| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES MINNESOTA |
|
| 158 | 68 Final 70 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Finals - Best of 5 - Game 2 - LA leads 1-0 | | | | |
665 | LOS ANGELES | +200 | 666 | MINNESOTA | -250 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (169-51 since 1997.) (76.8%, +85.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (148-32 since 1997.) (82.2%, +77.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, in August or September games. (105-26 since 1997.) (80.2%, +59 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, in August or September games. (111-40 since 1997.) (73.5%, +58.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, in August or September games. (56-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +36.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (97-31 since 1997.) (75.8%, +56 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, in August or September games. (138-46 since 1997.) (75%, +54.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (141-66 since 1997.) (68.1%, +53.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (88-13 since 1997.) (87.1%, +52.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival. (172-135 since 1997.) (56%, +52 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (88-15 since 1997.) (85.4%, +50.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (78-14 since 1997.) (84.8%, +48 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, in August or September games. (77-16 since 1997.) (82.8%, +44.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (77-45 since 1997.) (63.1%, +43 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (153-76 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.8%, +57.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (59-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.8%, +34.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a home loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (82-23 since 1997.) (78.1%, +40.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (90-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season against opponent after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (57-8 since 1997.) (87.7%, +38.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (59-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.1%, +31.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (71-50 since 1997.) (58.7%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite, in August or September games. (64-16 since 1997.) (80%, +36.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (47-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (87%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season. (53-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.6%, +22.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less, off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite. (48-23 since 1997.) (67.6%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (47-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (83.9%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (29-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +17.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less, off a upset loss as a favorite. (67-45 since 1997.) (59.8%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (43-8 since 1997.) (84.3%, +30.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (46-11 since 1997.) (80.7%, +29.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (51-19 since 1997.) (72.9%, +29.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (40-7 since 1997.) (85.1%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (65-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.3%, +39.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (44-10 since 1997.) (81.5%, +28.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (123-64 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (62-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.9%, +38 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (51-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (89.5%, +40.1 units. Rating = 5*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less. (39-7 since 1997.) (84.8%, +27.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (43-11 since 1997.) (79.6%, +27.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (33-4 since 1997.) (89.2%, +27 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (48-27 since 1997.) (64%, +25.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a close loss versus opponent by 3 points or less, off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite. (35-17 since 1997.) (67.3%, +25.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (35-6 since 1997.) (85.4%, +25.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after one or more consecutive overs, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (51-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (85%, +37.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (35-7 since 1997.) (83.3%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 80 points or more. (38-8 since 1997.) (82.6%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (59-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.7%, +28.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (38-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off an upset loss as a home favorite. (49-27 since 1997.) (64.5%, +24 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (35-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.4%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games. (79-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +28.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games. (30-9 since 1997.) (76.9%, +20.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - trailing 1-0 in a playoff series, as a # 1 seed in the playoffs. (28-7 since 1997.) (80%, +19.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight wins by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (31-14 since 1997.) (68.9%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (38-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (86.4%, +21.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (68-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (81%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more. (38-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.6%, +19.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +17 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (42-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.4%, +20.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (62-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.5%, +26.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good excellent shooting teams (>=46%) after 15+ games. (28-12 since 1997.) (70%, +16.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good excellent shooting teams (>=46%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (21-7 since 1997.) (75%, +15.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (58-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.9%, +25.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (37-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.5%, +13.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (40-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.4%, +19.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (103-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.8%, +22.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games. (28-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.1%, +8.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (49-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.7%, +23.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (90-60 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +27.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (38-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.9%, +11.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (78-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +18.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (46-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.7%, +11.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better. (33-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +2.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (102-73 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.3%, +28 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - being called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents on the season. (88-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.1%, +23.3 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (24-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +11.8 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (169-51 since 1997.) (76.8%, +85.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (227-75 since 1997.) (75.2%, +82.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (385-166 since 1997.) (69.9%, +81.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (196-68 since 1997.) (74.2%, +70.