| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
173
| 82
Final
59 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 647 | CHICAGO | -200 | | 648 | LOS ANGELES | +170 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(56-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games.
(57-26 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.7%, +31.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a close win by 3 points or less.
(64-30 since 1997.) (68.1%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd road game in 5 days.
(23-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.7%, +16.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games.
(53-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.2%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after going over the total by 18 or more points total in their last three games, on Thursday nights.
(21-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (80.8%, +19.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after scoring 80 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games.
(35-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two good excellent shooting teams (>=46%) after 15+ games, hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(21-7 since 1997.) (75%, +14.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as a road underdog, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(27-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more.
(60-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.1%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games.
(26-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.5%, +17.1 units. Rating = 1*) |  - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - with a winning percentage of between 40-49% on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(26-24 over the last 5 seasons.) (52%, +25.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(53-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.4%, +17.8 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
|
- Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season, after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(159-53 since 1997.) (75%, +55.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home underdogs vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - up-tempo team averaging 62 or more shots/game on the season against opponent after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(152-50 since 1997.) (75.2%, +54.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road favorites vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better.
(136-42 since 1997.) (76.4%, +53.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(41-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (85.4%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days.
(56-28 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +35.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(49-36 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games.
(59-49 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.6%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games against opponent after having won 5 or 6 of their last 7 games.
(33-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (82.5%, +21.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games.
(37-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.8%, +27.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games.
(57-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.9%, +29.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=42% of their shots.
(34-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.8%, +19.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(54-31 since 1997.) (63.5%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against a good free throw shooting team (76-80%), hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots.
(43-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.1%, +28.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more.
(55-33 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.5%, +35.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a losing record.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +17.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent shooting team (>=46%) against an poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(22-5 since 1997.) (81.5%, +16.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after going over the total by 48 or more points total in their last ten games, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(22-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.5%, +19.2 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after allowing 80 points or more in 3 straight games.
(32-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.2%, +15.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games, after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better.
(45-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.3%, +26.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 4 of their last 5 games.
(68-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.1%, +31.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games.
(36-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.3%, +25.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average defensive team (40.5-43.5%) against a poor defensive team (43.5-46%) after 15+ games.
(83-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.9%, +33.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) against a poor rebounding team (-3 to -6 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(46-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) against a poor rebounding team (-3 to -6 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(46-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average rebounding team (+/-3 reb/game) against a poor rebounding team (-3 to -6 reb/game).
(46-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average rebounding team (+/-3 Reb/G) against a poor rebounding team (-3 to -6 Reb/G) after 15+ games.
(46-22 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.6%, +28.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
| CHICAGO | 82 | | 30-65 | 46.7% | 8-21 | 37.3% | 13-16 | 82.6% | 42 | 8 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 78 | | 29-66 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 34.7% | 14-17 | 78.8% | 39 | 8 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, CHICAGO won the game straight up 622 times, while LOS ANGELES won 354 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CHICAGO is 12-3 against the money line (+11.9 Units) in road games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 78.7 | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 93.9, OPPONENT 87.4 | CHICAGO is 6-2 against the money line (+6.8 Units) when they make 83% or more of their free throws in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.0, OPPONENT 81.9 | CHICAGO is 15-8 against the money line (+10.5 Units) in road games where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.1, OPPONENT 83.4 | CHICAGO is 53-42 against the money line (+18.6 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.1, OPPONENT 78.5 | CHICAGO is 30-13 against the money line (+14.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 88.7, OPPONENT 82.3 | LOS ANGELES is 282-216 against the money line (-85.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 76.9 | LOS ANGELES is 109-99 against the money line (-54.3 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.6, OPPONENT 74.4 | LOS ANGELES is 1-8 against the money line (-9.1 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 88.0 | LOS ANGELES is 4-13 against the money line (-11.0 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 71.8, OPPONENT 80.1 | LOS ANGELES is 76-68 against the money line (-46.6 Units) when their opponents make 36% to 42% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 76.8 | LOS ANGELES is 7-14 against the money line (-14.1 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.3, OPPONENT 82.9 | LOS ANGELES is 49-75 against the money line (-76.1 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 80.0 | LOS ANGELES is 10-19 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 87.0 | LOS ANGELES is 11-17 against the money line (-11.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 85.8 | LOS ANGELES is 7-13 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 82.2 |
