28.3 Units) triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 97-110 against the money line (-41.5 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 86-93 against the money line (-51.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 50-60 against the money line (-31.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 69-80 against the money line (-39.4 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 4-7 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 124-171 against the money line (-92.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.8, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 64-84 against the money line (-40.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 156-172 against the money line (-73.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 70-89 against the money line (-35.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
MINNESOTA is 78-33 against the money line (+23.9 Units) in home games in August or September games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 43-18 against the money line (+17.7 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-8 against the money line (+14.6 Units) in home games after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in the conference finals since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 40-18 against the money line (+15.1 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 80-42 against the money line (+22.2 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-1 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 62-35 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 105-49 against the money line (+24.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 84-37 against the money line (+24.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 67-31 against the money line (+26.9 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.1 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 20-4 | +10.2 | 14-9 | 14-10 | 87.6 | 44.7 | 47.0% | 41.4 | 76.5 | 36.6 | 40.2% | 41.5 | Road Games | 20-3 | +11.2 | 14-9 | 13-10 | 87.8 | 44.7 | 47.3% | 41.2 | 76.1 | 36.2 | 40.0% | 41.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 2-2 | 4-1 | 90.2 | 49.0 | 46.7% | 43.8 | 81.2 | 40.8 | 40.2% | 39.8 | Division Games | 20-4 | +10.2 | 14-9 | 14-10 | 87.6 | 44.7 | 47.0% | 41.4 | 76.5 | 36.6 | 40.2% | 41.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 87.6 | 44.7 | 32-68 | 47.0% | 9-22 | 39.6% | 15-19 | 82.6% | 41 | 7 | 22 | 17 | 10 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 83.4 | 42 | 31-68 | 45.0% | 7-21 | 35.0% | 15-18 | 80.9% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 87.8 | 44.7 | 32-67 | 47.3% | 9-22 | 39.5% | 15-19 | 82.9% | 41 | 7 | 22 | 17 | 10 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.5 | 36.6 | 28-69 | 40.2% | 8-24 | 32.3% | 14-17 | 82.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82.5 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 7-21 | 34.7% | 15-18 | 80.9% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.1 | 36.2 | 27-69 | 40.0% | 8-24 | 32.0% | 14-16 | 83.6% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 15-10 | -0.5 | 15-10 | 16-9 | 84.1 | 41.6 | 45.4% | 39.9 | 81.2 | 42.6 | 44.9% | 39.6 | Home Games | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 86.4 | 43.6 | 46.2% | 35.6 | 89.2 | 49.2 | 46.9% | 42.0 | Division Games | 15-10 | -0.5 | 15-10 | 16-9 | 84.1 | 41.6 | 45.4% | 39.9 | 81.2 | 42.6 | 44.9% | 39.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.1 | 41.6 | 30-67 | 45.4% | 9-22 | 39.3% | 14-18 | 81.7% | 40 | 9 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.7 | 41 | 30-69 | 44.2% | 7-21 | 34.7% | 15-18 | 81.1% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.2 | 42.6 | 29-66 | 44.9% | 8-24 | 34.0% | 14-17 | 81.1% | 40 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 83.2 | 41.6 | 30-68 | 44.6% | 7-21 | 34.7% | 15-18 | 81.1% | 41 | 8 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0-0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 71.1, MINNESOTA 72.3 |
| | |
|
|
8/18/2020 | *NEW YORK | 105-64 | W | | 41-77 | 53.2% | 44 | 16 | 22-68 | 32.4% | 45 | 22 | 8/20/2020 | *INDIANA | 84-90 | L | | 28-64 | 43.7% | 32 | 12 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 53 | 17 | 8/22/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 74-82 | L | -210 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 42 | 13 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 51 | 16 | 8/25/2020 | *INDIANA | 87-74 | W | | 31-62 | 50.0% | 36 | 12 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 43 | 18 | 8/29/2020 | *CHICAGO | 88-74 | W | -210 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 44 | 15 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 34 | 14 | 9/2/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 71-64 | W | | 24-62 | 38.7% | 52 | 13 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 33 | 7 | 9/4/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 90-89 | W | -270 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 37 | 14 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 32 | 13 | 9/6/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 103-88 | W | -330 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 28 | 12 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 24 | 9/9/2020 | *DALLAS | 107-95 | W | -950 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 40 | 10 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 39 | 12 | 9/11/2020 | *PHOENIX | 83-60 | W | -200 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 46 | 16 | 15-62 | 24.2% | 40 | 14 | 9/13/2020 | LAS VEGAS | 84-86 | L | +105 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 46 | 11 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 50 | 9 | 9/22/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 88-86 | W | -400 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 47 | 16 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 36 | 9 | 9/24/2020 | *MINNESOTA | 89-79 | W | -330 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 40 | 13 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 34 | 9 | 9/27/2020 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/19/2020 | *DALLAS | 91-84 | W | -250 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 37 | 15 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 40 | 10 | 8/21/2020 | *PHOENIX | 90-80 | W | +120 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 42 | 14 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 37 | 15 | 8/23/2020 | *ATLANTA | 75-78 | L | -600 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 37 | 13 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 44 | 14 | 8/28/2020 | *ATLANTA | 88-79 | W | -400 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 46 | 13 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 42 | 16 | 8/30/2020 | *PHOENIX | 79-83 | L | -155 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 37 | 11 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 47 | 17 | 8/31/2020 | *LOS ANGELES | 96-78 | W | +200 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 39 | 7 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 37 | 10 | 9/2/2020 | *CHICAGO | 86-83 | W | +145 