| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
LOS ANGELES MINNESOTA |
|
| 168 | 77 Final 94 |
|
|
| | |
|
Western Conference Finals - Best of 3 - Game 1 | | | | |
601 | LOS ANGELES | +180 | 602 | MINNESOTA | -220 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent. (662-282 since 1997.) (70.1%, +147.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent. (620-270 since 1997.) (69.7%, +132.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - vs. division opponents, after 3 consecutive division games. (497-193 since 1997.) (72%, +114.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, with a winning record on the season after 15 or more games. (307-110 since 1997.) (73.6%, +94.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (257-96 since 1997.) (72.8%, +69.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (210-75 since 1997.) (73.7%, +65.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after going over the total by 42 or more points total in their last seven games, vs. division opponents. (194-70 since 1997.) (73.5%, +63 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (270-119 since 1997.) (69.4%, +61.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders, very good team - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game. (107-19 since 1997.) (84.9%, +56.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (198-70 since 1997.) (73.9%, +55.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, top level team, winning 75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (38-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (79.2%, +22.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better. (217-93 since 1997.) (70%, +53.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after scoring 75 points or more. (199-92 since 1997.) (68.4%, +48.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record. (179-142 since 1997.) (55.8%, +44 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road win, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (123-46 since 1997.) (72.8%, +42.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (68-17 since 1997.) (80%, +40 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning record on the season, on Thursday nights. (126-51 since 1997.) (71.2%, +38.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (78-22 since 1997.) (78%, +37.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (84-41 since 1997.) (67.2%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (62-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.8%, +41.4 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (97-50 since 1997.) (66%, +34.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (94-36 since 1997.) (72.3%, +33.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (97-38 since 1997.) (71.9%, +32.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a win against a division rival, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (51-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +20.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games. (64-22 since 1997.) (74.4%, +31.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - after 1 or more consecutive wins, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games. (53-17 since 1997.) (75.7%, +31.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - off a win against a division rival, a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%). (58-22 since 1997.) (72.5%, +31.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (64-31 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.4%, +28.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (41-9 since 1997.) (82%, +26.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 2 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (76-51 since 1997.) (59.8%, +26 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - a top-level team (>= 75%) playing a good team (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games. (52-12 since 1997.) (81.2%, +25.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games. (26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +23.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (38-16 since 1997.) (70.4%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (51-26 since 1997.) (66.2%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (53-18 since 1997.) (74.6%, +23.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (34-7 since 1997.) (82.9%, +22.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games. (52-21 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.2%, +24 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a close win by 3 points or less. (45-26 since 1997.) (63.4%, +20.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (44-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +24.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (52-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (52-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (52-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +24.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a close win by 3 points or less. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +17.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a close win by 3 points or less. (34-18 since 1997.) (65.4%, +17.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after allowing 75 points or more. (72-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.6%, +19.9 units. Rating = 0*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (53-15 since 1997.) (77.9%, +17.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 2 consecutive wins against division rivals, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games. (34-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.6%, +21.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - top caliber team - outscoring their opponents by 9+ points/game against opponent after scoring 75 points or more. (62-27 since 1997.) (69.7%, +16.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after failing to cover the spread in 4 or more consecutive games. (41-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.3%, +22.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (26-12 since 1997.) (68.4%, +15.7 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after 3 or more consecutive overs, in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games. (22-7 since 1997.) (75.9%, +15.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (55-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.7%, +23.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots. (30-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.2%, +18.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (39-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (39-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - in a game involving two good three point shooting teams (>=35%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO's) after 15+ games. (39-18 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +22.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots. (76-65 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.9%, +33.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, vs. division opponents. (87-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.3%, +37 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (MINNESOTA) - vs. division opponents, off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival. (141-105 since 1997.) (57.3%, +43.