| | | WNBA : First Half Matchup |
| |
PHOENIX
First Half Results
MINNESOTA |
|
|
82.5
| 36
Final
39 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 601 | PHOENIX | Pick | | 602 | MINNESOTA | 82.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
 - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(64-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(47-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after 3 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(29-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(121-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) |  - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - after 3 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(34-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(51-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +20.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, after 3 straight blowout wins by 12 points or more.
(28-9 since 1997.) (75.7%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after 3 straight wins by 10 points or more.
(29-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.4%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(182-120 since 1997.) (60.3%, +50 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(63-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +24.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - after 6 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(77-42 since 1997.) (64.7%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent against opponent off 2 or more consecutive home wins.
(130-81 since 1997.) (61.6%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(46-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.2%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(38-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (76%, +24.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite.
(71-37 since 1997.) (65.7%, +30.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite.
(61-29 since 1997.) (67.8%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(39-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +20.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(31-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +16.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(33-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(27-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.8%, +20.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(23-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(63-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.3%, +37.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(63-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.2%, +32.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(52-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (77.6%, +35.5 units. Rating = 4*) |
|
|
- Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(39-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +20.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(31-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.6%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +16.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(33-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +22 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(27-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.8%, +20.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(23-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.1%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(145-90 since 1997.) (61.7%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG), after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(52-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.5%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more.
(93-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - very good shooting team - shooting >=46% on the season, hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(51-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +20.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(64-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(47-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +25 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(121-78 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.8%, +35.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(61-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.8%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - explosive offensive team - scoring 77+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(47-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.1%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the 1rst half line (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(62-34 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +24.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(70-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +34.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(182-120 since 1997.) (60.3%, +50 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(63-35 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +24.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - after 6 or more consecutive wins, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(77-42 since 1997.) (64.7%, +30.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(56-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +30.7 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(87-49 since 1997.) (64%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games.
(119-62 since 1997.) (65.7%, +50.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the 1rst half line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(91-47 since 1997.) (65.9%, +39.3 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(396-279 since 1997.) (58.7%, +89.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(48-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +20.5 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(104-57 since 1997.) (64.6%, +41.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent.
(535-378 since 1997.) (58.6%, +119.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(162-104 since 1997.) (60.9%, +47.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road win.
(97-52 since 1997.) (65.1%, +39.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent.
(405-270 since 1997.) (60%, +108 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(49-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.1%, +23.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent.
(589-412 since 1997.) (58.8%, +135.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(155-91 since 1997.) (63%, +54.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(164-97 since 1997.) (62.8%, +57.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent against opponent off a home win.
(231-161 since 1997.) (58.9%, +53.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more.
(330-231 since 1997.) (58.8%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(89-47 since 1997.) (65.4%, +37.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a road win.
(46-18 since 1997.) (71.9%, +26.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(264-176 since 1997.) (60%, +70.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a win by 10 points or more.
(178-115 since 1997.) (60.8%, +51.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(205-132 since 1997.) (60.8%, +59.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in July games.
(71-31 since 1997.) (69.6%, +36.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game, in May, June, or July games.
(142-84 since 1997.) (62.8%, +49.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game.
(80-41 since 1997.) (66.1%, +34.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after a win by 10 points or more.
(261-178 since 1997.) (59.5%, +65.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games.
(299-210 since 1997.) (58.7%, +68 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in July games.
(108-61 since 1997.) (63.9%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, in May, June, or July games.
(180-118 since 1997.) (60.4%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after going under the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents.
(199-132 since 1997.) (60.1%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread.
(735-516 since 1997.) (58.8%, +167.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(379-239 since 1997.) (61.3%, +116.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(254-151 since 1997.) (62.7%, +87.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(202-128 since 1997.) (61.2%, +61.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(145-82 since 1997.) (63.9%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(109-69 since 1997.) (61.2%, +33.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after a game where they covered the spread against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(174-108 since 1997.) (61.7%, +55.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games.
(366-262 since 1997.) (58.3%, +77.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season.
(222-128 since 1997.) (63.4%, +81.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in July games.
(154-91 since 1997.) (62.9%, +53.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(161-93 since 1997.) (63.4%, +58.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(363-261 since 1997.) (58.2%, +75.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in July games.
(108-54 since 1997.) (66.7%, +48.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in May, June, or July games.
(185-112 since 1997.) (62.3%, +61.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games, in July games.
(76-37 since 1997.) (67.3%, +35.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(80-37 since 1997.) (68.4%, +39.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - off a win by 10 points or more over a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(147-89 since 1997.) (62.3%, +49.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - off a win against a division rival.
(464-332 since 1997.) (58.3%, +98.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - off a win against a division rival, in May, June, or July games.
(279-200 since 1997.) (58.2%, +59 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - off a win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season.