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (203-68 since 1997.) (74.9%, +63.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (97-31 since 1997.) (75.8%, +56 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (141-66 since 1997.) (68.1%, +53.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (122-40 since 1997.) (75.3%, +52.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (89-22 since 1997.) (80.2%, +52.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (105-40 since 1997.) (72.4%, +47.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 3 of their last 4 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (115-42 since 1997.) (73.2%, +44.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (112-47 since 1997.) (70.4%, +42 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (75-24 since 1997.) (75.8%, +40.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (182-110 since 1997.) (62.3%, +39.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a close loss by 3 points or less. (31-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +24.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (81-36 since 1997.) (69.2%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half. (49-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.5%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (53-15 since 1997.) (77.9%, +32.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (104-48 since 1997.) (68.4%, +30.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (50-30 since 1997.) (62.5%, +30.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (33-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +25.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (43-21 since 1997.) (67.2%, +26 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (25-20 since 1997.) (55.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (43-23 since 1997.) (65.2%, +25.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (53-30 since 1997.) (63.9%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having covered 4 of their last 5 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (40-14 since 1997.) (74.1%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +23.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival against opponent after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points. (18-10 since 1997.) (64.3%, +20.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (22-11 since 1997.) (66.7%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a close loss by 3 points or less. (30-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.2%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher. (20-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.5%, +12.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an road win where they scored 85 or more points, well rested team - playing only their 2nd game in 5 days. (30-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (60%, +14.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a close loss by 3 points or less against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (31-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 77 | | 31-68 | 46.1% | 5-16 | 30.6% | 9-11 | 82.1% | 37 | 8 | 14 | MINNESOTA | 81 | | 32-66 | 48.5% | 6-15 | 38.0% | 12-15 | 76.6% | 42 | 10 | 16 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 614 times, while LOS ANGELES won 366 times. Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.7 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.4, OPPONENT 78.5 | LOS ANGELES is 33-10 against the money line (+18.0 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 75.8 | MINNESOTA is 57-80 against the money line (-49.0 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.8, OPPONENT 78.7 | MINNESOTA is 19-11 against the money line (-25.4 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 75.7 | MINNESOTA is 133-118 against the money line (-53.2 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.5, OPPONENT 73.7 | MINNESOTA is 33-19 against the money line (-25.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 76.8 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 10-16 against the money line (-13.5 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 75.0 | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 7-7 against the money line (-13.7 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.8, OPPONENT 87.6 | LOS ANGELES is 5-6 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 81.6 | LOS ANGELES is 71-75 against the money line (-42.6 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 75.8 | LOS ANGELES is 188-156 against the money line (-80.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 82.1 | LOS ANGELES is 9-9 against the money line (-18.2 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 74.2 | LOS ANGELES is 10-14 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.8 | MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.6, OPPONENT 74.8 | MINNESOTA is 108-45 against the money line (+39.2 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 more rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 72.8 | MINNESOTA is 217-68 against the money line (+106.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.3, OPPONENT 78.5 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 14-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.4 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.4 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.8, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-3 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.4 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) in road games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-2 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-4 against the money line (+13.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.9, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 21-17 against the money line (-20.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 18-34 against the money line (-19.3 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 33-22 against the money line (-28.0 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 4-6 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 5-7 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 274-253 against the money line (-80.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 48-48 against the money line (-28.8 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-7 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 11-9 against the money line (-17.8 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-24 against the money line (-18.1 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.0, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 2-5 against the money line (-9.5 Units) in home games versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 130-116 against the money line (-52.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 79-73 against the money line (-53.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 118-107 against the money line (-68.2 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 167-140 against the money line (-56.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 201-150 against the money line (-65.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 69-109 against the money line (-47.6 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 21-2 against the money line (+16.6 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 25-2 against the money line (+20.6 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.1, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 6-2 against the money line (+8.3 Units) as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-0 against the money line (+8.2 Units) as a road underdog of +200 or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-0 against the money line (+7.2 Units) as a road underdog of +145 to +200 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in August or September games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-2 against the money line (+14.0 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after 2 consecutive division games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+9.6 Units) after 3 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-6 against the money line (+15.5 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-3 against the money line (+12.7 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.5, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 41-23 against the money line (+16.4 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) as a # 2 seed in the playoffs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after having won 20 or more of their last 25 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.4 Units) off a road win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.2, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-1 against the money line (+12.4 Units) off a win against a division rival this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.8, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-2 against the money line (+12.4 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-1 against the money line (+9.4 Units) off a road win this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.5, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-2 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-4 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-2 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-2 against the money line (+12.6 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.1, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+7.