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off 3 consecutive wins against division rivals, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team. (93-55 since 1997.) (62.8%, +37.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more. (65-38 since 1997.) (63.1%, +32.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset win as an underdog, playing with 3 or more days rest. (50-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +29 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (MINNESOTA) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better. (32-19 since 1997.) (62.7%, +21.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better. (25-13 since 1997.) (65.8%, +16.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off an upset win as an underdog, well rested team - playing 3 or less games in 10 days. (61-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.4%, +22.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 55% of their shots or better. (20-9 since 1997.) (69%, +14.8 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES | 83 | | 31-68 | 46.1% | 6-16 | 35.6% | 14-18 | 79.2% | 42 | 10 | 15 | MINNESOTA | 86 | | 32-71 | 45.0% | 6-18 | 35.8% | 15-20 | 78.6% | 44 | 13 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, MINNESOTA won the game straight up 585 times, while LOS ANGELES won 394 times. Edge against the money line=LOS ANGELES |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
LOS ANGELES is 12-5 against the money line (+8.2 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 74.3 | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.3 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.0, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 19-4 against the money line (+13.8 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 90.3, OPPONENT 79.2 | LOS ANGELES is 16-3 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 92.3, OPPONENT 80.1 | LOS ANGELES is 19-4 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.7, OPPONENT 77.2 | MINNESOTA is 89-118 against the money line (-59.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.7, OPPONENT 79.5 | MINNESOTA is 27-61 against the money line (-42.7 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.5, OPPONENT 77.5 | MINNESOTA is 40-34 against the money line (-31.2 Units) in home games when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.4, OPPONENT 76.1 | MINNESOTA is 63-74 against the money line (-34.2 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.2, OPPONENT 71.8 | MINNESOTA is 13-14 against the money line (-16.9 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.0, OPPONENT 87.8 | MINNESOTA is 5-7 against the money line (-12.0 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.6, OPPONENT 88.3 | MINNESOTA is 54-62 against the money line (-30.0 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.5, OPPONENT 73.4 |
|
LOS ANGELES is 6-13 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 84.2 | LOS ANGELES is 5-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 83.8 | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-10.4 Units) in road games when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 90.5 | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.7, OPPONENT 90.9 | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-8.3 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 85.5 | MINNESOTA is 14-1 against the money line (+14.7 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 73.8 | MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the money line (+7.5 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.8, OPPONENT 74.0 | MINNESOTA is 13-1 against the money line (+12.0 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 74.3 | MINNESOTA is 15-1 against the money line (+12.5 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.6, OPPONENT 71.7 | MINNESOTA is 20-12 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.4, OPPONENT 78.3 | MINNESOTA is 41-8 against the money line (+25.6 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.1, OPPONENT 76.6 | MINNESOTA is 30-4 against the money line (+21.7 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 91.8, OPPONENT 78.5 |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 9-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.1, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-4 against the money line (+6.8 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.1, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-4 against the money line (+8.4 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.6, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 92.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-3 against the money line (+6.3 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.9, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-2 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 92-117 against the money line (-40.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 78.0, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 47-81 against the money line (-39.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 74.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 3-5 against the money line (-11.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 116-146 against the money line (-52.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 70.5, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 112-142 against the money line (-50.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 169-205 against the money line (-70.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.1, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 59-81 against the money line (-35.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.5, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 7-7 against the money line (-12.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was MINNESOTA 86.3, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 58-81 against the money line (-34.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 85-117 against the money line (-41.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.8, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 4-7 against the money line (-9.9 Units) in road games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-5 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in road games vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.9, OPPONENT 87.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-14 against the money line (-13.0 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-7 against the money line (-10.1 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 85.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 26-25 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-7 against the money line (-6.8 Units) in road games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-22 against the money line (-15.6 Units) in road games versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-18 against the money line (-14.3 Units) versus good rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 3+ per game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.6, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-17 against the money line (-12.7 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.8, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 25-24 against the money line (-17.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.7, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-16 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in road games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 87.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 26-8 against the money line (+12.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.7, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 13-3 against the money line (+9.9 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 20-5 against the money line (+13.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 24-8 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 17-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 22-5 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 87.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