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 35 | 16 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 45 | 23 | 9/4/2020 | *DALLAS | 88-75 | W | -175 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 51 | 12 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 30 | 10 | 9/6/2020 | *SEATTLE | 88-103 | L | +250 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 24 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 28 | 12 | 9/8/2020 | *WASHINGTON | 86-89 | L | -360 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 32 | 12 | 33-61 | 54.1% | 29 | 10 | 9/10/2020 | *LAS VEGAS | 89-104 | L | +175 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 35 | 12 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 46 | 6 | 9/12/2020 | *INDIANA | 98-86 | W | -300 | 38-69 | 55.1% | 35 | 9 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 38 | 12 | 9/17/2020 | *PHOENIX | 80-79 | W | -200 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 38 | 12 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 39 | 15 | 9/22/2020 | *SEATTLE | 86-88 | L | +300 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 36 | 9 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 47 | 16 | 9/24/2020 | *SEATTLE | 79-89 | L | +250 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 34 | 9 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 40 | 13 | 9/27/2020 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
SEATTLE is 42-42 (+9.0 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
SEATTLE is 10-2 (+8.8 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
MINNESOTA is 29-11 (+7.8 Units) against the money line versus SEATTLE since 1997 |
| |
SEATTLE is 2-2 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/24/2020 | MINNESOTA | 79 | 163.5 | Over | 33 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 13-28 | 46.4% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 34 | 7 | 9 | N | SEATTLE | 89 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 10-31 | 32.3% | 17-18 | 94.4% | 40 | 5 | 13 | 9/22/2020 | MINNESOTA | 86 | 162.5 | ATS | 45 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 14-31 | 45.2% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 36 | 5 | 9 | N | SEATTLE | 88 | -8.5 | SU Over | 50 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 13-26 | 50.0% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 47 | 8 | 16 | 9/6/2020 | SEATTLE | 103 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 35-67 | 52.2% | 11-26 | 42.3% | 22-24 | 91.7% | 28 | 7 | 12 | N | MINNESOTA | 88 | 161 | Over | 38 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 12-26 | 46.2% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 42 | 14 | 24 | 7/28/2020 | MINNESOTA | 66 | 154 | Over | 35 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 19-21 | 90.5% | 47 | 15 | 19 | N | SEATTLE | 90 | -8 | SU ATS | 41 | 35-66 | 53.0% | 11-25 | 44.0% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 31 | 7 | 11 | 9/11/2019 | MINNESOTA | 74 | 149.5 | Over | 41 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 5-8 | 62.5% | 46 | 11 | 18 | | SEATTLE | 84 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 47 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 33 | 4 | 11 | 8/18/2019 | MINNESOTA | 74 | 149.5 | Over | 39 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 4-6 | 66.7% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 29 | 7 | 17 | | SEATTLE | 82 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 8-20 | 40.0% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 32 | 10 | 16 | 7/17/2019 | SEATTLE | 90 | 147 | SU ATS | 50 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 12-25 | 48.0% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 39 | 6 | 19 | | MINNESOTA | 79 | -5.5 | Over | 40 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 8-9 | 88.9% | 36 | 11 | 13 | 6/4/2019 | MINNESOTA | 77 | 148.5 | Over | 39 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 22 | 3 | 14 | | SEATTLE | 84 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 32-54 | 59.3% | 7-13 | 53.8% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 33 | 8 | 20 | 5/29/2019 | SEATTLE | 61 | 152.5 | Under | 24 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 2-15 | 13.3% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 30 | 8 | 13 | | MINNESOTA | 72 | -4 | SU ATS | 39 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 52 | 11 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Hughes is 9-2 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 89.5, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 66-30 against the money line (+22.6 Units) in all games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 11-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) as a road favorite as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 88.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 21-17 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in road games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 21-17 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.1, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 19-16 against the money line (+9.5 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 80.9, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 33-13 against the money line (+14.8 Units) in August or September games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.7, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 20-4 against the money line (+16.5 Units) when playing with 2 days rest as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 5*) | Hughes is 41-17 against the money line (+20.3 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 40-16 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after a division game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 28-9 against the money line (+16.8 Units) after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 15-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in road games after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 86.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 10-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 40-15 against the money line (+15.8 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 40-19 against the money line (+17.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 24-10 against the money line (+14.5 Units) after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.2, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 18-7 against the money line (+14.3 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 16-5 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 86.3, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 17-6 against the money line (+11.3 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 29-15 against the money line (+10.7 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 80.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 17-7 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in road games after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 36-17 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 22-9 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.8, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 33-11 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.9, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 30-9 against the money line (+12.9 Units) after having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 87.