|
CHICAGO is 175-217 against the money line (-64.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.2, OPPONENT 82.1 | CHICAGO is 6-10 against the money line (-12.1 Units) in road games when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.1, OPPONENT 85.9 | CHICAGO is 25-54 against the money line (-26.3 Units) in road games when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 81.3 | CHICAGO is 23-27 against the money line (-19.5 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 87.7 | CHICAGO is 111-156 against the money line (-56.4 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 77.5, OPPONENT 80.2 | LOS ANGELES is 10-3 against the money line (+7.9 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 79.4 | LOS ANGELES is 62-11 against the money line (+31.7 Units) in home games when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 70.2 | LOS ANGELES is 13-6 against the money line (+7.1 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 87.2, OPPONENT 82.9 |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 24-13 against the money line (+10.6 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.5, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-9 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in road games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 15-9 against the money line (+9.4 Units) in road games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 12-6 against the money line (+13.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 15-10 against the money line (+13.0 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 30-17 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 29-16 against the money line (+9.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-9 against the money line (+7.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 13-7 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 30-17 against the money line (+9.3 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-16 against the money line (-11.0 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 108-106 against the money line (-84.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 171-158 against the money line (-103.1 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 151-137 against the money line (-76.4 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 225-194 against the money line (-88.1 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-15 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.0, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 136-151 against the money line (-65.5 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 84-87 against the money line (-37.2 Units) versus good shooting teams - making >=44% of their shots after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-16 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 272-235 against the money line (-89.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-16 against the money line (-14.8 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-14 against the money line (-14.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 91-114 against the money line (-94.7 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-16 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.4, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-13 against the money line (-11.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.2, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 192-143 against the money line (-72.5 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 177-141 against the money line (-80.3 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.5, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 262-206 against the money line (-99.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 114-89 against the money line (-54.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 171-136 against the money line (-72.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-16 against the money line (-11.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 252-238 against the money line (-92.6 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 115-113 against the money line (-50.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 172-166 against the money line (-68.2 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-13 against the money line (-10.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 15-13 against the money line (-18.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 5-7 against the money line (-16.0 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.2, OPPONENT 84.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 46-39 against the money line (-29.0 Units) when playing against a bad team (Win Pct. 25% to 40%) since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.5, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 34-49 against the money line (-36.6 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.1, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 27-37 against the money line (-28.7 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 5-8 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 4*) | CHICAGO is 10-10 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 58-27 against the money line (+21.2 Units) in home games when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 11-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 55-19 against the money line (+25.7 Units) in home games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.5, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 70-30 against the money line (+23.8 Units) in home games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 72.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
CHICAGO is 19-11 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-11 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 19-11 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 8-2 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.6, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 14-7 against the money line (+9.5 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.4, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in road games revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.2, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.7, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-3 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in road games revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+8.9 Units) in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 10-2 against the money line (+9.0 Units) in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 87.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 7-3 against the money line (+8.0 Units) in road games revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 25-25 against the money line (+17.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-10 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 12-6 against the money line (+9.