(270-184 since 1997.) (59.5%, +67.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - off a home win by 10 points or more, with a winning record on the season.
(157-104 since 1997.) (60.2%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after a win by 10 points or more.
(390-266 since 1997.) (59.5%, +97.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season.
(367-282 since 1997.) (56.5%, +56.8 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game.
(750-552 since 1997.) (57.6%, +142.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in July games.
(287-171 since 1997.) (62.7%, +98.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good foul drawing team - attempting >=20 free throws/game, in May, June, or July games.
(475-328 since 1997.) (59.2%, +114.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(436-319 since 1997.) (57.7%, +85.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in July games.
(152-78 since 1997.) (66.1%, +66.2 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(145-82 since 1997.) (63.9%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(117-69 since 1997.) (62.9%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games on the season.
(76-41 since 1997.) (65%, +30.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(41-15 since 1997.) (73.2%, +24.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(43-16 since 1997.) (72.9%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games.
(181-116 since 1997.) (60.9%, +53.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season.
(113-64 since 1997.) (63.8%, +42.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(74-39 since 1997.) (65.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(25-7 since 1997.) (78.1%, +17.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(32-9 since 1997.) (78%, +22.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games.
(91-53 since 1997.) (63.2%, +32.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season.
(64-33 since 1997.) (66%, +27.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(43-17 since 1997.) (71.7%, +24.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(22-4 since 1997.) (84.6%, +17.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(773-539 since 1997.) (58.9%, +180.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in July games.
(245-147 since 1997.) (62.5%, +83.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(499-348 since 1997.) (58.9%, +116.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, on Thursday nights.
(123-77 since 1997.) (61.5%, +38.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(449-299 since 1997.) (60%, +120.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(293-193 since 1997.) (60.3%, +80.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(236-153 since 1997.) (60.7%, +67.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(163-100 since 1997.) (62%, +53 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(203-128 since 1997.) (61.3%, +62.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive wins against opponent after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(118-72 since 1997.) (62.1%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(431-316 since 1997.) (57.7%, +83.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, on Thursday nights.
(82-45 since 1997.) (64.6%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(315-212 since 1997.) (59.8%, +81.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(246-161 since 1997.) (60.4%, +68.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(154-94 since 1997.) (62.1%, +50.6 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season.
(203-130 since 1997.) (61%, +60 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - in July games.
(447-315 since 1997.) (58.7%, +100.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - in May, June, or July games.
(946-741 since 1997.) (56.1%, +130.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - playing with 3 or more days rest, in July games.
(118-72 since 1997.) (62.1%, +38.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents.
(916-703 since 1997.) (56.6%, +142.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(435-297 since 1997.) (59.4%, +108.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(325-210 since 1997.) (60.7%, +94 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(231-149 since 1997.) (60.8%, +67.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread.
(501-371 since 1997.) (57.5%, +92.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 2 of their last 3 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(65-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.7%, +24.3 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(99-51 since 1997.) (66%, +42.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after having covered 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(116-71 since 1997.) (62%, +37.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 straight games outrebounding opponent by 5 or more.
(70-35 since 1997.) (66.7%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(354-256 since 1997.) (58%, +72.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in July games.
(107-54 since 1997.) (66.5%, +47.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team, in May, June, or July games.
(176-107 since 1997.) (62.2%, +58.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games, in July games.
(77-37 since 1997.) (67.5%, +36.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games, in May, June, or July games.
(78-38 since 1997.) (67.2%, +36.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent.
(745-532 since 1997.) (58.3%, +159.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(85-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season.
(280-200 since 1997.) (58.3%, +60 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(203-122 since 1997.) (62.5%, +68.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, off a road win.
(134-80 since 1997.) (62.6%, +46 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite.
(82-48 since 1997.) (63.1%, +29.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points.
(549-408 since 1997.) (57.4%, +100.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(72-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.7%, +26.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points, off a road win.
(57-20 since 1997.) (74%, +35 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(104-61 since 1997.) (63%, +36.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good shooting team - shooting >=44% on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(76-45 since 1997.) (62.8%, +26.5 units. Rating = 1*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a win by 10 points or more.
(226-158 since 1997.) (58.9%, +52.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after playing a road game, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(187-122 since 1997.) (60.5%, +52.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after a game where they covered the spread against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 4 or more consecutive games.
(46-16 since 1997.) (74.2%, +28.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games against opponent after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games.
(44-14 since 1997.) (75.9%, +28.6 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins.
(733-562 since 1997.) (56.6%, +114.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins.
(388-271 since 1997.) (58.9%, +89.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(248-167 since 1997.) (59.8%, +64.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, playing with 3 or more days rest.
(96-53 since 1997.) (64.4%, +37.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(153-97 since 1997.) (61.2%, +46.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(113-68 since 1997.) (62.4%, +38.2 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins.
