| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
DALLAS
MINNESOTA |
|
|
148.5
| 70
Final
86 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 647 | DALLAS | +250 | | 648 | MINNESOTA | -330 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(296-99 since 1997.) (74.9%, +90.7 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(291-95 since 1997.) (75.4%, +90.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(248-78 since 1997.) (76.1%, +88.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(248-78 since 1997.) (76.1%, +88.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(248-78 since 1997.) (76.1%, +88.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(252-82 since 1997.) (75.4%, +87.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(252-82 since 1997.) (75.4%, +87.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(252-82 since 1997.) (75.4%, +87.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(281-122 since 1997.) (69.7%, +85.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(281-122 since 1997.) (69.7%, +85.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(281-122 since 1997.) (69.7%, +85.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(281-122 since 1997.) (69.7%, +85.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(281-122 since 1997.) (69.7%, +85.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(281-122 since 1997.) (69.7%, +85.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(281-108 since 1997.) (72.2%, +71.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(234-84 since 1997.) (73.6%, +67.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(181-60 since 1997.) (75.1%, +66.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(188-75 since 1997.) (71.5%, +61.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(144-44 since 1997.) (76.6%, +60.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(155-58 since 1997.) (72.8%, +56.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(171-87 since 1997.) (66.3%, +53.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(147-57 since 1997.) (72.1%, +52.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, in August or September games.
(158-56 since 1997.) (73.8%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, in August or September games.
(137-47 since 1997.) (74.5%, +49.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(122-43 since 1997.) (73.9%, +46.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(67-11 since 1997.) (85.9%, +45 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(106-38 since 1997.) (73.6%, +43.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(58-11 since 1997.) (84.1%, +41.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(55-11 since 1997.) (83.3%, +38.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(77-35 since 1997.) (68.8%, +34.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival.
(49-29 since 1997.) (62.8%, +33.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival.
(34-3 since 1997.) (91.9%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games.
(46-21 since 1997.) (68.7%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games.
(34-4 since 1997.) (89.5%, +27.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games.
(31-2 since 1997.) (93.9%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(33-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.6%, +33.4 units. Rating = 5*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games.
(37-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +20.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a bad team (25-40%) after 15 or more games.
(31-3 since 1997.) (91.2%, +26.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival.
(50-32 since 1997.) (61%, +23.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival.
(37-16 since 1997.) (69.8%, +22.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games.
(46-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.7%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, after allowing 80 points or more in a loss to a division rival.
(25-10 since 1997.) (71.4%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games.
(54-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +31.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(35-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (66%, +30.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG).
(69-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - in a game involving two average three point shooting teams (30%-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(31-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +13.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG).
(59-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.4%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(31-18 since 1997.) (63.3%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(31-18 since 1997.) (63.3%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (DALLAS) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(31-18 since 1997.) (63.3%, +29.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher.
(28-17 since 1997.) (62.2%, +26.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games.
(23-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.9%, +17.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road loss by 10 points or more, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season.