LOS ANGELES is 17-5 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 153-96 against the money line (+28.8 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.3, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after 3 consecutive division games this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 22-12 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-10 against the money line (+17.1 Units) in road games after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 62-26 against the money line (+19.6 Units) off a road win against a division rival since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.7, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-2 against the money line (+11.7 Units) off a win against a division rival this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 5*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-2 against the money line (+6.1 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season. The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.1, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 62-41 against the money line (+16.4 Units) in road games after 2 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 105-38 against the money line (+43.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 74-28 against the money line (+30.1 Units) after 4 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 71.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 56-16 against the money line (+30.0 Units) after 5 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 41-14 against the money line (+17.0 Units) after 6 or more consecutive wins since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 128-83 against the money line (-54.2 Units) as a favorite since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 76.1, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 133-167 against the money line (-69.4 Units) after a division game since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 87-104 against the money line (-42.5 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.6, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 103-133 against the money line (-51.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 26-45 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after failing to cover 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 73.1, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 63-79 against the money line (-37.2 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 71.3, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 83-105 against the money line (-41.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 77.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 56-79 against the money line (-36.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 79.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 16-20 against the money line (-23.0 Units) in home games after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 81.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 102-135 against the money line (-57.6 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was MINNESOTA 72.9, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
LOS ANGELES is 14-21 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-21 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 84.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-18 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 84.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) in road games when playing with 3 or more days rest over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 85.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-21 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-12 against the money line (-20.0 Units) hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-8 against the money line (-18.3 Units) hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-13.3 Units) hot shooting team - 5 straight games making >=42% of their shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-8 against the money line (-16.7 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-12 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after one or more consecutive overs over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 86.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-8 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in road games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 89.6 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-10 against the money line (-13.9 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 1-5 against the money line (-14.7 Units) off an road win where they scored 85 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 70.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-17 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-7 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games after allowing 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 88.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-22 against the money line (-14.9 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 86.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 2-6 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 89.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-20 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after 2 straight games forcing opponent to commit 11 or less turnovers since 1997. The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.1, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 52-16 against the money line (+19.7 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.7, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 33-11 against the money line (+13.1 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 19-5 against the money line (+11.0 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.1, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 26-8 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 14-3 against the money line (+10.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 10-2 against the money line (+8.0 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 88.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 11-1 against the money line (+11.5 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 5*) | MINNESOTA is 11-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 18-4 against the money line (+12.7 Units) off a home win against a division rival over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 18-2 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | MINNESOTA is 23-7 against the money line (+12.3 Units) off a home win over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 9-2 against the money line (+7.2 Units) after a win by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.5, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 41-11 against the money line (+15.9 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | MINNESOTA is 43-12 against the money line (+18.7 Units) after playing a game as favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | MINNESOTA is 27-7 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 27-7 against the money line (+17.1 Units) after playing a home game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | MINNESOTA is 40-12 against the money line (+17.