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 15-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in road games after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 88.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 38-11 against the money line (+22.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 29-6 against the money line (+23.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 6*) | Hughes is 42-13 against the money line (+25.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.0, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 24-7 against the money line (+14.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 15-2 against the money line (+15.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 6*) | Hughes is 32-9 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.5, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 23-4 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 7*) | Hughes is 49-16 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.5, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 43-12 against the money line (+32.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.6, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 6*) | Hughes is 38-10 against the money line (+29.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 86.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 6*) | Hughes is 33-10 against the money line (+23.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 86.4, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 5*) | Hughes is 35-10 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 51-21 against the money line (+18.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 19-9 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 26-9 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.9, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 19-11 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 84.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 16-5 against the money line (+13.5 Units) in road games after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 85.2, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 24-11 against the money line (+16.3 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 29-20 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 80.4, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 30-11 against the money line (+12.2 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 45-14 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 17-6 against the money line (+10.8 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.7, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 16-3 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 28-9 against the money line (+15.4 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 49-17 against the money line (+15.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 39-13 against the money line (+14.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.9, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 20-13 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 44-21 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.1, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 52-39 against the money line (+22.9 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 77.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 19-2 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 88.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 11-1 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 86.1, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 10-4 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 9 or less turnovers in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 74.7, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 12-4 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.7, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 38-21 against the money line (+18.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.4, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 22-14 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 10-4 against the money line (+6.8 Units) when playing against a marginal winning team (Win Pct. 51% to 60%) after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.3, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 19-12 against the money line (+7.8 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 80.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 12-5 against the money line (+6.9 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 34-12 against the money line (+18.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 49-18 against the money line (+23.8 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 36-14 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 53-22 against the money line (+23.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 29-14 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 41-21 against the money line (+17.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 22-7 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 85.2, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 32-10 against the money line (+25.9 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.5, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 5*) | Hughes is 37-15 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 55-25 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 34-12 against the money line (+18.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 50-18 against the money line (+29.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.3, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Hughes is 13-7 against the money line (+7.5 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.5, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 30-13 against the money line (+14.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.6, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 34-13 against the money line (+17.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 49-19 against the money line (+25.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.6, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Hughes is 35-15 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 51-23 against the money line (+19.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.5, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 14-2 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 87.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Hughes is 24-4 against the money line (+23.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 87.1, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 7*) | Hughes is 37-15 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 55-25 against the money line (+16.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 31-11 against the money line (+15.7 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 47-19 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 84.