| | | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
CONNECTICUT
LOS ANGELES |
|
|
160.5
| 78
Final
56 |
|
|
| | |
|
| WNBA Playoffs - Semifinals - Best of 5 - Game 3 - CONN leads 2-0 | | |  | |
| 619 | CONNECTICUT | +175 | | 620 | LOS ANGELES | -210 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
 - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, in August or September games.
(97-54 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +44.4 units. Rating = 3*) |  - Home favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(157-58 since 1997.) (73%, +58.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(188-150 since 1997.) (55.6%, +54.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 or more consecutive wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(124-50 since 1997.) (71.3%, +50.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game, in August or September games.
(64-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +46 units. Rating = 3*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(111-38 since 1997.) (74.5%, +45.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - a good team (+3 to +7 PPG differential) against an average team (+/- 3 PPG differential), after scoring 75 points or more.
(102-37 since 1997.) (73.4%, +44 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in the conference finals.
(87-26 since 1997.) (77%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - being called for 18 or less fouls/game on the season, on Sunday games.
(59-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.3%, +33.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(44-9 since 1997.) (83%, +29.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, a good team (60% to 75%) playing a team with a winning record after 15 or more games.
(69-51 since 1997.) (57.5%, +21.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off 2 or more consecutive home wins, in a game involving two good teams (60% to 75%) after 15 or more games.
(37-19 since 1997.) (66.1%, +20.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - when trailing in a playoff series, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season.
(35-18 since 1997.) (66%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - when trailing in a playoff series, good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games, after 15 or more games.
(35-18 since 1997.) (66%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good team, winning 60-75% or more of their games on the season, on Sunday games.
(46-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +27.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games against opponent after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games.
(73-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.9%, +34 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after scoring 90 points or more.
(162-119 since 1997.) (57.7%, +55.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(119-70 since 1997.) (63%, +55 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after scoring 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(107-77 since 1997.) (58.2%, +52.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more.
(130-90 since 1997.) (59.1%, +48.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(60-37 since 1997.) (61.9%, +42 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(54-33 since 1997.) (62.1%, +34.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days.
(58-25 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.9%, +29.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(27-5 over the last 5 seasons.) (84.4%, +22.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - good 3PT shooting team (>=35%) against an average 3PT shooting team (30-35%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots.
(55-29 since 1997.) (65.5%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout loss by 20 points or more.
(39-20 since 1997.) (66.1%, +27.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games.
(40-21 since 1997.) (65.6%, +23 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (LOS ANGELES) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a blowout win by 20 points or more.
(56-28 since 1997.) (66.7%, +20.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after a blowout win by 20 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 3 straight games.
(30-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (78.9%, +20.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (CONNECTICUT) - after beating the spread by more than 24 points in their previous game, with a winning record on the season.
(27-15 since 1997.) (64.3%, +14.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a road loss by 10 points or more.
(48-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.8%, +19.5 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more, with a winning record on the season playing another winning team after 15 or more games.
(27-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.1%, +14.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (CONNECTICUT) - off a home blowout win by 20 points or more.
(77-40 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.8%, +32.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (LOS ANGELES) - revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points, off a road loss.
(83-38 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.6%, +27.3 units. Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
| CONNECTICUT | 78 | | 30-72 | 41.7% | 7-21 | 34.6% | 11-16 | 69.4% | 45 | 14 | 15 | | LOS ANGELES | 83 | | 32-68 | 47.0% | 7-20 | 32.5% | 12-15 | 82.4% | 42 | 9 | 14 |
| | The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, LOS ANGELES won the game straight up 608 times, while CONNECTICUT won 364 times.
