| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES MINNESOTA |
|
| 156.5 | 77 Final 76 |
|
|
| | |
|
WNBA Finals - Best of 5 - Game 5 - Tied 2-2 | | | | |
609 | LOS ANGELES | +180 | 610 | MINNESOTA | -220 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (216-68 since 1997.) (76.1%, +94.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (164-47 since 1997.) (77.7%, +88.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (191-42 since 1997.) (82%, +88.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (144-28 since 1997.) (83.7%, +82.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (333-135 since 1997.) (71.2%, +81.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (279-101 since 1997.) (73.4%, +79.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (247-68 since 1997.) (78.4%, +71 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (341-132 since 1997.) (72.1%, +68.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (189-66 since 1997.) (74.1%, +66.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (178-55 since 1997.) (76.4%, +64.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning record on the season. (49-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +32 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (93-29 since 1997.) (76.2%, +55.6 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (118-37 since 1997.) (76.1%, +55.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (84-11 since 1997.) (88.4%, +52.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (105-24 since 1997.) (81.4%, +52.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 20 or more of their last 25 games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season. (122-37 since 1997.) (76.7%, +51.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - hot team - having won 20 or more of their last 25 games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (122-37 since 1997.) (76.7%, +51.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (147-107 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +49 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (84-13 since 1997.) (86.6%, +50.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (133-63 since 1997.) (67.9%, +50.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (75-12 since 1997.) (86.2%, +49.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (81-19 since 1997.) (81%, +47.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (103-26 since 1997.) (79.8%, +46.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (111-29 since 1997.) (79.3%, +45.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record. (100-38 since 1997.) (72.5%, +44.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (135-61 since 1997.) (68.9%, +43.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (104-42 since 1997.) (71.2%, +43.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (118-41 since 1997.) (74.2%, +42.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (94-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.6%, +33 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season. (27-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (73%, +27.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (72-23 since 1997.) (75.8%, +39.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (99-51 since 1997.) (66%, +39.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (86-44 since 1997.) (66.2%, +38.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, on Thursday nights. (44-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.3%, +20.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (61-12 since 1997.) (83.6%, +36.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (82-21 since 1997.) (79.6%, +36.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (96-61 since 1997.) (61.1%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 reb/game) against an average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game). (96-61 since 1997.) (61.1%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, good rebounding team (+3 to +6 Reb/G) vs. an average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) after 15+ games. (96-61 since 1997.) (61.1%, +35.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game. (205-73 since 1997.) (73.7%, +35.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (89-33 since 1997.) (73%, +35.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (62-16 since 1997.) (79.5%, +34.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (68-30 since 1997.) (69.4%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games. (49-17 since 1997.) (74.2%, +27.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (43-13 since 1997.) (76.8%, +25.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (130-104 since 1997.) (55.6%, +19.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (94-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.4%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (32-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against a good FT shooting team (76-80%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (328-331 since 1997.) (49.8%, +66.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (147-107 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.9%, +49 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (124-102 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.9%, +38.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (54-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.7%, +28.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (99-104 over the last 5 seasons.) (48.8%, +19.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, with a winning record on the season. (85-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game against opponent after a win by 6 points or less. (98-40 since 1997.) (71%, +30 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (36-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (47.4%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (86-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.4%, +16.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (60-57 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.3%, +22.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (110-70 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.1%, +33.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (70-52 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (93-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (93-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (93-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.9%, +19.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (130-104 since 1997.) (55.6%, +19.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (60-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (55%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games. (33-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +15.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (46-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (50.5%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (91-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (91-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT defense (30-35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (91-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.9%, +25.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (94-82 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.4%, +39.