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 18-10 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 10-5 against the money line (+7.6 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.0, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-5 against the money line (+11.9 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 3*) | CHICAGO is 10-4 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 6-1 against the money line (+7.8 Units) after playing a road game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 90.0, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 11-6 against the money line (+7.8 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.9, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-3 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.6, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 18-27 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in all games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-20 against the money line (-12.5 Units) in May, June, or July games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.5, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 70-60 against the money line (-54.0 Units) on Thursday since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 175-154 against the money line (-73.5 Units) after a non-conference game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-15 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 113-111 against the money line (-49.7 Units) after failing to cover 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.1, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-12 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.0, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-9 against the money line (-8.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.9, OPPONENT 87.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-9.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-8 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.1, OPPONENT 88.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-11.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 86.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 78-67 against the money line (-43.7 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 50-46 against the money line (-35.2 Units) after 4 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 5-11 against the money line (-9.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 85.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 136-91 against the money line (-52.7 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 45-46 against the money line (-52.1 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.5, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-13 against the money line (-10.0 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CHICAGO is 44-58 against the money line (-28.1 Units) hot shooting team - 2 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 15-31 against the money line (-19.0 Units) red hot shooting team - 3 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.3, OPPONENT 85.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 4-15 against the money line (-13.2 Units) red hot shooting team - 4 straight games making >=45% of their shots since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.1, OPPONENT 91.4 - (Rating = 2*) | CHICAGO is 43-54 against the money line (-29.3 Units) after a game where a team made 50% of their shots or better since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 132-161 against the money line (-53.6 Units) after one or more consecutive overs since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 69-79 against the money line (-36.9 Units) after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 158-208 against the money line (-63.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 128-168 against the money line (-53.9 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 40-59 against the money line (-32.5 Units) after allowing 90 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.4, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 61-94 against the money line (-46.0 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.9, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 7-10 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after scoring 90 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.4, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 48-72 against the money line (-42.8 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | CHICAGO is 10-12 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 140-176 against the money line (-57.4 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.6, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-11 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.1, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CHICAGO is 9-12 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after a combined score of 175 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 96-26 against the money line (+36.6 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.7, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 31-17 against the money line (+13.6 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 11-5 | +4.4 | 7-9 | 8-7 | 85.4 | 41.9 | 46.9% | 41.9 | 81.0 | 40.8 | 43.0% | 42.7 | | Road Games | 6-3 | +3.2 | 5-4 | 4-4 | 83.6 | 43.1 | 47.9% | 39.6 | 80.3 | 43.3 | 44.1% | 41.3 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.2 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 93.6 | 49.2 | 49.6% | 41.2 | 89.8 | 46.0 | 46.6% | 41.6 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 85.4 | 41.9 | 32-69 | 46.9% | 7-21 | 35.8% | 13-16 | 82.3% | 42 | 7 | 24 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 81.2 | 39.9 | 30-68 | 43.3% | 8-23 | 34.2% | 14-18 | 78.9% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 83.6 | 43.1 | 33-68 | 47.9% | 7-20 | 35.4% | 11-14 | 83.1% | 40 | 6 | 24 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.0 | 40.8 | 31-72 | 43.0% | 7-20 | 33.5% | 12-16 | 74.8% | 43 | 9 | 21 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | vs opponents averaging | 81.1 | 40.4 | 30-68 | 43.5% | 8-23 | 34.1% | 14-18 | 78.2% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.3 | 43.3 | 31-70 | 44.1% | 7-20 | 34.8% | 12-16 | 74.5% | 41 | 9 | 21 | 16 | 6 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 6-9 | -7.4 | 7-8 | 10-5 | 83.0 | 41.4 | 46.8% | 38.9 | 87.3 | 44.5 | 44.8% | 42.1 | | Home Games | 3-2 | -0.8 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 86.4 | 43.6 | 50.8% | 34.8 | 88.6 | 42.8 | 47.6% | 41.2 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.3 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 81.0 | 41.4 | 47.2% | 39.0 | 87.0 | 43.2 | 45.0% | 42.2 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 83.0 | 41.4 | 31-65 | 46.8% | 5-16 | 33.5% | 17-21 | 78.0% | 39 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 5 | | vs opponents surrendering | 82.4 | 40.7 | 30-68 | 44.2% | 8-23 | 34.2% | 14-18 | 78.9% | 42 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 86.4 | 43.6 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 6-15 | 42.7% | 14-18 | 75.6% | 35 | 6 | 22 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 87.3 | 44.5 | 30-68 | 44.8% | 10-24 | 39.1% | 17-21 | 80.3% | 42 | 9 | 20 | 20 | 9 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 82.3 | 40.9 | 30-69 | 43.4% | 8-23 | 34.6% | 15-19 | 78.9% | 43 | 8 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 88.6 | 42.8 | 32-67 | 47.6% | 9-22 | 40.5% | 16-20 | 78.8% | 41 | 10 | 20 | 18 | 10 | 16 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 70.7, LOS ANGELES 69.