No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
CONNECTICUT is 91-52 against the money line (+26.6 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.8, OPPONENT 75.6 | CONNECTICUT is 22-5 against the money line (+15.4 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 77.6 | CONNECTICUT is 6-1 against the money line (+5.8 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.4, OPPONENT 73.0 | CONNECTICUT is 21-2 against the money line (+18.7 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.8, OPPONENT 77.0 | LOS ANGELES is 30-26 against the money line (-23.2 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 78.3 | LOS ANGELES is 17-18 against the money line (-15.3 Units) when they attempt 12 to 16 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.4, OPPONENT 79.0 | LOS ANGELES is 16-14 against the money line (-16.9 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 77.8 | LOS ANGELES is 4-6 against the money line (-12.1 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 80.3 | LOS ANGELES is 5-13 against the money line (-15.6 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.1, OPPONENT 86.3 | LOS ANGELES is 16-20 against the money line (-25.1 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.1, OPPONENT 79.6 | LOS ANGELES is 23-21 against the money line (-24.0 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.6, OPPONENT 81.7 |
|
CONNECTICUT is 5-12 against the money line (-27.0 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.6, OPPONENT 84.1 | CONNECTICUT is 39-66 against the money line (-61.4 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.5, OPPONENT 80.7 | CONNECTICUT is 12-13 against the money line (-21.1 Units) when they make 29% to 35% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 81.0 | CONNECTICUT is 6-10 against the money line (-11.6 Units) in road games when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.3, OPPONENT 82.3 | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) in road games when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 88.3 | CONNECTICUT is 3-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) when they allow 83 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 93.3 | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 69.7, OPPONENT 87.0 | CONNECTICUT is 12-12 against the money line (-14.3 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.5, OPPONENT 83.3 | CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-10.3 Units) in road games when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 88.1 | CONNECTICUT is 7-11 against the money line (-11.2 Units) in road games in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.1, OPPONENT 81.6 | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.2 Units) in home games when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.1, OPPONENT 76.4 | LOS ANGELES is 9-3 against the money line (+6.5 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 75.3 | LOS ANGELES is 15-6 against the money line (+9.0 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 75.1 | LOS ANGELES is 11-1 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.2, OPPONENT 69.9 | LOS ANGELES is 134-73 against the money line (+31.2 Units) when they grab 42 to 46 rebounds in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.9, OPPONENT 71.6 | LOS ANGELES is 286-76 against the money line (+160.9 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 86.4, OPPONENT 77.8 | LOS ANGELES is 20-4 against the money line (+12.1 Units) when they score 83 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 90.2, OPPONENT 78.9 |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 143-100 against the money line (+25.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.0, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 89-65 against the money line (+28.6 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 20-17 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 30-24 against the money line (-23.3 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.6, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 203-168 against the money line (-78.0 Units) versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 117-123 against the money line (-50.4 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.7, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 37-27 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 4-9 against the money line (-13.2 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-26 against the money line (-19.2 Units) vs. dominant rebounding teams - outrebounding opponents by 5+ per game after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 36-27 against the money line (-22.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.9, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-19 against the money line (-25.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 23-24 against the money line (-30.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.4, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 3-10 against the money line (-13.9 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.5, OPPONENT 83.0 - (Rating = 4*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-12 against the money line (-14.6 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-19 against the money line (-18.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 33-24 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-18 against the money line (-13.5 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.0, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 24-22 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-15 against the money line (-21.1 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 31-22 against the money line (-19.5 Units) versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 80.7 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 13-17 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-15 against the money line (-14.3 Units) in road games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.1, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 11-16 against the money line (-16.5 Units) in road games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.8, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-8 against the money line (-10.0 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 76.8, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 24-19 against the money line (-17.9 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.7, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-8.7 Units) in road games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.7, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-1 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.8, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 6*) | LOS ANGELES is 87-68 against the money line (+19.2 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 75.4, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 63-48 against the money line (+15.9 Units) when playing against a good team (Win Pct. 60% to 75%) after 15+ games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 74.8, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-5 against the money line (+6.7 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.2, OPPONENT 78.5 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 17-6 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-0 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games versus teams who make 5 or more 3 point shots/game on the season after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-0 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-0 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-0 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 16-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-9 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 12-0 against the money line (+12.0 Units) in home games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.3, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.2 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