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-3 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after 10 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-2 against the money line (+11.1 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the money line (+8.1 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+8.8 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after 6 or more consecutive wins this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 42-11 against the money line (+19.8 Units) after 7 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 205-197 against the money line (-69.3 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 186-163 against the money line (-79.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 25-14 against the money line (-25.1 Units) after having won 8 or more of their last 10 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 23-48 against the money line (-25.1 Units) triple revenge - 3 straight losses vs. opponent since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-17 against the money line (-14.0 Units) off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 134-152 against the money line (-64.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.7, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 8-8 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in road games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-17 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-17 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-12 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-12 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-19 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-12 against the money line (-15.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-11 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-28 against the money line (-23.8 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-35 against the money line (-22.7 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-8 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-15 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 71-29 against the money line (+24.8 Units) in home games in August or September games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-2 against the money line (+12.9 Units) on Tuesday over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 74-25 against the money line (+30.3 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 54-17 against the money line (+26.0 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 80-39 against the money line (+20.6 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.3, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 21-4 against the money line (+14.0 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 24-4 against the money line (+14.2 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.7, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-2 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+11.8 Units) in home games after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 89.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 24-3 against the money line (+16.7 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 35-14 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 72-38 against the money line (+19.6 Units) in home games revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-1 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 129-61 against the money line (+32.8 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-1 against the money line (+13.8 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.2, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 88-36 against the money line (+27.5 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 60-17 against the money line (+25.6 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 45-19 against the money line (+21.3 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 67-15 against the money line (+26.8 Units) in home games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 20-1 against the money line (+18.5 Units) in home games after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 20-1 against the money line (+18.5 Units) in home games after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 30-8 | +5.1 | 25-13 | 13-25 | 83.7 | 43.0 | 47.9% | 39.0 | 75.4 | 37.1 | 43.4% | 38.8 | Road Games | 12-7 | -2.4 | 11-8 | 9-10 | 84.4 | 41.7 | 48.4% | 37.4 | 80.7 | 38.1 | 45.5% | 40.1 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5.8 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 84.0 | 42.2 | 48.3% | 40.4 | 75.8 | 35.0 | 44.4% | 36.4 | Division Games | 16-4 | +7.7 | 12-8 | 7-13 | 82.0 | 43.1 | 47.4% | 38.3 | 74.7 | 36.0 | 43.6% | 38.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.7 | 43.0 | 32-66 | 47.9% | 5-16 | 33.8% | 15-18 | 82.1% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 41.4 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 16-20 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 84.4 | 41.7 | 32-67 | 48.4% | 6-16 | 35.7% | 14-17 | 83.0% | 37 | 7 | 18 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.4 | 37.1 | 28-64 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 13-17 | 79.1% | 39 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.4 | 41 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 16-20 | 79.4% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.7 | 38.1 | 30-67 | 45.5% | 7-17 | 39.9% | 13-17 | 77.8% | 40 | 10 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 30-8 | -2.9 | 20-18 | 19-18 | 85.8 | 44.9 | 48.4% | 42.6 | 74.8 | 37.8 | 42.5% | 38.1 | Home Games | 17-3 | +1.6 | 9-11 | 11-9 | 88.2 | 45.4 | 49.5% | 42.7 | 74.2 | 37.5 | 41.7% | 38.8 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.8 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 89.0 | 44.0 | 51.1% | 43.6 | 78.2 | 42.2 | 42.4% | 38.4 | Division Games | 13-4 | +0.6 | 8-9 | 9-8 | 85.8 | 43.4 | 48.5% | 43.2 | 74.6 | 37.4 | 43.0% | 35.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.8 | 44.9 | 33-68 | 48.4% | 6-16 | 38.2% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 43 | 9 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.9 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 34.3% | 16-20 | 79.5% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 88.2 | 45.4 | 34-68 | 49.5% | 6-16 | 39.7% | 14-18 | 77.6% | 43 | 9 | 22 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.8 | 37.8 | 28-67 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 32.2% | 12-15 | 79.4% | 38 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 81.1 | 40.8 | 30-68 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 16-20 | 80.1% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 74.2 | 37.5 | 28-68 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 11-15 | 77.2% | 39 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71, MINNESOTA 70.9 |
| | |
|
|
8/18/2017 | @ CHICAGO | 115-106 | W | -300 | 45-99 | 45.5% | 49 | 6 | 41-82 | 50.0% | 49 | 21 | 8/22/2017 | SAN ANTONIO | 75-55 | W | -1050 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 36 | 14 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 38 | 18 | 8/24/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 82-67 | W | -220 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 38 | 8 | 27-54 | 50.0% | 35 | 20 | 8/27/2017 | MINNESOTA | 78-67 | W | -155 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 35 | 8 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 37 | 18 | 9/1/2017 | ATLANTA | 81-56 | W | -950 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 42 | 16 | 17-59 | 28.8% | 36 | 19 | 9/3/2017 | CONNECTICUT | 81-70 | W | -360 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 37 | 13 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 39 | 17 | 9/12/2017 | PHOENIX | 79-66 | W | -360 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 42 | 10 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 39 | 16 | 9/14/2017 | PHOENIX | 86-72 | W | -550 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 43 | 11 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 34 | 18 | 9/17/2017 | @ PHOENIX | 89-87 | W | -200 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 39 | 12 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 29 | 13 | 9/24/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | 85-84 | W | +180 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 41 | 14 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 