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (80-83 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.1%, +5.1 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 76 | | 29-64 | 45.2% | 6-17 | 35.2% | 13-16 | 80.1% | 35 | 8 | 14 | MINNESOTA | 86 | | 33-69 | 48.1% | 3-10 | 31.5% | 16-20 | 80.7% | 45 | 13 | 12 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 754 times, while LOS ANGELES won 221 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.9, OPPONENT 80.7 | LOS ANGELES is 12-1 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.6, OPPONENT 75.5 | MINNESOTA is 51-76 against the money line (-47.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.0, OPPONENT 78.8 | MINNESOTA is 66-76 against the money line (-38.4 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.4, OPPONENT 74.3 | MINNESOTA is 105-103 against the money line (-53.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.2, OPPONENT 74.3 | MINNESOTA is 65-72 against the money line (-33.8 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.1, OPPONENT 77.0 | MINNESOTA is 122-114 against the money line (-46.3 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.9, OPPONENT 73.5 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 29-28 against the money line (-26.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.7, OPPONENT 79.6 | LOS ANGELES is 13-16 against the money line (-18.9 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 78.3 | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.2, OPPONENT 74.0 | LOS ANGELES is 5-13 against the money line (-13.1 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.9, OPPONENT 75.0 | LOS ANGELES is 3-5 against the money line (-10.5 Units) in road games when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 83.8 | LOS ANGELES is 8-10 against the money line (-19.7 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.7, OPPONENT 88.2 | LOS ANGELES is 20-22 against the money line (-26.1 Units) in games where they force 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 76.4 | LOS ANGELES is 61-57 against the money line (-35.8 Units) when they grab 32 to 36 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 75.8 | LOS ANGELES is 172-150 against the money line (-77.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.9, OPPONENT 82.1 | LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-18.0 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 74.8 | LOS ANGELES is 12-15 against the money line (-20.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 76.0 | MINNESOTA is 16-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 75.4 | MINNESOTA is 95-46 against the money line (+41.1 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 more free throws than opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.7, OPPONENT 72.3 | MINNESOTA is 20-5 against the money line (+12.6 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 74.8 | MINNESOTA is 59-11 against the money line (+25.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.0, OPPONENT 78.0 | MINNESOTA is 146-32 against the money line (+106.6 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 90.3, OPPONENT 80.2 | MINNESOTA is 33-8 against the money line (+16.5 Units) in games where they commit 12 or fewer turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 71.7 |
|
| | |
|
MINNESOTA is 14-12 against the money line (-17.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 10-10 against the money line (-17.3 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 4-7 against the money line (-19.1 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 5-6 against the money line (-13.8 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-8 against the money line (-17.9 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 111-107 against the money line (-46.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 42-62 against the money line (-27.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 4-5 against the money line (-16.3 Units) in home games versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 17-40 against the money line (-31.4 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 3*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 11-12 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-15 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.4, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-17 against the money line (-12.4 Units) versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-18 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 132-118 against the money line (-51.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-30 against the money line (-28.5 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-18 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-13.9 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-16 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-42 against the money line (-23.1 Units) in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.4, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 175-144 against the money line (-74.8 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-39 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-17 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-19 against the money line (-14.2 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-7 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-18 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after 2 consecutive division games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-5 against the money line (+13.2 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 197-193 against the money line (-66.1 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 174-159 against the money line (-75.3 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-7 against the money line (-20.9 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.8, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 37-42 against the money line (-37.5 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 62-72 against the money line (-42.7 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-9 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after a win by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 139-152 against the money line (-82.8 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 59-53 against the money line (-30.5 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 52-43 against the money line (-40.9 Units) on Thursday since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 32-43 against the money line (-32.5 Units) in road games when playing with 3 or more days rest since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-36 against the money line (-23.3 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after 3 consecutive division games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-4 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in road games after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-12.6 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-18.1 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-10 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-7 against the money line (-12.7 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-9 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 0-4 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 65.