CONNECTICUT is 13-5 against the money line (+8.0 Units) on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 140-99 against the money line (+31.4 Units) against Western conference opponents since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 9-1 against the money line (+8.4 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 140-99 against the money line (+31.4 Units) in non-conference games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.3, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-2 against the money line (+7.7 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 94.1, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 32-16 against the money line (+13.0 Units) after a blowout win by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.7, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 96-62 against the money line (+31.4 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 77.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 19-5 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after 1 or more consecutive wins this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-17 against the money line (-17.2 Units) against Eastern conference opponents over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 21-17 against the money line (-17.2 Units) in non-conference games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 77.5 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 107-91 against the money line (-56.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.7, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-18 against the money line (-13.1 Units) off a road blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.5, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 10-10 against the money line (-14.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.3, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-24 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after a blowout loss by 20 points or more since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 73.1, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-8 against the money line (-15.9 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 78.2, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
CONNECTICUT is 3-6 against the money line (-9.8 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.2, OPPONENT 87.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-18 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 16-18 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in a road game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.4, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-12 against the money line (-16.7 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 78.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-10 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games after 2 straight games - attempting 10+ more shots than opponent since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 75.1, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in the 3rd game of a playoff series since 1997.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 66.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-4 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in road games after 2 consecutive covers as a favorite over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 86.4 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 12-15 against the money line (-13.2 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 25-20 against the money line (-17.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.0, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 20-19 against the money line (-20.5 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 83.1, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-13 against the money line (-16.2 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.8, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 2-5 against the money line (-8.8 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 72.4, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-4 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.0, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 0-4 against the money line (-9.3 Units) in road games after scoring 75 points or more in 4 straight games this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.0, OPPONENT 88.8 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-10 against the money line (-18.8 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 3*) | CONNECTICUT is 8-11 against the money line (-11.7 Units) in road games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.6, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 0*) | CONNECTICUT is 14-13 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after scoring 80 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.8, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 10-13 against the money line (-15.4 Units) in road games after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.0, OPPONENT 82.5 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 5-9 against the money line (-11.1 Units) in road games after playing a game as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 2*) | CONNECTICUT is 4-8 against the money line (-9.6 Units) in road games after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 74.8, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-6 against the money line (-10.2 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.0, OPPONENT 87.1 - (Rating = 4*) | CONNECTICUT is 1-5 against the money line (-9.2 Units) in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite this season.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 73.2, OPPONENT 87.7 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 15-0 against the money line (+15.0 Units) in home games in August or September games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 82.5, OPPONENT 69.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) on Sunday games this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in home games when playing with 2 days rest over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.9, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.2 Units) in home games after a non-conference game this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.3, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+5.2 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 7-1 against the money line (+6.1 Units) revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.4, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 9-1 against the money line (+7.9 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent by 10 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 70.5 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-3 against the money line (+5.7 Units) off a road loss this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.9, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 6-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) off a road loss by 10 points or more this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.1, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 14-2 against the money line (+10.7 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 77.7, OPPONENT 68.9 - (Rating = 1*) | LOS ANGELES is 27-12 against the money line (+15.5 Units) in home games after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.5, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 2*) | LOS ANGELES is 8-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more this season.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 3*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games after a game where they failed to cover the spread over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 68.1 - (Rating = 0*) | LOS ANGELES is 13-2 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in home games after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 67.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
