| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES MINNESOTA |
|
| 163.5 | 64 Final 88 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
605 | LOS ANGELES | +210 | 606 | MINNESOTA | -270 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent. (669-289 since 1997.) (69.8%, +143.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days. (268-100 since 1997.) (72.8%, +77.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games. (223-71 since 1997.) (75.9%, +73.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (154-42 since 1997.) (78.6%, +62.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (70-19 since 1997.) (78.7%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (61-25 since 1997.) (70.9%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games. (49-29 since 1997.) (62.8%, +28.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (23-2 since 1997.) (92%, +20.5 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (31-15 since 1997.) (67.4%, +18.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a loss versus opponent, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (28-11 since 1997.) (71.8%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (22-5 since 1997.) (81.5%, +17 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a road loss versus opponent, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (21-5 since 1997.) (80.8%, +16.4 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (169-113 since 1997.) (59.9%, +52.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record. (78-55 since 1997.) (58.6%, +32 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive wins, on Friday nights. (61-40 since 1997.) (60.4%, +31.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after leading their last 2 games by 10+ points at the half. (23-9 since 1997.) (71.9%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, playing with 3 or more days rest. (65-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +23.2 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 81 | | 32-66 | 48.3% | 4-12 | 35.4% | 13-18 | 76.9% | 40 | 9 | 14 | MINNESOTA | 81 | | 31-69 | 44.2% | 6-16 | 35.0% | 14-18 | 79.8% | 42 | 12 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 493 times, while MINNESOTA won 480 times. Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.2, OPPONENT 77.8 | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.8, OPPONENT 78.9 | LOS ANGELES is 178-48 against the money line (+117.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.8, OPPONENT 77.5 | LOS ANGELES is 21-6 against the money line (+13.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.1, OPPONENT 76.2 | MINNESOTA is 96-121 against the money line (-65.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.9, OPPONENT 79.4 | MINNESOTA is 55-72 against the money line (-30.3 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.8, OPPONENT 74.9 | MINNESOTA is 30-62 against the money line (-40.3 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.8, OPPONENT 77.5 | MINNESOTA is 45-69 against the money line (-45.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.7, OPPONENT 74.3 | MINNESOTA is 71-84 against the money line (-39.7 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.0, OPPONENT 73.2 | MINNESOTA is 65-75 against the money line (-32.9 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.3, OPPONENT 72.0 | MINNESOTA is 23-45 against the money line (-33.4 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.8, OPPONENT 79.6 | MINNESOTA is 9-10 against the money line (-18.4 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.4, OPPONENT 85.5 | MINNESOTA is 86-98 against the money line (-42.0 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.9, OPPONENT 73.3 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 9-14 against the money line (-13.9 Units) in road games in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 86.6 | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 86.4 | LOS ANGELES is 26-47 against the money line (-39.6 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 80.1 | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-19.1 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.9, OPPONENT 89.0 | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 84.1 | LOS ANGELES is 2-4 against the money line (-12.6 Units) in road games when they grab 37 to 41 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.8, OPPONENT 88.2 | LOS ANGELES is 7-11 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 86.5 | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-10.6 Units) in road games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 88.7 | MINNESOTA is 17-1 against the money line (+14.5 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.0, OPPONENT 72.0 | MINNESOTA is 48-10 against the money line (+23.2 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.7, OPPONENT 76.6 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 11-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 63-45 against the money line (+20.8 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 19-7 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 56-35 against the money line (+19.4 Units) vs. teams who are called for 2+ less fouls/game than their opponents since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.1, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 97-121 against the money line (-42.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.9, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 174-209 against the money line (-72.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.3, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 62-82 against the money line (-32.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 6-29 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 67.9, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 90-121 against the money line (-44.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-34 against the money line (-22.5 Units) in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.6, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-18 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in road games vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.0, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-17 against the money line (-13.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 26-9 against the money line (+12.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 20-6 against the money line (+12.6 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.0, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 19-11 against the money line (+10.2 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 154-91 against the money line (+38.4 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 58-39 against the money line (+18.2 Units) in road games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 43-16 against the money line (+19.7 Units) off a home no-cover where the team won straight up as a favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 103-39 against the money line (+28.6 Units) after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.1, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 105-39 against the money line (+42.