(234-156 since 1997.) (60%, +62.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, in May, June, or July games.
(148-96 since 1997.) (60.7%, +42.4 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, on Thursday nights.
(43-16 since 1997.) (72.9%, +25.4 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(108-61 since 1997.) (63.9%, +40.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(81-45 since 1997.) (64.3%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 4 or more consecutive wins, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team.
(75-41 since 1997.) (64.7%, +29.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (MINNESOTA) - after 5 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>=75%) playing a team with a winning record.
(37-13 since 1997.) (74%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Home teams where the first half total is greater than 70.5 (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, in July games.
(31-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.6%, +23.3 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - in July games.
(447-315 since 1997.) (58.7%, +100.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game.
(52-21 since 1997.) (71.2%, +28.9 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive unders.
(371-259 since 1997.) (58.9%, +86.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(135-82 since 1997.) (62.2%, +44.8 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game.
(74-33 since 1997.) (69.2%, +37.7 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game.
(35-9 since 1997.) (79.5%, +25.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - hot team - covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread, with a winning record on the season.
(47-21 since 1997.) (69.1%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season.
(681-487 since 1997.) (58.3%, +145.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season, in July games.
(219-119 since 1997.) (64.8%, +88.1 units. Rating = 3*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(384-250 since 1997.) (60.6%, +109 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games.
(458-330 since 1997.) (58.1%, +95 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - in May, June, or July games.
(946-741 since 1997.) (56.1%, +130.9 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - vs. division opponents.
(916-703 since 1997.) (56.6%, +142.7 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(75-39 since 1997.) (65.8%, +32.1 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(55-25 since 1997.) (68.8%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(55-25 since 1997.) (68.8%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(55-25 since 1997.) (68.8%, +27.5 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(435-297 since 1997.) (59.4%, +108.3 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(325-210 since 1997.) (60.7%, +94 units. Rating = 2*) | Play Under - Road teams where the first half total is greater than 65.5 (PHOENIX) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(243-166 since 1997.) (59.4%, +60.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| PHOENIX | 83 | | 42 | | 32-66 | 48.4% | 6-16 | 38.0% | 14-17 | 81.6% | 40 | 7 | 13 | | MINNESOTA | 81 | | 41 | | 32-69 | 46.5% | 4-12 | 32.9% | 14-17 | 81.3% | 40 | 9 | 11 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team covered the first half spread and the number of simulations which went over or under the first half total are listed below. Edges are indicated where one side enjoyed a significant advantage against the first half line or total. | In 1000 simulated games, PHOENIX covered the first half line 525 times, while MINNESOTA covered the first half line 442 times.
No Edge. | In 1000 simulated games, 535 games went over first half total, while 465 games went under first half total.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox First Half Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
PHOENIX is 15-7 against the 1rst half line (+7.3 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.0, OPPONENT 36.6 | PHOENIX is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 46.7, OPPONENT 37.8 | MINNESOTA is 42-65 against the 1rst half line (-29.5 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.9, OPPONENT 38.2 | MINNESOTA is 68-94 against the 1rst half line (-35.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 35.9 | MINNESOTA is 65-129 against the 1rst half line (-76.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.2, OPPONENT 42.2 | MINNESOTA is 5-23 against the 1rst half line (-20.3 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.5, OPPONENT 46.5 |
|
PHOENIX is 22-40 against the 1rst half line (-22.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.2, OPPONENT 43.5 | MINNESOTA is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 45.4, OPPONENT 41.4 | MINNESOTA is 128-92 against the 1rst half line (+26.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.4, OPPONENT 38.7 |
|
PHOENIX is 175-129 OVER (+33.1 Units) the 1rst half total when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 40.7, OPPONENT 43.1 | PHOENIX is 41-21 OVER (+17.9 Units) the 1rst half total where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 41.3, OPPONENT 41.8 | PHOENIX is 184-117 OVER (+55.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.8, OPPONENT 40.6 | PHOENIX is 27-8 OVER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.3, OPPONENT 40.7 |
|
PHOENIX is 103-71 UNDER (+24.9 Units) the 1rst half total in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.8, OPPONENT 37.1 | PHOENIX is 31-12 UNDER (+17.8 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.1, OPPONENT 37.7 | PHOENIX is 65-44 UNDER (+16.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 35.9, OPPONENT 38.1 | MINNESOTA is 79-48 UNDER (+26.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.1, OPPONENT 36.1 | MINNESOTA is 72-41 UNDER (+26.9 Units) the 1rst half total when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.2, OPPONENT 35.2 | MINNESOTA is 162-117 UNDER (+33.3 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.1, OPPONENT 35.4 | MINNESOTA is 119-83 UNDER (+27.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.9, OPPONENT 35.9 | MINNESOTA is 96-63 UNDER (+26.7 Units) the 1rst half total when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 34.8 | MINNESOTA is 106-68 UNDER (+31.2 Units) the 1rst half total when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.7 |
|
| | |
|
| PHOENIX | -2 |  | | MINNESOTA | | |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 11-4 against the 1rst half line (+6.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.6, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 46.6, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 3*) | PHOENIX is 10-3 against the 1rst half line (+6.7 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 44.6, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 111-148 against the 1rst half line (-51.8 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.7, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 26-46 against the 1rst half line (-24.6 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-37 against the 1rst half line (-20.7 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.3, OPPONENT 35.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 64-95 against the 1rst half line (-40.5 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 4-12 against the 1rst half line (-9.2 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 40.1, OPPONENT 40.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the 1rst half line (+6.9 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 46.3, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 6-0 against the 1rst half line (+6.0 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.7, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the 1rst half line (+6.8 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 25-14 against the 1rst half line (+9.6 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-10 against the 1rst half line (+8.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.7, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-4 against the 1rst half line (+6.6 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 33-22 against the 1rst half line (+8.