(29-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +18.1 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| DALLAS | 70 | | 26-66 | 39.9% | 6-20 | 32.2% | 11-14 | 81.4% | 42 | 12 | 16 | | MINNESOTA | 77 | | 29-65 | 44.7% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 13-16 | 78.9% | 43 | 10 | 15 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 662 times, while DALLAS won 317 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
DALLAS is 12-6 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 84.4, OPPONENT 77.6 | MINNESOTA is 83-90 against the money line (-39.1 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 74.9 | MINNESOTA is 7-12 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 78.2 | MINNESOTA is 5-7 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in home games when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.1, OPPONENT 78.1 | MINNESOTA is 146-131 against the money line (-62.4 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.6, OPPONENT 73.9 | MINNESOTA is 6-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 77.1 | MINNESOTA is 16-19 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.5, OPPONENT 78.3 |
|
DALLAS is 16-29 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.0, OPPONENT 81.4 | DALLAS is 11-22 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 78.8, OPPONENT 84.8 | MINNESOTA is 105-35 against the money line (+78.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 73.5 | MINNESOTA is 15-2 against the money line (+13.0 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 69.2 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 166-123 against the money line (-65.1 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-7 against the money line (-19.0 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-16 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.7, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 9-17 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 21-24 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 10-18 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 24-25 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 1-8 against the money line (-8.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.7, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 5-11 against the money line (-9.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.4, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 3-9 against the money line (-8.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.1, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-16 against the money line (-15.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 27-30 against the money line (-31.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 9-17 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 20-24 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-10 against the money line (-12.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 146-126 against the money line (-57.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 10-18 against the money line (-20.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 51-38 against the money line (-43.8 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.4, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 81-59 against the money line (-59.8 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 8-14 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.9, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 3-8 against the money line (-8.5 Units) in road games when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 15-16 against the money line (-18.7 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 86.2, OPPONENT 87.5 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-19 against the money line (-17.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 3-15 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 76.9, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 11-22 against the money line (-18.5 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 17-30 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 79.3, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 11-18 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-21 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 89.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 3-10 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.9, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 6-15 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 13-22 against the money line (-16.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-18 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 77.5, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-17 against the money line (-11.7 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.3, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 17-25 against the money line (-12.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 80.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 11-21 against the money line (-17.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.0, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 4-17 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 76.9, OPPONENT 84.7 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 12-22 against the money line (-17.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 4-18 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 76.7, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 13-21 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 5-17 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 77.4, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 13-22 against the money line (-16.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.2, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 5-18 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 77.5, OPPONENT 85.3 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 9-17 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.9, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 14-25 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
DALLAS is 13-10 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.0, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 30-31 against the money line (-21.2 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-12 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.2, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-14 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.3, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-9 against the money line (-11.4 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 10-19 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after a game where a team made 55% of their free throws or worse since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 68.2, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 8-10 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 67-82 against the money line (-43.5 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 53-78 against the money line (-35.3 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 5-9 against the money line (-9.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 89-99 against the money line (-50.2 Units) off a road loss since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 44-50 against the money line (-32.6 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-20 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 15-19 against the money line (-14.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-13 against the money line (-10.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 43-54 against the money line (-31.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 64-79 against the money line (-41.5 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 73.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 114-164 against the money line (-89.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 72.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 2-6 against the money line (-9.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 87-125 against the money line (-75.2 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.9, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 30-44 against the money line (-29.2 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 71.3, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 166-172 against the money line (-92.9 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 70-70 against the money line (-42.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 15-18 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-11 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 3-7 against the money line (-10.9 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 13-16 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 68-88 against the money line (-36.2 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 75.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
DALLAS is 6-23 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 76.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 6-23 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 76.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 13-22 against the money line (-15.5 Units) when playing with 3 or more days rest since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 80.5, OPPONENT 85.1 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 10-19 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 79.8, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 3*) | DALLAS is 1-5 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 94.3 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 4-20 against the money line (-14.8 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 77.5, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 0*) | DALLAS is 11-20 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 77.6, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 4-14 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in road games after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 82.6, OPPONENT 92.2 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 15-24 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.2, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 12-18 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 83.2, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 10-15 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.2, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 3-14 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 76.8, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 4*) | DALLAS is 12-18 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 81.6, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 8-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 82.0, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 2*) | DALLAS is 4-11 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was DALLAS 85.3, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 6*) | DALLAS is 10-21 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.3, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 1*) | DALLAS is 22-43 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997.