41 | 15 | 9/26/2017 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2017 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/18/2017 | INDIANA | 111-52 | W | | 42-71 | 59.2% | 50 | 12 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 27 | 19 | 8/20/2017 | @ NEW YORK | 61-70 | L | -200 | 25-74 | 33.8% | 44 | 9 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 40 | 12 | 8/22/2017 | PHOENIX | 105-69 | W | -330 | 39-72 | 54.2% | 40 | 13 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 28 | 20 | 8/25/2017 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 89-70 | W | -950 | 37-67 | 55.2% | 43 | 12 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 36 | 13 | 8/27/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | 67-78 | L | +135 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 37 | 18 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 35 | 8 | 8/30/2017 | @ INDIANA | 80-69 | W | | 30-61 | 49.2% | 35 | 9 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 40 | 9 | 9/1/2017 | CHICAGO | 110-87 | W | -950 | 45-67 | 67.2% | 36 | 16 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 38 | 15 | 9/3/2017 | WASHINGTON | 86-72 | W | -750 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 48 | 10 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 36 | 15 | 9/12/2017 | WASHINGTON | 101-81 | W | -600 | 41-69 | 59.4% | 38 | 8 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 35 | 11 | 9/14/2017 | WASHINGTON | 93-83 | W | -600 | 38-75 | 50.7% | 48 | 5 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 43 | 9 | 9/17/2017 | @ WASHINGTON | 81-70 | W | -270 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 43 | 13 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 37 | 10 | 9/24/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 84-85 | L | -220 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 41 | 15 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 41 | 14 | 9/26/2017 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2017 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 50-34 (+15.4 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 9-10 (+2.7 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 21-22 (+6.3 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 5-6 (+3.3 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/24/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 85 | 157 | SU ATS | 43 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 12-19 | 63.2% | 41 | 8 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 84 | -5.5 | Over | 33 | 35-70 | 50.0% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 41 | 7 | 15 | 8/27/2017 | MINNESOTA | 67 | 155 | Under | 32 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 3-6 | 50.0% | 37 | 3 | 18 | | LOS ANGELES | 78 | -3 | SU ATS | 46 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 35 | 6 | 8 | 8/11/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 70 | 161.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 38 | 6 | 15 | | MINNESOTA | 64 | -5.5 | Under | 36 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 8-11 | 72.7% | 41 | 7 | 16 | 7/6/2017 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 166.5 | Under | 36 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 9-11 | 81.8% | 32 | 9 | 17 | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 14-19 | 73.7% | 46 | 15 | 15 | 10/20/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 156.5 | SU ATS | 28 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 6-9 | 66.7% | 43 | 14 | 13 | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -5.5 | Under | 34 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 11-13 | 84.6% | 33 | 6 | 9 | 10/16/2016 | MINNESOTA | 85 | -1 | SU ATS | 46 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 24-27 | 88.9% | 44 | 14 | 16 | | LOS ANGELES | 79 | 160 | Over | 40 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 36 | 8 | 9 | 10/14/2016 | MINNESOTA | 75 | 159.5 | Over | 40 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 29 | 5 | 13 | | LOS ANGELES | 92 | 0 | SU ATS | 48 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 37 | 11 | 8 | 10/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 60 | 159.5 | Under | 25 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 3-20 | 15.0% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 45 | 8 | 12 | | MINNESOTA | 79 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 52 | 13 | 14 | 10/9/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 78 | 161 | SU ATS | 34 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 34 | 5 | 11 | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -6.5 | Under | 36 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 0-4 | 0.0% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 35 | 8 | 15 | 9/6/2016 | MINNESOTA | 77 | 158.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 42 | 6 | 11 | | LOS ANGELES | 74 | 0 | Under | 37 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 37 | 5 | 8 | 6/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 94 | 157 | SU ATS | 38 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 37 | 6 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -5.5 | Over | 36 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 38 | 8 | 18 | 6/21/2016 | MINNESOTA | 72 | 163 | SU ATS | 38 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 51 | 12 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 69 | -3 | Under | 39 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 39 | 5 | 17 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 160-103 against the money line (+46.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.5, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 27-6 against the money line (+15.5 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 21-5 against the money line (+13.1 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 40-17 against the money line (+24.8 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 7 or less offensive rebounds in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.8, OPPONENT 70.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 10-3 against the money line (+7.1 Units) as a # 2 seed in the playoffs as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-2 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after having won 20 or more of their last 25 games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 15-5 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.8, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 11-2 against the money line (+10.0 Units) off a road win against a division rival as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 28-9 against the money line (+19.2 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 13-2 against the money line (+12.4 Units) off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.8, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 5*) | Agler is 18-6 against the money line (+13.4 Units) off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.4, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 23-9 against the money line (+11.8 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 23-5 against the money line (+13.0 Units) off a road win as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 13-2 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after leading their last 3 games by 5+ points at the half as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 54-19 against the money line (+25.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 79.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 21-5 against the money line (+12.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.0, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 28-5 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 82.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 17-3 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.8, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 93-54 against the money line (+20.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.5, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 70-46 against the money line (+19.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.4, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 62-31 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 45-15 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 79.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 18-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 26-6 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after 6 or more consecutive wins in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 82.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 35-21 against the money line (+10.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 26-13 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 133-105 against the money line (+24.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.2, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 17-4 against the money line (+11.