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) in home games versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.1, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 8-1 OVER (+6.9 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 41.7, OPPONENT 42.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 174-116 UNDER (+46.4 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.6, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 114-71 UNDER (+35.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.3, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 45-21 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 34.8, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 28-11 UNDER (+15.9 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 33.9, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 129-91 UNDER (+28.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.9, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 178-139 UNDER (+25.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.9, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 65-38 UNDER (+23.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.4, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 89-59 UNDER (+24.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.5, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 57-32 UNDER (+21.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.5, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 78-54 UNDER (+18.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.5, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 16-5 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 35.5, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good shooting teams - making >=46% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.0, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 110-70 UNDER (+33.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.4, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 151-101 UNDER (+39.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.2, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 143-110 UNDER (+22.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 205-142 UNDER (+48.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.5, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 287-210 UNDER (+56.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.2, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 71-42 UNDER (+24.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.0, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 93-63 UNDER (+23.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.0, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 66-39 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 35.8, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 95-62 UNDER (+26.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.1, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 84-60 UNDER (+18.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.2, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 161-99 UNDER (+52.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.7, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 97-55 UNDER (+36.5 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.9, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 26-9 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 32.4, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 113-70 UNDER (+36.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 164-110 UNDER (+43.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 92-60 UNDER (+26.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.2, OPPONENT 36.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 136-92 UNDER (+34.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.1, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 60-37 UNDER (+19.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 45-26 UNDER (+16.4 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.0, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 76-43 UNDER (+28.7 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.5, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 98-61 UNDER (+30.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.3, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 141-90 UNDER (+42.0 Units) the 1rst half total vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.4, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 37-19 UNDER (+16.1 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.1, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 56-31 UNDER (+21.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.3, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 128-87 UNDER (+32.3 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.9, OPPONENT 34.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 183-125 UNDER (+45.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.7, OPPONENT 34.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 176-120 UNDER (+44.0 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 259-176 UNDER (+65.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 43-26 UNDER (+14.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 61-25 UNDER (+33.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.1, OPPONENT 35.2 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 86-46 UNDER (+35.4 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.5, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 16-4 UNDER (+11.6 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 32.0, OPPONENT 32.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 31-11 UNDER (+18.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 33.1, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 13-1 UNDER (+11.9 Units) the 1rst half total vs. top caliber teams - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 31.1, OPPONENT 34.6 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 74-42 UNDER (+27.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.6, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 UNDER (+8.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
PHOENIX is 12-5 against the 1rst half line (+6.5 Units) vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 11-4 against the 1rst half line (+6.6 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) after scoring 90 points or more this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.8, OPPONENT 34.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-26 against the 1rst half line (-15.6 Units) in home games hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.3, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-15 against the 1rst half line (-10.5 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 39.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 40-66 against the 1rst half line (-32.6 Units) off a road win since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-29 against the 1rst half line (-17.9 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.1, OPPONENT 38.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-22 against the 1rst half line (-13.2 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 108-147 against the 1rst half line (-53.7 Units) after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 115-158 against the 1rst half line (-58.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.4, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 119-157 against the 1rst half line (-53.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.2, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 22-41 against the 1rst half line (-23.1 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.8, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-20 against the 1rst half line (-14.0 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 7-18 against the 1rst half line (-12.8 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.6, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 28-17 against the 1rst half line (+9.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.9, OPPONENT 37.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.0, OPPONENT 34.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 11-3 against the 1rst half line (+7.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-7 against the 1rst half line (+6.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.3, OPPONENT 40.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 12-5 against the 1rst half line (+6.5 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.1, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 10-3 against the 1rst half line (+6.7 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.4, OPPONENT 38.