| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES MINNESOTA |
|
| 154 | 76 Final 85 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Finals - Best of 5 - Game 5 - Series tied at 2-2 | | | | |
671 | LOS ANGELES | +170 | 672 | MINNESOTA | -200 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (228-77 since 1997.) (74.8%, +81.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (386-168 since 1997.) (69.7%, +79.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (203-49 since 1997.) (80.6%, +77 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (196-71 since 1997.) (73.4%, +67.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (184-61 since 1997.) (75.1%, +58.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (108-33 since 1997.) (76.6%, +57.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (97-19 since 1997.) (83.6%, +56.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread against opponent after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread. (100-71 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.5%, +50.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (113-49 since 1997.) (69.8%, +40.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good excellent shooting teams (>=46%) after 15+ games. (30-13 since 1997.) (69.8%, +16.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games. (24-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +25.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a upset loss as a favorite, on Wednesday nights. (27-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +19.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a poor defensive team (72-76 PPG). (28-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +25.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games against opponent hot team - having won 6 or 7 of their last 8 games. (35-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season. (89-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +24.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having won 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games. (48-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +16.6 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (171-53 since 1997.) (76.3%, +84.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (212-152 since 1997.) (58.2%, +60.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (167-110 since 1997.) (60.3%, +57.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (99-33 since 1997.) (75%, +55.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (143-68 since 1997.) (67.8%, +53 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (123-42 since 1997.) (74.5%, +51.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (106-42 since 1997.) (71.6%, +45.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (116-44 since 1997.) (72.5%, +42.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (76-26 since 1997.) (74.5%, +39.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (81-37 since 1997.) (68.6%, +33.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (72-36 since 1997.) (66.7%, +26.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (43-22 since 1997.) (66.2%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (43-24 since 1997.) (64.2%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 54 or more points total in their last ten games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (45-16 since 1997.) (73.8%, +20.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - playing with 2 days rest, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (50-20 since 1997.) (71.4%, +20.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - hot team - having won 15 or more of their last 20 games, playing with 2 days rest. (47-23 since 1997.) (67.1%, +16.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a home favorite, off a loss against a division rival. (24-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.2%, +28.2 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 75 | | 30-67 | 45.0% | 5-16 | 29.1% | 10-12 | 82.4% | 37 | 8 | 14 | MINNESOTA | 80 | | 31-66 | 47.5% | 6-15 | 38.2% | 12-16 | 74.9% | 43 | 10 | 15 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 636 times, while LOS ANGELES won 335 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 14-4 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.9, OPPONENT 80.9 | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.3 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.0, OPPONENT 79.1 | LOS ANGELES is 34-11 against the money line (+17.4 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 75.6 | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 73.6 | MINNESOTA is 57-80 against the money line (-49.0 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 78.7 | MINNESOTA is 19-11 against the money line (-25.4 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 75.7 | MINNESOTA is 134-119 against the money line (-53.2 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 73.7 | MINNESOTA is 14-11 against the money line (-27.0 Units) in home games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 75.8 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 10-16 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 75.0 | LOS ANGELES is 5-6 against the money line (-14.2 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 7-8 against the money line (-15.3 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.6, OPPONENT 87.1 | LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 79.5 | LOS ANGELES is 71-76 against the money line (-43.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 75.8 | LOS ANGELES is 188-156 against the money line (-80.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 82.1 | LOS ANGELES is 10-9 against the money line (-17.2 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 73.6 | LOS ANGELES is 10-14 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.8 | MINNESOTA is 15-2 against the money line (+11.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 75.7 | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.7, OPPONENT 74.5 | MINNESOTA is 109-45 against the money line (+40.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 72.8 | MINNESOTA is 218-68 against the money line (+107.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.3, OPPONENT 78.5 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 15-5 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-4 against the money line (+6.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-3 against the money line (+6.1 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-6 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-7 against the money line (+9.4 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+7.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-4 against the money line (+10.