| All Games | 25-11 | +3.2 | 16-19 | 17-19 | 81.3 | 40.7 | 42.4% | 46.1 | 77.6 | 40.3 | 43.9% | 40.6 | | Road Games | 8-9 | -7.7 | 4-12 | 8-9 | 76.4 | 39.9 | 39.9% | 45.3 | 80.6 | 42.0 | 44.7% | 43.6 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.2 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 92.0 | 43.6 | 43.9% | 49.0 | 85.6 | 41.2 | 48.9% | 38.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 81.3 | 40.7 | 30-72 | 42.4% | 8-21 | 35.6% | 13-18 | 70.2% | 46 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 79 | 40.1 | 29-69 | 42.3% | 7-20 | 34.1% | 14-17 | 79.5% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 76.4 | 39.9 | 28-71 | 39.9% | 7-21 | 33.1% | 13-20 | 67.6% | 45 | 11 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.6 | 40.3 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 6-21 | 30.5% | 13-17 | 79.7% | 41 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 78.6 | 39.9 | 29-69 | 42.4% | 7-20 | 33.5% | 14-17 | 80.6% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 80.6 | 42.0 | 30-66 | 44.7% | 7-21 | 34.8% | 14-17 | 80.5% | 44 | 8 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 23-14 | +1.2 | 19-17 | 19-18 | 79.9 | 39.5 | 43.4% | 41.6 | 77.6 | 39.0 | 41.0% | 44.4 | | Home Games | 16-2 | +9 | 13-4 | 10-8 | 83.3 | 42.0 | 45.9% | 43.2 | 72.7 | 38.0 | 38.7% | 42.2 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.9 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 82.8 | 41.8 | 48.7% | 41.0 | 76.6 | 36.6 | 40.1% | 44.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.9 | 39.5 | 30-70 | 43.4% | 7-21 | 33.9% | 12-15 | 82.9% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 79 | 40.2 | 29-69 | 42.7% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 14-17 | 79.8% | 42 | 9 | 19 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.3 | 42.0 | 32-69 | 45.9% | 7-21 | 34.8% | 12-15 | 83.6% | 43 | 8 | 19 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 77.6 | 39.0 | 28-68 | 41.0% | 7-21 | 34.4% | 14-18 | 78.8% | 44 | 10 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 79 | 40.3 | 29-69 | 42.4% | 7-20 | 34.0% | 14-18 | 78.9% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.7 | 38.0 | 27-69 | 38.7% | 7-22 | 32.2% | 12-15 | 78.9% | 42 | 9 | 17 | 16 | 9 | 15 | 4 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 71, LOS ANGELES 71.5 |
| | |
|
|
| 8/14/2019 | @ PHOENIX | 78-71 | W | -300 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 50 | 15 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 40 | 19 | | 8/16/2019 | SEATTLE | 79-78 | W | -270 | 29-74 | 39.2% | 39 | 15 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 46 | 27 | | 8/18/2019 | DALLAS | 78-68 | W | -500 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 43 | 15 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 37 | 9 | | 8/23/2019 | LAS VEGAS | 89-85 | W | -120 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 42 | 10 | 32-71 | 45.1% | 42 | 10 | | 8/25/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | 72-84 | L | +175 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 43 | 15 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 35 | 14 | | 8/27/2019 | @ SEATTLE | 89-70 | W | +135 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 50 | 8 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 38 | 17 | | 8/30/2019 | @ NEW YORK | 94-84 | W | -600 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 45 | 9 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 39 | 13 | | 9/4/2019 | DALLAS | 102-72 | W | -600 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 48 | 16 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 23 | 9 | | 9/6/2019 | CHICAGO | 104-109 | L | -250 | 38-89 | 42.7% | 49 | 17 | 41-77 | 53.2% | 47 | 20 | | 9/8/2019 | @ INDIANA | 76-104 | L | -165 | 24-71 | 33.8% | 42 | 14 | 38-65 | 58.5% | 47 | 15 | | 9/17/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 84-75 | W | -115 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 49 | 9 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 42 | 17 | | 9/19/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 94-68 | W | -115 | 36-79 | 45.6% | 57 | 12 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 31 | 13 | | 9/22/2019 | @ LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 8/14/2019 | @ DALLAS | 78-84 | L | -300 | 30-68 | 44.1% | 38 | 15 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 40 | 18 | | 8/16/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 81-91 | L | -120 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 37 | 13 | 32-67 | 47.8% | 44 | 18 | | 8/20/2019 | MINNESOTA | 81-71 | W | -250 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 40 | 16 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 38 | 17 | | 8/22/2019 | INDIANA | 98-65 | W | -450 | 38-76 | 50.0% | 51 | 13 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 37 | 18 | | 8/25/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 84-72 | W | -210 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 35 | 14 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 43 | 15 | | 8/27/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | 66-95 | L | +250 | 23-67 | 34.3% | 44 | 15 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 41 | 9 | | 8/29/2019 | @ INDIANA | 87-83 | W | -210 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 36 | 11 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 49 | 13 | | 8/31/2019 | @ LAS VEGAS | 86-92 | L | +145 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 33 | 4 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 59 | 16 | | 9/3/2019 | ATLANTA | 70-60 | W | -550 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 56 | 18 | 23-74 | 31.1% | 41 | 11 | | 9/5/2019 | SEATTLE | 102-68 | W | -270 | 41-75 | 54.7% | 52 | 8 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 32 | 13 | | 9/8/2019 | MINNESOTA | 77-68 | W | -165 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 35 | 14 | 27-72 | 37.5% | 45 | 16 | | 9/15/2019 | SEATTLE | 92-69 | W | -300 | 37-76 | 48.7% | 45 | 8 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 37 | 15 | | 9/17/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 75-84 | L | -105 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 42 | 17 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 49 | 9 | | 9/19/2019 | @ CONNECTICUT | 68-94 | L | -105 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 31 | 13 | 36-79 | 45.6% | 57 | 12 | | 9/22/2019 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
| LOS ANGELES is 24-20 (+0.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| CONNECTICUT is 6-5 (+3.0 Units) against the money line versus LOS ANGELES over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 14-7 (+1.2 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT since 1997 |
| |