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 8-2 against the 1rst half line (+5.8 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.0, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 11-4 OVER (+6.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.8, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 45.3, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 2*) | PHOENIX is 7-1 OVER (+5.9 Units) the 1rst half total off an home win scoring 85 or more points this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.1, OPPONENT 39.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 13-4 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after a blowout win by 15 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 41.9, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 15-8 OVER (+6.2 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 42.9, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 10-3 OVER (+6.7 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.8, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 10-2 OVER (+7.8 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 3 or more consecutive games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was PHOENIX 46.4, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 14-7 OVER (+6.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 42.1, OPPONENT 37.0 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 12-5 OVER (+6.5 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was PHOENIX 42.5, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 35-20 OVER (+13.0 Units) the 1rst half total after a win by 10 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.2, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 19-8 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was MINNESOTA 44.0, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
PHOENIX is 343-268 UNDER (+48.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.3, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 142-92 UNDER (+40.8 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 35.0, OPPONENT 37.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 83-59 UNDER (+18.1 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.3, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 181-125 UNDER (+43.5 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in road games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.2, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 137-95 UNDER (+32.5 Units) the 1rst half total in a road game where where the first half total >= 60.5 since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.1, OPPONENT 39.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 116-74 UNDER (+34.6 Units) the 1rst half total in July games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.7, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 220-179 UNDER (+23.1 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.0, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 210-167 UNDER (+26.3 Units) the 1rst half total after a division game since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 37.4, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 146-113 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.3, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 0*) | PHOENIX is 172-127 UNDER (+32.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.6, OPPONENT 36.8 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 17-6 UNDER (+10.4 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 8 or more of their last 10 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 36.5, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | PHOENIX is 110-77 UNDER (+25.3 Units) the 1rst half total off a win against a division rival since 1997.
The average score was PHOENIX 38.1, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 314-228 UNDER (+63.2 Units) the 1rst half total versus the first half line in all games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 125-87 UNDER (+29.3 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.4, OPPONENT 34.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 69-43 UNDER (+21.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a home favorite of 3 points or less vs. the 1rst half line since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 34.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 162-111 UNDER (+39.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus the 1rst half line in home games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.5, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 94-68 UNDER (+19.2 Units) the 1rst half total in July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 204-159 UNDER (+29.1 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.7, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 207-137 UNDER (+56.3 Units) the 1rst half total vs. division opponents since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.6, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 114-76 UNDER (+30.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 154-114 UNDER (+28.6 Units) the 1rst half total when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.0, OPPONENT 36.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 162-117 UNDER (+33.3 Units) the 1rst half total when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.2, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 150-111 UNDER (+27.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.5, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 118-66 UNDER (+45.4 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.4 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 80-38 UNDER (+38.2 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.3, OPPONENT 35.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 88-51 UNDER (+31.9 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.8, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 49-31 UNDER (+14.9 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.0, OPPONENT 34.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 149-107 UNDER (+31.3 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 71-48 UNDER (+18.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.6, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 98-71 UNDER (+19.9 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a same season loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.8, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 81-54 UNDER (+21.6 Units) the 1rst half total double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.1, OPPONENT 36.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 95-58 UNDER (+31.2 Units) the 1rst half total revenging a road loss versus opponent since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.3, OPPONENT 35.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 68-34 UNDER (+30.6 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.2, OPPONENT 36.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 130-99 UNDER (+21.1 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.4, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 101-74 UNDER (+19.6 Units) the 1rst half total after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.8, OPPONENT 37.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 162-119 UNDER (+31.1 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a game as favorite since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.3, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 154-94 UNDER (+50.6 Units) the 1rst half total after playing a road game since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 83-45 UNDER (+33.5 Units) the 1rst half total after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 35.0, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 165-107 UNDER (+47.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.2, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 95-56 UNDER (+33.4 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 55-31 UNDER (+20.9 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.5, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 20-8 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 34.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 69-46 UNDER (+18.4 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better since 1997.