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-6 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 35-23 against the money line (-26.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-7 against the money line (-15.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 7-8 against the money line (-19.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 276-254 against the money line (-79.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-8 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-10 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-25 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 21-45 against the money line (-35.6 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 132-117 against the money line (-51.1 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 120-102 against the money line (-47.3 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 168-142 against the money line (-58.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 202-152 against the money line (-66.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 69-110 against the money line (-48.6 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 22-2 against the money line (+17.6 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 16-2 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 5-0 against the money line (+8.2 Units) as a road underdog of +200 or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-0 against the money line (+7.2 Units) as a road underdog of +145 to +200 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-4 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) after 2 consecutive division games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) after 3 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.3 Units) after covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-4 against the money line (+13.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-2 against the money line (+13.6 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 18-12 against the money line (-25.5 Units) when playing with 2 days rest over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 207-198 against the money line (-67.9 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 188-164 against the money line (-77.9 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 21-11 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 66-83 against the money line (-39.1 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 30-42 against the money line (-26.4 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 62-76 against the money line (-40.8 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 26-15 against the money line (-25.1 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-37 against the money line (-37.4 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.3, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 32-55 against the money line (-37.6 Units) off an upset win as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.4, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 11-11 against the money line (-16.0 Units) off a road win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 23-42 against the money line (-38.7 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 70.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 104-152 against the money line (-81.6 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 55-76 against the money line (-36.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 78-119 against the money line (-76.8 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 29-42 against the money line (-26.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.4, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 150-157 against the money line (-84.1 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 63-62 against the money line (-33.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.2, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 100-83 against the money line (-50.0 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-20 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games revenging a home loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-18 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-13 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 64-76 against the money line (-31.9 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 47-16 against the money line (+17.0 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 31-10 | +3.5 | 27-14 | 13-28 | 82.7 | 42.0 | 47.4% | 38.9 | 75.1 | 37.2 | 43.3% | 39.3 | Road Games | 12-8 | -3.4 | 12-8 | 9-11 | 83.5 | 40.9 | 47.9% | 37.4 | 80.2 | 38.4 | 45.4% | 40.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 77.2 | 35.4 | 45.1% | 39.0 | 77.0 | 37.0 | 45.0% | 41.4 | Division Games | 17-6 | +6.1 | 14-9 | 7-16 | 80.6 | 41.4 | 46.6% | 38.3 | 74.3 | 36.3 | 43.5% | 39.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 82.7 | 42.0 | 31-66 | 47.4% | 5-16 | 33.1% | 15-18 | 82.2% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.5 | 41 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 33.5% | 16-20 | 79.7% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 83.5 | 40.9 | 32-66 | 47.9% | 5-15 | 35.3% | 14-17 | 83.3% | 37 | 7 | 18 | 18 | 9 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.1 | 37.2 | 28-64 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 13-17 | 77.9% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.6 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 16-20 | 79.2% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.2 | 38.4 | 30-67 | 45.4% | 6-16 | 39.4% | 13-17 | 77.0% | 40 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 32-9 | -1.6 | 21-20 | 19-21 | 84.8 | 44.4 | 47.9% | 42.9 | 74.5 | 37.2 | 42.4% | 38.1 | Home Games | 18-3 | +2.6 | 9-12 | 11-10 | 87.3 | 45.4 | 49.3% | 42.8 | 73.9 | 37.0 | 41.5% | 38.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.1 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 75.8 | 37.0 | 45.5% | 44.2 | 73.4 | 34.2 | 41.8% | 38.6 | Division Games | 15-5 | +1.9 | 9-11 | 9-11 | 83.6 | 42.6 | 47.6% | 43.6 | 74.0 | 36.2 | 42.7% | 36.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.8 | 44.4 | 32-68 | 47.9% | 6-16 | 37.9% | 14-18 | 76.8% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.4 | 40.9 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 34.3% | 16-20 | 79.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 87.3 | 45.4 | 34-68 | 49.3% | 6-15 | 39.3% | 14-18 | 76.9% | 43 | 9 | 21 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.5 | 37.2 | 28-67 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 12-16 | 79.7% | 38 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.1 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 16-20 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.9 | 37.0 | 28-68 | 41.5% | 6-19 | 33.4% | 12-15 | 78.0% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.6, MINNESOTA 71.4 |