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 5/14/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 82-78 | W | -360 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 37 | 5 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 45 | 15 | | 5/18/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 71-74 | L | -105 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 38 | 17 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 46 | 16 | | 5/22/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 82-73 | W | +100 | 34-63 | 54.0% | 41 | 15 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 37 | 12 | | 5/24/2022 | INDIANA | 95-90 | W | | 31-65 | 47.7% | 44 | 16 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 51 | 16 | | 5/28/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 76-83 | L | -105 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 57 | 10 | 31-84 | 36.9% | 57 | 7 | | 5/31/2022 | PHOENIX | 73-70 | W | -400 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 47 | 13 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 42 | 10 | | 6/3/2022 | @ ATLANTA | 73-65 | W | -200 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 47 | 16 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 42 | 12 | | 6/5/2022 | WASHINGTON | 91-82 | W | -220 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 36 | 16 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 38 | 15 | | 6/8/2022 | @ WASHINGTON | 82-84 | L | +145 | 33-72 | 45.8% | 38 | 13 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 41 | 13 | | 6/10/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 83-79 | W | +200 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 35 | 12 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 42 | 10 | | 6/12/2022 | @ NEW YORK | 88-86 | W | -300 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 45 | 12 | 32-66 | 48.5% | 33 | 14 | | 6/17/2022 | ATLANTA | 106-100 | W | -330 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 51 | 15 | 39-87 | 44.8% | 47 | 15 | | 6/19/2022 | @ INDIANA | 87-89 | L | -360 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 34 | 14 | 35-69 | 50.7% | 49 | 15 | | 6/21/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 104-95 | W | +280 | 43-75 | 57.3% | 41 | 9 | 33-75 | 44.0% | 37 | 9 | | 6/23/2022 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/26/2022 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/29/2022 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/2/2022 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2022 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 5/14/2022 | @ CONNECTICUT | 60-77 | L | +250 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 32 | 19 | 28-70 | 40.0% | 53 | 19 | | 5/17/2022 | MINNESOTA | 84-87 | L | -300 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 32 | 14 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 44 | 18 | | 5/20/2022 | @ SEATTLE | 80-83 | L | +220 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 37 | 15 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 40 | 10 | | 5/23/2022 | @ LAS VEGAS | 76-104 | L | +400 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 40 | 5 | 36-71 | 50.7% | 45 | 7 | | 5/25/2022 | PHOENIX | 99-94 | W | -115 | 39-66 | 59.1% | 30 | 14 | 34-60 | 56.7% | 31 | 18 | | 5/27/2022 | @ INDIANA | 96-101 | L | -250 | 35-71 | 49.3% | 44 | 13 | 32-70 | 45.7% | 42 | 13 | | 5/29/2022 | @ MINNESOTA | 85-83 | W | +105 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 33 | 15 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 37 | 13 | | 5/31/2022 | DALLAS | 93-91 | W | -115 | 36-56 | 64.3% | 33 | 15 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 43 | 9 | | 6/5/2022 | @ PHOENIX | 74-81 | L | -155 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 36 | 17 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 33 | 16 | | 6/11/2022 | LAS VEGAS | 72-89 | L | +210 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 35 | 13 | 33-68 | 48.5% | 47 | 19 | | 6/19/2022 | @ DALLAS | 82-92 | L | +155 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 47 | 17 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 47 | 13 | | 6/21/2022 | WASHINGTON | 84-82 | W | +120 | 33-67 | 49.3% | 44 | 16 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 41 | 17 | | 6/23/2022 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/25/2022 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/27/2022 | LAS VEGAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/1/2022 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/3/2022 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/4/2022 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/7/2022 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 30-10 (+8.9 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 5-1 (+4.4 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 14-3 (+2.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 1-0 (+1.0 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
5/6/2022 | LOS ANGELES | 98 | 155.5 | SU ATS | 42 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 27-33 | 81.8% | 41 | 8 | 20 | | | CHICAGO | 91 | -3.5 | Over | 39 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 7-22 | 31.8% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 35 | 6 | 25 | 6/5/2021 | CHICAGO | 63 | 157 | Under | 31 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 5-18 | 27.8% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 49 | 14 | 18 | | | LOS ANGELES | 68 | -1.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 3-19 | 15.8% | 15-21 | 71.4% | 48 | 9 | 11 | 5/30/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 82 | 165 | SU ATS | 37 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 14-18 | 77.8% | 41 | 8 | 19 | | | CHICAGO | 79 | -3 | Under | 37 | 30-75 | 40.0% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 12-12 | 100.0% | 51 | 13 | 22 | 5/28/2021 | LOS ANGELES | 76 | 170 | SU ATS | 38 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 9-19 | 47.4% | 15-18 | 83.3% | 36 | 9 | 19 | | | CHICAGO | 61 | -4 | Under | 33 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 6-19 | 31.6% | 13-14 | 92.9% | 38 | 5 | 27 |
|
| | |
|
Wade is 27-21 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in road games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 27-21 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 27-21 against the money line (+12.6 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 20-11 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in June games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.5, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 9-3 against the money line (+6.8 Units) after a game with 4 or less offensive rebounds as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 14-6 against the money line (+8.7 Units) after 3 or more consecutive overs as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 89.3, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 33-14 against the money line (+21.7 Units) after having won 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.8, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 4*) | Wade is 26-16 against the money line (+9.4 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.2, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 18-13 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in road games revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 17-12 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 14-7 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in road games revenging a loss where opponent scored 85 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 32-25 against the money line (+8.8 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 83.