The average score was MINNESOTA 36.6, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 22-3 | +13.2 | 19-6 | 12-13 | 85.9 | 42.5 | 49.9% | 39.2 | 74.5 | 36.2 | 41.7% | 40.2 | | Road Games | 10-2 | +6.7 | 8-4 | 6-6 | 84.0 | 39.3 | 47.5% | 39.5 | 77.3 | 37.9 | 41.4% | 42.3 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 5-0 | 3-2 | 90.2 | 49.6 | 52.9% | 38.2 | 72.2 | 36.0 | 41.3% | 41.6 | | Division Games | 15-2 | +8.9 | 13-4 | 9-8 | 86.0 | 43.0 | 50.7% | 38.1 | 74.3 | 35.9 | 41.5% | 40.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.9 | 42.5 | 32-63 | 49.9% | 6-15 | 37.6% | 17-21 | 82.1% | 39 | 7 | 20 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 6 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.8 | 39 | 30-66 | 45.0% | 5-14 | 33.6% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 84.0 | 39.3 | 30-63 | 47.5% | 5-14 | 34.1% | 19-23 | 81.1% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 7 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.5 | 36.2 | 29-70 | 41.7% | 5-15 | 30.4% | 12-15 | 78.2% | 40 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.1 | 38 | 29-66 | 43.8% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 15-18 | 79.1% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 77.3 | 37.9 | 29-69 | 41.4% | 5-14 | 35.3% | 15-19 | 80.3% | 42 | 10 | 16 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 20-6 | +8.3 | 13-13 | 17-9 | 83.8 | 42.2 | 48.1% | 42.2 | 78.7 | 40.5 | 42.9% | 39.3 | | Home Games | 12-1 | +8.8 | 6-7 | 8-5 | 85.6 | 40.1 | 48.2% | 43.3 | 78.2 | 39.3 | 42.0% | 39.5 | | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +5 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 89.2 | 41.4 | 49.6% | 47.6 | 78.6 | 35.8 | 39.7% | 39.4 | | Division Games | 12-4 | +4 | 9-7 | 10-6 | 83.1 | 42.7 | 48.7% | 40.7 | 77.6 | 39.9 | 43.2% | 38.1 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.8 | 42.2 | 32-67 | 48.1% | 4-12 | 34.0% | 16-19 | 80.6% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 78.1 | 38.6 | 29-66 | 44.7% | 5-14 | 33.2% | 15-19 | 78.8% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 85.6 | 40.1 | 33-67 | 48.2% | 4-11 | 36.6% | 17-20 | 83.7% | 43 | 7 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.7 | 40.5 | 30-69 | 42.9% | 7-19 | 35.1% | 13-16 | 78.5% | 39 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 77.4 | 38.1 | 29-66 | 43.8% | 5-15 | 33.6% | 14-18 | 78.6% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 78.2 | 39.3 | 30-70 | 42.0% | 7-20 | 34.4% | 12-16 | 76.4% | 39 | 10 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: PHOENIX 70.9, MINNESOTA 69.3 |
| | |
|
|
| 6/27/2014 | @ INDIANA | 81-76 | 33-42 | -3 | L | 78.5 | U | 24-57 | 42.1% | 30 | 7 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 46 | 17 | | 6/29/2014 | @ TULSA | 80-77 | 31-37 | -2.5 | L | 81.5 | U | 25-51 | 49.0% | 33 | 13 | 24-77 | 31.2% | 50 | 12 | | 7/2/2014 | CHICAGO | 87-69 | 44-38 | -5.5 | W | 80 | O | 30-66 | 45.5% | 51 | 13 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 38 | 7 | | 7/6/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 94-89 | 45-47 | -1 | L | 79.5 | O | 35-63 | 55.6% | 31 | 15 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 39 | 15 | | 7/9/2014 | SEATTLE | 78-58 | 37-20 | -6 | W | 75 | U | 32-68 | 47.1% | 30 | 6 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 43 | 20 | | 7/11/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 72-66 | 29-30 | -3 | L | 80 | U | 25-67 | 37.3% | 54 | 17 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 36 | 12 | | 7/13/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 90-61 | 52-32 | -5 | W | 78.5 | O | 33-61 | 54.1% | 39 | 13 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 38 | 16 | | 7/15/2014 | WASHINGTON | 90-78 | 48-33 | -6 | W | 77.5 | O | 34-63 | 54.0% | 39 | 12 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 34 | 12 | | 7/17/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 101-85 | 51-39 | -6.5 | W | 79.5 | O | 38-71 | 53.5% | 37 | 8 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 45 | 15 | | 7/22/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 89-71 | 47-36 | -3.5 | W | 74.5 | O | 35-65 | 53.8% | 27 | 10 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 38 | 20 | | 7/24/2014 | @ LOS ANGELES | 93-73 | 61-36 | -2.5 | W | 81.5 | O | 35-65 | 53.8% | 39 | 8 | 27-70 | 38.6% | 44 | 12 | | 7/26/2014 | NEW YORK | 78-63 | 47-30 | -7.5 | W | 78.5 | U | 31-60 | 51.7% | 48 | 16 | 27-83 | 32.5% | 44 | 7 | | 7/29/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 90-69 | 42-39 | -7 | L | 80.5 | O | 36-70 | 51.4% | 40 | 15 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 37 | 15 | | 7/31/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2014 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2014 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2014 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/13/2014 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2014 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 6/22/2014 | INDIANA | 83-77 | 35-41 | -5.5 | L | 74.5 | O | 31-54 | 57.4% | 34 | 19 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 37 | 16 | | 6/27/2014 | @ SEATTLE | 71-81 | 26-33 | -3.5 | L | 73 | U | 27-68 | 39.7% | 40 | 6 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 13 | | 6/29/2014 | SEATTLE | 74-69 | 42-32 | -5 | W | 72.5 | O | 28-64 | 43.7% | 48 | 18 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | | 7/3/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 91-84 | 41-35 | -4.5 | W | 77 | U | 28-63 | 44.4% | 38 | 7 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 43 | 12 | | 7/6/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 80-87 | 48-48 | -2 | L | 75.5 | O | 31-70 | 44.3% | 38 | 11 | 37-71 | 52.1% | 41 | 13 | | 7/8/2014 | LOS ANGELES | 83-72 | 48-42 | -2 | W | 80.5 | O | 33-61 | 54.1% | 38 | 8 | 27-80 | 33.7% | 49 | 8 | | 7/10/2014 | @ TULSA | 91-85 | 55-49 | -1.5 | W | 81.5 | O | 33-60 | 55.0% | 40 | 12 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 36 | 10 | | 7/13/2014 | SEATTLE | 77-60 | 34-28 | -4.5 | W | 73 | U | 31-65 | 47.7% | 51 | 16 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 32 | 12 | | 7/16/2014 | TULSA | 93-82 | 40-39 | -5 | L | 82.5 | U | 34-70 | 48.6% | 39 | 8 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 44 | 16 | | 7/22/2014 | ATLANTA | 112-108 | 52-48 | -2.5 | W | 81 | O | 42-86 | 48.8% | 58 | 21 | 42-93 | 45.2% | 45 | 14 | | 7/25/2014 | SAN ANTONIO | 88-78 | 42-36 | -5 | W | 80 | U | 36-66 | 54.5% | 