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-11.7 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-9 against the money line (-13.4 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-12 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-9 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-8 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-19 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-18 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-12 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-11 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 18-3 against the money line (+12.4 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 65-22 against the money line (+30.7 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 47-15 against the money line (+23.4 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 72-35 against the money line (+23.0 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.3, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.3 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 15-2 against the money line (+12.4 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 22-2 against the money line (+16.2 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 35-4 against the money line (+22.1 Units) in home games after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 29-7 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after having won 20 or more of their last 25 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 15-1 against the money line (+12.8 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.8, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 35-6 against the money line (+19.2 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 31-3 against the money line (+22.5 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 28-2 against the money line (+23.1 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.0, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 24-2 against the money line (+19.1 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 15-1 against the money line (+12.3 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 28-3 against the money line (+19.5 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 21-4 against the money line (+12.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 28-6 against the money line (+15.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 69-31 against the money line (+22.5 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 115-40 against the money line (+29.6 Units) in home games after playing a game as favorite since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 19-3 against the money line (+13.4 Units) after a game where they covered the spread this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 31-11 | +3 | 20-22 | 23-19 | 83.0 | 40.7 | 48.3% | 38.6 | 76.2 | 37.7 | 43.4% | 40.1 | Road Games | 14-7 | -3.8 | 11-10 | 10-11 | 80.5 | 39.2 | 46.6% | 40.0 | 75.5 | 37.2 | 42.9% | 40.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 80.8 | 40.4 | 45.8% | 36.6 | 78.0 | 38.4 | 46.5% | 40.6 | Division Games | 13-7 | +0.7 | 8-12 | 8-12 | 78.1 | 37.0 | 46.4% | 37.2 | 73.6 | 37.0 | 43.4% | 40.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.0 | 40.7 | 31-64 | 48.3% | 6-16 | 36.8% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 39 | 7 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.6 | 41.1 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 6-16 | 34.0% | 17-22 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 80.5 | 39.2 | 30-64 | 46.6% | 6-17 | 36.4% | 15-18 | 80.8% | 40 | 7 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.2 | 37.7 | 29-67 | 43.4% | 4-15 | 29.7% | 14-17 | 78.8% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82.4 | 41.2 | 30-68 | 44.3% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 17-21 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.5 | 37.2 | 29-68 | 42.9% | 5-16 | 28.9% | 13-17 | 75.1% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 33-8 | -3.2 | 24-17 | 23-18 | 85.9 | 44.0 | 47.5% | 43.5 | 77.4 | 39.0 | 42.3% | 38.8 | Home Games | 18-3 | +0.6 | 13-8 | 12-9 | 87.3 | 45.1 | 48.4% | 44.2 | 75.7 | 36.7 | 41.1% | 38.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.8 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 79.4 | 40.0 | 47.7% | 40.0 | 75.2 | 37.0 | 43.5% | 38.4 | Division Games | 20-3 | +12.4 | 15-8 | 12-11 | 85.6 | 43.9 | 47.7% | 44.3 | 76.2 | 38.1 | 42.3% | 37.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.9 | 44.0 | 32-68 | 47.5% | 4-11 | 33.8% | 17-21 | 81.3% | 44 | 10 | 20 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 82.1 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 44.5% | 5-16 | 33.5% | 17-21 | 80.0% | 42 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 87.3 | 45.1 | 33-68 | 48.4% | 4-11 | 33.6% | 18-22 | 80.2% | 44 | 9 | 21 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.4 | 39.0 | 28-67 | 42.3% | 5-17 | 32.2% | 16-20 | 79.1% | 39 | 8 | 15 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 82 | 40.5 | 30-67 | 44.5% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 17-21 | 80.1% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.7 | 36.7 | 28-67 | 41.1% | 5-17 | 31.3% | 15-19 | 80.8% | 38 | 9 | 16 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 71.9, MINNESOTA 71.2 |
| | |
|
|
9/11/2016 | @ SEATTLE | 60-78 | L | -140 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 27 | 13 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 47 | 16 | 9/13/2016 | PHOENIX | 90-85 | W | -155 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 38 | 4 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 43 | 11 | 9/16/2016 | SAN ANTONIO | 71-65 | W | -650 | 27-54 | 50.0% | 36 | 22 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 27 | 14 | 9/28/2016 | CHICAGO | 95-75 | W | -650 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 45 | 17 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 37 | 15 | 9/30/2016 | CHICAGO | 99-84 | W | -850 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 44 | 18 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 44 | 14 | 10/2/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 66-70 | L | -360 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 47 | 14 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 44 | 8 | 10/4/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 95-75 | W | -330 | 29-53 | 54.7% | 31 | 15 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 43 | 18 | 10/9/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 78-76 | W | +210 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 34 | 11 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 35 | 15 | 10/11/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | 60-79 | L | +250 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 45 | 12 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 52 | 14 | 10/14/2016 | MINNESOTA | 92-75 | W | -110 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 37 | 8 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 29 | 13 | 10/16/2016 | MINNESOTA | 79-85 | L | -105 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 36 | 9 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 44 | 16 | 10/20/2016 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