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 226-259 against the money line (-84.0 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 134-87 against the money line (-63.2 Units) as a favorite since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 148-181 against the money line (-85.5 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 34-54 against the money line (-30.8 Units) on Friday since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.8, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-10 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after a division game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 90-106 against the money line (-43.8 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.8, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 63-58 against the money line (-37.2 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.3, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 78-99 against the money line (-41.3 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.9, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 40-71 against the money line (-46.2 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.0, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 68-80 against the money line (-33.5 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.8, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 42-48 against the money line (-32.6 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 28-24 against the money line (-24.9 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.3, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 67-75 against the money line (-38.7 Units) off a win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 88-109 against the money line (-50.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 93-111 against the money line (-46.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 75.9, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 36-64 against the money line (-46.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.1, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 19-27 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 60-74 against the money line (-35.3 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.4, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 11-22 against the money line (-15.0 Units) after 2 straight games where they had 5 or less steals since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 69.4, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 105-136 against the money line (-55.9 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.2, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 9-12 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-12 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games in June games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-8 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in road games when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-9 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.9, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-6 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.6, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-7 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 91.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-9 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-11.9 Units) in road games off a home win over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.8, OPPONENT 88.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-16 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-24 against the money line (-19.0 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-7 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games after playing 3 consecutive games as favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-10 against the money line (-15.9 Units) in road games after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-11 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in road games after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 86.5 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-6 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-12 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in road games after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 85.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 38-12 against the money line (+17.4 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 24-2 against the money line (+19.4 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 8-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.0, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-3 against the money line (+9.7 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 15-6 against the money line (+13.9 Units) revenging a blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.3, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 14-2 against the money line (+13.2 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.6, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 4*) | MINNESOTA is 12-3 against the money line (+8.5 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 12-5 against the money line (+9.6 Units) revenging a road blowout loss versus opponent by 20 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 5-2 | -4.6 | 3-4 | 2-5 | 83.9 | 45.0 | 48.7% | 43.1 | 70.6 | 36.1 | 41.0% | 40.7 | Road Games | 0-2 | -7.6 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 79.5 | 46.0 | 43.0% | 43.5 | 90.0 | 46.5 | 47.5% | 46.0 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.4 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 81.4 | 44.0 | 47.2% | 43.6 | 68.4 | 33.4 | 40.3% | 40.8 | Division Games | 4-2 | -5.6 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 84.7 | 44.7 | 49.4% | 44.2 | 70.8 | 36.0 | 40.7% | 39.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.9 | 45.0 | 32-66 | 48.7% | 4-11 | 32.5% | 16-21 | 75.2% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 19 | 10 | 13 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 81.2 | 40 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 5-15 | 35.0% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.5 | 46.0 | 30-71 | 43.0% | 3-15 | 19.4% | 15-20 | 75.6% | 43 | 9 | 14 | 21 | 6 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.6 | 36.1 | 27-66 | 41.0% | 4-15 | 29.2% | 12-18 | 67.5% | 41 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 78.5 | 38.4 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 5-16 | 34.0% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 90.0 | 46.5 | 33-69 | 47.5% | 6-18 | 36.1% | 17-25 | 70.0% | 46 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 9 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 6-2 | -5.5 | 4-4 | 3-5 | 83.2 | 41.9 | 44.8% | 48.0 | 77.4 | 39.1 | 40.8% | 40.7 | Home Games | 4-0 | +2 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 91.0 | 49.0 | 47.8% | 45.7 | 76.0 | 37.0 | 39.2% | 40.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 79.4 | 37.4 | 45.2% | 47.0 | 76.2 | 39.6 | 40.3% | 39.4 | Division Games | 5-1 | +2 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 82.7 | 41.2 | 45.0% | 47.0 | 76.7 | 38.5 | 40.4% | 40.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.2 | 41.9 | 32-71 | 44.8% | 4-13 | 35.6% | 15-20 | 77.0% | 48 | 13 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 80.9 | 40.5 | 30-69 | 43.9% | 5-15 | 35.2% | 15-19 | 77.6% | 44 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 91.0 | 49.0 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 5-12 | 43.7% | 19-23 | 83.7% | 46 | 13 | 23 | 15 | 6 | 11 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.4 | 39.1 | 28-69 | 40.8% | 6-17 | 34.5% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 41 | 9 | 18 | 20 | 6 | 11 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 80.1 | 39.2 | 30-69 | 42.9% | 6-16 | 33.9% | 15-20 | 79.0% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 76.0 | 37.0 | 28-71 | 39.2% | 7-21 | 33.7% | 13-17 | 79.4% | 41 | 10 | 19 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 68, MINNESOTA 66.2 |
| | |
|
|