41 | 11 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 34 | 8 | | 7/27/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 76-65 | 39-28 | -3 | W | 80 | U | 31-64 | 48.4% | 49 | 12 | 24-73 | 32.9% | 42 | 10 | | 7/31/2014 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/2/2014 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/5/2014 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/7/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/9/2014 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/12/2014 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/15/2014 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8/16/2014 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| PHOENIX is 32-31 versus the first half line when playing against MINNESOTA since 1997 | | 39 of 63 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 8-5 versus the first half line when playing against PHOENIX over the last 3 seasons | | 8 of 13 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| PHOENIX is 16-15 versus the first half line when playing against MINNESOTA since 1997 | | 21 of 31 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL since 1997 |
| |
| MINNESOTA is 4-3 versus the first half line when playing against PHOENIX over the last 3 seasons | | 4 of 7 games in this series have gone UNDER THE FIRST HALF TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/18/2014 | MINNESOTA | 79 | 163 | Over | 42 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 28 | 4 | 6 | | | PHOENIX | 92 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 52 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 44 | 11 | 13 | 6/15/2014 | PHOENIX | 80 | 165 | SU ATS | 50 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 6-12 | 50.0% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 42 | 5 | 10 | | | MINNESOTA | 72 | -5.5 | Under | 31 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 6-9 | 66.7% | 42 | 10 | 10 | 9/29/2013 | MINNESOTA | 72 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 38 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 3-7 | 42.9% | 15-27 | 55.6% | 45 | 6 | 6 | | | PHOENIX | 65 | 156 | Under | 35 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 2-21 | 9.5% | 13-15 | 86.7% | 47 | 10 | 12 | 9/26/2013 | PHOENIX | 62 | 158 | Under | 22 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 2-18 | 11.1% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 41 | 11 | 18 | | | MINNESOTA | 85 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 45 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 15-20 | 75.0% | 41 | 6 | 14 | 7/24/2013 | PHOENIX | 69 | 164.5 | ATS | 34 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 37 | 6 | 18 | | | MINNESOTA | 81 | -15 | SU Under | 41 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 2-10 | 20.0% | 17-21 | 81.0% | 36 | 7 | 9 | 7/21/2013 | MINNESOTA | 82 | -7.5 | SU Under | 36 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 4-18 | 22.2% | 12-20 | 60.0% | 46 | 12 | 11 | | | PHOENIX | 77 | 171.5 | ATS | 44 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 7-26 | 26.9% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 49 | 8 | 16 | 7/7/2013 | PHOENIX | 59 | 176.5 | Under | 29 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 3-14 | 21.4% | 2-5 | 40.0% | 46 | 14 | 21 | | | MINNESOTA | 91 | -6.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 3-11 | 27.3% | 26-35 | 74.3% | 51 | 8 | 8 | 6/19/2013 | MINNESOTA | 80 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 1-6 | 16.7% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 54 | 17 | 10 | | | PHOENIX | 69 | 178.5 | Under | 37 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 4-21 | 19.0% | 21-21 | 100.0% | 32 | 6 | 8 | 6/6/2013 | PHOENIX | 79 | 171 | Over | 33 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 6-22 | 27.3% | 21-25 | 84.0% | 43 | 4 | 11 | | | MINNESOTA | 99 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 60 | 36-81 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 47 | 17 | 6 |
|
| | |
|
Sandy is 9-1 against the 1rst half line (+7.9 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 46.6, OPPONENT 33.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 16-28 against the 1rst half line (-14.8 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 40.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 17-29 against the 1rst half line (-14.9 Units) after having won 12 or more of their last 15 games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.3, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 9-24 against the 1rst half line (-17.4 Units) after 2 straight wins by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.5, OPPONENT 39.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 45-61 against the 1rst half line (-22.1 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 32-48 against the 1rst half line (-20.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.2, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 3-12 against the 1rst half line (-10.2 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 37.7, OPPONENT 41.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 6-17 against the 1rst half line (-12.7 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.6, OPPONENT 42.7 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Sandy is 9-21 against the 1rst half line (-14.1 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 35.8, OPPONENT 38.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 4-14 against the 1rst half line (-11.4 Units) in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 35.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 98-84 against the 1rst half line (+5.6 Units) versus the first half line in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.5, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 16-6 against the 1rst half line (+9.4 Units) in home games in July games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.1, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 59-42 against the 1rst half line (+12.8 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 68-48 against the 1rst half line (+15.2 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 37.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 37-22 against the 1rst half line (+12.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 30-19 against the 1rst half line (+9.1 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 39.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 43.4, OPPONENT 35.