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 34-15 against the money line (+15.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.2, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 51-24 against the money line (+16.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 29-14 against the money line (+14.7 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 83.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Hughes is 45-22 against the money line (+16.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 82.8, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 19-11 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of SEATTLE. The average score was SEATTLE 81.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 54-46 against the money line (-40.0 Units) on Sunday games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 34-32 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 38-33 against the money line (-18.1 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.2, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 45-43 against the money line (-22.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 20-21 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 130-88 against the money line (-33.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 34-30 against the money line (-22.0 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 47-39 against the money line (-27.7 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 104-71 against the money line (-26.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 140-94 against the money line (-37.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 54-49 against the money line (-28.0 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 38-40 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 55-56 against the money line (-28.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.2, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 22-33 against the money line (-19.1 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 6-13 against the money line (-9.4 Units) vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 127-82 against the money line (-32.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Hughes is 41-55 against the money line (-28.1 Units) after a game where a team made 90% of their free throws or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 73.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 59-73 against the money line (-38.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive overs in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 74.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Hughes is 98-101 against the money line (-40.6 Units) off a win against a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 74.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 39-65 against the money line (-28.0 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 74.0, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Hughes is 116-137 against the money line (-47.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Hughes 72.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 61-22 against the money line (+15.5 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 130-42 against the money line (+20.6 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 130-42 against the money line (+20.6 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 53-12 against the money line (+24.8 Units) in home games in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 157-81 against the money line (+28.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 73-34 against the money line (+13.2 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 46-21 against the money line (+20.8 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 30-11 against the money line (+18.0 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 17-7 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 123-54 against the money line (+23.3 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 14-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in the conference finals as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.6, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 45-9 against the money line (+22.2 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 27-17 against the money line (+9.9 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 16-7 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 84-54 against the money line (+12.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 45-16 against the money line (+17.0 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 40-25 against the money line (+13.0 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 37-25 against the money line (+9.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 66-36 against the money line (+24.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 66-32 against the money line (+23.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 49-23 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 68-31 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 50-21 against the money line (+20.0 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 184-90 against the money line (+11.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 77-21 against the money line (+21.9 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 134-62 against the money line (+23.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 116-48 against the money line (+28.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 52-14 against the money line (+22.0 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 193-92 against the money line (+23.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 150-63 against the money line (+24.9 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 117-48 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 96-37 against the money line (+26.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 79-28 against the money line (+27.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 67-21 against the money line (+21.9 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 58-19 against the money line (+27.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 147-65 against the money line (+26.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 42-8 against the money line (+23.8 Units) in home games after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 42-11 against the money line (+18.8 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 53-15 against the money line (+19.9 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 40 times, while the home underdog won straight up 5 times. Edge against the money line=SEATTLE | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the home underdog won straight up 2 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[G] 09/26/2020 - Shenise Johnson is doubtful Sunday vs Seattle Storm ( Calf ) | [C] 09/24/2020 - Sylvia Fowles is "?" Sunday vs Seattle Storm ( Calf ) | [G] 09/21/2020 - Lexie Brown is out for season ( Concussion ) | [F] 07/30/2020 - Maya Moore is out for season ( Personal ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 3:03:36 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|