| | |
|
|
8/27/2017 | MINNESOTA | 78-67 | W | -155 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 35 | 8 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 37 | 18 | 9/1/2017 | ATLANTA | 81-56 | W | -950 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 42 | 16 | 17-59 | 28.8% | 36 | 19 | 9/3/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 81-70 | W | -360 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 37 | 13 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 39 | 17 | 9/12/2017 | PHOENIX | 79-66 | W | -360 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 42 | 10 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 39 | 16 | 9/14/2017 | PHOENIX | 86-72 | W | -550 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 43 | 11 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 34 | 18 | 9/17/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 89-87 | W | -200 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 39 | 12 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 29 | 13 | 9/24/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 85-84 | W | +180 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 41 | 14 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 41 | 15 | 9/26/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 68-70 | L | +220 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 38 | 12 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 44 | 12 | 9/29/2017 | MINNESOTA | 75-64 | W | -155 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 48 | 15 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 31 | 15 | 10/1/2017 | MINNESOTA | 69-80 | L | -155 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 29 | 14 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 62 | 17 | 10/4/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/25/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 89-70 | W | -950 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 43 | 12 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 36 | 13 | 8/27/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 67-78 | L | +135 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 37 | 18 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 35 | 8 | 8/30/2017 | @ INDIANA | 80-69 | W | | 30-61 | 49.2% | 35 | 9 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 40 | 9 | 9/1/2017 | CHICAGO | 110-87 | W | -950 | 45-67 | 67.2% | 36 | 16 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 38 | 15 | 9/3/2017 | WASHINGTON | 86-72 | W | -750 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 48 | 10 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 36 | 15 | 9/12/2017 | WASHINGTON | 101-81 | W | -600 | 41-69 | 59.4% | 38 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 35 | 11 | 9/14/2017 | WASHINGTON | 93-83 | W | -600 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 48 | 5 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 43 | 9 | 9/17/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 81-70 | W | -270 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 43 | 13 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 37 | 10 | 9/24/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 84-85 | L | -220 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 41 | 15 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 41 | 14 | 9/26/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 70-68 | W | -300 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 44 | 12 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 38 | 12 | 9/29/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 64-75 | L | +135 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 31 | 15 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 48 | 15 | 10/1/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 80-69 | W | +135 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 62 | 17 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 29 | 14 | 10/4/2017 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 51-36 (+13.9 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 10-12 (+1.1 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 21-23 (+5.3 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 5-7 (+2.3 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
10/1/2017 | MINNESOTA | 80 | 152.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 5-12 | 41.7% | 19-30 | 63.3% | 62 | 16 | 17 | | LOS ANGELES | 69 | -3 | Under | 31 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 5-22 | 22.7% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 29 | 7 | 14 | 9/29/2017 | MINNESOTA | 64 | 154 | Under | 26 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 31 | 4 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 75 | -3 | SU ATS | 32 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 48 | 8 | 15 | 9/26/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 68 | 158 | ATS | 26 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 17-19 | 89.5% | 38 | 5 | 12 | | MINNESOTA | 70 | -7 | SU Under | 45 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 1-6 | 16.7% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 44 | 7 | 12 | 9/24/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 85 | 157 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 12-19 | 63.2% | 41 | 8 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 84 | -5.5 | Over | 33 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 41 | 7 | 15 | 8/27/2017 | MINNESOTA | 67 | 155 | Under | 32 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 3-6 | 50.0% | 37 | 3 | 18 | | LOS ANGELES | 78 | -3 | SU ATS | 46 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 35 | 6 | 8 | 8/11/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 70 | 161.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 38 | 6 | 15 | | MINNESOTA | 64 | -5.5 | Under | 36 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 41 | 7 | 16 | 7/6/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 166.5 | Under | 36 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 32 | 9 | 17 | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 46 | 15 | 15 | 10/20/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 156.5 | SU ATS | 28 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 6-9 | 66.7% | 43 | 14 | 13 | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -5.5 | Under | 34 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 33 | 6 | 9 | 10/16/2016 | MINNESOTA | 85 | -1 | SU ATS | 46 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 24-27 | 88.9% | 44 | 14 | 16 | | LOS ANGELES | 79 | 160 | Over | 40 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 36 | 8 | 9 | 10/14/2016 | MINNESOTA | 75 | 159.5 | Over | 40 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 29 | 5 | 13 | | LOS ANGELES | 92 | 0 | SU ATS | 48 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 37 | 11 | 8 | 10/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 60 | 159.5 | Under | 25 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 3-20 | 15.0% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 45 | 8 | 12 | | MINNESOTA | 79 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 52 | 13 | 14 | 10/9/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 78 | 161 | SU ATS | 34 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 34 | 5 | 11 | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -6.5 | Under | 36 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 0-4 | 0.0% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 35 | 8 | 15 | 9/6/2016 | MINNESOTA | 77 | 158.