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 28-14 against the 1rst half line (+12.6 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.6, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 16-7 against the 1rst half line (+8.3 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.2, OPPONENT 38.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 25-13 against the 1rst half line (+10.7 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.5, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 12-4 against the 1rst half line (+7.6 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 34-23 against the 1rst half line (+8.7 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 56-41 against the 1rst half line (+10.9 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.1, OPPONENT 38.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 59-46 against the 1rst half line (+8.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.8, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 26-15 against the 1rst half line (+9.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.3, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 35-23 against the 1rst half line (+9.7 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Sandy is 6-0 OVER (+6.0 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 45.3, OPPONENT 37.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 13-5 OVER (+7.5 Units) the 1rst half total after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of PHOENIX.
The average score was PHOENIX 43.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 57-44 OVER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in May, June, or July games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 42.1, OPPONENT 39.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 52-38 OVER (+10.2 Units) the 1rst half total after 1 or more consecutive unders as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.7, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Sandy is 14-3 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total as a road underdog vs. the 1rst half line in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 34.2, OPPONENT 38.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Sandy is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 33.8, OPPONENT 38.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 13-4 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 32.6, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 15-5 UNDER (+9.5 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 35.6, OPPONENT 39.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Sandy is 7-0 UNDER (+7.0 Units) the 1rst half total in road games when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 33.3, OPPONENT 33.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Sandy is 14-4 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in road games versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Sandy 35.4, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 36-23 UNDER (+10.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.9, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 35-23 UNDER (+9.7 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.8, OPPONENT 36.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 24-14 UNDER (+8.6 Units) the 1rst half total after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.9, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 32-18 UNDER (+12.2 Units) the 1rst half total off a road win as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.5, OPPONENT 37.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 39-27 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total after 3 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 37.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 9-2 UNDER (+6.8 Units) the 1rst half total after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.4, OPPONENT 40.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 25-14 UNDER (+9.6 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 35.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 27-15 UNDER (+10.5 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.4, OPPONENT 35.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 20-9 UNDER (+10.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.6, OPPONENT 36.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 26-13 UNDER (+11.7 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 40.7, OPPONENT 37.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 26-12 UNDER (+12.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.7, OPPONENT 38.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 34-22 UNDER (+9.8 Units) the 1rst half total versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.8, OPPONENT 39.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 31-18 UNDER (+11.2 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.3, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 31-20 UNDER (+9.0 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.6, OPPONENT 36.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 21-11 UNDER (+8.9 Units) the 1rst half total versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.1, OPPONENT 38.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 28-17 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 41.4, OPPONENT 37.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 17-7 UNDER (+9.3 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 38.8, OPPONENT 36.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 21-9 UNDER (+11.1 Units) the 1rst half total in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of MINNESOTA.
The average score was MINNESOTA 39.1, OPPONENT 36.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road underdog covered the first half line 4 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 2 times. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road underdog covered the first half line 1 times, while the home favorite covered the first half line 0 times. |
|
|
| |
|
| Since 1997, 6 games went under the first half total, while 5 games went over the first half total. | | Over the last 3 seasons, 2 games went over the first half total, while 2 games went under the first half total. |
|
|
| | | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| No significant injuries. |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/27/2024 4:16:56 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|