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins over the last 2 seasons. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.2, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 26-10 | +5.9 | 21-13 | 22-14 | 84.7 | 42.0 | 46.2% | 44.2 | 78.9 | 38.4 | 41.8% | 42.4 | Road Games | 9-9 | -6.5 | 9-9 | 12-6 | 82.6 | 40.3 | 45.0% | 45.0 | 83.8 | 40.4 | 43.7% | 42.5 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +4.4 | 4-0 | 5-0 | 96.0 | 46.4 | 52.9% | 41.2 | 82.8 | 39.8 | 41.7% | 41.2 | Division Games | 17-7 | +1.2 | 13-9 | 16-8 | 85.9 | 42.0 | 46.6% | 43.7 | 81.0 | 38.8 | 42.8% | 42.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 84.7 | 42.0 | 31-68 | 46.2% | 6-16 | 36.2% | 16-21 | 79.4% | 44 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 78.2 | 38.9 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 35.9% | 14-19 | 76.9% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 82.6 | 40.3 | 31-69 | 45.0% | 6-16 | 35.1% | 15-19 | 79.4% | 45 | 12 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 17 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 78.9 | 38.4 | 29-70 | 41.8% | 6-19 | 32.2% | 14-19 | 73.8% | 42 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 77.3 | 38.2 | 28-67 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 14-19 | 75.9% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.8 | 40.4 | 31-72 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 35.3% | 15-20 | 73.2% | 42 | 11 | 17 | 17 | 10 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 29-8 | -2.4 | 19-18 | 22-15 | 85.2 | 43.1 | 46.8% | 46.2 | 76.2 | 39.1 | 40.7% | 39.9 | Home Games | 18-1 | +6.5 | 9-10 | 13-6 | 88.4 | 43.5 | 47.0% | 48.0 | 75.5 | 38.5 | 40.3% | 40.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.8 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 80.6 | 40.8 | 41.8% | 46.0 | 78.6 | 38.4 | 41.3% | 42.2 | Division Games | 19-6 | -2.8 | 12-13 | 15-10 | 85.9 | 43.8 | 46.5% | 46.5 | 76.9 | 39.4 | 41.3% | 39.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.2 | 43.1 | 32-68 | 46.8% | 6-16 | 39.6% | 15-20 | 76.1% | 46 | 11 | 20 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 78.1 | 38.5 | 29-67 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 35.7% | 14-19 | 76.8% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 88.4 | 43.5 | 33-70 | 47.0% | 6-15 | 40.6% | 16-21 | 75.9% | 48 | 12 | 21 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 76.2 | 39.1 | 28-68 | 40.7% | 7-20 | 32.9% | 14-19 | 74.9% | 40 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 76.9 | 37.9 | 28-66 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 35.0% | 14-19 | 76.0% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.5 | 38.5 | 28-69 | 40.3% | 7-21 | 31.7% | 13-18 | 72.7% | 41 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LOS ANGELES 70.9, MINNESOTA 69.2 |
| | |
|
|
8/25/2012 | NEW YORK | 87-62 | W | -550 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 43 | 6 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 50 | 19 | 8/30/2012 | @ TULSA | 85-99 | L | -500 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 41 | 17 | 37-72 | 51.4% | 41 | 12 | 9/2/2012 | @ CHICAGO | 74-85 | L | -300 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 33 | 19 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 37 | 18 | 9/4/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-88 | L | +325 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 42 | 19 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 39 | 14 | 9/7/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 96-68 | W | -450 | 39-63 | 61.9% | 40 | 18 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 33 | 14 | 9/9/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 71-73 | L | -220 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 55 | 19 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 44 | 14 | 9/13/2012 | CHICAGO | 86-77 | W | -550 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 43 | 14 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 33 | 10 | 9/14/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 93-82 | W | -270 | 35-68 | 51.5% | 41 | 16 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 44 | 19 | 9/18/2012 | PHOENIX | 101-76 | W | | 39-76 | 51.3% | 44 | 10 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 43 | 19 | 9/20/2012 | MINNESOTA | 92-76 | W | -125 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 40 | 15 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 17 | 9/27/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 93-86 | W | -300 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 40 | 11 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 37 | 11 | 9/29/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 101-94 | W | +145 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 41 | 17 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 38 | 11 | 10/4/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/25/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 84-74 | W | -270 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 56 | 13 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 41 | 12 | 8/28/2012 | SAN ANTONIO | 96-84 | W | -330 | 40-92 | 43.5% | 64 | 12 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 43 | 8 | 8/31/2012 | TULSA | 92-83 | W | | 34-77 | 44.2% | 48 | 9 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 34 | 9 | 9/4/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 88-77 | W | -450 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 39 | 14 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 42 | 19 | 9/7/2012 | ATLANTA | 97-93 | W | -500 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 59 | 19 | 37-93 | 39.8% | 51 | 13 | 9/9/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 81-62 | W | -105 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 40 | 14 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 36 | 9 | 9/11/2012 | @ CHICAGO | 70-83 | L | -270 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 30 | 17 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 42 | 13 | 9/14/2012 | @ INDIANA | 66-64 | W | +155 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 40 | 13 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 35 | 7 | 9/17/2012 | INDIANA | 86-79 | W | -220 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 41 | 14 | 31-71 | 43.7% | 36 | 11 | 9/20/2012 | @ LOS ANGELES | 76-92 | L | +105 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 44 | 17 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 40 | 15 | 9/21/2012 | @ PHOENIX | 89-66 | W | | 33-76 | 43.4% | 53 | 13 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 42 | 19 | 9/23/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 84-99 | L | -165 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 40 | 10 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 37 | 7 | 9/28/2012 | SEATTLE | 78-70 | W | -600 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 44 | 13 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 40 | 12 | 9/30/2012 | @ SEATTLE | 79-86 | L | -220 | 25-77 | 32.5% | 55 | 15 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 55 | 16 | 10/2/2012 | SEATTLE | 73-72 | W | -600 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 38 | 8 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 37 | 8 | 10/4/2012 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