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 28-21 against the money line (+9.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 27-17 against the money line (+11.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.4, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 24-17 against the money line (+8.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 21-16 against the money line (+8.6 Units) in road games after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.5, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 19-6 against the money line (+15.2 Units) after 2 straight games making 8 or more 3 point shots as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 86.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Wade is 27-21 against the money line (+8.7 Units) in road games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.3, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 25-29 against the money line (-15.0 Units) in May, June, or July games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 12-19 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 2-8 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after a home game where both teams score 75 or more points as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.3, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 32-36 against the money line (-15.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 20-26 against the money line (-14.8 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 8-13 against the money line (-10.2 Units) after a win by 6 points or less as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 15-16 against the money line (-14.9 Units) after a combined score of 150 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 2-8 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 69.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 4*) | Fisher is 9-18 against the money line (-14.6 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 22-28 against the money line (-17.3 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.3, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 14-19 against the money line (-12.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.0, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 30-34 against the money line (-17.5 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 5-12 against the money line (-8.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 72.8, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 14-22 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 79.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 29-36 against the money line (-19.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Wade is 3-6 against the money line (-10.1 Units) on Thursday as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 4-9 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when playing their 4th game in 7 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.9, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | Wade is 22-26 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.4, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 13-21 against the money line (-18.9 Units) after scoring 90 points or more as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 82.6, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Wade is 22-24 against the money line (-16.6 Units) after scoring 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.3, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 19-24 against the money line (-16.8 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.9, OPPONENT 85.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Wade is 16-16 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.6, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Wade is 5-8 against the money line (-19.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 84.5, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Wade is 11-10 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus poor defensive teams - shooting pct defense of >=44% as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 85.8, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 7-1 against the money line (+9.2 Units) as a home underdog of +200 or less as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 9-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in home games on Thursday as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 69.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 12-4 against the money line (+10.1 Units) in home games when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 13-3 against the money line (+10.4 Units) in home games after one or more consecutive overs as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 13-1 against the money line (+12.4 Units) in home games off a home win as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.4, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Fisher is 8-2 against the money line (+6.7 Units) in home games after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.6, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 10-2 against the money line (+8.2 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 16-4 against the money line (+13.2 Units) in home games after playing a home game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.1, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 4*) | Fisher is 16-7 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 17-7 against the money line (+10.0 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 16-4 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in home games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 16-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 13-5 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in home games versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 17-5 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 26-10 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 13-4 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 22-9 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 17-4 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 26-7 against the money line (+14.2 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.8, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 17-5 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 26-10 against the money line (+11.2 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 15-3 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in home games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 19-6 against the money line (+13.7 Units) in home games versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 17-4 against the money line (+12.7 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 26-9 against the money line (+12.2 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 15-5 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.8, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 14-7 against the money line (+8.1 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the road favorite won the game straight up 19 times, while the home underdog won straight up 10 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the road favorite won the game straight up 4 times, while the home underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| No significant injuries. | |
| [F] 06/22/2022 - Chiney Ogwumike is OUT Thursday vs Chicago Sky ( Personal ) | | [F] 05/28/2022 - Rae Burrell is out indefinitely ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/19/2024 9:05:52 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|