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 79-38 against the money line (+23.6 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.3, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 111-59 against the money line (+34.7 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.7, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 128-82 against the money line (+22.7 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-7 against the money line (+16.0 Units) versus excellent shooting teams - making >=48% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 131-91 against the money line (+21.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 187-135 against the money line (+38.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.7, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 13-7 against the money line (+8.6 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 190-123 against the money line (+32.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.9, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 16-8 against the money line (+12.7 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 22-14 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 133-96 against the money line (+28.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 76.8, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 4-8 against the money line (-10.8 Units) off an upset loss to a division rival as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 4-9 against the money line (-13.0 Units) off a home loss against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.6, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 3-6 against the money line (-10.3 Units) off a close loss by 3 points or less to a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 29-27 against the money line (-18.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.1, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 42-39 against the money line (-27.1 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Agler is 22-26 against the money line (-20.0 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 73.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 23-24 against the money line (-21.2 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 3-7 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in road games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 14-15 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 6-9 against the money line (-11.5 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 7-25 against the money line (-17.9 Units) in road games off an upset win as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 66.1, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 13-17 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 15-17 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 5-10 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 9-12 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 2-8 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 72.1, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 10-12 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.7, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 19-19 against the money line (-18.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 14-15 against the money line (-19.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 12-12 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-11 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 16-15 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 6-8 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-10 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 5-8 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 9-15 against the money line (-17.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 7-11 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 4-9 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games after 5 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 201-88 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 105-26 against the money line (+24.3 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 109-29 against the money line (+27.2 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 109-29 against the money line (+27.2 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 46-8 against the money line (+25.8 Units) in home games in August or September games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 41-11 against the money line (+24.9 Units) on Tuesday as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 123-52 against the money line (+38.0 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 89-27 against the money line (+28.6 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 68-18 against the money line (+31.7 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 52-13 against the money line (+28.0 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 67-17 against the money line (+30.5 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 37-7 against the money line (+21.0 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 20-4 against the money line (+13.0 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 72-15 against the money line (+42.3 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Reeve is 98-34 against the money line (+28.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 14-3 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in the 2nd game of a playoff series as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 67-24 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after having won 4 of their last 5 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 35-10 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 29-14 against the money line (+10.5 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 47-19 against the money line (+20.3 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 17-2 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in home games after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 39-19 against the money line (+15.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 77-29 against the money line (+15.7 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 31-11 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 147-60 against the money line (+18.4 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 124-49 against the money line (+19.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 108-40 against the money line (+28.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 92-32 against the money line (+22.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 41-11 against the money line (+15.7 Units) in home games after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 152-62 against the money line (+28.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 119-43 against the money line (+21.6 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 95-31 against the money line (+21.7 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 79-24 against the money line (+29.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 65-19 against the money line (+22.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 57-11 against the money line (+27.5 Units) after scoring 77 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.8, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 121-47 against the money line (+27.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 75-21 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 47-9 against the money line (+21.0 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 36-7 against the money line (+22.2 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 115-41 against the money line (+30.6 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 69-22 against the money line (+20.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 168-63 against the money line (+20.8 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.6, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 124-41 against the money line (+23.9 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 110-35 against the money line (+21.5 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 104-36 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 107-40 against the money line (+24.1 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 52-17 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 51-14 against the money line (+17.3 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 31-9 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in home games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 61-35 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 44-11 against the money line (+17.4 Units) in home games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 68-15 against the money line (+24.3 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 221 times, while the road underdog won straight up 83 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 24 times, while the road underdog won straight up 9 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/26/2024 2:48:18 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|