| LOS ANGELES is 4-1 (-0.7 Units) against the money line versus CONNECTICUT over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/19/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 68 | 163 | Under | 40 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 31 | 4 | 13 | | | CONNECTICUT | 94 | -1 | SU ATS | 41 | 36-79 | 45.6% | 10-30 | 33.3% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 57 | 16 | 12 | 9/17/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 75 | 162.5 | Under | 40 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 5-22 | 22.7% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 42 | 7 | 17 | | | CONNECTICUT | 84 | -1 | SU ATS | 37 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 49 | 8 | 9 | 8/25/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 72 | 157.5 | Under | 39 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 8-22 | 36.4% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 43 | 10 | 15 | | | LOS ANGELES | 84 | -5 | SU ATS | 42 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 9-24 | 37.5% | 13-13 | 100.0% | 35 | 3 | 14 | 6/6/2019 | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 158 | Over | 32 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 8-25 | 32.0% | 11-12 | 91.7% | 25 | 7 | 21 | | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -8 | SU ATS | 43 | 34-73 | 46.6% | 4-15 | 26.7% | 17-20 | 85.0% | 38 | 14 | 17 | 5/31/2019 | CONNECTICUT | 70 | -3 | Under | 31 | 24-78 | 30.8% | 6-23 | 26.1% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 63 | 18 | 14 | | | LOS ANGELES | 77 | 164 | SU ATS | 38 | 28-72 | 38.9% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 15-17 | 88.2% | 46 | 9 | 10 | 8/19/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 86 | 160.5 | ATS | 41 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 7-23 | 30.4% | 19-22 | 86.4% | 44 | 10 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 89 | -5 | SU Over | 52 | 32-63 | 50.8% | 11-20 | 55.0% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 38 | 3 | 16 | 7/3/2018 | CONNECTICUT | 73 | 162 | SU ATS | 41 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 41 | 6 | 17 | | | LOS ANGELES | 72 | -9.5 | Under | 25 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 14-15 | 93.3% | 30 | 6 | 13 | 5/24/2018 | LOS ANGELES | 94 | 162.5 | Over | 47 | 35-64 | 54.7% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 16-19 | 84.2% | 18 | 5 | 11 | | | CONNECTICUT | 102 | -4.5 | SU ATS | 46 | 40-64 | 62.5% | 8-14 | 57.1% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 40 | 9 | 20 |
|
| | |
|
Miller is 45-28 against the money line (+22.2 Units) against Western conference opponents as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 45-28 against the money line (+22.2 Units) in non-conference games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.2, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 29-20 against the money line (+10.0 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 10-1 against the money line (+10.9 Units) off a home blowout win by 20 points or more as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 92.9, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 5*) | Miller is 38-16 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after playing a game as a home favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.1, OPPONENT 81.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 43-24 against the money line (+11.4 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 86.0, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 24-11 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after playing 2 consecutive home games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 88.5, OPPONENT 84.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 22-14 against the money line (+13.3 Units) after successfully covering the spread in 2 or more consecutive games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.4, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 23-11 against the money line (+12.0 Units) after 3 straight games where they committed 14 or less turnovers as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 87.5, OPPONENT 82.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 48-29 against the money line (+11.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 48-26 against the money line (+16.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.6, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 65-41 against the money line (+11.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 29-13 against the money line (+21.4 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.5, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 4*) | Miller is 36-24 against the money line (+13.1 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 84.3, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 49-29 against the money line (+12.0 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 37-23 against the money line (+16.2 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 85.3, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
|
Miller is 21-27 against the money line (-14.4 Units) in road games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.9, OPPONENT 83.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 10-13 against the money line (-11.8 Units) in road games after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.3, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 19-26 against the money line (-12.4 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.9, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 16-24 against the money line (-13.1 Units) in road games after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.2, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Miller is 6-10 against the money line (-15.3 Units) in road games after playing 4 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 80.3, OPPONENT 84.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Miller is 4-8 against the money line (-10.8 Units) in road games after playing 5 consecutive games as favorite as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 79.6, OPPONENT 86.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Miller is 18-23 against the money line (-13.3 Units) in road games versus teams who attempt 16 or more 3 point shots/game on the season as the coach of CONNECTICUT.
The average score was CONNECTICUT 81.1, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 8-2 against the money line (+6.2 Units) on Sunday games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.0, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fisher is 7-1 against the money line (+6.6 Units) in home games revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 79.1, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 8-2 against the money line (+6.6 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 76.4, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Fisher is 8-1 against the money line (+7.2 Units) in home games after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.4, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 12-1 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 83.8, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 5*) | Fisher is 17-6 against the money line (+12.1 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 84.3, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Fisher is 16-5 against the money line (+10.7 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game after 15+ games as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 81.3, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Fisher is 21-9 against the money line (+11.6 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game as the coach of LOS ANGELES.
The average score was LOS ANGELES 80.2, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
| Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 247 times, while the road underdog won straight up 115 times. No Edge. | | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 20 times, while the road underdog won straight up 8 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
| [G] 06/26/2019 - Layshia Clarendon is OUT 3-4 months ( Ankle ) | |
| [G] 07/21/2019 - Karlie Samuelson is out indefinitely ( Knee ) |
|
|
| | Last Updated: 4/26/2024 2:36:37 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|