The average score was DALLAS 81.7, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) on Thursday over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 83-31 against the money line (+33.9 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 14-4 against the money line (+10.6 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 against the money line (+9.6 Units) in home games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-5 against the money line (+7.2 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 52-29 against the money line (+18.0 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 143-74 against the money line (+30.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 10-4 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 9-18 | +0.7 | 14-13 | 7-18 | 70.7 | 35.6 | 38.6% | 42.4 | 75.1 | 38.6 | 41.6% | 42.6 | | Road Games | 1-12 | -6.8 | 5-8 | 3-10 | 66.8 | 34.2 | 37.0% | 42.5 | 78.2 | 39.8 | 43.6% | 42.2 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +4.4 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 74.4 | 38.6 | 41.3% | 38.6 | 75.8 | 39.6 | 41.9% | 41.2 | | Division Games | 5-9 | +2.8 | 8-6 | 5-8 | 70.5 | 35.0 | 39.4% | 42.7 | 74.7 | 40.1 | 40.4% | 42.1 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 70.7 | 35.6 | 26-67 | 38.6% | 6-20 | 31.9% | 13-16 | 80.7% | 42 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.1 | 39.4 | 29-69 | 41.8% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 13-17 | 80.0% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 66.8 | 34.2 | 25-66 | 37.0% | 6-20 | 29.7% | 11-15 | 77.6% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.1 | 38.6 | 26-64 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 16-20 | 80.6% | 43 | 8 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 78 | 39.4 | 29-68 | 42.0% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 14-17 | 80.4% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.2 | 39.8 | 28-64 | 43.6% | 6-17 | 36.5% | 16-20 | 81.7% | 42 | 8 | 19 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 13-15 | -4 | 14-13 | 14-14 | 77.0 | 40.0 | 44.5% | 40.9 | 76.1 | 38.5 | 43.1% | 38.9 | | Home Games | 7-6 | -0.8 | 8-4 | 6-7 | 79.2 | 40.1 | 44.9% | 43.8 | 74.4 | 37.0 | 42.1% | 35.4 | | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 78.2 | 39.0 | 47.6% | 35.2 | 84.6 | 45.4 | 48.7% | 37.2 | | Division Games | 4-8 | -6.8 | 4-7 | 5-7 | 74.7 | 38.8 | 43.9% | 39.6 | 76.7 | 38.7 | 44.7% | 36.4 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.0 | 40.0 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 12-15 | 77.9% | 41 | 9 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 77.9 | 39.5 | 29-68 | 42.1% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 14-17 | 80.2% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.2 | 40.1 | 30-67 | 44.9% | 6-18 | 35.0% | 12-16 | 78.5% | 44 | 10 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 17 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.1 | 38.5 | 28-66 | 43.1% | 7-21 | 33.0% | 12-16 | 79.7% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 17 | 9 | 16 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.8 | 39.5 | 29-69 | 41.8% | 7-21 | 33.6% | 14-17 | 80.0% | 43 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.4 | 37.0 | 28-66 | 42.1% | 7-21 | 33.8% | 12-15 | 79.3% | 35 | 7 | 16 | 17 | 10 | 15 | 5 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: DALLAS 71.6, MINNESOTA 71.8 |
| | |
|
|
| 7/14/2019 | CHICAGO | 79-89 | L | -115 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 42 | 7 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 10 | | 7/17/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 64-69 | L | +210 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 47 | 7 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 45 | 7 | | 7/18/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | 64-69 | L | +250 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 45 | 15 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 36 | 11 | | 7/20/2019 | PHOENIX | 66-70 | L | +105 | 23-69 | 33.3% | 49 | 14 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 48 | 11 | | 7/30/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 54-86 | L | +500 | 18-63 | 28.6% | 46 | 18 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 46 | 10 | | 8/1/2019 | NEW YORK | 87-64 | W | -120 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 41 | 18 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 39 | 21 | | 8/3/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 70-75 | L | +170 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 35 | 13 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 55 | 17 | | 8/8/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 57-69 | L | +350 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 38 | 15 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 39 | 12 | | 8/10/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 80-77 | W | +325 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 40 | 11 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 44 | 12 | | 8/14/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 84-78 | W | +220 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 18 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 38 | 15 | | 8/16/2019 | NEW YORK | 83-77 | W | -175 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 12 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 42 | 16 | | 8/18/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 68-78 | L | +350 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 37 | 9 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 43 | 15 | | 8/22/2019 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2019 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/29/2019 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/31/2019 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/4/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 7/14/2019 | PHOENIX | 75-62 | W | -115 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 52 | 18 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 31 | 13 | | 7/17/2019 | SEATTLE | 79-90 | L | -220 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 36 | 13 | 33-62 | 53.2% | 39 | 19 | | 7/21/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 74-79 | L | +200 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 40 | 18 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 39 | 18 | | 7/24/2019 | WASHINGTON | 71-79 | L | +180 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 43 | 18 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 37 | 14 | | 8/3/2019 | @ INDIANA | 75-86 | L | -155 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 34 | 21 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 37 | 14 | | 8/6/2019 | @ ATLANTA | 85-69 | W | -210 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 51 | 10 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 45 | 18 | | 8/9/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 89-57 | W | +135 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 48 | 19 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 42 | 20 | | 8/11/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | 78-101 | L | +280 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 29 | 17 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 38 | 16 | | 