9/11/2016 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-76 | W | -1050 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 51 | 8 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 47 | 10 | 9/13/2016 | @ CHICAGO | 97-98 | L | -220 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 44 | 15 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 41 | 17 | 9/16/2016 | @ INDIANA | 82-75 | W | -120 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 37 | 14 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 33 | 18 | 9/17/2016 | ATLANTA | 95-87 | W | -300 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 49 | 12 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 37 | 15 | 9/28/2016 | PHOENIX | 113-95 | W | -250 | 46-72 | 63.9% | 48 | 13 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 23 | 10 | 9/30/2016 | PHOENIX | 96-86 | W | -330 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 38 | 12 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 37 | 20 | 10/2/2016 | @ PHOENIX | 82-67 | W | -125 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 40 | 10 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 40 | 15 | 10/9/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 76-78 | L | -270 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 35 | 15 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 34 | 11 | 10/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 79-60 | W | -330 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 52 | 14 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 45 | 12 | 10/14/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 75-92 | L | -110 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 29 | 13 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 37 | 8 | 10/16/2016 | @ LOS ANGELES | 85-79 | W | -115 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 44 | 16 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 36 | 9 | 10/20/2016 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 46-33 (+10.0 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 12-6 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 18-21 (+1.9 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 3-6 (+0.7 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
10/16/2016 | MINNESOTA | 85 | -1 | SU ATS | 46 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 3-9 | 33.3% | 24-27 | 88.9% | 44 | 14 | 16 | | LOS ANGELES | 79 | 160 | Over | 40 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 36 | 8 | 9 | 10/14/2016 | MINNESOTA | 75 | 159.5 | Over | 40 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 18-20 | 90.0% | 29 | 5 | 13 | | LOS ANGELES | 92 | 0 | SU ATS | 48 | 39-71 | 54.9% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 7-10 | 70.0% | 37 | 11 | 8 | 10/11/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 60 | 159.5 | Under | 25 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 3-20 | 15.0% | 11-17 | 64.7% | 45 | 8 | 12 | | MINNESOTA | 79 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 52 | 13 | 14 | 10/9/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 78 | 161 | SU ATS | 34 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 34 | 5 | 11 | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -6.5 | Under | 36 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 0-4 | 0.0% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 35 | 8 | 15 | 9/6/2016 | MINNESOTA | 77 | 158.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 42 | 6 | 11 | | LOS ANGELES | 74 | 0 | Under | 37 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 19-26 | 73.1% | 37 | 5 | 8 | 6/24/2016 | LOS ANGELES | 94 | 157 | SU ATS | 38 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 11-19 | 57.9% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 37 | 6 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 76 | -5.5 | Over | 36 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 38 | 8 | 18 | 6/21/2016 | MINNESOTA | 72 | 163 | SU ATS | 38 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 51 | 12 | 14 | | LOS ANGELES | 69 | -3 | Under | 39 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 16-24 | 66.7% | 39 | 5 | 17 | 9/22/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 80 | 146 | Over | 30 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 33 | 7 | 13 | | MINNESOTA | 91 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 43 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 30-36 | 83.3% | 49 | 16 | 10 | 9/20/2015 | MINNESOTA | 71 | 145.5 | Over | 35 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 6-14 | 42.9% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 35 | 8 | 16 | | LOS ANGELES | 81 | -3 | SU ATS | 53 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 46 | 11 | 10 | 9/18/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 65 | 146.5 | ATS | 36 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 9-12 | 75.0% | 38 | 8 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 67 | -5.5 | SU Under | 33 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 4-14 | 28.6% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 36 | 6 | 11 | 8/9/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 64 | 149.5 | Under | 32 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 39 | 9 | 16 | | MINNESOTA | 72 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 37 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 1-10 | 10.0% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 43 | 10 | 9 | 8/4/2015 | MINNESOTA | 61 | -2 | Under | 35 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 5-20 | 25.0% | 6-7 | 85.7% | 37 | 4 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 83 | 152.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 37-77 | 48.1% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 42 | 9 | 7 | 7/29/2015 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | 148 | ATS | 35 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 7-8 | 87.5% | 32 | 2 | 21 | | MINNESOTA | 82 | -8.5 | SU Over | 43 | 29-61 | 47.5% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 18-24 | 75.0% | 31 | 6 | 12 | 6/16/2015 | MINNESOTA | 67 | -11.5 | SU ATS | 23 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 4-7 | 57.1% | 31 | 4 | 8 | | LOS ANGELES | 52 | 144.5 | Under | 28 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 3-18 | 16.7% | 1-4 | 25.0% | 39 | 9 | 11 |
|
| | |
|
Agler is 135-96 against the money line (+40.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 74.5, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 113-59 against the money line (+40.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 77.7, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 111-90 against the money line (+22.9 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 75.9, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 31-25 against the money line (-21.3 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 22-18 against the money line (-19.0 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.6, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 37-34 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Agler is 4-9 against the money line (-16.3 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 1-6 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.3, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 0-4 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in road games after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 67.0, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 4-8 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive overs as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 3-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.7, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 7-11 against the money line (-18.1 Units) off a loss against a division rival as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 7-14 against the money line (-14.7 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.7, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 4-10 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.1, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 2-8 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 68.7, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 8-14 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 11-13 against the money line (-14.