5/26/2013 | SEATTLE | 102-69 | W | | 36-58 | 62.1% | 44 | 8 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 34 | 12 | 6/1/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 78-83 | L | -600 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 40 | 12 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 47 | 11 | 6/8/2013 | TULSA | 76-69 | W | | 28-63 | 44.4% | 45 | 20 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 35 | 21 | 6/14/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 81-97 | L | -155 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 47 | 10 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 45 | 14 | 6/15/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 84-48 | W | -450 | 36-61 | 59.0% | 34 | 15 | 16-53 | 30.2% | 37 | 22 | 6/21/2013 | MINNESOTA | 87-59 | W | -165 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 55 | 14 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 39 | 16 | 6/23/2013 | WASHINGTON | 79-69 | W | -1050 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 37 | 11 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 48 | 19 | 6/28/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/4/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/11/2013 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
6/1/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 90-74 | W | -650 | 37-74 | 50.0% | 47 | 10 | 28-78 | 35.9% | 47 | 14 | 6/6/2013 | PHOENIX | 99-79 | W | -600 | 36-81 | 44.4% | 47 | 6 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 43 | 11 | 6/8/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-85 | L | -850 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 55 | 13 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 39 | 14 | 6/11/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 87-72 | W | | 28-63 | 44.4% | 48 | 15 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 36 | 12 | 6/14/2013 | @ TULSA | 83-74 | W | -600 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 53 | 13 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 37 | 5 | 6/19/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 80-69 | W | -165 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 54 | 10 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 32 | 8 | 6/21/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 59-87 | L | +145 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 39 | 16 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 55 | 14 | 6/23/2013 | TULSA | 88-79 | W | | 32-60 | 53.3% | 41 | 13 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 37 | 11 | 6/28/2013 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/11/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/13/2013 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 38-19 (+13.6 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 8-4 (+2.7 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 15-13 (+3.2 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 6-0 (+6.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/21/2013 | MINNESOTA | 59 | 165 | Under | 24 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 2-14 | 14.3% | 13-21 | 61.9% | 39 | 5 | 16 | | LOS ANGELES | 87 | -3.5 | SU ATS | 50 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 4-9 | 44.4% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 55 | 8 | 14 | 10/7/2012 | MINNESOTA | 80 | 166.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 31 | 10 | 13 | | LOS ANGELES | 79 | -3 | Under | 39 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 4-17 | 23.5% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 51 | 18 | 17 | 10/4/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 168 | Over | 31 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 5-13 | 38.5% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 36 | 4 | 14 | | MINNESOTA | 94 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 40-82 | 48.8% | 9-21 | 42.9% | 5-6 | 83.3% | 44 | 13 | 8 | 9/20/2012 | MINNESOTA | 76 | 167.5 | Over | 36 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 6-27 | 22.2% | 24-29 | 82.8% | 44 | 12 | 17 | | LOS ANGELES | 92 | -2 | SU ATS | 44 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 40 | 6 | 15 | 9/4/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 170.5 | Under | 37 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 42 | 8 | 19 | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -9 | SU ATS | 41 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 39 | 13 | 14 | 7/5/2012 | MINNESOTA | 90 | -6.5 | Over | 43 | 36-86 | 41.9% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 9-17 | 52.9% | 55 | 16 | 13 | | LOS ANGELES | 96 | 164.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 28-34 | 82.4% | 47 | 13 | 14 | 5/24/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 84 | 154 | ATS | 47 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 34 | 8 | 19 | | MINNESOTA | 92 | -9 | SU Over | 44 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 20-29 | 69.0% | 39 | 13 | 18 |
|
| | |
|
Carol is 11-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.8, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 11-2 against the money line (+10.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 4*) | Carol is 19-7 against the money line (+10.5 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 11-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.5, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 8-10 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.0, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
Carol is 9-12 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in road games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 9-12 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 7-12 against the money line (-17.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 2-6 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games in June games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 90.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 6-9 against the money line (-13.8 Units) in road games vs. division opponents as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.9, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 3-6 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.6, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 7-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 2-5 against the money line (-15.2 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Carol is 5-9 against the money line (-16.4 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.4, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 2-5 against the money line (-9.4 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.7, OPPONENT 90.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 1-6 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after a game where they failed to cover the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 4-8 against the money line (-10.9 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 86.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 28-7 against the money line (+14.7 Units) in home games vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Cheryl is 27-2 against the money line (+25.5 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 8*) | Cheryl is 27-19 against the money line (+8.7 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.6, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Cheryl is 22-10 against the money line (+14.2 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Cheryl is 26-14 against the money line (+11.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.8, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 162 times, while the road underdog won straight up 66 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 19 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 7:57:05 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|