8/13/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 89-73 | W | -220 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 40 | 14 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 43 | 17 | | 8/16/2019 | WASHINGTON | 79-86 | L | +200 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 40 | 19 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 33 | 12 | | 8/18/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 74-82 | L | +145 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 29 | 17 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 32 | 16 | | 8/20/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | 71-81 | L | +200 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 38 | 17 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 40 | 16 | | 8/22/2019 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/25/2019 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/27/2019 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/1/2019 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/6/2019 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| MINNESOTA is 36-13 (+20.8 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 6-1 (+4.4 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| MINNESOTA is 17-4 (+8.7 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 2-0 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus DALLAS over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/30/2019 | MINNESOTA | 86 | -3.5 | Over | 53 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 20-27 | 74.1% | 37 | 5 | 7 | | | DALLAS | 89 | 145.5 | SU ATS | 41 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 11-22 | 50.0% | 18-21 | 85.7% | 44 | 5 | 15 | 6/1/2019 | MINNESOTA | 70 | -3.5 | SU Under | 41 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 5-19 | 26.3% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 48 | 10 | 16 | | | DALLAS | 67 | 154 | ATS | 27 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 5-21 | 23.8% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 45 | 13 | 12 | 7/1/2018 | MINNESOTA | 76 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 42 | 9 | 13 | | | DALLAS | 72 | 168 | Under | 33 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 43 | 6 | 16 | 6/19/2018 | DALLAS | 83 | 165 | ATS | 36 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 6-21 | 28.6% | 21-27 | 77.8% | 40 | 6 | 22 | | | MINNESOTA | 91 | -8.5 | SU Over | 51 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 30-35 | 85.7% | 41 | 7 | 12 | 5/23/2018 | DALLAS | 68 | 164 | ATS | 21 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 9-29 | 31.0% | 3-7 | 42.9% | 47 | 6 | 11 | | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -12.5 | SU Under | 46 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 19-28 | 67.9% | 63 | 14 | 13 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 177-122 against the money line (+37.5 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 75.3, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 116-70 against the money line (-29.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 31-29 against the money line (-20.2 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 78.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 35-36 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 10-16 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 76.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 37-28 against the money line (-22.1 Units) after failing to cover the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 18-20 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 96-65 against the money line (-27.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 127-86 against the money line (-36.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Agler is 94-86 against the money line (-47.8 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 15-28 against the money line (-20.3 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.2, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 30-53 against the money line (-24.7 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 73.3, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 98-100 against the money line (-50.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 72.6, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 15-37 against the money line (-22.2 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Agler 70.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 49-12 against the money line (+20.5 Units) in home games in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 139-69 against the money line (+27.1 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 47-23 against the money line (+12.4 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 101-37 against the money line (+31.2 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 77-24 against the money line (+35.3 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 59-16 against the money line (+33.8 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 36-16 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 21-6 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 9-2 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after 5 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 12-4 against the money line (+8.3 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 45% or higher as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 22-5 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in home games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 25-16 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 50-21 against the money line (+15.9 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 77-46 against the money line (+12.5 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 42-16 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 36-21 against the money line (+12.0 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 60-30 against the money line (+22.9 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 56-26 against the money line (+20.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 80.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 39-18 against the money line (+14.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 40-15 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 89-29 against the money line (+19.4 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 122-53 against the money line (+26.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 104-41 against the money line (+24.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 47-11 against the money line (+31.0 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 5*) | Reeve is 39-11 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 50-15 against the money line (+16.9 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 178 times, while the road underdog won straight up 54 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 14 times, while the road underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 08/11/2019 - Kelsey Griffin is out indefinitely ( Foot ) | | [G] 08/09/2019 - Karima Christmas-Kelly is out for season ( Knee ) | | [F] 06/10/2019 - Jessica Shepard is out for season ( Knee ) | | [F] 02/07/2019 - Maya Moore is out for season ( Personal ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 5/17/2024 8:25:10 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|