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 1-5 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 0-4 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 65.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 4-9 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games after allowing 80 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.4, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Agler is 27-34 against the money line (-22.3 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Agler 68.6, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 12-13 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 9-12 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 7-9 against the money line (-12.0 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 7-8 against the money line (-13.1 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 7-13 against the money line (-16.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.3, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 21-19 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 12-18 against the money line (-20.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 4-12 against the money line (-14.5 Units) in road games after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.0, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 3-11 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games after 4 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Agler is 11-12 against the money line (-17.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 15-15 against the money line (-16.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 4-9 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 11-14 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 14-18 against the money line (-12.8 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 6-12 against the money line (-12.3 Units) in road games vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 12-18 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.2, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 8-12 against the money line (-13.9 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 9-16 against the money line (-17.7 Units) in road games versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.2, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Agler is 9-14 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 11-17 against the money line (-14.0 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 8-11 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Agler is 11-14 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Agler is 14-18 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 178-80 against the money line (+21.5 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 94-22 against the money line (+24.9 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 98-25 against the money line (+27.8 Units) in home games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 98-25 against the money line (+27.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 114-47 against the money line (+39.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 43-9 against the money line (+19.6 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 52-21 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.2, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 113-52 against the money line (+16.2 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 78-23 against the money line (+30.0 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 59-15 against the money line (+32.1 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.5, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 45-11 against the money line (+25.4 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 59-13 against the money line (+32.9 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 31-4 against the money line (+24.4 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Reeve is 14-2 against the money line (+11.4 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.6, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 83-31 against the money line (+18.2 Units) after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 30-10 against the money line (+12.8 Units) as a # 1 seed in the playoffs as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 61-24 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 29-7 against the money line (+15.6 Units) after having won 20 or more of their last 25 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 71-30 against the money line (+18.9 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 42-8 against the money line (+19.9 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 19-7 against the money line (+11.0 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 69-19 against the money line (+23.3 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 57-14 against the money line (+20.6 Units) in home games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.5, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 94-37 against the money line (+24.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 80-29 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 131-56 against the money line (+22.3 Units) after scoring 75 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 102-38 against the money line (+17.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 38-6 against the money line (+20.4 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 66-21 against the money line (+25.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 53-16 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 102-41 against the money line (+22.7 Units) after scoring 80 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 56-13 against the money line (+24.8 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 97-37 against the money line (+22.8 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 145-55 against the money line (+25.9 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.1, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 100-43 against the money line (+18.5 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 127-52 against the money line (+26.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 51-15 against the money line (+19.3 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.7, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 32-12 against the money line (+12.5 Units) after 4 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 41-22 against the money line (+11.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 56-30 against the money line (+17.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 104-44 against the money line (+18.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 132-61 against the money line (+16.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 91-42 against the money line (+14.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 190 times, while the road underdog won straight up 81 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 20 times, while the road underdog won straight up 13 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
[F] 10/16/2016 - Janel McCarville "?" Thursday vs. LA Sparks ( Back ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/1/2024 8:38:24 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|