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 42 | 6 | 11 | | LOS ANGELES | 74 | 0 | Under | 37 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 37 | 5 | 8 | 6/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 94 | 157 | SU ATS | 38 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 37 | 6 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -5.5 | Over | 36 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 38 | 8 | 18 | 6/21/2016 | MINNESOTA | 72 | 163 | SU ATS | 38 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 51 | 12 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 69 | -3 | Under | 39 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 39 | 5 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 161-105 against the money line (+44.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.4, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 75-61 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 71.3, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) after covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 23-10 against the money line (+10.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 36-23 against the money line (+9.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 27-15 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 134-107 against the money line (+22.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.1, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 18-6 against the money line (+9.6 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 188-137 against the money line (+37.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 191-125 against the money line (+30.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 17-10 against the money line (+11.2 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 23-16 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 134-98 against the money line (+27.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 5-8 against the money line (-11.3 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 9-13 against the money line (-11.1 Units) off an upset win as an underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 30-24 against the money line (-21.5 Units) off a road win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 7-11 against the money line (-12.3 Units) off an upset win as a road underdog as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.5, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 31-28 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 44-40 against the money line (-25.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Agler is 18-24 against the money line (-23.0 Units) on Wednesday in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 71.4, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 36-38 against the money line (-34.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.5, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 11-11 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in road games after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 80.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 31-48 against the money line (-25.1 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 72.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 5-11 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 71.1, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 12-12 against the money line (-13.7 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 15-18 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 9-13 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 20-20 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 203-89 against the money line (+17.7 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 106-26 against the money line (+25.3 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 110-29 against the money line (+28.2 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 110-29 against the money line (+28.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 125-53 against the money line (+39.3 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 45-10 against the money line (+19.4 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 54-22 against the money line (+13.8 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 35-13 against the money line (+12.7 Units) as a # 1 seed in the playoffs as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.0, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 39-5 against the money line (+21.0 Units) in home games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 19-3 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in home games after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 88-30 against the money line (+17.8 Units) after a win by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 153-62 against the money line (+29.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 122-47 against the money line (+28.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 146-60 against the money line (+18.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 52-14 against the money line (+18.3 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 32-9 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 63-36 against the money line (+13.1 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 37-8 against the money line (+16.8 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 45-11 against the money line (+18.4 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 69-15 against the money line (+25.3 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 273 times, while the road underdog won straight up 145 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 16 times, while the road underdog won straight up 14 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 10/02/2017 - Odyssey Sims injured last game, probable Wednesday vs. Min Lynx ( Shoulder ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 11:54:22 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|