LOS ANGELES is 37-17 (+15.2 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
LOS ANGELES is 7-6 (+4.2 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
LOS ANGELES is 15-12 (+4.2 Units) against the money line versus MINNESOTA since 1997 |
| |
MINNESOTA is 5-2 (-0.2 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/20/2012 | MINNESOTA | 76 | 167.5 | Over | 36 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 6-27 | 22.2% | 24-29 | 82.8% | 44 | 12 | 17 | | LOS ANGELES | 92 | -2 | SU ATS | 44 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 40 | 6 | 15 | 9/4/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 170.5 | Under | 37 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 12-16 | 75.0% | 42 | 8 | 19 | | MINNESOTA | 88 | -9 | SU ATS | 41 | 32-76 | 42.1% | 9-23 | 39.1% | 15-16 | 93.7% | 39 | 13 | 14 | 7/5/2012 | MINNESOTA | 90 | -6.5 | Over | 43 | 36-86 | 41.9% | 9-26 | 34.6% | 9-17 | 52.9% | 55 | 16 | 13 | | LOS ANGELES | 96 | 164.5 | SU ATS | 49 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 8-16 | 50.0% | 28-34 | 82.4% | 47 | 13 | 14 | 5/24/2012 | LOS ANGELES | 84 | 154 | ATS | 47 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 4-12 | 33.3% | 22-26 | 84.6% | 34 | 8 | 19 | | MINNESOTA | 92 | -9 | SU Over | 44 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 4-11 | 36.4% | 20-29 | 69.0% | 39 | 13 | 18 | 8/20/2011 | LOS ANGELES | 68 | 157 | Under | 34 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 6-9 | 66.7% | 30 | 5 | 16 | | MINNESOTA | 87 | -9 | SU ATS | 46 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 9-20 | 45.0% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 50 | 20 | 9 | 8/7/2011 | MINNESOTA | 84 | -7 | SU Over | 45 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 4-19 | 21.1% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 32 | 12 | 12 | | LOS ANGELES | 78 | 157.5 | ATS | 37 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 35 | 8 | 18 | 7/26/2011 | LOS ANGELES | 72 | 160 | Under | 30 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 40 | 11 | 25 | | MINNESOTA | 85 | -9 | SU ATS | 43 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 1-6 | 16.7% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 35 | 12 | 14 | 6/5/2011 | LOS ANGELES | 69 | 154.5 | Over | 40 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 16-18 | 88.9% | 37 | 5 | 17 | | MINNESOTA | 86 | -5.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 6-16 | 37.5% | 16-21 | 76.2% | 51 | 15 | 12 | 6/3/2011 | MINNESOTA | 74 | 156.5 | Under | 43 | 29-71 | 40.8% | 8-19 | 42.1% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 38 | 11 | 10 | | LOS ANGELES | 82 | -3 | SU ATS | 37 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 10-24 | 41.7% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 45 | 14 | 14 |
|
| | |
|
Carol is 17-5 against the money line (+9.8 Units) after a division game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 85.0, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Carol is 8-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after 3 consecutive division games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Carol is 11-3 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 13-2 against the money line (+11.7 Units) off a win against a division rival as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Carol is 9-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.1, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 8-1 against the money line (+9.3 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 8-1 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 89.9, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Carol is 6-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 92.4, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 14-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 17-5 against the money line (+11.1 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.2, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Carol is 9-1 against the money line (+10.3 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 88.8, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 4*) | Carol is 10-2 against the money line (+11.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES. The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.9, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 4*) |
|
|
Reeve is 65-37 against the money line (+11.5 Units) in all games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.2, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 26-7 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in home games vs. division opponents as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.2, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 26-8 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after having won 15 or more of their last 20 games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 19-9 against the money line (+12.5 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 21-6 against the money line (+13.8 Units) off a home win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.7, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Reeve is 18-2 against the money line (+14.0 Units) in home games off a win against a division rival as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 85.7, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 27-10 against the money line (+14.6 Units) off a home win as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Reeve is 46-19 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after playing a game as favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 83.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 30-14 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.6, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 33-18 against the money line (+11.6 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 45-19 against the money line (+16.2 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 82.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 32-17 against the money line (+10.2 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 80.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 15-8 against the money line (+9.2 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.5, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Reeve is 21-12 against the money line (+8.6 Units) vs. excellent 3 point shooting teams - making >=36% of their attempts as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.9, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Reeve is 23-13 against the money line (+9.1 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots as the coach of MINNESOTA. The average score was MINNESOTA 84.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 224 times, while the road underdog won straight up 78 times. Edge against the money line=MINNESOTA | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 31 times, while the road underdog won straight up 12 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 06/13/2012 - Sharnee' Zoll out indefinitely ( ACL ) | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/19/2024 11:57:17 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|